Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tidal exchange of total mercury and methylmercury between a salt marsh and a Chesapeake Bay sub-estuary

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the net exchange of total mercury (THg) and methylmercury (MeHg) between a tidal marsh and its adjacent estuary over a 1-year period from August 2007 to July 2008. Our objectives were to estimate the importance of tidal salt marshes as sources and sinks of mercury within the Chesapeake Bay system, and to examine the hydrologic and biogeochemical controls on mercury fate and transport in tidal marshes. Tidal flows and water chemistry were measured at an established tidal flume at the mouth of the principal tidal creek of a 3-ha marsh section at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Fluxes were estimated by combining continuous tidal flow measurement for the entire study year, with discrete, hourly, flow-weighted measurements of filterable and particulate THg and MeHg, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and suspended particulate matter (SPM) made over 20 tidal cycles during the year. We found that the marsh was a relatively small net tidal source of MeHg, mainly during the warmer growing season. We also confirmed that the marsh was a substantial source of DOC to the adjacent estuary. DOC was a significant predictor of both filterable THg and MeHg fluxes. However, although the marsh was a source of filterable THg, it was overall a net sink for THg because of particulate trapping. The net per-area annual flux of MeHg from tidal marshes is greater than other MeHg pathways within Chesapeake Bay. The annual load of MeHg from tidal marshes into Chesapeake Bay, however, is likely small relative to fluvial fluxes and efflux from bottom sediment. This study suggests that MeHg production within the tidal marsh has greater consequences for biota inhabiting the marsh than for the efflux of MeHg from the marsh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergamaschi BA, Fleck JA, Downing BD, Boss E, Pellerin B, Ganju NK, Schoellhamer DH, Byington AA, Heim WA, Stephenson M, Fujii R (2011) Methyl mercury dynamics in a tidal wetland quantified using in situ optical measurements. Limnol Oceanogr 56(4):1355–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman M, Bartha R (1986) Levels of chemical versus biological methylation of mercury in sediments. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36(3):401–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black FJ, Paytan A, Knee KL, De Sieyes NR, Ganguli PM, Gary E, Flegal AR (2009) Submarine groundwater discharge of total mercury and monomethylmercury to central California coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):5652–5659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canario J, Caetano M, Vale C, Cesario R (2007) Evidence for elevated production of methylmercury in salt marshes. Environ Sci Technol 41(21):7376–7382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington CD, Montwill B, Bolger PM (2004) An intervention analysis for the reduction of exposure to methylmercury from the consumption of seafood by women of child-bearing age. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 40(3):272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Bay Program (2011) Tidal wetlands abundance. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/status_tidalwetlands.aspx?menuitem=19681. Accessed 29 March 2011

  • Childers DL, Sklar FH, Drake B, Jordan T (1993) Seasonal measurements of sediment elevation in three mid-Atlantic estuaries. J Coastal Res 9:986–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers DL, Day JW, McKellar HN (2000) Twenty more years of marsh and estuarine flux studies: Revisiting Nixon (1980). In: Weinstein MP, Kreeger DA (eds) International Symposium: Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 389–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin YP, Aiken G, O’Loughlin E (1994) Molecular weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 28:1853–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaway CH, Watson EB, Flanders JR, Flegal AR (2004) Mercury deposition in a tidal marsh of south San Francisco Bay downstream of the historic New Almaden mining district, California. Mar Chem 90(1–4):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll DL, Jordan TE, Weller DE (1992) Nutrient flux in a landscape–Effects of coastal land-use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal water. Estuaries 15:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF, Spurrier JD, Williams TM, Kjerfve B, Zingmark RG, Wolaver TG, Chrzanowski TH, McKellar HN, Vernberg FJ (1991) Annual material processing by a salt-marsh estuarine-basin in South Carolina, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 72(1–2):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing BD, Boss E, Bergamaschi BA, Fleck JA, Lionberger MA, Ganju NK, Schoellhamer DH, Fujii R (2009) Quantifying fluxes and characterizing compositional changes of dissolved organic matter in aquatic systems in situ using combined acoustic and optical measurements. Limnol Oceanogr Method 7:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Blette V, Yan C, Schofield CL, Munson R, Holsapple J (1995) The role of dissolved organic-carbon in the chemistry and bioavailability of mercury in remote Adirondack lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 80(1–4):499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Holsapple J, Schofield CL, Munson R (1998) The chemistry and transport of mercury in a small wetland in the Adirondack region of New York, USA. Biogeochemistry 40(2–3):137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, De La Cruz SEW, Takekawa JY (2009) Mercury bioaccumulation and risk to three waterbird foraging guilds is influenced by foraging ecology and breeding stage. Environ Pollut 157(7):1993–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field DW, Reyer AJ, Genovese PV, Shearer BD (1991) Coastal wetlands of the United States: an accounting of a valuable national resource. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway ME, Branfireun BA (2004) Hydrological and biogeochemical controls on mercury fate and transport in a southern Ontario forested wetlands. Sci Total Environ 325:239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield BK, Jahn A (2010) Mercury in San Francisco Bay forage fish. Environ Pollut 158(8):2716–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigal DF (2003) Mercury sequestration in forests and peatlands: a review. J Environ Qual 32(2):393–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BD, Aiken GR, Krabbenhoft DP, Marvin-DiPasquale M, Swarzenski CM (2008) Wetlands as principal zones of methylmercury production in southern Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico region. Environ Pollut 154(1):124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmidt CR, Fitzgerald WF, Lamborg CH, Balcom PH, Visscher PT (2004) Biogeochemistry of methylmercury in sediments of Long Island Sound. Mar Chem 90(1–4):31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim WA, Coale KH, Stephenson M, Choe KY, Gill GA, Foe C (2007) Spatial and habitat-based variations in total and methyl mercury concentrations in surficial sediments in the San Francisco Bay-delta. Environ Sci Technol 41(10):3501–3507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms JR, Stubbins A, Ritchie JD, Minor EC, Kieber DJ, Mopper K (2008) Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr 53(3):955–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A, Moore TR, Rudd JWM (1998) Mercury and methyl mercury in decomposing vegetation of a pristine and impounded wetland. J Environ Qual 27:591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A, Mason RP, Kim EH, Sunderland E (2006) Mercury methylation in estuaries: Insights from using measuring rates using stable mercury isotopes. Mar Chem 102(1–2):134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines NA, Brezonik PL (2007) Mercury inputs and outputs at a small lake in northern Minnesota. Biogeochemistry 84(3):265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintelmann H, Keppel-Jones K, Evans RD (2000) Constants of mercury methylation and demethylation rates in sediments and comparison of tracer and ambient mercury availability. Environ Toxicol Chem 19(9):2204–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollweg TA, Gilmour CC, Mason RP (2009) Methylmercury production in sediments of Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic continental margin. Mar Chem 114(3–4):86–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollweg TA, Gilmour CC, Mason RP (2010) Mercury and methylmercury cycling in sediments of the mid-Atlantic continental shelf and slope. Limnol Oceanogr 55(6):2703–2722

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung GA, Chmura GL (2006) Mercury accumulation in surface sediments of salt marshes of the Bay of Fundy. Environ Pollut 142(3):418–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey BH, Odum WE (1992) Evapotranspiration in salt marshes. Estuaries 15(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TE, Correll DL (1985) Nutrient chemistry and hydrology of interstitial water in brackish tidal marshes of Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 21(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TE, Correll DL (1991) Continuous automated sampling of tidal exchanges of nutrients by brackish marshes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 32(6):527–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TE, Correll DL, Whigham DF (1983) Nutrient flux in the Rhode River–Tidal exchange of nutrients by brackish marshes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 17:651–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JK, Kostka JE, Frischer ME, Saunders FM, Jahnke RA (2001) A quantitative relationship that demonstrates mercury methylation rates in marine sediments are based on the community composition and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 35(12):2491–2496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RS, Hines AH, Craige FD, Grap S (2005) Regional, watershed and local correlates of blue crab and bivalve abundances in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay, USA. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 319(1–2):101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib RT, Wagner SL (1994) Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer CS, Fitzgerald WF, Visscher PT, Vandal GM (2001) Biogeochemical cycling of methylmercury at Barn Island Salt Marsh, Stonington, CT, USA. Wetlands Ecol Manage 9:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YB, Mao YX, Liu GL, Tachiev G, Roelant D, Feng XB, Cai Y (2010) Degradation of methylmercury and its effects on mercury distribution and cycling in the Florida Everglades. Environ Sci Technol 44(17):6661–6666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvin-DiPasquale MC, Agee JL, Bouse RM, Jaffe BE (2003) Microbial cycling of mercury in contaminated pelagic and wetland sediments of San Pablo Bay, California. Environ Geol 43(3):260–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason RP, Lawson NM, Lawrence AL, Leaner JJ, Lee JG, Sheu GR (1999) Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay. Mar Chem 65(1–2):77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RP, Lawson NM, Sheu GR (2000) Annual and seasonal trends in mercury deposition in Maryland. Atmos Environ 34(11):1691–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CPJ, Gilmour CC (2008) Methylmercury production in a Chesapeake Bay salt marsh. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 113: G00C04

  • Monperrus M, Tessier E, Point D, Vidimova K, Amouroux D, Guyoneaud R, Leynaert A, Grall J, Chauvaud L, Thouzeau G, Donard OFX (2007) The biogeochemistry of mercury at the sediment-water interface in the Thau Lagoon. 2. Evaluation of mercury methylation potential in both surface sediment and the water column. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 72(3):485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munthe J, Bodaly RA, Branfireun BA, Driscoll CT, Gilmour CC, Harris R, Horvat M, Lucotte M, Malm O (2007) Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin P, Pelletier E, Koutitonski VG, Neumeier U (2009) Seasonal nutrient fluxes variability of northern salt marshes: examples from the lower St. Lawrence Estuary. Wetlands Ecol Manage 17(6):655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel GF, Williams SA, Riedel GS, Gilmour CC, Sanders JG (2000) Temporal and spatial patterns of trace elements in the Patuxent River: a whole watershed approach. Estuaries 23(4):521–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 36(1):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvendiran P, Driscoll CT, Montesdeoca MR, Bushey JT (2008) Inputs, storage, and transport of total and methyl mercury in two temperate forest wetlands. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences 113:G00C01

    Google Scholar 

  • StLouis VL, Rudd JWM, Kelly CA, Beaty KG, Flett RJ, Roulet NT (1996) Production and loss of methylmercury and loss of total mercury from boreal forest catchments containing different types of wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 30(9):2719–2729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland EM (2007) Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the US seafood market. Environ Health Perspect 115(2):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland EM, Dalziel J, Heyes A, Branfireun BA, Krabbenhoft DP, Gobas F (2010) Response of a macrotidal estuary to changes in anthropogenic mercury loading between 1850 and 2000. Environ Sci Technol 44(5):1698–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teal JM (1962) Energy flow is a salt-marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology 43(4):614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzortziou M, Neale PJ, Osburn CL, Megonigal JP, Maie N, Jaffe R (2008) Tidal marshes as a source of optically and chemically distinctive colored dissolved organic matter in the Chesapeake Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 53(1):148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA, Fram MS, Fujii R, Mopper K (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37(20):4702–4708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Georgia Riedel, Tyler Bell, Alex Crawford and Peter Minchella provided field and laboratory support. Pat Neale and Maria Tzortziou provided assistance with spectrophotometric absorbance measurements. Pat Megonigal and Pat Neale provided critical background information on Kirkpatrick Marsh chemistry and ecology. Funding for this project was provided through the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, the National Science Foundation (OCE- 0351050 to R. Mason and C. Gilmour; and the SERC Research Experience for Undergraduates program), and the Smithsonian Institution through a postdoctoral fellowship to C. P. J. M. We thank an anonymous reviewer for helping us to clarify error and variability in water budgets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto-Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada

    Carl P. J. Mitchell

  2. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, MD, 21037-0028, USA

    Carl P. J. Mitchell, Thomas E. Jordan & Cynthia C. Gilmour

  3. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 1 Williams Street, Solomons, MD, 20688, USA

    Andrew Heyes

Authors
  1. Carl P. J. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas E. Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Heyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cynthia C. Gilmour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl P. J. Mitchell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, C.P.J., Jordan, T.E., Heyes, A. et al. Tidal exchange of total mercury and methylmercury between a salt marsh and a Chesapeake Bay sub-estuary. Biogeochemistry 111, 583–600 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9691-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9691-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation