Fungal invasions can have far-reaching consequences, and despite increasing relevance, fungi are notoriously underrepresented in invasion science. Here, we present the second annotated checklist for alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria. This list contains 375 taxa of which 278 are classified as established; compared to the first checklist from 2002, this amounts to an almost five-fold increase and the number of decade-wise first records is steadily rising since the mid-twentieth century. The introduction pathway is unclear for the vast majority of taxa, while the main means of spread within the country is unassisted secondary spread. Fungi were predominantly introduced from the Northern Hemisphere, especially North America and Temperate Asia. Rates of newly recorded alien fungi differ among phyla; the majority belongs to the Ascomycota, which experienced an 9.6-fold increase in numbers. Orders found most frequently are powdery mildews (Erysiphales, Ascomycota), downy mildews (Peronosporales, Oomycota), agarics (Agaricales, Basidiomycota), Mycosphaerellales (Ascomycota), rusts (Pucciniales, Basidiomycota) and Pleosporales (Ascomycota). The majority (about 80%) of the taxa are plant pathogens, while animal pathogens are few but severely affecting their native hosts. The dominance of pathogens in our checklist underlines the need of better tackling fungal invasions—especially in the light of emerging infectious diseases—and highlights potential knowledge gaps for ectomycorrhizal and saprobic alien fungi, whose invasion processes are often much more inconspicuous. Our results show that fungal invasions are a phenomenon of increasing importance, and collaborative efforts are needed for advancing the knowledge and management of this important group.
While the massive human-mediated introduction of organisms beyond their native range [i.e. alien taxa sensu Blackburn et al. (2011) that may establish and become invasive by spreading and causing negative impacts on human livelihoods and the environment (IPBES 2019)] is already ongoing for centuries, it has—together with globalization—rapidly accelerated in the last decades (Seebens et al. 2017; Pyšek et al. 2020). Whereas biological invasions from well-studied taxonomic groups such as vascular plants and vertebrates received the bulk of attention, fungal invasions remain poorly studied. This is due to their cryptic lifestyle, small size, challenging systematics and uncertainties regarding their biogeographic status (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007; Gladieux et al. 2015; Thakur et al. 2019; Pyšek et al. 2020). Nevertheless, fungi [used hereafter in a broader sense, i.e., encompassing the true fungi (kingdom Fungi) and oomycetes (Pseudofungi; kingdom Straminipila)], are an important component of biological diversity, harboring an estimated minimum of 1.5 million species and their diversity remains largely unexplored (Hawksworth and Lücking 2017; Antonelli et al. 2020). They are vital for many ecosystem functions and consequently, ecosystem services (Spatafora et al. 2017; Willis 2018). Saprobic fungi are essential for nutrient cycling, as they can break down complex dead organic matter, while other fungi engage in mutualistic or antagonistic relationships (Antonelli et al. 2020).
Mutualistic relationships, such as different types of mycorrhizae, are often essential for the growth and vitality of their host (Willis 2018). Given the close association with their host plants, it can be assumed that they were—similarly to endophytes and pathogens—frequent hitch-hikers in plant trade and transport, in particular when living plants were involved (Vellinga et al. 2009; Desprez-Loustau et al. 2010; Sikes et al. 2018). In forestry, ectomycorrhizal taxa were even used as inoculum to promote growth of forestry trees in plantations outside their native range (e.g. Pinus spp. in the Southern Hemisphere) (Vellinga et al. 2009). Nevertheless, their introduction usually lacks immediate obvious consequences to biodiversity and socioeconomy and is therefore often inadequately reported. Similarly, only few introductions of saprobic fungi are thoroughly documented, as for example the spread of the conspicuous Clathrus archeri or the introduction of some edible species (e.g., Agaricus bisporus, Lentinula edodes), and potential impacts on native decomposers are poorly studied (Voglmayr and Krisai‐Greilhuber 2002; Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007). Compared to mutualists and saprobes, pathogens are likely to cause more obvious impacts in areas of introduction, resulting in a better knowledge about their presence (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007), especially for those infecting plants and animals of economic interest (Thakur et al. 2019). While some textbook examples of catastrophic invasions by pathogenic fungi are well-known (Fisher et al. 2012), such as Late Potato Blight (Phytophthora infestans, e.g. Yoshida et al. (2013)), Chestnut Blight (Cryphonectria parasitica, e.g. Rigling and Prospero (2018)), Dutch Elm Disease (Ophiostoma ulmi/novo-ulmi, e.g. Brasier and Kirk (2010)), Ash Dieback Disease (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, e.g. Gross et al. (2014); Coker et al. (2019)), White-Nose Syndrome of bats (Pseudogymnoascus destructans, e.g. Frick et al. (2010)), and chytrid fungi Bd and Bsal on amphibians (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis & B. salamandrivorans, e.g. Fisher et al. (2009); Spitzen-van der Sluijs et al. (2016)), those are only the tip of the iceberg of fungal invasions.
Usually, fungi are introduced unintentionally, for example as contaminants of goods, soil, and traded organisms such as plants and animals (Sikes et al. 2018), and therefore their numbers are thought to steadily increase with trade (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2010; Essl et al. 2011; Seebens et al. 2017; Sikes et al. 2018). It was found that in Europe the number of forest pathogens was increasing exponentially in the past 200 years (Santini et al. 2013). Similarly, introduced macrofungi (fungi that form visible fruiting bodies, i.e. mostly saprobes and ectomycorrhizal) were most commonly reported from Europe (Vellinga et al. 2009; Monteiro et al. 2020). National checklists of alien fungi have been published for several European countries, such as the Czech Republic (Černý et al. 2013), France (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2010), Germany (Kreisel and Scholler 1994; Karasch et al. 2021), Lithuania (Motiejūnaitė et al. 2017), Norway (Gederaas et al. 2012), Poland (Mułenko et al. 2010), Switzerland (Beenken and Senn-Irlet 2016), the United Kingdom (Hill et al. 2005). Two decades ago, Voglmayr and Krisai-Greilhuber (2002) in Essl and Rabitsch (2002) compiled the first checklist of alien fungi for Austria consisting of 83 fungal taxa, of which 61 were classified as established.
Here, we present an updated and considerably expanded annotated checklist of alien and cryptogenic [likely alien sensu Essl et al. (2018)] fungi and oomycetes for Austria. Note that the checklist does not include lichenized fungi and human pathogens. Only neomycetes (sensu Kreisel and Scholler 1994, i.e. taxa introduced after 1492), were included in the checklist, while archeomycetes were not considered. We summarize information on (i) the taxonomic composition, (ii) status and distribution in Austria, (iii) introduction pathways, (iv) habitat affiliation, hosts and ecofunctional composition, (v) temporal trajectories of introduction and (vi) region of origin. We provide the full checklist in the supplementary material and discuss key findings and notable changes compared to Voglmayr and Krisai‐Greilhuber (2002).
Material and methods
Austria is a medium-sized (~ 83,900 km2) landlocked country situated in Central Europe and inhabited by about 9 million people. While the western and central parts of the country are characterized by the European Alps, lowlands and hilly landscapes dominate the eastern, northern and southeastern parts of Austria. This topographic heterogeneity results in diverse climates and landscapes, ranging from glaciated peaks of the Alps to mild temperate climates in the lowlands, where agricultural land use is most intense. About half of the country is covered by forest (Austrian Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism 2018).
Organismic and temporal scope
The checklist includes true fungi (kingdom Fungi) and the pseudofungal oomycetes (Oomycota, kingdom Straminipila), excluding lichenized fungi and human-pathogenic fungi. Records are made on species level or lower taxonomic units (varieties). For inclusion, a taxon must be classified as alien or cryptogenic [i.e., likely alien, but the biogeographic status is uncertain; Essl et al. (2018)]. We consider only fungi that fit the definition of a neomycete sensu Kreisel and Scholler (1994). Those are fungi that were introduced after 1492, when Columbus first landed in the Americas and the Columbian biotic exchange began (Crosby 2003). Archeomycetes, i.e. fungi that—e.g. judging from their host range—were likely introduced a long time ago (Kreisel and Scholler 1994) were not included in the checklist. This applies for example to several notorious crop pathogens.
Data compilation and analyses
The checklist is based on an exhaustive evaluation of literature, herbaria, herbarium databases (Virtual Herbaria: JACQ (https://www.jacq.org) and MyCoPortal (https://mycoportal.org)), the online fungal record database of the Austrian Mycological Society (Mykologische Datenbank, https://pilzdaten-austria.eu), unpublished expert information and own targeted search for species not yet documented for Austria but known to occur in neighboring countries. Additionally, scientific search engines (Google Scholar and Web of Science) were used and online inventories screened (e.g. USDA Fungal Databases, CAB International). As a baseline, the first checklist on alien fungi (Voglmayr and Krisai‐Greilhuber 2002) was first revised according to the current state of knowledge and subsequently expanded by adding newly recorded taxa. Two species that were previously included were removed within the course of the update, due to new insights in fungal systematics and re-identifications: Records from Austria that were previously identified as the North American Peronospora swinglei were recently reported to belong in fact to a different, morphologically very similar species native to Europe (Peronospora salviae-pratensis; Hoffmeister et al. 2020), while the Austrian record of the East Asian Puccinia hemerocallidis was shown to be based on a misidentification of both fungus and host (Hernández et al. 2002).
The second edition of the checklist includes the current valid names of the taxa and their higher taxonomy as well as important synonyms. Additional information on the status and distribution of the taxa in Austria, their introduction and spread pathways, population trends, habitat affiliation and known impacts, their region of origin, ecofunctional group, recorded hosts, and year of first record were added when available. As the time of first introduction is usually unknown, we instead consider the year of first record as a proxy. This was assigned to each taxon using literature, herbaria and databases. Habitats were assigned based on own observations in the field and expert opinions as well as literature. The regions of origin follow the delineation of the continental regions in the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (TDWG Level 1, Brummitt 2001). The annotated checklist and information on used definitions is provided in Supplementary Information 2. We give an overview to the current situation in Austria and patterns emerging in this dataset by displaying frequency distributions and spatiotemporal patterns. Data manipulation, analyses and visualization were done in R V4.0.5 (R Core Team 2021) and RStudio V1.1.463 (RStudio Team 2021) using ggplot2 (Wickham 2016), sf (Pebesma 2018) and the tidyverse package collection (Wickham et al. 2019).
The updated Austrian checklist of alien fungi and oomycetes (Supplementary Information 2) includes 375 taxa, distributed across five phyla, 40 orders, 88 families and 171 genera (Table S1). Our work considerably expands the previous checklist (Voglmayr and Krisai‐Greilhuber 2002), from formerly 83 taxa; this accounts for a 4.6-fold increase in numbers of alien fungi within the past two decades. Not only the number of alien fungi increased strongly, but also their distribution across phyla changed considerably, likely due to differing introduction rates but also an improved state of knowledge, particularly for plant pathogens (Fig. 1). While the first Austrian checklist of alien fungi was dominated by Basidiomycota (57%), now most records are members of the Ascomycota (56%) (Fig. 1). Consequently, the largest proportion of taxa in the updated checklist belongs to the Ascomycota (210 taxa) and Basidiomycota (113 taxa), followed by Oomycota (48 taxa), Chytridiomycota (3 taxa) and the newly included Microsporidia (1 taxon). The most frequent orders were the Erysiphales (powdery mildews, Ascomycota: 46 taxa), Peronosporales (downy mildews and Phytophthora, Oomycota: 43 taxa), Agaricales (agarics, Basidiomycota: 40 taxa), Mycosphaerellales (Ascomycota: 39 taxa), as well as the Pleosporales (Ascomycota) with 37 taxa and the Pucciniales (rusts, Basidiomycota: 36 taxa) (Fig. S1).
Overview on fungal invasions in Austria
Most alien fungi (278 taxa) are classified as established in Austria, 31 taxa are casual, and 28 further taxa are only known from isolated occurrences, i.e. individual records. Two taxa (Chlorophyllum agaricoides and Ophiostoma ulmi) have gone extinct since their introduction and another two taxa (Synchytrium endobioticum and Monilinia fructicola) are classified as eradicated (Fig. 2a). Finally, for 34 taxa the status is unknown. The federal states of Styria, Lower Austria and Vienna harbour the highest numbers of established taxa, while western regions of Austria have considerably fewer records of established alien fungi, revealing an east–west gradient (Fig. 2b). The means of introduction to Austria (Fig. 2c) are unclear for most taxa (275 taxa). Fifty-one taxa are thought to have been introduced as contaminants of goods and two animal pathogens via stowaway (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Aphanomyces astaci). There are five examples of cultivated fungi that have escaped into natural habitats (Agaricus bisporus, Lentinula edodes, Psilocybe azurescens, Stropharia rugosoannulata and Volvariella volvacea). Forty-two taxa are assumed to have reached Austria via secondary spread after the human-mediated introduction to another surrounding country. Unassisted dispersal is also thought to be the main pathway of spread within Austria (applies to 245 taxa), followed by the spread as contaminant (83 taxa) or via stowaway (2 taxa). While 52 taxa were assigned multiple spread mechanisms, the means of spread were unknown for 99 taxa (Fig. 2d). Recent population trends for the alien fungal taxa currently present in Austria (n = 371; subtracting the four which are extinct/eradicated) could not be evaluated for almost half of them (177 taxa) due to lack of data. The remaining ones are assessed to have either stable occurrences (147 taxa) or are expansive, meaning they became notably more abundant in the past decade (47 taxa) (Fig. 2e). Negative impacts were given for 193 taxa, either on biodiversity or socioeconomy (including health). Most affect the agricultural sector (90 taxa), followed by horticulture (72 taxa), forestry (28 taxa) and biodiversity (17 taxa). Few taxa also impact either human or animal health (3 taxa each) and one taxon, Serpula lacrymans, is known for the damage it causes to wooden constructions such as buildings (Fig. 2f).
Habitat affiliation and ecology
Man-made technical habitats, i.e. those that are strongly influenced by humans such as street avenues, ornamental gardens and similar places in settlements, contain by far the highest number of alien fungi (229 taxa), with more than half being Ascomycota (Fig. 3a). Those are followed by fields (116 taxa) and forests (76 taxa). The least invaded habitats are mires and inland waters (2 taxa each). The majority of alien fungi in Austria are plant pathogens (80%), followed by saprobionts (15%), and taxa that can have both a saprobic and parasitic lifestyle, as well as ectomycorrhizal symbionts (2% each) (Fig. 3b). Two taxa (Flammocladiella anomiae and Woswasia atropurpurea) were found to grow on another fungus, i.e., are mycoparasites. One taxon (Nosema ceranae) infects the commercially utilized European honey bee (Apis mellifera) and two taxa infect (semi-)aquatic animals: Aphanomyces astaci is highly pathogenic to native crayfish species and Batrachochytrium dendrobatitis is pathogenic to anuran amphibians (frogs, toads). All except those two taxa are associated with terrestrial habitats (373 taxa). The ectomycorrhizal fungi were found to form associations with the coniferous tree genera Pinus and Cedrus. The importance of alien plant pathogens for agriculture is exemplified by their most common hosts genera: Helianthus (reported for 10 fungal taxa), Solanum (9 fungal taxa), Zea (8 fungal taxa), and Glycine (7 fungal taxa). Tree genera most commonly listed as host for plant pathogens were Fagus (6 fungal taxa), Platanus, Prunus, Quercus and Robinia (5 fungal taxa each), Acer, Fraxinus, Juglans and Pinus (4 fungal taxa each). Overall, there is a wide spectrum of host plants infected by alien fungal pathogens, with about 180 listed genera.
Temporal patterns of first records
The dataset covers the time span from 2021 back to around 1780, when the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans was originally described and constituted a serious problem in European buildings and ships (Kauserud et al. 2007). A minor peak in the 1870s coincides with the onset of microscopical methods in fungal species identification and a consequent strong increase in fungal species descriptions (Hawksworth and Lücking 2017) (Fig. 4). Another minor peak in the early 1900s relates to a combination of several factors: a first peak in global trade ahead of World War I favoring the spread of phytopathogens with their crop and ornamental hosts (Bonnamour et al. 2021); establishment of modern phytopathology in agriculture and forestry by government agencies and universities (Köck 1935; Beran 1951); and a strong increase in collecting and recording of fungi by amateur and professional mycologists, which is also expressed by the flourishing of exsiccata collections (Dörfelt and Heklau 1998). The number of decade-wise first records show a steady rise in in the twentieth and early twenty-first century, with a steep increase in the 1980s and constantly high numbers since then, recording more than 40 new alien taxa per decade. In the past decades the number of newly recorded Ascomycota has increased strongly, while the number of new records for Basidiomycota and Oomycota declined. Since the publication of the first edition of the checklist in 2002 about 115 alien fungal taxa were recorded for the first time in Austria, six of them alone in the two years of the ongoing decade.
Most alien fungi in Austria are native to continents of the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 5), mainly originating from North America (122 taxa), followed by Temperate Asia (80 taxa) and other parts of Europe (61 taxa). Those numbers are contrasted by much lower numbers of known introductions from the Southern Hemisphere and from Tropical Asia. Importantly, 64 taxa are of unknown origin, i.e., clearly alien to Austria but could not be assigned to any continent and 11 taxa were cryptogenic, i.e., likely alien to Austria.
We show that the number of recorded alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria (375 taxa of which 278 are established) has experienced a 4.6-fold increase in only 20 years and that the numbers of decade-wise first records steadily increased since the end of WW II. Our finding is in line with the increase of alien invasive forest pathogens in Europe (Santini et al. 2013) and general global trends of alien species accumulations found across taxonomic groups (Seebens et al. 2017, 2018) and therefore illustrates the rapid ongoing introduction and spread of many new alien species of this often neglected but important group. Importantly, this finding partly may be attributable to increased research effort due to greater awareness towards invasive species and improvements in species identification. Also, taxonomic insights that lead to splitting of taxa increase the total number of alien taxa, such as the separation of Plasmopara muralis from P. viticola in 2011 (Thines 2011). However, due to lags in reporting and impacts, even more introductions might have happened in the past decades and more first records are likely to be added retrospectively (Essl et al. 2011; Seebens et al. 2017). Many of the newly found species are microfungi, which can remain undiscovered for a long time due to their small size and the small number of active mycologists, especially if the symptoms caused are inconspicuous. This is especially likely for taxa that are already long known in other countries, such as for example Basidiophora entospora which was found in France already in 1868 and later in the nineteenth century also in surrounding regions but, to our knowledge, was first collected in Austria in 1999 (H. Voglmayr, personal observation). Voglmayr and Krisai-Greilhuber (2002) already mentioned some introduced taxa of neighboring countries which—they argued—will likely be recorded in Austria soon. Several of those, such as Mutinus ravenelii, Psilocybe cyanescens, P. azurescens, Erysiphe catalpae, E. howeana, E. palczewskii, Pseudoidium hortensiae, Urocystis eranthidis and Thecaphora oxalidis have indeed been recorded in the meantime and are included in the updated checklist. Overall, especially the phylum Ascomycota experienced a strong increase in records and now comprises over half of the alien fungal taxa in Austria, likely due to better knowledge regarding plant pathogens.
The updated checklist exceeds the numbers of taxa listed for several other European countries: e.g. Switzerland (283 taxa; Beenken and Senn-Irlet 2016), Germany (131 taxa—note that this list only contains fungi that occur in wild environments/on wild hosts; Karasch et al. (2021) in Rabitsch and Nehring (2021)), and France (227 taxa; Desprez-Loustau et al. (2010)). This is likely in part attributable to high recording efforts. Importantly, this also suggests that the number of yet unrecorded alien fungi will often be substantial in countries with lower recording efforts, particularly for inconspicuous species. Despite the differences in alien taxon numbers, there is a notable similarity to the checklists of other European countries in taxonomic and functional composition. The most frequent orders found (Erysiphales, Peronosporales, Agaricales, Mycosphaerellales, Pleosporales, Pucciniales) are in agreement with other inventories; in Switzerland powdery mildews (Erysiphales), rust fungi (Pucciniales) and downy mildews (Peronosporales) together accounted for more than 40% of alien fungi (Beenken and Senn-Irlet 2016). Desprez-Loustau et al. (2010) found Peronosporales and Erysiphales to be overrepresented among the alien fungi of France and the Agaricales were the most common order in a recently published global checklist of alien macrofungi (Monteiro et al. 2020).
We found that most alien fungi were introduced from North America, followed by Temperate Asia, which is in line with other Central European checklists (e.g. Desprez-Loustau et al. 2010; Beenken and Senn-Irlet 2016), but also with general patterns of origin of the Austrian alien fauna and flora (Rabitsch and Essl 2006). The predominance of these continents as source regions is likely due to the combined effects of climatic similarity and strong trade connections. Notably, for some of the 61 taxa classified as native in other regions of Europe, climate change may also trigger increases in abundance (making yet unrecorded natives easier to detect) or range shifts/expansions, which would challenge their status as alien taxa, but rather make them neonatives (Essl et al. 2019). Karasch et al. (2021) estimate that about 80% of invasive fungi in Germany benefit from climate change. Finally, we found that secondary spread after initial introduction to a new area is a major known mechanism of entry to and spread within/from Austria—contributing strongly to the homogenization of alien fungal checklists of European countries.
In most national checklists of alien fungi from European countries plant pathogens are the dominant ecofunctional group, e.g. 78% in Switzerland (Beenken and Senn-Irlet 2016), and 65% in France (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2010); this is also the case in our checklist, as about 80% of the taxa are pathogenic to plants. In contrast, ectomycorrhizal fungi—which due to their close host association are expected to have similar pathways of introductions as their hosts—make up a minor part of the alien fungal diversity. This contrasts to native fungal species richness patterns. When analyzing large-scale patterns of soil fungal diversity, Tedersoo et al. (2014) found that while the richness of saprobionts and pathogens decreased with latitude, the richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi was highest in temperate forests and regions with Mediterranean climates in mid-latitudes. In Austria 4450 species of macrofungi (mostly saprobes and ectomycorrhiza) are known to occur and nearly 1300 of those are included in the Austrian Red List (Dämon and Krisai-Greilhuber 2017). However, saprobionts and ectomycorrhizal fungi together account for less than 20% of our checklist. While it also needs to be considered that many plant pathogens are seed-transmitted, effecting a rapid, undetected spread via seed (Elmer 2001)—a pathway not available for mycorrhizal fungi, which rely on the association with roots of living plants—another cause might be insufficient recording of introduced non-pathogenic fungi that often remain inconspicuous. Biases in recording can also influence observed geographical patterns of fungal distributions (Andrew et al. 2017) and of alien fungal species richness; although the Austrian east–west gradient in alien fungal species numbers coincides with other diversity patterns, such as those of plants (the most important host group), it may also to a certain degree represent a bias in research effort, with more active mycologists and phytopathologists and therefore also literature and records in the eastern parts of Austria (H. Voglmayr, pers. observation).
Direct, but difficult to observe, impacts on native fungi, such as resource competition are likely to remain undetected as the knowledge on the native fungal community is often very incomplete (Dickie et al. 2017; Thakur et al. 2019). Intraguild competition and eventual displacement of native taxa are only two of several potential consequences; the co-introduction of mycorrhizal fungi might enhance the fitness and hence invasion success of their mutualist hosts or lead to novel associations (Dickie et al. 2017), while saprobes could impact the decomposition rates in ecosystems (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2007). However, the direct impacts of pathogens on economy, human livelihood (i.e. by affecting food security) and natural environments are often much more obvious. Just a single introduced taxon can have wide-ranging consequences when causing emerging disease in a naïve host that acts as a keystone species (Dickie et al. 2017; Thakur et al. 2019). There are prominent examples of forest tree species that experienced severe decline, leading to changes in forest composition after encountering an introduced pathogenic fungus (e.g. Dutch elm disease, ash dieback, chestnut blight) (Brasier and Kirk 2010; Gross et al. 2014; Rigling and Prospero 2018). Nevertheless, man-made technical and agricultural habitats were found to be the most invaded habitats and agriculture as well as horticulture were also the sectors negatively affected by the highest number of taxa. This was exemplified by the dominance of important crop genera among the most frequently recorded hosts. Globally, crop pest and pathogens increasingly threaten food security (Bebber et al. 2014; Fones et al. 2020) and climate change may contribute to their invasion success; potentially even amplifying impacts through decreasing resilience due to increasing environmental stress.
Since the establishment of molecular genetic methods in ecology and the abandonment of dual nomenclature in favour of the adoption of the one fungus-one name concept (Taylor 2011), significant advances have been made regarding the recognition and surveillance of fungal invasions (Gladieux et al. 2015). Nevertheless, mycological research in general is still hampered by knowledge gaps (Antonelli et al. 2020) and especially in invasion biology, fungi were often neglected in the past years (Wingfield et al. 2017). Although we show a nearly five-fold increase of alien fungi in Austria within the past two decades, it still can be assumed that the true number of alien fungi is much higher. Thus, increased research efforts including collaboration of researchers with different backgrounds (mycology, invasion science, plant pathology) are key to better tackle the phenomenon of fungal invasions in the future.
All data generated and analysed during this study are included in the Supplementary Information 2.
Andrew C, Heegaard E, Kirk PM et al (2017) Big data integration: Pan-European fungal species observations’ assembly for addressing contemporary questions in ecology and global change biology. Fungal Biol Rev 31:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2017.01.001
Antonelli A, Fry C, Smith RJ et al (2020) State of the world’s plants and fungi 2020. R Bot Gard Kew. https://doi.org/10.34885/172
Austrian Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism (2018) Sixth national report of Austria. Convention on Biological Diversity. Vienna
Bebber DP, Holmes T, Gurr SJ (2014) The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12214
Beenken L, Senn-Irlet B (2016) Neomyceten in der Schweiz. Stand des Wissens und Abschätzung des Schadpotentials der mit Pflanzen assoziierten gebietsfremden Pilze. [in German]. WSL Berichte 50:93
Beran F (1951) 50 Jahre österreichischer Pflanzenschutz 1901–1951 [in German]. Bundesanstalt für Pflanzenschutz, Wien
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S et al (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Bonnamour A, Gippet JMW, Bertelsmeier C (2021) Insect and plant invasions follow two waves of globalisation. Ecol Lett 24:2418–2426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13863
Brasier CM, Kirk SA (2010) Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathol 59:186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02157.x
Brummitt RK (2001) World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions Edition 2. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Pittsburgh
Černý K, Hejná M, Kolářová Z et al (2013) An overview of selected alien invasive fungal pathogens of woody plants in the Czech Republic. unpubl
Coker TLR, Rozsypálek J, Edwards A et al (2019) Estimating mortality rates of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) under the ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) epidemic. Plants People Planet 1:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.11
Crosby AJ (2003) The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Greenwood Publishing Group
Dämon W, Krisai-Greilhuber I (2017) Die Pilze Österreichs - Verzeichnis und Rote Liste. Makromyzeten [in German]. Österreichische Mykologische Gesellschaft, Wien
Desprez-Loustau ML, Courtecuisse R, Robin C et al (2010) Species diversity and drivers of spread of alien fungi (sensu lato) in Europe with a particular focus on France. Biol Invasions 12:157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9439-y
Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buée M et al (2007) The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.005
Dickie IA, Bufford JL, Cobb RC et al (2017) The emerging science of linked plant–fungal invasions. New Phytol 215:1314–1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14657
Dörfelt H, Heklau H (1998) Die Geschichte der Mykologie [in German]. Einhorn Verlag, Schwäbisch Gmünd
Elmer WH (2001) Seeds as vehicles for pathogen importation. Biol Invasions 3:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015217308477
Essl F, Bacher S, Genovesi P et al (2018) Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. Bioscience 68:496–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy057
Essl F, Dullinger S, Genovesi P et al (2019) A conceptual framework for range-expanding species that track human-induced environmental change. Bioscience 69:908–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz101
Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W et al (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011728108
Essl F, Rabitsch W (eds) (2002) Neobiota in Österreich. Umweltbundesamt. Vienna, Austria
Fisher MC, Garner TWJ, Walker SF (2009) Global emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and amphibian chytridiomycosis in space, time, and host. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:291–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073435
Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ et al (2012) Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10947
Fones HN, Bebber DP, Chaloner TM et al (2020) Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens. Nat Food 1:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0
Frick WF, Pollock JF, Hicks AC et al (2010) An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science (80) 329:679–682. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188594
Gederaas L, Moen TL, Skjelseth S, Larsen L-K (eds) (2012) Alien species in Norway—with the Norwegian black list 2012. The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Norway.
Gladieux P, Feurtey A, Hood ME et al (2015) The population biology of fungal invasions. Mol Ecol 24:1969–1986. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13028
Gross A, Holdenrieder O, Pautasso M et al (2014) Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol Plant Pathol 15:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12073
Hawksworth D, Lücking R (2017) Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiol Spectr 5(4): FUNK-0052–2016.https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0052-2016
Hernández JR, Palm ME, Castlebury LA (2002) Puccinia hemerocallidis, cause of daylily rust, a newly introduced disease in the Americas. Plant Dis 86:1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.11.1194
Hill M, Baker R, Broad G et al (2005) Audit of non-native species in England for nature tomorrow. English Nature Research Reports. Number 662. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Hoffmeister M, Ashrafi S, Thines M, Maier W (2020) Two new species of the Peronospora belbahrii species complex, Pe. choii sp. nov. and Pe. salviae-pratensis sp. nov., and a new host for Pe. salviae-officinalis. Fungal Syst Evol 6:38–52. https://doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2020.06.03
IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany
Karasch P, Halbwachs H, Kruse J et al (2021) Pilze [in German]. In: Rabitsch W, Nehring S (eds) Naturschutzfachliche Invasivitätsbewertungen für in Deutschland wild lebende gebietsfremde terrestrische Moose, Flechten und Pilze. BfN-Skripten 603. Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Bonn, Germany
Kauserud H, Svegården IB, Sætre GP et al (2007) Asian origin and rapid global spread of the destructive dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans. Mol Ecol 16:3350–3360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03387.x
Köck G (1935) Ludwig Hecke zum Gedächtnis. Österr Bot Z 84:295–301
Kreisel H, Scholler M (1994) Chronology of phytoparasitic fungi introduced to Germany and adjacent countries. Bot Acta 107:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1994.tb00812.x
Monteiro M, Reino L, Schertler A et al (2020) A database of the global distribution of alien macrofungi. Biodivers Data J. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.E51459
Motiejūnaitė J, Markovskaja S, Kutorga E et al (2017) Alien fungi in Lithuania: list of species, current status and trophic structure. Bot Lith 23:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/botlit-2017-0016
Mułenko W, Piątek M, Wołczańska A et al (2010) Plant parasitic fungi introduced to Poland in modern times. Alien and invasive species. Biol Invasions Pol 1:43–64
Pebesma E (2018) Simple Features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector data. R J 10:439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D et al (2020) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev 95:1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.0.5
Rabitsch W, Essl F (2006) Biological invasions in Austria: patterns and case studies. Biol Invasions 8:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-7890-3
Rabitsch W, Nehring S (eds) (2021) Naturschutzfachliche Invasivitätsbewertungen für in Deutschland wild lebende gebietsfremde terrestrische Moose, Flechten und Pilze. [in German]. BfN-Skripten 603. Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Bonn, Germany
Rigling D, Prospero S (2018) Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Mol Plant Pathol 19:7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12542
RStudio Team (2021) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Version 1.1.463
Santini A, Ghelardini L, De Pace C et al (2013) Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytol 197:238–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04364.x
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE et al (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE et al (2018) Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E2264–E2273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719429115
Sikes BA, Bufford JL, Hulme PE et al (2018) Import volumes and biosecurity interventions shape the arrival rate of fungal pathogens. PLoS Biol 16:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006025
Spatafora JW, Aime MC, Grigoriev IV et al (2017) The fungal tree of life: from molecular systematics to genome-scale phylogenies. Microbiol Spectrum 5(5): FUNK-0053-2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0053-2016
Spitzen-van der Sluijs A, Martel A, Asselberghs J et al (2016) Expanding distribution of lethal amphibian fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1286–1288. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.160109
Taylor JW (2011) One Fungus = One Name: DNA and fungal nomenclature twenty years after PCR. IMA Fungus 2:113–120. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.01
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S et al (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346(6213):1256688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688
Thakur MP, van der Putten WH, Cobben MMP et al (2019) Microbial invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:621–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0236-z
Thines M (2011) Recent outbreaks of downy mildew on grape ivy (Parthenocissus tricuspidata, Vitaceae) in Germany are caused by a new species of Plasmopara. Mycol Prog 10:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-010-0712-3
Vellinga EC, Wolfe BE, Pringle A (2009) Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions. New Phytol 181:960–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02728.x
Voglmayr H, Krisai‐Greilhuber I (2002) Pilze. In: Essl F, Rabitsch W (eds). Neobiota in Österreich. Umweltbundesamt. Vienna, Austria, pp 181–195
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J et al (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Willis (ed) KJ (2018) State of the world’s fungi 2018. Report. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew
Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Wingfield BD, Barnes I (2017) The unified framework for biological invasions: a forest fungal pathogen perspective. Biol Invasions 19:3201–3214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1450-0
Yoshida K, Schuenemann VJ, Cano LM et al (2013) The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. Elife 2013:1–25. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00731
We thank very much the many colleagues who have recorded alien fungal occurrences in Austria and who have thus developed the baseline data for this study. HV is thankful to Thomas Kirisits for fruitful discussions and for providing literature. We appreciate the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers.
Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF).; Please verify relation to: Austrian Science Fund (FWF); Kindly add the collection title: Alien Floras and Faunas. AS and FE acknowledge funding by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF (Grant I 3757-B29). HV and IKG gratefully acknowledge the funding of preliminary work on updating the inventory of alien fungi of Austria by Umweltbundesamt GmbH. within the framework of the Austrian Programme for Rural Development 2014–2020.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Voglmayr, H., Schertler, A., Essl, F. et al. Alien and cryptogenic fungi and oomycetes in Austria: an annotated checklist (2nd edition). Biol Invasions 25, 27–38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02896-2