Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Test of the Higher-Taxon Approach in the Identification of Candidate Sites for Marine Reserves

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternatives to species-level identification have been advocated as one solution to the problem of selecting marine reserves with limited information on the distribution of marine biodiversity.This study evaluated the effects on selection of candidate sites for marine reserves from using the higher-taxon approach as a surrogate for species-level identification of intertidal molluscs and rocky reef fishes. These effects were evaluated by determining the percentage of species included in candidate reserves identified from genus-, family- and order-level data by a complementarity-based reserve selection algorithm, and by testing for correlations between the irreplaceability values of locations. Candidate reserves identified from genus- and family-level data of intertidal molluscs included a similar percentage of all species as the reserves identified from species-level data. Candidate reserves selected from genus- and family-level data of rocky reef fishes included, respectively, 3–7% and 14–23% fewer species than reserves selected from species-level data. When the reserve identification process was constrained by a practical planning limit (a maximum of 20% locations able to be reserved) the reserves selected from genus- and family-level data of intertidal molluscs, and genus-level data of rocky reef fishes, included a similar percentage of species as the reserves identified from species-level data. Irreplaceability values of locations for species, genera and families of intertidal molluscs were highly correlated, and irreplaceability values of locations for species and genera of rocky reef fishes were highly correlated. This study suggests that genus- and family-level data for intertidal molluscs, and genus-level data for rocky reef fishes, are suitable surrogates for species in the identification of candidate sites for marine reserves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council). 1999. Strategic Plan of Action for the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: A Guide for Action by Australian Governments. Environment AustraliaCanberra.

  2. A. Balmford M.J.B. Green M.G. Murray (1996a) ArticleTitleUsing higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional tests Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263 1267–1274

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Balmford A.H.M. Jayasuriya M.J.B. Green (1996b) ArticleTitleUsing higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: II. Local applications Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263 1571–1575

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Balmford A.J.E. Lyon R.M. Lang (2000) ArticleTitleTesting the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi Biol. Conserv. 93 209–217 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00140-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beesley P.L., Ross G.J.B. and Wells A. (eds),, 1998. Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol 5. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

  6. M.G. Chapman (1998) ArticleTitleRelationships between spatial patterns of benthic assemblages in a mangrove forest using different levels of taxonomic resolution Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 162 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Csuti S. Polasky P.H. Williams R.L. Pressey J.D. Camm M. Kershaw A.R. Kiester B. Downs R. Hamilton M. Huso K. Sahr (1997) ArticleTitleA comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon Biol. Conserv. 80 83–97 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.P. Ferraro F.A. Cole (1990) ArticleTitleTaxonomic level and sample size sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the Southern California Bight macrobenthos Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 67 251–262

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ferrier R.L. Pressey T.W. Barrett (2000) ArticleTitleA new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement Biol. Conserv. 93 303–325 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00149-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K.J. Gaston (1996) Spatial covariance in the species richness of higher taxa M.E. Hichberg J. Clobert R. Barbault (Eds) Aspects of the Genesis and Maintenance of Biological Diversity Oxford Oxford University Press 221–242

    Google Scholar 

  11. K.J. Gaston (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity: higher taxon richness Prog. Phys. Geogr. 24 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Gladstone (2002) ArticleTitleThe potential value of indicator groups in the selection of marine reserves Biol. Conserv. 104 211–220 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00167-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Gladstone J. Davis (2003) ArticleTitleReduced survey intensity and its consequences for marine reserve selection Biodiv. Conserv. 12 1525–1536 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023637917029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Gladstone F. Krupp M. Younis (2003) ArticleTitleDevelopment and management of a regional network of marine protected areas for the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Ocean Coast. Manage. 46 741–761 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00065-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Gladstone M. Schreider (2003) ArticleTitleEffects of pruning a temperate mangrove forest on the associated assemblages of macroinvertebrates Mar.Freshwater Res. 54 683–690 Occurrence Handle10.1071/MF02083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Hopkinson J.M.J. Travis J. Evans R. Gregory M.G. Telfer P.H. Williams (2001) ArticleTitleFlexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reserves Biodiv. Conserv. 10 271–285 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008959829585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.C. Howard P. Viskanic T.R.B. Davenport F.W. Kigenyi M. Baltzer C.J. Dickinson J.S. Lwanga R.A. Matthews A. Balmford (1998) ArticleTitleComplementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda Nature 394 472–475 Occurrence Handle10.1038/28843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Hutchings W. Ponder (2003) ArticleTitleMarine invertebrates and their conservation Mar. Poll. Bull. 46 153–154 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00483-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Jablonski K.W. Flessa (1986) ArticleTitleThe taxonomic structure of shallow-water marine faunas: implications for Phanerozoic extinctions Malacologia 27 43–66

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.J. James M.P. Lincoln Smith P.G. Fairweather (1995) ArticleTitleSieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution needed to describe natural spatial variation in marine macrofauna Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 118 187–198

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.A. Kay F.E. Wells W.F. Ponder (1998) Class Gastropoda P.L. Beesley G.J.B. Ross A. Wells (Eds) Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis Part B CSIRO Publishing Canberra 565–604

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Kelleher C. Bleakley S. Wells (1995.) A Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas, Vol. 1 The World Bank Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Kershaw G.M. Mace P.H. Williams (1995) ArticleTitleThreatened status, rarity, and diversity as alternative selection measures for protected areas: a test using Afrotropical antelopes Conserv. Biol. 9 324–334 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020324.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.B. Kirkpatrick (1983) ArticleTitleAn iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania Biol. Conserv. 25 127–134 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(83)90056-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.H. Kuiter (2000.) Coastal Fishes of South-Eastern Australia Gary Allen Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Lasiak (2003) ArticleTitleInfluence of taxonomic resolution, biological attributes and data transformations on multivariate comparisons of rocky macrofaunal assemblages Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 250 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.P. Lincoln Smith (1989) ArticleTitleImproving multispecies rocky reef fish censuses by counting different groups of species using different procedures Environ. Biol. Fish. 26 29–37 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00002473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B.F.J. Manly (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.R. Margules R.L. Pressey (2000) ArticleTitleSystematic conservation planning Nature 405 243–253 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35012251 Occurrence Handle10821285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D.E. McAllister F.W. Schueler C.M. Roberts J.P. Hawkins (1994) Mapping and GIS analysis of the global distribution of coral reef fishes on an equal area grid R.I. Miller (Eds) Mapping the Diversity of Nature Chapman and Hall London 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  31. A.A. Myers (1997) ArticleTitleBiogeographic barriers and the development of marine biodiversity Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 44 241–248 Occurrence Handle10.1006/ecss.1996.0216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. InstitutionalAuthorNameNSWMPAMPASWG(New South Wales Marine Parks Authority Marine Protected Area Strategy Working group) (2001) Developing a Representative System of Marine Protected Areas in NSW-an Overview Marine Parks Authority Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. Olsgard T. Brattegard T. Holthe (2003) ArticleTitlePolychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups Biodivers. Conserv. 12 1033–1049 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022800405253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. F. Olsgard P.J. Somerfield M.R. Carr (1998) ArticleTitleRelationships between taxonomic resolution, macrobenthic community patterns and disturbance Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 172 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  35. E.J. Pharo A.J. Beattie R.L. Pressey (2000) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens Biol. Conserv. 96 371–378 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00080-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. A.J. Pik I. Oliver A.J. Beattie (1999) ArticleTitleTaxonomic sufficiency in ecological studies of terrestrial invertebrates Aust. J. Ecol. 24 555–562 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1442-9993.1999.01003.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. W. Ponder P. Hutchings R. Chapman (2002) Overview of the Conservation of Australian Marine Invertebrates Australian MuseumSydney and Environment Australia Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  38. R.L. Pressey (1998) Algorithms, politics and timber: an example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests R. Wills R. Hobbs (Eds) Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the Politicians Surrey Beatty and Sons Sydney 73–87

    Google Scholar 

  39. R.L. Pressey (1999) ArticleTitleApplications of irreplaceability analysis to planning and management problems Parks 9 42–51

    Google Scholar 

  40. R.L. Pressey I.R. Johnson P.D. Wilson (1994) ArticleTitleShades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal Biodiv. Conserv. 3 242–262 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00055941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. R.L. Pressey K.H. Taffs (2001) ArticleTitleScheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss Biol. Conserv. 100 355–376 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00039-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A.G. Rebelo W.R. Siegfried (1992) ArticleTitleWhere should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? – models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximising the protection of floral diversity. Conserv. Biol. 6 243–252 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620243.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. W.V. Reid (1998) ArticleTitleBiodiversity hotspots TREE 13 275–280

    Google Scholar 

  44. B. Reyers A.S. van Jaarsveld M. Kruger (2000) ArticleTitleComplementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 267 505–513 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2000.1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts C.M. and Hawkins J.P. 2000. Fully Protected Marine Reserves: A Guide. WWF Endangered Seas Campaign USA and University of York, UK.

  46. K. Roy D. Jablonski J.W. Valentine (1996) ArticleTitleHigher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine molluscs Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351 1605–1613

    Google Scholar 

  47. B. Tardiff J.L. DesGranges (1998) ArticleTitleCorrespondence between bird and plant hotspots of the St Lawrence River and influence of scale on their location Biol. Conserv. 84 53–63 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00074-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Thackway (1996) Developing consistent national criteria for the identification and selection of a national representative system of marine protected areas R. Thackway (Eds) Developing Australia's Representative System of Marine Protected Areas: Criteria and Guidelines for Identification and Selection Department of the Environment Sport and Territories Canberra 20–28

    Google Scholar 

  49. A.J. Underwood M.J. Kingsford N.L. Andrew (1991) ArticleTitlePatterns in shallow subtidal marine assemblages along the coast of New South Wales Aust. J. Ecol. 6 231–249

    Google Scholar 

  50. M.A. Vanderklift T.J. Ward J.C. Phillips (1998) ArticleTitleUse of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity Biol. Conserv. 86 307–315 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00036-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. A.S. van Jaarsveld S. Freitag S.L. Chown C. Muller S. Koch H. Hull C. Bellamy M. Kruger S. Endrody-Younga M.W. Mansell C.H. Scholtz (1998) ArticleTitleBiodiversity assessment and conservation strategies Science 279 2106–2108 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.279.5359.2106 Occurrence Handle9516111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. R.I. Vane-Wright C.J. Humphries P.H. Williams (1991) ArticleTitleWhat to protect? – Systematics and the agony of choice Biol. Conserv. 55 235–254 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. K. Walls (1995) The New Zealand experience in developing a marine biogeographic regionalisation J. Muldoon (Eds) Towards a Marine Regionalisation for Australia Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Townsville 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  54. T. Ward M.A. Vanderklift A.O. Nicholls R.A. Kenchington (1999) ArticleTitleSelecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity Ecol. Appl. 9 691–698

    Google Scholar 

  55. R.M. Warwick (1988) ArticleTitleAnalysis of community attributes of the macrobenthos of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord at taxonomic levels higher than species Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46 167–170

    Google Scholar 

  56. C. Wilkinson (2002) Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002 Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  57. D.M. Wilkinson S.R. Davis (2000) ArticleTitleRapid assessments of microbial biodiversity using relationships between genus and species richness. Studies on testate amoebae Acta Protozool. 39 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  58. Williams P.H. 1999. WORLDMAP iv Windows: Software and Help Document 4.1. Privately distributed, London.

  59. P.H. Williams K.J. Gaston (1994) ArticleTitleMeasuring more of biodiversity: can higher taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol. Conserv. 67 211–217 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(94)90612-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. P. Williams D. Gibbons C. Margules A. Rebelo C. Humphries R. Pressey (1996) ArticleTitleA comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds Conserv. Biol. 10 155–174 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010155.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. P.H. Williams C.J. Humphries (1994) Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness and endemism in conservation P.L. Florey C.J. Humphries R.I. Vane-Wright (Eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation Oxford Clarendon Press, 269–287

    Google Scholar 

  62. D. Yurick (1995) Development of a marine protected area system planning regional framework in Canada J. Muldoon (Eds) Towards a Marine Regionalisation for Australia Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Townsville 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  63. M.A. Zacharias J.C. Roff (2000) ArticleTitleA hierarchical ecological approach to conserving marine biodiversity Conserv. Biol. 14 1327–1334 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99191.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. M.A. Zacharias J.C. Roff (2001) ArticleTitleExplanations of patterns of intertidal diversity at regional scales J. Biogeogr. 28 471–483 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00559.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Gladstone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gladstone, W., Alexander, T. A Test of the Higher-Taxon Approach in the Identification of Candidate Sites for Marine Reserves. Biodivers Conserv 14, 3151–3168 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0383-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0383-y

Key words:

Navigation