Abstract
Fragmentation transforms natural habitats into a set of structurally and functionally differentiated small and separated patches, and causes the loss of connectivity among populations. In this study, we used a multi-temporal approach (1986, 2011 and 2016), to analyze the patterns of habitat fragmentation and to identify critical zones for the maintenance of habitat connectivity of two focal pine species (Pinus pseudostrobus and P. montezumae) with the broadest distribution and highest economic importance in the temperate forests of the Meseta Purépecha, in Michoacán, Mexico. This eco-region is currently one of the most threatened in terms of habitat degradation and extinction of forest communities. From a supervised classification of satellite images, land use coverage classes were selected and used as a basis to analyze the degree of landscape fragmentation using configuration and composition metrics and landscape connectivity based on the graph-theory approach. The fragmentation metrics suggested an increase in agricultural coverage (10.81%; fruits crop, mainly avocado), while the coverage of the forest showed a reduction (15.06%) and fragmentation throughout the study period. The landscape connectivity is lower (16.3% on average) and showed two highly important zones (Uruapan and Tancítaro) and one zone of high importance (Pátzcuaro) to maintain connectivity, considering three different dispersion distances (0.5, 5.0 and 10 km) for the species analyzed. We propose these three zones as potential habitat stepping stones to promote overall landscape connectivity, offering primary habitats and possible ecological resilience for this important forest ecosystem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aavik T, Holderegger R, Bolliger J (2014) The structural and functional connectivity of the grassland plant Lychnis flos-cuculi. Heredity 112:471–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2013.120
Aguayo M, Pauchard A, Azócar G, Parra O (2009) Land use change in the south central Chile at the end of the 20th century: understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of the landscape. Rev Chil Hist Nat 82:361–374. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2009000300004
Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9:968–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x
Aguilar VY, Aliphat FMM, Caso BL, del Amo RS, Sánchez Gómez MDL, Martínez-Carrera D (2014) Impact of traditionally managed forest units on the landscape connectivity of Sierra de Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 62:1099–1109
Altamirano A, Echeverria C, Lara A (2007) Effect of forest fragmentation on vegetation structure of Legrandia concinna (Myrtaceae) threatened populations in southcentral Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 80:27–42. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2007000100003
Altamirano A, Miranda A, Jiménez C (2012) Uncertainty of landscape indices for spatial structure analysis. Bosque 33:171–181. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002012000200007
Alvarado LG, Andrare D, Domínguez R, Garibay GA, Martínez Y, Mas J, Vázquez FF (2014) Inventario Estatal Forestal y de Suelos, Michoacán de Ocampo. COFOM, Michoacán, México
Baum KA, Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Cronin JT (2004) The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85:2671–2676
Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252
Bennett AF (1998) Linkages in the landscape. The role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN, Gland
Borda-Niño M, Hernández-Muciño D, Ceccon E (2017) Planning restoration in human-modified landscapes: new insights linking different scales. Appl Geogr 83:118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.012
Bravo-Espinoza M, Sánchez-Pérez J, Vidales-Fernández JA, Sáenz-Reyes JT, Chávez-León JG, Madrigal-Huendo S, Muñoz-Flores HJ (2009) Impactos ambientales y socioeconómicos del cambio de uso del suelo forestal a huertos de aguacate en Michoacán. INIFAP, Ciudad de México
Brodie JF, Giordano AJ, Dickson B, Hebblewhite M, Bernard H, Mohd-Azlan J, Anderson J, Ambu L (2015) Evaluating multispecies landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community. Conserv Biol 29:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12337
Brown S (2003) Finalizing avoided deforestation project baselines. Final report to US Agency for International Development, Contract No. 523-C-00-02-00032-00. https://rmportal.net/library/content/nric/2313.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manage 59:265–278. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0373
Challenger A, Dirzo R, López JC, Mendoza E, Lira-Noriega A, Cruz I (2009) Factores de cambio y estado de la biodiversidad. In: Dirzo R, González I, March IJ (eds) Capital Natural de México, vol II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. CONABIO, México City, pp 37–73
Chassot O, Finegan B, Monge-Arias G (2011) Red de conectividad ecológica en el Caribe Norte de Costa Rica. LRC-LAJoC 2:60–70
Clauzel C, Xiqing D, Gongsheng W, Giraudoux P, Li L (2015) Assessing the impact of road developments on connectivity across multiple scales: application to Yunnan snub-nosed monkey conservation. Biol Conserv 192:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.029
CONAFOR (2012) Situación de los recursos genéticos forestales en México. Informe final del proyecto TCP/MEX/3301/MEX (4). FAO-CONAFOR, México DF, México
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Etter A, Salicrup DRP (2017a) Antrophogenic impact on habitat connectivity: a multi-dimensional human footprint index evaluated in a highly biodiverse landscape of Mexico. Ecol Indic 72:895–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.007
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Salicrup DRP, Granados EL (2014) Identifying potential conservation areas in the Cuitzeo Lake basin, Mexico by multitemporal analysis of landscape connectivity. J Nat Conserv 22:424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.010
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Etter A, Salicrup DRP (2016) Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation: a review of recent studies and applications. Prog Phys Geogr 40:7–37
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Etter A, Salicrup DRP (2017b) Potential distribution of Mountain cloud forest in Michoacán, México: prioritization for conservation in the contex of landscape connectivity. Environ Manage 60:86–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0871-y
Craven D, Filotas E, Angers VA, Messier C (2016) Evaluating resilience of tree communities in fragmented landscapes: linking functional response diversity with landscape connectivity. Divers Distrib 22:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12423
Crouzeilles R, Prevedello JA, Figueiredo MDSL, Lorini ML, Grelle CEV (2014) The effects of the number, size and isolation of patches along a gradient of native vegetation cover: how can we increment habitat availability? Landsc Ecol 2:479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9978-6
Crouzeilles R, Beyer HL, Mills M, Grelle CE, Possingham HP (2015) Incorporating habitat availability into systematic planning for restoration: a species-specific approach for Atlantic Forest mammals. Divers Distrib 21:1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12349
De Abreu Moreira P, Brandão MM, de Araujo NH, de Oliveira DA, Fernandes GW (2015) Genetic diversity and structure of the tree Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Fabaceae) associated with remnants of a seasonally dry tropical forest. Flora 210:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.10.005
Eastman JR (2009) IDRISI 16: The Taiga Edition. Clark University, Worcester
Farjon A, Styles TB (1997) Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica, Monograph 75. Organization for Flora Neotropica. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, p 291
Fernandes I, Penha J, Zuanon J (2015) Size-dependent response of tropical wetland fish communities to changes in vegetation cover and habitat connectivity. Landsc Ecol 30:1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0196-2
Frankham R (2015) Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: Meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Mol Ecol 24(11):2610–2618. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13139
Frate L, Acosta AT, Cabido M, Hoyos L, Carranza ML (2015) Temporal changes in forest contexts at multiple extents: three decades of fragmentation in the Gran Chaco (1979-2010), Central Argentina. PLoS ONE 10:e0142855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142855
Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.002
García D (2011) Efectos biológicos de la fragmentación de hábitats: nuevas aproximaciones para resolver un viejo problema. Ecosistemas 20:1–10
Garibay C, Bocco G (2011) Cambios de uso de suelo en la Meseta Purépecha (1976-2005). INE-SEMARNAT y CIGA-UNAM. Michoacán, México
Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Cook WM (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Hall M, Guerrero G, Masera O (2015) Apéndice 2: Modelación de líneas base de deforestación utilizando GEOMOD para las regiones de Calakmul y Meseta Purépecha en México. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268377461_Apendice_2_Modelacion_de_lineas_base_de_deforestacion_utilizando_GEOMOD. Accessed 12 Apr 2017
Harary F (1969) Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Herrera LP, Sabatino MC, Jaimes FR, Saura S (2017) Landscape connectivity and the role of small habitat patches as stepping stones: an assessment of the grassland biome in South America. Biodivers Conserv 26:3465–3479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1416-7
INEGI (1997) Anuario Estadístico del Estado de Michoacán. http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/historicos/380/702825118310/702825118310_3.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
INFORURAL (2017) Michoacán, líder nacional en producción de berries: Sedrua. https://www.inforural.com.mx/michoacan-lider-nacional-en-produccion-de-berries-sedrua/. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
Kang W, Minor ES, Lee D, Park CR (2016) Predicting impacts of climate change on habitat connectivity of Kalopanax septemlobus in South Korea. Acta Oecol 71:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2016.01.005
Leitao AB, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93
Lienert J (2004) Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations—a review. J Nat Conserv 12:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2003.07.002
Lindig-Cisneros R, Blanco-Garcìa A, Sáenz-Romero C, Alvarado-Sosa P, Alejandre-Melena N (2007) Restauración adaptable en la Meseta Purépecha, Michoacán, México: hacia un modelo de estados y transiciones. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 80:25–31
Liu S, Dong Y, Deng L, Liu Q, Zhao H, Dong S (2014) Forest fragmentation and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension and city expansion: a case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecol Indic 36:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.018
Madrigal X (1982) Claves para la identificación de las coníferas silvestres del estado de Michoacán. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, México
Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9
Manzanilla Quiñones U, Delgado Valerio P, Hernández Ramos J, Molina Sánchez A, García Magaña JJ, Rocha Granados M (2019) Similaridad del nicho ecológico de Pinus montezumae y P. pseudostrobus (Pinaceae) en México: implicaciones para la selección de áreas productoras de semillas y de conservación. Acta Bot Mex 126:e1398. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1398
Mas JF, Lemoine-Rodríguez R, González R, López-Sánchez J, Piña-Garduño A, Herrera-Flores E (2017) Evaluación de las tasas de deforestación en Michoacán a escala detallada mediante un método híbrido de clasificación de imágenes SPOT. Madera y Bosques 23:119–131
McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-351. USDA Forest Service Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon
Molina JR, Martín Á, Drake F, Martín LM, Herrera MÁ (2015) Fragmentation of Araucaria araucana forests in Chile: quantification and correlation with structural variables. iForest 9:244–252. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1399-008
Mondragón EA, Morrone JJ (2004) Propuesta de áreas para la conservación de aves de México, empleando herramientas panbiogeográficas e índices de complementariedad. Interciencia 29:112–120
Mora C, Metzger R, Rollo A, Myers RA (2007) Experimental simulations about the effects of overexploitation and habitat fragmentation on populations facing environmental warming. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0338
Moreno Jiménez A, Cervera Cruañes B, Fernández García F, Gómez García N, Martínez Suarez P et al (2006) Sistemas y análisis de la información geográfica: manual de autoaprendizaje con ArcGis. RA-MA, Madrid
Muñoz HJ, Sáenz JT, Rueda A (2011) Especies promisorias de clima tropical para plantaciones forestales comerciales en Michoacán. INIFAP, México
Nogues S, Cabarga-Varona A (2014) Modelling land use changes for landscape connectivity: the role of plantation forestry and highways. J Nat Conserv 22:504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.08.004
Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2006) Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landsc Ecol 21:959–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z
Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2008) Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain). Eur J For Res 127:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0165-z
Pérez-Hernández CG, Vergara PM, Saura S, Hernández J (2015) Do corridors promote connectivity for bird-dispersed trees? The case of Persea lingue in Chilean fragmented landscapes. Landsc Ecol 30:77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0111-2
Perry JP (1991) The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, p 231
QUADRATIN 2019. Michoacán, líder productor de arándano: Sedrua. https://www.quadratin.com.mx/economia/michoacan-lider-productor-de-arandano-sedrua/. Accessed 21 Feb 2019
R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Reddy CS, Manaswini G, Satish KV, Singh S, Jha CS, Dadhwal VK (2016) Conservation priorities of forest ecosystems: evaluation of deforestation and degradation hotspots using geospatial techniques. Ecol Eng 91:333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.007
Sáenz RJT, Muñoz FHJ, Rueda SA (2011). Especies Promisorias de Clima Templado para Plantaciones Forestales Comerciales en Michoacán. Libro Técnico Núm. 10. SAGARPA-INIFAP-CIRPAC-Campo Experimental Uruapan. Uruapan, Michoacán, México, p 213
San Vicente MG, Valencia PJL (2012) Efectos de la fragmentación de hábitats y pérdida de conectividad ecológica dentro de la dinámica territorial. Polígonos 16:35–54. https://doi.org/10.18002/pol.v0i16.410
Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005
Saura S, Rubio L (2010) A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33:523–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05760.x
Saura S, Torne J (2009) Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Model Softw 24:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
Savolainen O, Tanja P, Knurr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:595–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646
Segurado P, Branco P, Avelar AP, Ferreira MT (2015) Historical changes in the functional connectivity of rivers based on spatial network analysis and the past occurrences of diadromous species in Portugal. Aquat Sci 77:427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0371-6
Sieving KE, Willson MF, De Santo TL (2000) Defining corridor functions for endemic birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Conserv Biol 14:1120–1132
Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York
Tittler R, Filotas É, Kroese J, Messier C (2015) Maximizing conservation and production with intensive forest management: it’s all about location. Environ Manage 56:1104–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0556-3
Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x
Varga D, Vila J (2006) Ecología del paisaje y sistemas de información geográfica ante el cambio socioambiental en las áreas de montaña mediterránea. Una aproximación metodológica al caso de los valles d’Hortmoier y Sant Aniol (Alta Garrotxa. Girona). Áreas 25:59–72
Vila J, Varga D, Llausàs A, Ribas A (2006) Conceptos y métodos fundamentales en ecología del paisaje (landscape ecology). Una interpretación desde la geografía. Doc Anal Geogr 48:151–166
Acknowledgements
We thank Keith MacMillan and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions that have enriched and improved this study. We also thank Juan Pablo Vargas and Aridahi González for help with field work. This study was funded by a master scholarship (No. 402771) to A. Molina from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México (CONACyT) and grants from Programa de Fortalecimiento de la Calidad en Instituciones Educativas (PROFOCIE-2016) and the Consejo de la Investigación Científica (CIC-2016-2017) to P. Delgado.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity protection and reserves.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molina Sánchez, A., Delgado, P., González-Rodríguez, A. et al. Spatio-temporal approach for identification of critical conservation areas: a case study with two pine species from a threatened temperate forest in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 28, 1863–1883 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01767-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01767-y