Abstract
This study determined habitat characteristics related to the presence of species of rodents and possible associations between pairs of these species that may affect their distribution. The study was conducted in the southern half of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. We used an environmentally constrained null model with 200 data sites that were sampled from 1999 to 2004 and measurements of different environmental factors obtained from electronic maps, meteorological stations, and measurements in the field. Although most of the isolated factors were not adequate for distinguishing between sites (rodents’ habitat), the combination of all the factors gave an acceptable explanation for the presence of rodent species. The low selectivity of the species for the variables used in the model could be related to the selection of variables that were not appropriate for all species and because an artifact of scale of several variables was employed in the analysis. The percentage of rock cover and vegetation types was most closely related to habitat preference for most species. The possible associations between pairs of these species shown by the null model, the negative interaction between two pairs of species (Peromyscus eva vs. P. fraterculus and Chaetodipus spinatus vs. C. fallax) have probably affected the distribution of these rodents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez-Castañeda ST, Patton L (1999) Mamíferos del Noroeste de México. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz, México
Alvarez-Castañeda ST, Patton L (2004) Geographic genetic architecture of pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) populations in Baja California, Mexico. Mol Ecol 13:2287–2301. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02243.x
Alvarez-Castañeda ST, Arnaud G, Yensen E (1996) Spermophillus atricapillus. Mammalian Species is published by the American Society of Mammalogists 251, 1–3
Anderson RP, Verde MG-L, Peterson AT (2002) Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:131–141. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00275.x
Animal Care and Use Committee (1998) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 79:1416–1431
Beissinger SR, Steadman EC, Wohlgenant T, Blate G, Zack S (1996) Null models for assessing ecosystem conservation priorities: threatened birds as titters of threatened ecosystems in South America. Conserv Biol 10:1343–1352. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10051343.x
Chapman AD, Muñoz MES, Koch I (2005) Environmental information: placing biodiversity phenomena in an ecological and environmental context. Biodivers Inform 2:24–41
Falkenber GJ, Clarke JA (1998) Microhabitat use of deer mice: effects on interespecific interaction risks. J Mammal 79:558–565. doi:10.2307/1382986
Gotelli NJ (2000) Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81:2606–2621
Gotelli NJ (2001) Reserch frontiers in null model analysis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:337–343. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00249.x
Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2003) Swap algorithms in null model analysis. Ecology 84:532–535. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0532:SAINMA]2.0.CO;2
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell 135:147–186. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
Hall ER (1981) The Mammals of North America, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Hijmans RJ, Cameron S, Parra J, Jones P, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim 25:1965–1978
Illoldi P, Linaje MA, Sanchez-Cordero V (2002) Distribución de los mamíferos terrestres en la región del Golfo de California México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Ser Zoologica 72:213–224
Johnson DE (2000) Métodos multivariados aplicados al análisis de datos. International Thomson, Mexico
Lackey JA (1991) Chaetodipus arenarius. Mammalian Species is published by the American Society of Mammalogists 384, 1–3
Lackey JA (1996) Chaetodipus fallax. Mammalian Species is published by the American Society of Mammalogists 517, 1–6
MacArthur RH (1984) Geographical Ecology. Princeton University, Princeton
Maccracken JG, Hansen RM, Collins F (1984) Rodent-vegetation relationships in southeastern Montana. Northwest Sci 4:272–278
Mackey BG, Lindernmayer DB (2001) Towards a hierarchical framework for modeling the special distribution of animals. J Biogeogr 28:1147–1166. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00626.x
Macpherson JM, Jetz W, Rogers DJ (2006) Using coarse-grained occurrence data to predict species distributions at finer spatial resolutions-possibilities and limitations. Ecol Modell 192:499–522. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.08.007
Martinez-Meyer E (2005) Climate change and biodiversity: some considerations in forecasting shifts in species’ potential distributions. Biodivers Inform 2:42–55
Martinez-Meyer E, Peterson AT, Hargrove WW (2004) Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:305–314. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00107.x
Patton JL, Huckaby DG, Alvarez-Castañeda ST (2007) The evolutionary history and a systematic revision of wood rats of the Neotamia lepida group. University of California Press, California
Peres-Neto PR, Olden JD, Jackson DA (2001) Environmentally constrained null models: site suitability as occupancy criterion. Oikos 93:110–120. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930112.x
Riddle BR, Hafner DJ, Alexander LF (2000) Comparative phylogeography of bailey’s pocket mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi) and the Peromyscus eremicus Species group: historical vicariance of the Baja California Peninsular Desert. Phylogenet Evol 17:161–172. doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0842
Rogovin KA, Shenbrot GI, Surov AV (1992) Analysis of spatial organization of a desert rodent community in the Bolson de Mapimi, Mexico. In: Sokolov V, Halffter G, Ortega A (eds) Vertebrate ecology in arid zones of Mexico and Asia. Instituto de Ecología, Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas de Baja California Sur, and MAB-UNESCO, La Paz
Schlossberg S (2006) Abundance and habitat preferences of gray vireos (Vireo vicinior) on the Colorado Plateau. Am Ornithologists Union 123:33–44
Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10
Soltz HC, Valone TJ (2000) The effect of mammalian predator scent on the foraging behavior of Dipodomys merriami. Oikos 91:139–145. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910113.x
Sorensen JS, Heward E, Dearing MD (2005) Plant secondary metabolites alter the feeding patterns of mammalian herbivore (Neotoma lepida). Oecologia 146:415–422. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0236-8
Storch I (2002) On spatial resolution in habitat models: can small-scale forest structure explain Capercaillie numbers? Conserv Ecol 6(1):6
Sullivan RM, Best TL (1997) Effects of environment on phenotypic variation and sexual dimorphism in Dipodomys simulans (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). J Mammal 78:798–810. doi:10.2307/1382937
Titus JE, Wagner DJ (1984) Carbon balance for two Sphagnum mosses: water balance resolves a physiological paradox. Ecology 65:1765–1774. doi:10.2307/1937772
Trujano-Alvarez AL, Alvarez-Castañeda ST (2007) Taxonomic revision of Thomomys bottae in the Baja California Sur lowlands. J Mammal 88:343–350. doi:10.1644/05-MAMM-A-291R3.1
Verner J, Morrison ML, Ralph CJ (1986) Wildlife 2000 Modelling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Verts BJ, Carraway LN (2002) Neotoma lepida. Mammalian Species is published by the American Society of Mammalogists 699, 1–2
Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R, Foster MS (1996) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Peterson, E. Martinez-Meyer, H. Cabrera-Santiago, and J. P. Gallo-Reynoso for providing helpful comments; H. Cabrera-Santiago, F. Cota, and M. De La Paz for their valuable assistance in the field; and the technical staff of the GIS Laboratory at CIBNOR. This study was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT grants I25251N and 39467Q); Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT-2002-CO1-019 and 106), and a CONACYT fellowship to G. Suarez-Gracida.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suárez-Gracida, C.G., Álvarez-Castañeda, S.T. Physical and biological variables related to habitat preferences of rodents. Biodivers Conserv 18, 2779–2797 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9606-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9606-6