Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting Species Numbers Using Species–Area and Endemics–Area Relations

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current ecological theory predicts an allometric relation between the number of species with restricted range size (endemics) and area (the endemics–area relation EAR), a pattern similar to the common species–area relation (SAR). Using SARs and EARs we can estimate species loss after habitat loss. A comparison of the predictive power of both approaches (using a patch occupancy model and data from European butterflies) revealed that the EAR approach is less reliable than the SAR. Contrary to current theory it appeared that EARs are relations in their own right that describe spatial distributions of endemic species. They do not simply follow from the underlying SAR. The implications of these results for the applicability of SARs and EARs in biodiversity forecasting are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. Andrén (1994) ArticleTitleEffects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review Oikos 71 355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen M., Thoruhill A. and Koopowitz H. 1997. Tropical forest disruption and stochastic biodiversity loss. In: Laurance W.F. and Bierregard R.O. (eds), Tropical Forest Remnants. University of Chicago Press, pp. 281–291.

  • O. Arrhenius (1921) ArticleTitleSpecies and area J. Ecol. 9 95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Balmford A. Long (1994) ArticleTitleAvian endemism and forest loss Nature 372 623–624 Occurrence Handle10.1038/372623a0 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXislansb0%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Burrough (1983) ArticleTitleMultiscale sources of spatial variation in soil I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation J. Soil Sci. 34 577–597

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Colwell J.A. Coddington (1994) ArticleTitleEstimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345 101–118 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD283ls1I%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • E.F. Connor E.D. McCoy (1979) ArticleTitleThe statistics and biology of the species–area relationship Am. Nat. 113 791–833 Occurrence Handle10.1086/283438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Crawley J.E. Harral (2001) ArticleTitleScale dependence in plant biodiversity Science 291 864–868 Occurrence Handle11157164 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.291.5505.864 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXpslKqtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Golden T.O Crist (1999) ArticleTitleExperimental effects of habitat fragmentation on old-field canopy insects: community, guild and species responses Oecologia 118 371–380 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420050738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Griffiths (1992) ArticleTitleSizeabundanceand energy use in communities J. Anim. Ecol. 61 307–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. University Press Oxford.

  • Harte J. 2000. Scaling and self-similarity in species distributions: implications for extinction, species richness, abundance, and range. In: Brown J.H., West G.B. and Enquist B.J. (eds), Scaling in Biology: Patterns and Processes, Causes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, pp. 325–342.

  • J. Harte A.P. Kinzig (1997) ArticleTitleOn the implications of species–area relationships for endemismspatial turnoverand food web patterns Oikos 80 417–427

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Harte A.P. Kinzig J. Green (1999) ArticleTitleSelf-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species Science 284 334–336 Occurrence Handle10195901 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.284.5412.334 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXitlOgtLY%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings H.M. and Sugihara G. 1993. Fractals – A User’s Guide for the Natural Sciences. Oxford University Press.

  • A.P. Kinzig J. Harte (2000) ArticleTitleImplications of endemics–area relationships for estimates of species extinction Ecology 81 3305–3311

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kruess T. Tscharnke (2000) ArticleTitleSpecies richness and parasitism in a fragmented landscape: experiments and field studies with insects on Vicia sepium Oecologia 122 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Leitner M.L. Rosenzweig (1997) ArticleTitleNested species-area curves and stochastic sampling: a new theory Oikos 79 503–512

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Lennon W.E. Kunin S. Hartley (2002) ArticleTitleFractal species distributions do not produce power-law species–area relationships Oikos 97 378–386 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970308.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.V. Lomolino (2000) ArticleTitleEcologist’s most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship J. Biogeogr. 27 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • M.V. Lomolino M.D. Weiser (2001) ArticleTitleTowards a more general species–area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small J. Biogeogr. 28 431–445 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00550.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Maddux K. Athreya (1999) ArticleTitleOn the distribution and abundance of species Science 286 1647a Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.286.5445.1647a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May R.M., Lawton J.H. and Stork N.E. 1995. Assessing extinction rates. In: Lawton J.H. and May R.M. (eds), Extinction Rates. University Press Oxford, pp. 1–24.

  • M. Ney-Nifle M. Mangel (1999) ArticleTitleSpecies–area curves based on geographic range and occupancy J. Theoret. Biol. 196 327–342

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ney-Nifle M. Mangel (2000) ArticleTitleHabitat loss and changes in the species–area relationship Conserv. Biol. 14 893–898 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98163.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Pearson F. Cassola (1992) ArticleTitleWorld-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coeleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies Conserv. Biol. 6 376–391 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030376.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Pimm (1998) Extinction W.J. Sutherland (Eds) Conservation Science and Action Blackwell Oxford 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Pimm R.A. Askins (1995) ArticleTitleForest losses predict bird extinction in eastern North America Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 9343–9347 Occurrence Handle11607581 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXosVWltbc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Plotkin M.D. Potts D.W. Yu S. Bunyavejchewin R. Condit R. Foster S. Hubbell J. LaFranckie N. Manokaran L.H. Seng R. Sukarmar M.A. Nowak P.S. Ashton (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting species diversity in tropical forests Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 10850–10854 Occurrence Handle11005859 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnt1ahs78%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M.L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. University Press Cambridge.

  • M.L. Rosenzweig (2001) ArticleTitleLoss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 5404–5410 Occurrence Handle11344286 Occurrence Handle10.1073/pnas.101092798 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjs1Wgtbg%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Summerville T.O. Crist (2003) ArticleTitleDeterminants of Lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, ecoregion and patch size Oikos 100 134–148 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11992.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaay C. and van Warren M. 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment No. 99, Strasbourg.

  • M. Tokeshi (1996) ArticleTitlePower fraction: a new explanation of relative abundance patterns in species-rich assemblages Oikos 75 543–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W. 2002a. Patch Occupancy – a FORTRAN program for the study of species spatial distributions. www.uni.torun.pl/˜ulrichw

  • Ulrich W. 2002b. RAD – a FORTRAN program for the study of relative abundance distributions. www.uni.torun.pl/˜ulrichw

  • W Ulrich (2004a) ArticleTitle PatchOccupancy – a FORTRAN program for modeling patterns of species spatial distributions Ecol. Quest. 4 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W. 2004b. Fitting stochastic models of relative abundance distributions to species abundance data. Ecol. Quest. 4, (in press).

  • W. Ulrich J. Buszko (2003a) ArticleTitleSelf-similarity and the species–area relation of Polish butterflies Basic Appl. Ecol. 4 263–270 Occurrence Handle10.1078/1439-1791-00139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Ulrich J. Buszko (2003b) ArticleTitleThe species–area relationship of butterflies in Europe: the simulation of extinction processes reveals different patterns between Northern and Southern Europe Ecography 26 365–374 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03441.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W. and Buszko J. 2004a. Detecting biodiversity hotspots using species–area and endemics–area relationships: the case of butterflies. Biodiv. Conserv., (in press).

  • W. Ulrich J. Buszko (2004b) ArticleTitleHabitat reduction and patterns of species loss Basic Appl. Ecol. 5 231–240 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.baae.2004.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Veech (2000) ArticleTitleChoice of species-area function affects identification of hotspots Conserv. Biol. 14 140–147 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99064.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.O. Wilson (1992) The Diversity of Life Norton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Zschokke C. Dolt H.-P. Rusterholz P. Oggler B. Braschler G.H. Thommen E. Lüdin A. Erhardt B. Baur (2000) ArticleTitleShort term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation Oecologia 125 559–572 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420000483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Ulrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulrich, W. Predicting Species Numbers Using Species–Area and Endemics–Area Relations. Biodivers Conserv 14, 3351–3362 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-9543-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-9543-3

Keywords

Navigation