Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of sugar beet pressed pulp (SBPP) is a promising treatment concept. It produces biogas as a renewable energy source making sugar production more energy efficient and it turns SBPP from a residue into a valuable resource. In this study one- and two-stage mono fermentation at mesophilic conditions in a continuous stirred tank reactor were compared. Also the optimal incubation temperature for the pre-acidification stage was studied. The fastest pre-acidification, with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 4 days, occurred at a temperature of 55 °C. In the methanogenic reactor of the two-stage system stable fermentation at loading rate of 7 kg VS/m³ d was demonstrated. No artificial pH adjustment was necessary to maintain optimum levels in both the pre-acidification and the methanogenic reactor. The total HRT of the two-stage AD was 36 days which is considerably lower compared to the one-stage AD (50 days). The frequently observed problem of foaming at high loading rates was less severe in the two-stage reactor. Moreover the viscosity of digestate in the methanogenic stage of the two-stage fermentation was in average tenfold lower than in the one-stage fermentation. This decreases the energy input for the reactor stirring about 80 %. The observed advantages make the two-stage process economically attractive, despite higher investments for a two reactor system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkaya E, Demirer GN (2011) Anaerobic acidification of sugar-beet processing wastes: effect of operational parameters. Biomass Bioenergy 35:32–39
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA
BeMiller JN, Fishman ML, Jen JJ (1986) An introduction to pectins: structure and properties. In: Chemistry and function of pectins, ACS symposium series. American Chemichal Society, Washington DC, pp 2–12
Braun R (1982) Biogas—Methangärung organischer Abfallstoffe : Grundlagen u. Anwendungsbeispiele. Springer Wien, New York
Brooks L, Parravicini V, Svardal K, Kroiss H, Prendl L (2008) Biogas from sugar beet press pulp as substitute of fossil fuel in sugar beet factories. Water Sci Technol 58:1497–1504
CEFS (2011) CEFS Sugar Statistics Inquiry 2011, www.comitesucre.org. Assessed 27 Jan 2013
Cooney M, Maynard N, Cannizzaro C, Benemann J (2007) Two-phase anaerobic digestion for production of hydrogen–methane mixtures. Bioresour Technol 98:2641–2651
Coughlan MP, Considine PJ, O`Rorke A, Puls J (1985) Saccharification of agricultural residues by combined cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzyme systems. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 15:447–458
Demirel B, Yenigün O (2002) Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:743–755
Döhler H, Eckel H, Fröba N, Grebe S, Hartmann S, Häussermann U, Klages S, Sauer N, Nakazi S, Nienbum A, Roth U, Wirth B, Wulf S (2009) Faustzahlen Biogas, 2nd edn. KTBL Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft e. V, Darmstadt
FAO (2010) FAOSTAT database, www.fao.org. Assessed 27 Jan 2013
Ganidi N, Tyrrel S, Cartmell E (2009) Anaerobic digestion foaming causes-a review. Bioresour Technol 100:5546–5554
Ghosh S, Klass DL (1978) Two-phase anaerobic digestion. Process Biochem 13:15–24
Grajek W (1988) Production of protein by thermophilic fungi from sugar-beet pulp in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:255–260
Günzler H, Gremlich H-U (2002) IR Spectroscopy, an introduction, 1. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Hutnan M, Drtil M, Mrafkova L (2000) Anaerobic biodegradation of sugar beet pulp. Biodegradation 11:203–211
Hutnan M, Drtil M, Derco J, Mrafkova L, Hornak M, Mico S (2001) Two-step pilot-scale anaerobic treatment of sugar beet pulp. Pol J Environ Stud 10:237–243
Kamnev AA, Colina M, Rodriguez NM, Ptitchkina NM, Ignatov VV (1998) Comparative spectroscopic characterization of different pectins and their sources. Food Hydrocoll 12:263–271
Kampmann K, Ratering S, Baumann R, Schmidt M, Zerr W, Schnell S (2012) Hydrogenotrophic methanogens dominate in biogas reactors fed with defined substrates. Syst Appl Microbiol 35:404–413
Krakat N, Schmidt S, Scherer P (2011) Potential impact of process parameters upon the bacterial diversity in the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of beet silage. Bioresour Technol 102:5692–5701
Kraume M (2006) Mischen und Rühren, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim
Lier JBV, Grolle KC, Frijters CT, Stams AJ, Lettinga G (1993) Effects of acetate, propionate, and butyrate on the thermophilic anaerobic degradation of propionate by methanogenic sludge and defined cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1003–1011
Mah RA (1977) Acetate, a key intermediate in methanogenesis. In: Microbial energy conversion. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 97–106
Micard V, Renard CMGC, Thibault J-F (1996) Enzymatic saccharification of sugar-beet pulp. Enzym Microb Technol 19:162–170
Mularczyk-Oliwa M, Bombalska A, Kaliszewski M, Włodarski M, Kopczyński K, Kwaśny M, Szpakowska M, Trafny EA (2012) Comparison of fluorescence spectroscopy and FTIR in differentiation of plant pollens. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 97:246–254
Ozkan L, Erguder TH, Demirer GN (2011) Effects of pretreatment methods on solubilization of beet-pulp and bio-hydrogen production yield. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:382–389
Phatak L, Chang KC, Brown G (1988) Isolation and characterization of pectin in sugar-beet pulp. J Food Sci 53:830–833
Pohn S, Kamarad L, Kirchmayr R, Harasek M (2010) Design, calibration and numerical investigation of a macro viscosimeter. In: Proceedings presented at the 19th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering CHISA 2010, Prague, Czech Republic
Pose S, Kirby AR, Mercado JA, Morris VJ, Quesada MA (2012) Structural characterization of cell wall pectin fractions in ripe strawberry fruits using AFM. Carbohydr Polym 88:882–890
Scherer P, Lehmann K, Schmidt O, Demirel B (2009) Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono-substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:736–748
Sinitsya A, Čopíková J, Prutyanov V, Skoblya S, Machovič V (2000) Amidation of highly methoxylated citrus pectin with primary amines. Carbohydr Polym 42:359–368
Spagnuolo M, Crecchio C, Pizzigallo MDR, Ruggiero P (1997) Synergistic effects of cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes in degrading sugar beet pulp. Bioresour Technol 60:215–222
Stuart B (2000) Infrared Spectroscopy. In: Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Toğrul H, Arslan N (2003) Flow properties of sugar beet pulp cellulose and intrinsic viscosity–molecular weight relationship. Carbohydr Polym 54:63–71
Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Meng L (2009) Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 33:848–853
Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860
Wen LF, Chang KC, Brown G, Gallaher DD (1988) Isolation and characterization of hemicellulose and cellulose from sugar beet pulp. J Food Sci 53:826–829
Zuru AA, Dangoggo SM, Birnin-Yauri UA, Tambuwal AD (2004) Adoption of thermogravimetric kinetic models for kinetic analysis of biogas production. Renew Energy 29:97–107
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by K1 center Bioenergy 2020+, GmbH, Austria and AAT Abwasser- und Abfalltechnik GmbH, Austria. The authors are also grateful to Markus Pruckner and Ing. Marion Sumetzberger-Hasinger for their technical support in carrying out the analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoyanova, E., Forsthuber, B., Pohn, S. et al. Reducing the risk of foaming and decreasing viscosity by two-stage anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pressed pulp. Biodegradation 25, 277–289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-013-9659-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-013-9659-9