Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the efficacy of aerial culling of introduced wild deer in New Zealand with analytical decomposition of predation risk

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Native and introduced wild deer have significant unwanted impacts in many countries. Lethal control, usually by hunting, is the most cost-effective method of reducing their number and impact. However, deer habitat use varies spatially and temporally, meaning that hunters (the predator) may search in habitats with few or no deer. Also, deer may modify their behaviour in response to hunting pressure in ways that decrease the risk of being killed, reducing the efficacy of lethal control programmes. To address these issues we decomposed the predation process into its four constituent stages–prey occurrence, predator search, predators encounter prey, predators kill prey they encounter–to reveal what makes female sika deer (Cervus nippon) in the North Island, New Zealand, more susceptible to control by professional helicopter-based hunters. Female sika deer were encountered more in some habitats or landscape features than in others, but the likelihood of kill given an encounter in those habitats was not always correspondingly high. Similarly, variables that positively influenced the probabilities of encounter and kill did not similarly influence deer occurrence, and variables most likely to be searched often poorly correlated with the other predation stages. These disparities contributed to suboptimal searching for and killing of deer by helicopter-based hunters during winter and spring, but not summer. Our study demonstrates how decomposing predation risk can identify risk and refuge areas for target species, and can be used to alter tactics as target species adjust to changing predation risk. This analytical approach is highly applicable to other human hunter–prey systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R, Allan C (1997) Mountain beech forest dynamics in the Kaweka Range and the influence of browsing animals. Sci Conserv (Dep Conserv, Wellington) 44:20

    Google Scholar 

  • Andruskiw M, Fryxell JM, Thompson ID, Baker JA (2008) Habitat-mediated variation in predation risk by the American marten. Ecology 89:2273–2280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer JRF, Hewitt AE, Lynn IH, Schmidt J (2008) National mapping of landform elements in support of S-map, a New Zealand soils database. In: Zhou Q, Lees B, Tang G (eds) Advances in digital terrain analysis. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 443–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Laundré JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown TL, Decker DJ, Riley SJ, Enck JW, Lauber TB, Curtis PD, Mattfeld GF (2000) The future of hunting as a mechanism to control white-tailed deer populations. Wildl Soc Bull 28:797–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1983) The deer wars: the story of deer in New Zealand. Heinemann, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton R, Cowan P (2010) Management of animal and plant pests in New Zealand: patterns of control and monitoring by regional agencies. Wildl Res 37:360–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Christianson D (2008) Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol 23:194–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cromsigt JPGM, Kuijper DPJ, Adam M, Beschta RL, Churski M, Eycott A, Kerley GIH, Mysterud A, Schmidt K, West K (2013) Hunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts. J Appl Ecol 50:544–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MM (1973) Use of habitat by sika deer. In: Orwin J (ed) 14th FRI symposium assessment and management of introduced mammals in New Zealand forests. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, pp 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan R, Ruscoe W, Richardson S, Allen R (2006) Consequences of deer control for Kaweka mountain beech forest dynamics. Contract Report LC0607/021. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand

  • Elder NL (1959) Vegetation of the Kaweka Range. Trans Royal Soc New Zeal 87:9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth DM, Barker RJ, Morriss G, Scroggie MP (2007) Modeling the relationship between fecal pellet indices and deer density. J Wildl Manag 71:964–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth DM, Wilmshurst JM, Allen RB, Coomes DA (2010) Impacts of introduced deer and extinct moa on New Zealand ecosystems. New Zeal J Ecol 34:48–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth DM, Ramsey DSL, Veltman CJ, Allen RB, Allen WJ, Barker RJ, Jacobson CL, Nicol SJ, Richardson SJ, Todd CR (2013) When deer must die: large uncertainty surrounds changes in deer abundance achieved by helicopter- and ground-based hunting in New Zealand forests. Wildl Res 40:447–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser KW (2005) Sika deer. In: King CM (ed) The handbook of New Zealand mammals, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 428–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser KW, Cone JM, Whitford EJ (2000) A revision of the established ranges and new populations of 11 introduced ungulate species in New Zealand. J R Soc New Zeal 30:419–437

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RJ, Gill RMA (2001) Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland. Forestry 74:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervasi V, Sand H, Zimmermann B, Mattisson J, Wabakken P, Linnell JDC (2013) Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates. Ecol Appl 23:1722–1734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conserv Biol 10:1059–1067

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2009) Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90:3445–3454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH, McDonald TL (2005) Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf–elk predator–prey system. Oikos 111:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Husheer SW, Robertson AW (2005) High-intensity deer culling increases growth of mountain beech seedlings in New Zealand. Wildl Res 32:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Husheer SW, Coomes DA, Robertson AW (2003) Long-term influences of introduced deer on the composition and structure of New Zealand Nothofagus forests. For Ecol Manag 181:99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HE, Fischer JW, Hammond M, Dorsey PD, Walter WD, Anderson C, VerCauteren KC (2014) Evaluation of techniques to reduce deer and elk damage to agricultural crops. Wildl Soc Bull 38:358–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56:234–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman MJ, Varley N, Smith DW, Stahler DR, MacNulty DR, Boyce MS (2007) Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system. Ecol Lett 10:690–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr GN, Abell W (2014a) Big game hunting in New Zealand: per capita effort, harvest and expenditure in 2011–2012. New Zeal J Zool 41:124–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr GN, Abell W (2014b) Hunting for optimality: preferences for sika deer hunting experiences. In: Proceedings of the 58th Australian Agricultural & Resource Economics Society Annual Conference, Port Macquarie, Australia

  • King CM (2005) The handbook of New Zealand mammals, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham ADM, Latham MC, McCutchen NA, Boutin S (2011) Invading white-tailed deer change wolf-caribou dynamics in northeastern Alberta. J Wildl Manag 75:204–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham ADM, Latham MC, Knopff KH, Hebblewhite M, Boutin S (2013) Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines. Ecography 36:1276–1290

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham MC, Latham ADM, Webb NF, McCutchen NA, Boutin S (2014) Can occupancy–abundance models be used to monitor wolf abundance? PLoS ONE 9:e102982

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latham ADM, Gormley AM, Nugent G (2015a) Review of the Fiordland Wapiti Foundation’s management of deer in the Wapiti Area, Fiordland National Park. Contract Report LC2363. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand

  • Latham ADM, Herries D, Latham MC (2015b) Seasonal patterns of resource selection by introduced sika deer (Cervus nippon) in Kaweka Forest Park Recreational Hunting Area, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 39:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundré JW, Hernández L, Ripple WJ (2010) The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. Open Ecol J 3:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard N (2001) The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Dougl.) in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 141:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lone K, Loe LE, Meisingset EL, Stamnes I, Mysterud A (2015) An adaptive behavioural response to hunting: surviving male red deer shift habitat at the onset of the hunting season. Anim Behav 102:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli S (2011) Family Cervidae (deer). In: Wilson DE, Mittermeyer RA (eds) Handbook of the mammals of the world, vol 2. Hoofed mammals. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 350–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller KV, Marchinton RL (1995) Quality whitetails: the why and how of quality deer management. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson KL, Milleret C, Månsson J, Sand H (2014) Testing the risk of predation hypothesis: the influence of recolonizing wolves on habitat use by moose. Oecologia 176:69–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northrup JM, Hooten MB, Anderson CR, Wittemyer G (2013) Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology 94:1456–1463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent G (1992) Big-game, small-game, and gamebird hunting in New Zealand: hunting effort, harvest, and expenditure in 1988. New Zeal J Zool 19:75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent G, Fraser KW (1993) Pests or valued resources? Conflicts in management of deer. New Zeal J Zool 20:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent G, Parkes JP, Tustin KG (1987) Changes in the density and distribution of red deer and wapiti in northern Fiordland. New Zeal J Ecol 10:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.2.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.Rproject.org

  • Ramón-Laca A, Gleeson D, Yockney I, Perry M, Nugent G, Forsyth DM (2014) Reliable discrimination of 10 ungulate species using high resolution melting analysis of faecal DNA. PLoS ONE 9:e92043

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ (1998) Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs. Am Nat 151:327–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takatsuki S (2009) Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: a review. Biol Conserv 142:1922–1929

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen TT, Stewart GH (1982) The effects of introduced wild animals on New Zealand forests. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 72:372–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman CJ, Pinder DN (2001) Brushtail possum mortality and ambient temperatures following aerial poisoning using 1080. J Wildl Manag 65:476–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton B, Anderson DP, Nugent G (in press) Economic aspects of New Zealand’s wild venison recovery industry. In: Proceedings of the conservation through sustainable use of wildlife conference, University of Queensland, Brisbane

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to a number of individuals and organisations for fieldwork, in-kind support, sponsorship and/or funding (see Latham et al. 2015b). Preparation of this manuscript was funded by the Department of Conservation and Landcare Research (Core funding provided by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment). This paper is an output of Department of Conservation Investigation 4536. We thank Phil Cowan, Eelke Jongejans, Ray Prebble, Clare Veltman, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand

    A. David M. Latham, M. Cecilia Latham, Mandy Barron, Jenyffer Cruz & Dean P. Anderson

  2. Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 644, Napier, 4110, New Zealand

    Dan Herries

Authors
  1. A. David M. Latham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Cecilia Latham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dan Herries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mandy Barron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jenyffer Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dean P. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. David M. Latham.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5165 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latham, A.D.M., Cecilia Latham, M., Herries, D. et al. Assessing the efficacy of aerial culling of introduced wild deer in New Zealand with analytical decomposition of predation risk. Biol Invasions 20, 251–266 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1531-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1531-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation