Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 14, pp 3405–3423 | Cite as

Finding your way in the interdisciplinary forest: notes on educating future conservation practitioners

  • K. Andrade
  • C. Corbin
  • S. Diver
  • M. V. Eitzel
  • J. Williamson
  • J. Brashares
  • L. Fortmann
Original Paper

Abstract

We explore the challenges of educating interdisciplinary thinkers who can address the management of complex socio-ecological systems, such as forests, by sharing our experiences from several perspectives. Five contexts for interdisciplinarity are explored along with examples related to: the department, advising, integrated research collaborations, a graduate working group, an interdisciplinary class, and trans-academic research. These experiences demonstrate the importance of safe space and patience, the need for adequate time to build trust and respect, and the recognition that interdisciplinary thinking is developed and reinforced in multiple contexts. Interdisciplinarity is always a work in progress that differs in its particulars according to the research or management question at hand and the kinds of specializations involved. Thus, there are no hard and fast rules for its creation but only guiding principles that must be adapted in the course of their implementation.

Keywords

Collaboration Graduate education Interdisciplinarity Mentoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the many participants of IDTEA over the years for their insights, energy, enthusiasm and commitment to interdisciplinarity. We also acknowledge the financial support our interdisciplinary efforts have received. IDTEA and two Intercampus Workshops were funded by a Breslauer Graduate Conversation Group Award from UC Berkeley’s Institute of International Studies. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive suggestions.

References

  1. Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A, Michaud G (1972) Interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in universities. [Paris]: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  2. Balazs C, Morello-Frosch R (2013) The three r’s:how community-based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environ Justice 6:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benderly BL (2012) Rethinking the Ph.D. Sci Careers. doi: 10.1126/science.caredit.a1200101 Google Scholar
  4. Bradwell P (2009) The Edgeless University. Demos, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell L (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conserv Biol 19:574–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casey BA (2010) Administering interdisciplinary programs. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, Holbrook JB (eds) The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 345–359Google Scholar
  7. Chronicle of Higher Education (2012) The almanac of higher education. http://chronicle.com/section/Almanac-of-Higher-Education/723/. Accessed 30 Mar 2014
  8. Commission European (2003) EUR 20877 Science shops—knowledge for the community. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  9. DeZure D (2010) Interdisciplinary pedagogies in higher education. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, Holbrook JB (eds) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 372–386Google Scholar
  10. Du Preez P (2012) The human right to education, the ethical responsibility of curriculum, and the irony in ‘Safe Spaces’. In: Roux C (ed) Safe spaces: human rights in diverse contexts. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funtowitcz SO, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Funtowitcz S, Ravetz J. (2003) Post normal science. In: International Society for Ecological Economics (eds) Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  13. Graybill JK (2010) Doctoral student and early career academic perspectives. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, Holbrook JB (eds) The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 404–418Google Scholar
  14. Hall R, Sandler B (1982) The classroom climate: a chilly one for women? Association of American colleges.Project on the status and education of women. Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Haraway D (1999) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Biagioli M (ed) The science studies reader. Routledge, New York, pp 172–188Google Scholar
  16. Holley LC, Steiner S (2013) Safe space: student perspectives on classroom environment. J Soc Work Educ 41:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur S, Manaan SA (2013) Developing interdisciplinary teaching: a vignette of a postgraduate course. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 90:755–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein JT (2010) Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: a model for strength and sustainability. Jossey-Bass/Association of American Colleges and Universities, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Lele S, Norgaard RB (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerena-Quinn R (2013) A safe space to speak above the silences. Cult Med Psychiatry 37:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyall C, Meagher L (2012) A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures 44:606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyons A (2012) Visualizing wildlife conservation and development in Southern Africa: a multi-optic approach. Ph.D Dissertation, University of California at BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. McCook A (2011) Rethinking Ph.Ds. Nature 472:280–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller CA (2010) Policy challenges and university reform. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, Holbrook JB (eds) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 333–338Google Scholar
  27. Millis BJ (1997) Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  28. Newell WH, Luckie DB (2013) Pedagogy for interdisciplinary habits of the mind. In: McCright AM, Eaton W(eds) Insights on interdisciplinary teaching and learning. White Paper. Michigan State University East Lansing: 7–14. http://lbc.msu.edu/CITL/whitepaper.cfm
  29. Öberg G (2011) Interdisciplinary environmental studies: a primer. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Rafols I, Leydesdorff L, O’hare A, Nightingale P, Stirling A (2012) How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Res Policy 41:1262–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Redman C, Grove MJ, Kuby L (2004) Integrating social science into the long term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhoten D, Parker A (2004) Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path”. Science 306:2046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers M (2012) Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. Qual Rep 17:1–17Google Scholar
  34. Scott J (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  35. Sprain L, Timpson W (2012) Pedagogy for sustainability science:case-based approaches for interdisciplinary instruction. Environ Commun 6:532–550Google Scholar
  36. Steiner G, Alfred P (2006) Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. J Clean Prod, Sustainability In Higher Education: What is Happening? 14(9–11):877–90Google Scholar
  37. Wallner F (1992) Das Verfahren der Verfremdung. In: Wallner F (ed) Wissenschaft in reflexion. Braumüller, WienGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson EO (2013) Great scientist ≠ good at math. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323611604578398943650327184. Accessed 21 Mar 2014
  39. Woodford MR, Kolb CL, Durocher-Radeka G, Javier G (2014) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ally training programs on campus: current variations and future directions. J Coll Stud Dev 55:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Andrade
    • 1
  • C. Corbin
    • 1
  • S. Diver
    • 1
  • M. V. Eitzel
    • 1
  • J. Williamson
    • 1
  • J. Brashares
    • 1
  • L. Fortmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations