In most regions there are many possible ways of combining numbers of sites into reserve systems that represent a range of natural feasures. The ‘irreplaceability’ of a site is operationally defined as the percentage of these alternative systems in which it occurs. This is a fundamental measure of the conservation value of the site in terms of its potential contribution to the achievement of a reservation goal or, alternatively, the options for reservation that are lost if the site is lost. The measure allows decisions to be made on the future of individual sites in the context of their value, in combination with other sites, to the conservation of the full range of natural features in a region. It also provides a logical framework for the design of whole systems of reserves, with decisions proceeding from the most to the least irreplaceable. Irreplaceability can be measured directly for small data sets but must be predicted for regional data sets. A promising approach to prediction is discussed that requires validation with more extensive trials. The irreplaceability of a site depends on a specific reservation target and changes as some of the site's features become progressively represented in reserves elsewhere. The concept of irreplaceability undermines notions of conservation value that are static or based on a single static system of sites to achieve a reservation goal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, M.P. and Margules, C.R. (1986) Assessing representativeness. In Wildlife conservation evaluation (M.B. Usher, ed.) pp. 46–67. London: Chapman and Hall.
Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Scores and score classes for evaluation criteria: a comparison based on the cost of reserving all natural features. Biol. Conserv. 56, 281–94.
Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Keith, D.A. (1992) A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conserv. 62, 115–25.
Cocks, K.D. and Baird, I.A. (1989) Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biol. Conserv. 49, 113–30.
Franklin, J.F. (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes? Ecol. Appl. 3, 202–5.
Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127–34.
Kirkpatrick, J.B. and Harwood, C.E. (1983) Conservation of Tasmanian macrophytic wetland vegetation. Proc. R. Soc. Tas. 117, 5–20.
Leader-Williams, N., Harrison, J. and Green, M.J.B. (1990) Designing protected areas to conserve natural resources. Sci. Progress 74, 189–204.
Lewis, A., Stein, J.L., Stein, J.A., Nix, H.A., Mackey, B.G. and Bowyer, J.K. (1991) An assessment of regional conservation adequacy: Tasmania. Resource Assessment Commission Forest and Timber Inquiry Consultancy Series Number FTC91/17.
Mabbutt, J.A. (1968) Review of concepts of land classification. In Land evaluation (G.A. Stewart, ed.) pp. 11–28. Melbourne: MacMilian.
Margules, C.R. (1989) Selecting nature reserves in the South Australian mallee. In Mediterranean landscapes in Australia: Mallee ecosystems and their management (J.C. Noble and R.A. Bradstock, ed) pp. 398–405. Melbourne: CSIRO.
Margules, C.R. and Nicholls, A.O. (1987) Assessing the conservation value of remnant ‘islands’: mallee patches on the western Eyre Feninsula, South Australia. In Nature conservation: The role of remnants of native vegetation (D.A. Saunders, G.W. Arnold, A.A. Burbidge and A.J.M. Hopkins, eds) pp. 89–102. Sydney: Surrey Beatty.
Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 663–76.
Margules, C.R. and Usher, M.B. (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv. 24, 115–28.
McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A. and Werner, T.B. (1990) Conserving the world's biological diversity. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
Morgan, G. and Terrey, J. (1990) Natural regions of western New South Wales and their use for environmental management. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16, 467–73.
Morgan, G. and Terrey, J. (1992) Nature conservation in western New South Wales. Sydney: National Parks Association of New South Wales.
Morton, S.R. (1990) The impact of European settlement on the vertebrate animals of arid Australia: a conceptual model. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16, 201–13.
Mwalyosi, R.B.B. (1991) Ecological evaluation for wildlife corridors and buffer zones for Lake Manyara National Park, Tanzania, and its immediate environment. Biol. Conserv. 57, 171–86.
Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv. 64, 165–9.
Nix, H.A. (1976) Environmental control of breeding, post-breeding dispersal and migration of birds in the Australian region. In Proceedings of the 16th Ornithological Congress, Canberra 1974 (H.J. Frith and J.H. Calaby, eds) pp. 272–305. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
Noss, R.F. (1987) From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol. Conserv. 41, 11–37.
Pressey, R.L. (1990) Reserve selection in New South Wales: where to from here? Aust. Zool. 26, 70–5.
Pressey, R.L., Bedward, M. and Nicholls, A.O. (1990) Reserve selection in mallee lands. In The mallee lands: A conservation perspective (J.C. Noble, P.J. Joss and G.K. Jones, eds) pp. 167–78. Melbourne: CSIRO.
Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989a) Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50, 263–78.
Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989b) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring vs. ierative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199–218.
Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Reserve selection in the Western Division of New South Wales: development of a new procedure based on land system mapping. In Nature conservation: Cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 98–105. Melbourne: CSIRO.
Purdie, R.W., Blick, R. and Bolton, M.P. (1986) Selection of a conservation reserve network in the Mulga Biogeographic Region of south-western Queensland, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 38, 369–84.
Rebelo, A.G. and Siegfried, W.R. (1990) Protection of Fynbos vegetation: ideal and real world options. Biol. Conserv. 54, 15–31.
Rebelo, A.G. and Siegfried, W.R. (1992) Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa?—models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximising the protection of floral diversity. Conserv. Biol. 6, 243–52.
Reed, P. (1990) An historical perspective on: Conserving What?-the basis for nature conservation reserves in New South Wales 1967–1989. Aust. Zool. 26, 85–91.
Rojas, M. (1992) The species problem and conservation: what are we protecting? Conserv. Biol. 6, 170–8.
Runte, A. (1979) National Parks the American Experience. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryti, R.T. (1992) The effect of the focal taxon on the selection of nature reserves. Ecol. Appl. 2, 404–10.
Smith, P.G.R. and Theberge, J.F. (1986) A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas. Environ. Manage. 10, 715–34.
Soule, M.E. (1991) Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. Science 253, 744–50.
Terborgh, J. (1992) Maintenance of diversity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24, 283–92.
Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?—systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–54.
Walker, P.J. (1991) Land systems ot western New South Wales. Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales Technical Report No. 25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pressey, R.L., Johnson, I.R. & Wilson, P.D. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodivers Conserv 3, 242–262 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055941
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055941