Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Usefulness of a Japanese internet community for fish conservation

Abstract

Large biodiversity datasets are currently being collected not only by experts and amateur researchers, but also by the general public. In this study, records of non-native and Japanese Red List fishes observed by citizens were extracted from all 85,453 posts on the bulletin board system of WEB sakana-zukan, a web-based encyclopedia of Japanese fishes that went online in 2002. We found 681 (0.8%) and 549 (0.6%) posts containing attached images of non-native and Red Data Book fishes, resulting in 418 and 362 Japanese distributional records respectively. The number of posts and the composition of non-native species reflected the Japanese inland fisheries policy to increase target species. These data included records of exotic species (eleven taxa) whose introduction to Japan had been unknown previously, as well as records of nine exotic/domestic species whose introductions into specific Japanese regions had been unknown. Additionally, we identified the range extension of one Red Data Book species. These photographs were stored in a public museum’s photographic collection for ongoing scientific use. Three heavy users of the website combined contributed 26.7% of the new distribution records (8/30 lots), while 15 light users contributed 50.0% (15/30 lots), suggesting that overall there is a greater contribution by light users. This indicates that a web community with abundant users can accumulate new biodiversity observations better than one with fewer users but many posts per user. Our results show that this web-community was able to contribute to monitoring non-native and Red List fishes in conjunction with expert participation, and therefore that web-communities targeting living organisms can contribute to biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Aravind NA (2013) Potential of social network and internet media for biodiversity mapping and conservation. Curr Sci 105:291–293

  2. Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023

  3. Brosi BJ, Biber EGN (2012) Citizen involvement in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Science 337:802–803. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220660

  4. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12(2):11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/

  5. Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ 10:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236

  6. Dickinson JL, Crain RL, Reeve HK, Schuldt JP (2013) Can evolutionary design of social networks make it easier to be ‘green’? Trends Ecol Evol 28:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.011

  7. Fisheries Agency, Japan (2017) Publication of the Red List for marine organisms. http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/press/sigen/170321.html (in Japanese)

  8. Froese R, Pauly D (eds) (2018) FishBase, version June 2018. http://www.fishbase.org/

  9. Fukui K (2014) Who has a monopoly on the “knowledge?”—the war of digital archive. Shueisha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  10. Graham CH, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C, Peterson AT (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 19:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.006

  11. Hackett S, Parmanto B, Zeng X (2004) Accessibility of Internet websites through time. ACM SIGACCESS 77–78:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029014.1028638

  12. Helfman GS (2007) Fish conservation: a guide to understanding and restoring global aquatic biodiversity and fishery resources. Island Press, Washington, DC

  13. Hochachka WM, Fink D, Hutchinson RA, Sheldon D, Wong W-K, Kelling S (2012) Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 27:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006

  14. Japan Productivity Center (2014) White paper on leisure 2014. Japan Productivity Center, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  15. Kobori H, Dickinson JL, Washitani I, Sakurai R, Amano T, Komatsu N, Kitamura W, Takagawa S, Koyama K, Ogawara T, Miller-Rushing AJ (2016) Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecol Res 31:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-015-1314-y

  16. Kohno H, Kanou K, Yokoo T (eds) (2011) A photographic guide to the fishes in Tokyo Bay. Heibonsha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  17. Kudo T (2011) Fish. In: Marine Environment Committee for Tokyo Bay (ed) Tokyo Bay: restorations of relationships between human and nature, pp 157–161. Tokyo: Koseisha-koseikaku. (in Japanese)

  18. Matsuura K, Senou H (2002) Fish databases in Japan with special reference to fish-image database and its role in biodiversity study. Res Rep Natl Inst Environ Stud Jpn 171:220–227

  19. Matsuzawa Y, Senou H (2008) Alien fishes of Japan. Bun-ichi, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  20. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: our human planet. Island Press, Washington, DC

  21. Ministry of Environment, Japan (2010) The national survey on the natural environment distributional survey of Japanese animals: animal distribution atlas of Japan. Biodiversity Center of Japan, Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Fujiyoshida (in Japanese)

  22. Ministry of Environment, Japan (2015) Threatened wildlife of Japan: red data book 2014 Pisces—brackish and fresh water fishes. Gyosei, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  23. Ministry of Environment, Japan (2017) Publication of the Red List for marine organisms, the version of the Ministry of the Environment. https://www.env.go.jp/press/103813.html (in Japanese)

  24. Miyazaki Y (2016) The relationship between citizen science and biodiversity information databases. Jpn J Ecol 66:237–246. http://doi.org/10.18960/seitai.66.1_237 (in Japanese)

  25. Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Senou H (2014a) Citizen participation in augmenting a museum database enhances fish monitoring and public awareness. J Aquat Mar Environ Educ Res 7:22–26

  26. Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Shiina M, Naoe K, Nakashiro R, Honda J, Yamaide J, Senou H (2014b) Biological monitoring by citizens using Web-based photographic databases of fishes. Biodivers Conserv 23:2383–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0724-4

  27. Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Senou H (2015a) A natural history museum as a platform for accumulating verifiable information on non-native fishes: a Japanese example. Manag Biol Invasion 6:105–110. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2015.6.1.08

  28. Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Shiina M, Masui R, Senou H (2015b) Integrating and utilizing citizen biodiversity data on the Web for science: an example of a rare triggerfish hybrid image provided by a sport fisherman. J Coast Res 31:1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00170.1

  29. Miyazaki Y, Teramura A, Senou H (2016) Biodiversity data mining from Argus-eyed citizens: the first illegal introduction record of Lepomis macrochirus macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819 in Japan based on Twitter information. ZooKeys 569:123–133. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.7577

  30. Mukai T, Onikura N, Yodo T, Senou H (eds) (2013) Domestic alien fishes: hidden threats to biodiversity. Tokai University Press, Hadano (in Japanese)

  31. Murphy J, Hashim NH (2007) Take me back: validating the Wayback Machine. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:60–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00386.x

  32. Nakabo T (ed) (2013) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, 3rd edn. Tokai University Press, Hadano (in Japanese)

  33. Newell D, Ommer RE (eds) (1999) Fishing places, fishing people: traditions and issues in Canadian small-scale fisheries. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

  34. Proulx R, Massicotte P, Pépino M (2014) Googling trends in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 28:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12131

  35. Puth LM, Post DM (2005) Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecol Lett 8:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00774.x

  36. Roberge J-M (2014) Using data from online social networks in conservation science: which species engage people the most on Twitter? Biodivers Conserv 23:715–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.1007/s10531-014-0629-2

  37. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2014) Global biodiversity outlook 4. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal

  38. Shaffer HB, Fisher RN, Davidson C (1998) The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. Trends Ecol Evol 13:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01177-4

  39. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017

  40. Silvertown J, Harvey M, Greenwood R, Dodd M, Rosewell J, Rebelo T, Ansine J, McConway K (2015) Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: a case-study of iSpot. ZooKeys 480:125–146. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.480.8803

  41. Stafford R, Hart AG, Collins L, Kirkhope CL, Williams RL, Rees SG, Lloyd JR, Goodenough AE (2010) EU-social science: the role of internet social networks in the collection of bee biodiversity data. PLoS ONE 5(12):e14381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014381

  42. Tachihara K (2005) Non-native fish species in Okinawa Prefecture. In: Nature Conservation Division, Department of Cultural & Environmental Affairs, Okinawa Prefectural Government (ed), Threatened wildlife in Okinawa, second edition (animals)—red data Okinawa. Nature Conservation Division, Department of Cultural & Environmental Affairs, Okinawa Prefectural Government, Naha (in Japanese)

  43. Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, Szabo J, Martin TG (2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biol Conserv 165:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025

  44. Uonokai (2005) Fish distribution in Shiga Prefecture. Res Rep Lake Biwa Mus 23:75–223 (in Japanese)

  45. Vaidhyanathan S (2007) The Googlization of everything and the future of copyright. UC Davis Law Rev 40:1207–1231

  46. Wals AEJ, Brody M, Dillon J, Stevenson RB (2014) Convergence between science and environmental education. Science 344:583–584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515

  47. Yokogawa K (1999) Introduction of exotic fishes and shellfishes into Japan and their biological characteristics. Fish Genet Breed Sci 28:1–25 (in Japanese with English abstract)

  48. Yoshigou H (2014) Annotated checklist and bibliographic records of inland water fishes of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Fauna Ryukyuana 9:1–153 (in Japanese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank K. Matsuura, R. Takahashi, H. Konishi, H. Izumi, N. Miwa, S. Matsui, R. Nakashiro, K. Naoe, M. Shiina, M. Watai, and all users of both databases for helping provide reliable data on stable online platforms. We appreciate R. Inui, Y. Kai, Y. Kano, H. Miyahara, H. Motomura, T. Nakabo, Y. Sakurai, K. Shibukawa, T. Suzuki, and T. Yodo for their helpful advice and comments including identifications. We are sincerely grateful to G. Yearsley (Ellipsis Editing), K. French, R. Akcalaya, M. Burgman, and annonymous reviewers for their careful reviews and valuable comments. This work has been partly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to Y. Miyazaki (Research Fellowship for Young Scientist, No. 25, 11038) and by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to H. Senou (Grants-in-Aid, No. 24501278) and Y. Miyazaki (same as Nos. 13J11038 and 16K16225).

Author information

Correspondence to Yusuke Miyazaki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Coastal and marine biodiversity.

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10531_2019_1902_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Appendices S1, S2, and S3 presents details of the information for non-native and Red List fishes extracted from the BBS of WEB sakana-zukan during 2002–2012. These tables include the (1) scientific name, (2) locality, (3) date, (4) year posted, (5) URL in http://zukan.com, (6) URL of the original post on the BBS, (7) number of images, and (8) remarks. In addition, the museum collections of KPM-NR are available as an online website, FishPix (http://fishpix.kahaku.go.jp/fishimage-e/). Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 167 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyazaki, Y., Murase, A., Honda, J. et al. Usefulness of a Japanese internet community for fish conservation. Biodivers Conserv 29, 625–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01902-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citizen science
  • Database
  • Picture
  • Social networking service (SNS)
  • Verifiability
  • Voucher