Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrasting levels of evolutionary potential in populations of the invasive plant Polygonum cespitosum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The amount of quantitative genetic variation within an invasive species influences its ability to adapt to conditions in the new range and its long-term persistence. Consequently, this aspect of genetic diversity (or evolutionary potential) can be a key factor in the success of species invasions. Previous studies have compared the evolutionary potential of populations in introduced versus native ranges of invasive species, but to date no study has examined differences among introduced-range populations of such species in levels of quantitative genetic variation expressed in ecologically relevant environments. We assessed quantitative variation of fitness, life-history, and functional traits in six geographically separate introduced-range populations of the invasive annual Polygonum cespitosum, by comparing norms of reaction for a large sample of genotypes (16–19 per population) expressed in response to two glasshouse environments simulating contrasting habitats in this new range. Patterns of reaction norm diversity varied considerably among the 6 populations studied. Two populations showed very little quantitative genetic variation in both environments. In contrast, two other populations contained significant genetic variation for fitness and life-history traits in the form of genotypes with low performance in both habitats. Finally, two populations showed significant norm of reaction diversity in the form of cross-over interaction: genotypes that performed relatively well in one environment did poorly in the other. Differences among populations in potential selective response are likely to affect the dynamics and future spread of P. cespitosum, since specific populations will likely contribute differently to the invasion process. More generally, our results suggest that the evolutionary component of long-term invasion success may depend on population rather than on species-level processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Hiyaly SA, McNeily T, Bradshaw AD (1988) The effects of zinc contamination from electricity pylons—evolution in a replicated situation. New Phytol 110:571–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hiyaly SA, McNeilly T, Bradshaw AD, Mortimer AM (1993) The effect of zinc contamination from electricity pylons—genetic constraints on selection for zinc tolerance. Heredity 70:22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baguley T (2012) Serious stats: a guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Palgrave, Basingstoke

  • Baker RJ (1988) Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Can J Plant Sci 68:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black-Samuelsson S, Andersson S (1997) Reaction norm variation between and within populations of two rare plant species, Vicia pisiformis and V. dumetorum (Fabaceae). Heredity 79:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake SF (1932) Polygonum caespitosum var. longisetum in the United States. Rhodora J N Engl Bot Club 34:146–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Blows MW, Hoffmann AA (2005) A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers DL (2005) Evolution in heterogeneous environments and the potential of maintenance of genetic variation in traits of adaptive significance. Genetica 123:107–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1991) The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants—photosynthetic machinery appears adapted to brief, unpredictable periods of radiation. Bioscience 41:760–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Black TA, Adams RS (1991) Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant-area index and geometry of a forest stand. Agric For Meteorol 56:129–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Opp SB, Berlocher SH, Roderick GK (2006) Are bottlenecks associated with colonization? Genetic diversity and diapause variation of native and introduced Rhagoletis completa populations. Oecologia 149:656–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Eckert CT, Barrett SCH (2010) Evolutionary constraints on adaptive evolution during range expansion in an invasive plant. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:1799–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK (2003) Artificial selection: a powerful tool for ecologists. Ecology 84:1650–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt SJ, Siemann E, Rogers WE (2011) Geographic distribution of genetic variation among native and introduced populations of Chinese tallow tree, Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae). Am J Bot 98:1128–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008a) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008b) Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecol Lett 11:701–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K, Pyle EH, Messiqua D, Heschel MS, Schmitt J (2001) Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution 55:692–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etterson JR, Shaw RG (2001) Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Facon B, Pointier JP, Jarne P, Sarda V, David P (2008) High genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Curr Biol 18:363–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, Burnt Mill, Harlow, UK

  • Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications, New York, USA

  • Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH, Turelli M (1989) Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121:129–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mestre I, Tejedo M (2004) Contrasting patterns of quantitative and neutral genetic variation in locally adapted populations of the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Evolution 58:2343–2352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith TM, Sultan SE (2005) Shade tolerance plasticity in response to neutral vs green shade cues in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. New Phytol 166:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith TM, Sultan SE (2012) Field-based insights to the evolution of specialization: plasticity and fitness across habitats in a specialist/generalist species pair. Ecol Evol 2:778–791

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111:1169–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty BD, Le Roux JJ, Rocha OJ, Meyer J-Y, Westcott D, Wieczorek AM (2012) Getting here from there: testing the genetic paradigm underpinning introduction histories and invasion success. Divers Distrib 18:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill T, Lewicki P (eds) (2005) Statistics: methods and applications. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA

  • Holland JB, Nyquist WE, Cervantes-Martinez CT (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: an update. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 22. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Hendry AP (2005) Using invasive species to study evolution. Case studies with Drosophila and salmon. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC, Hassol SJ (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman SR, Smouse PE (2001) Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 127:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim ST, Donoghue MJ (2008) Molecular phylogeny of Persicaria (Persicarieae, Polygonaceae). Syst Bot 33:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG, Massie KR, Shlichta JG, Smith MH, Ragland GJ, Gomulkiewicz R (2007) Relating environmental variation to selection on reaction norms: an experimental test. Am Nat 169:163–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knopp T, Cano JM, Crochet P-A, Merila J (2007) Contrasting levels of variation in neutral and quantitative genetic loci on island populations of moor frogs (Rana arvalis). Conserv Genet 8:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Schettino LRG, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos JB (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3883–3888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux JJ, Wieczorek AM, Wright MG, Tran CT (2007) Super-genotype: global monoclonality defies the odds of nature. PLoS One 2:e590

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE, Gelembiuk GW (2008) Evolutionary origins of invasive populations. Evol Appl 1:427–448

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vila M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P (2004) Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol Monogr 74:261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matesanz S, Gianoli E, Valladares F (2010) Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matesanz S, Horgan-Kobelski T, Sultan SE (2012) Phenotypic plasticity and population differentiation in an ongoing species invasion. PLoS One 12:e44955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrhoff LJ, Silander JAJ, Leicht SA, Mosher ES, Tabak NM (2003) IPANE. Invasive plant atlas of New England. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. http://www.ipane.org. Accessed Nov 2012

  • Miehls ALJ, Peacor SD, McAdam AG (2011) Genetic and maternal effects on tail spine and body length in the invasive spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longimanus). Evol Appl 5:306–316

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5446–5451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novak SJ (2007) The role of evolution in the invasion process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3671–3672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Rodriguez J, Loik ME (2003) An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptation and general-purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conserv Biol 17:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson AK (2000) Range expansion of Polygonum caespitosum var. longisetum in the United States. Bartonia 60:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team tRDC (2012) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-105

  • Prentis PJ, Wilson JR, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ (2008) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci 13:288–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE et al (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Thiede DA (2005) Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytol 166:319–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE (2001) Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology 82:328–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE (2007) Development in context: the timely emergence of eco-devo. Trends Ecol Evol 22:575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993a) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. 1. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47:1009–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993b) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. 2. Norms of reaction to soil moisture and the maintenance of genetic diversity. Evolution 47:1032–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Wilczek AM, Hann SD, Brosi BJ (1998) Contrasting ecological breadth of co-occurring annual Polygonum species. J Ecol 86:363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE, Horgan-Kobelski T, Nichols LM, Riggs C, Waples R (2012) A resurrection study reveals rapid adaptive evolution within populations of an invasive plant. Evol Appl 6:266–278

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Allen MT, Pearcy RW (1997) Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occurring along a light gradient. Oecologia 111:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2008) Adaptive rather than non-adaptive evolution of Mimulus guttatus in its invasive range. Basic Appl Ecol 9:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B (2002) Experimental life-history evolution: selection on the allocation to sexual reproduction and its plasticity in a clonal plant. Evolution 56:2168–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentince Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sophie Ackoff, Lizzie Greenwald, Caleb Corliss, Nora Vogel, Peri Mason and Sara Rood-Ojalvo for their inestimable help during data collection. The authors are especially grateful to Jacob Herman for valuable discussion and to Prof. Dr. Txema Iriondo for kindly revising the manuscript. The study was funded by a Marie Curie IOF Fellowship (European Commission FP7) awarded to Silvia Matesanz, and by a Wesleyan University Project Grant to Sonia E. Sultan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Matesanz.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matesanz, S., Horgan-Kobelski, T. & Sultan, S.E. Contrasting levels of evolutionary potential in populations of the invasive plant Polygonum cespitosum . Biol Invasions 16, 455–468 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0533-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0533-9

Keywords

Navigation