Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biodiversity gradients in the Alps: the overriding importance of elevation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land abandonment is causing woodland expansion and loss of open habitats in the Alps, coupled with a shift in forestry practices from coppice management to high forest. Despite such rapid large-scale changes, there has been very little investigation of the environmental predictors of biodiversity in the Alpine landscape. We assessed the richness of amphibians, reptiles and breeding birds (n = 189 species), used as a surrogate of biodiversity, in 58 quadrats of 100 km2, located within a well surveyed area of the province of Trento (central-eastern Italian Alps). The surrogates were then related to a series of environmental variables by means of stepwise multiple regression. Depending on the surrogate analysed, species richness declined linearly or quadratically with elevation, and increased with habitat heterogeneity and the availability of grassland and arid-rocky habitats. The same results were obtained when incorporating a measure of species threat into the biodiversity estimates. Different surrogates were positively inter-correlated, probably because of a common response to the same factor, namely elevation, which was the only variable to enter all models. Such elevational gradient produced a clear biodiversity peak in low-elevation areas, generating potential conflict between efficient biodiversity conservation and economic interests linked to human development, a scenario which probably applies to many mountain regions worldwide. The current network of protected areas was quite satisfactory in terms of area covered but biased towards high-elevation areas, of high scenic beauty but relatively low in animal biodiversity value. Low-elevation reserves were small and isolated. Proposed conservation targets include the establishment of corridors increasing the connectivity of low-elevation reserves and the promotion of incentives for the extensive management of grassland, an agro-ecosystem of high historical and biological value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 157:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin GE, Thomas CJ, Houston DC, Thompson BA (1996) Predicting the spatial distribution of buzzard Buteo buteo nesting areas using a Geographical Information Systemand remote sensing. J Appl Ecol 33:1541–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro L, Dutoit T, Cozic P (2001) A six-year experimental restoration of biodiversity by shrub-clearing and grazing in calcareous grasslands of the French Alps. Biodivers Conserv 10:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beniston M (ed) (1994) Mountain environments in changing climates. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone RB, Krohn WB (2000) Partitioning sources of variation in vertebrate species richness. J Biogeogr 27:457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch J, Boyero L, Martìnez-Solano I (2004) Spatial scales for the management of amphibians populations. Biodivers Conserv 13:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (2001) Mammals on mountainsides: elevational patterns of diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldonazzi M, Pedrini P, Zanghellini S (eds) (2002) Atlante degli anfibi e dei rettili della provincial di Trento (Amphibia, Reptilia), 1987–1996, con aggiornamenti al 2001. Stud Trent Sci Nat Acta Biol 77:1–173

  • CEC. Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General—Environment, Nuclear Safety, Civil Protection (1993) CORINE Land cover—guide technique. Office for official publications of the european communities, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernusca A, Tappeiner U, Bayfield N (1999) Land-use changes in European mountain ecosystems. Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPRA (2001) Rapporto sullo stato delle Alpi 2: dati, fatti, problemi, proposte. Centro Documentazione Alpina, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell HV, Lawton JH (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. J Anim Ecol 61:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirnböck T, Dullinger S, Grabherr G (2003) A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J Biogeogr 30:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle A, Dunstone N (eds) (2000) Priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity: has the Panda had its day? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes? Ecol Appl 3:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfo C, Sulli M (1993) Studi sul clima del Trentino per ricerche dendroclimatologiche e di ecologia forestale. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (ed) (1996a) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996b) Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 77–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Williams PH (1996) Spatial patterns in taxonomic diversity. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 202–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RH (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen A, Rotella J 1999 Abiotic factors. In: Hunter ML (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Rotella JJ, Kraska MPV, Brown D (1999) Dynamic habitat and population analysis: an approach to resolve the biodiversity manager’s dilemma. Ecol Appl 9:1459–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt AH (2000) Coincidence and mismatch of biodiversity hostspots: a global survey for the order primates. Biol Conserv 93:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (2000) The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • I.P.L.A. (2000) Sweet chestnut coppice. Blu Edizioni, Cuneo

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner C, Spehn EM (eds) (2003) Mountain biodiversity: a global assessment. CRC Press, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1998) Ecological methodology. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo P, Dondero F, Ciliento E, Rolando A (2004) Consequences of pastoral abandonment for the structure and diversity of the alpine avifauna. J Appl Ecol 41:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenbergen E (1994) Die Alpen in Europa. Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschften, Veröff. Komm. Humanökologie 5:53–86

  • Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and perspective views. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi L, Sergio F (2005) Distribution, density, diet and productivity of the Scops Owl Otus scops in the Italian Alps. Ibis 147:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesi L, Sergio F, Pedrini P (2006) Density, nest-site selection, diet and productivity of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in the Alps: implications of temporal changes in forest dynamics. Bird Study 53:310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JD (1989) Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RI (ed) (1994) Mapping the diversity of nature. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris K, Pain DJ (eds) (2002) Conserving bird biodiversity: general principles and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Odasso M (2002) I tipi forestali del Trentino: catalogo, guida al riconoscimento, localizzazione e caratteristiche ecologico-vegetazionali. Centro di Ecologia Alpina, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen JG (1990) Patterns of mammalian species richness in relation to temperature, productivity, and variance in elevation. J Mammal 71:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain DJ, Pienkowski MW (eds) (1997) Farming and birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its implications for bird conservation. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • PAT (1995) Rapporto sullo stato dell’ambiente. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • PAT (1997) I biotopi tutelati. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrini P, Caldonazzi M, Zanghellini S (eds) (2005) Atlante degli Uccelli nidificanti e svernanti in provincia di Trento. Saud Trent Sci Nat Acta Biol 80 (2003) Suppl. 2:1–692

  • Purvis A, Hector A (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405:212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbek C (1997) The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18:200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray N, Lehman A, Joly P (2002) Modelling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on matrix permeability. Biodivers Conserv 11:2143–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Bogliani G (2000) Hobby Falco subbuteo nest-site selection and productivity in relation to intensive agriculture and forestry. J Wildl Manage 64:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Pedrini P, Marchesi L (2003) Adaptive selection of foraging and nesting habitat by black kites (Milvus migrans) and its implications for conservation: a multi-scale approach. Biol Conserv 112:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Rizzolli F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2004) The importance of interspecific interactions for breeding-site selection: Peregrine Falcons seek proximity to Raven nests. Ecography 27:818–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Scandolara C, Marchesi L, Pedrini P, Penteriani V (2005) Effect of agro-forestry and landscape changes on common buzzards (Buteo buteo) in the Alps: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 8:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servizio Foreste (1999) Carta fisionomica della copertura forestale in Trentino. Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Trento

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer C (1994) Beyond park boundaries. In: Cook EA, van Lier HN (eds) Landscape planning and ecological networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1991) Conservation: tactics for constant crisis. Science 253:744–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (ed) 1998. Conservation science and action. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2000) Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405:208–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GM, Evans MI (1997) Habitats for birds in Europe: a conservation strategy for the wider environment. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GM, Heath MF (eds) (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill L, Gibbons D (2002) Mapping and monitoring bird populations: their conservation uses. In: Norris K, Pain DJ (eds) Conserving bird biodiversity: general principles and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 34–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JM, Hobbs PV (1977) Atmospheric science. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels KJ, Freitag S, van Jaarsveld AS (1999) The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a alocal scale. Biol Conserv 89:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels KJ, Reyers B, Van Jaaresveld AS (2000) Incorporating land cover information into regional biodiversity assessments in South Africa. Anim Conserv 3:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White D, Minotti PG, Barczak MJ, Sifneos JC, Freemark KE, Santelmann MV, Steinitz CF, Kiester AR, Preston EM (1997) Assessing risk to biodiversity from future landscape change. Conserv Biol 11:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous people who have taken part to the field surveys through the years (list in Caldonazzi et al. 2002) and Pedrini et al. (2005). M. Licantropi, L, Marchesi, V. Penteriani and two anonymous referees gave useful comments on a first draft of the manuscript. This study was included in Project Biodiversità, funded by the Provincia Autonoma di Trento.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Sergio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sergio, F., Pedrini, P. Biodiversity gradients in the Alps: the overriding importance of elevation. Biodivers Conserv 16, 3243–3254 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9113-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9113-y

Keywords

Navigation