Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of Steinernema feltiae against the leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella in laboratory and field conditions

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The susceptibility of larvae of the leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) to different concentrations of an autochthonous strain of Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) was examined in laboratory experiments using Petri dishes. The efficacy of this strain in pots and field experiments was also evaluated. High mortality (80%–100%) of leek moth larvae was observed when these larvae were exposed to low concentrations (3 × 103 to 1 × 104 IJs/m2) of S. feltiae under laboratory conditions. Foliar application of 30,000 IJs/leek in pot experiments caused a 98% reduction in leek moth larvae. Field experiments showed a 87.7% reduction of leek moth larvae with the nematode treatment, significantly higher than the 22% reduction with the Bacillus thuringiensis treatment. The efficacy of the treatments with S. feltiae in relation to the microhabitat of the leek moth larvae between the interfolded leaves of the leek is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arthurs S, Heinz KM, Prasifka JR (2004) An analysis of using entomopathogenic nematodes against above-ground pest. Bull Entomol Res 94:297–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asman K (2002) Trap cropping effect on oviposition behaviour of the leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella and the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella. Entomol Exp Appl 105(2/3):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bari MA, Kaya HK (1984) Evaluation of the entomogenous nematodes Neoaplectana carpocapsae (=Steinernema feltiae) Weiser (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var kurstaki for suppression of the artichoke plume moth (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae). J Econ Entomol 77:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélair G, Wright DJ, Curto G (2005) Vegetable and tuber crop applications. In: Nematodes as Biological Agents. Grewal PS, Ehlers RU, Shapiro-Ilan DI (eds) CABI Publishing, London UK, pp 255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélair G, Vincent C, Chouinard G (1998) Foliar spray with Steinernema carpocapsae against early-season apple pest. J Nematol 30:599–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boscher J (1983) Effect of the phytophage Acrolepiopsis assectella Zell. on the foliar demography of Allium porrum L. Acta Oecol Oecol Planta 4(4):335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Goix J (1986) The leek tineid. Phytoma 379:37

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood P, Halstead A (1997) Pest and Diseases. Dorling Kindersley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal PS, Georgis R (1998) Entomopathogenic nematodes. In: Hall F.R., Menn JJ. (eds) Biopesticides: Use and Delivery. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, pp 271–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hara AH, Kaya HK, Gaugler R, Lebeck LM, Mello CL (1993) Entomopathogenic nematodes for biological control of the leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Entomophaga 38:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Walters KFA (2003) Augmentation biological control utilising the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema feltiae, against the South American leafminer, Lyriomyza huidobrensis. Proceeding of the 1st International Symposium on Biological Control (Hawaii, USA, 13–18 January 2002). USDA Forest Service, FHTET-03–05, pp 136–140

  • Hommes M (1992) Simple control thresholds for foliage pests of leek. Bull OILB SROP 15(4):115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Isart J, Frerot B, Chichon FM (1982) First test of control by mating disruption against the leek moth: Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller) in the Barcelona region. Les médiateurs chimiques agissant sur le comportement des insectes. Symposium international. Versailles, 16–20 novembre 1981.pp 373–387

  • Kaya HK, Gaugler R (1993) Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annu Rev Entomol 38:181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya HK, Hara AH, Reardon RC (1981) Laboratory and field evaluation of Neoaplectana carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) against the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the Western Spruce Budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomol 113(9):787–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumond C, Mauléon H, Kermarrec A (1979) Données nouvelles sur le spectre d’hôtes et le parasitisme du nématode entomophage Neoaplectana carpocapsae. Entomophaga 24(1):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legutowska H, Plaskota E (1986) Influence des conditions d’environment et de culture sur deux ravageurs des plantes maraicherères : la mouche de la carotte Psila rosae Fab. Et la teigne du poireau Acrolepiopsis assectella. In: Impacts de la structure des paysages agricoles sur la protection des cultures, Poznan, 9–14 Septembre, 1985. Ed. by INRA, Paris : Les Colloque de l’INRA 36, 61–73

  • Lorenz N, Zimmermann O, Hassan SA (2003) Use of Trochogramma parasitoids against the leek moth (Acrolepiopsis assectella, Lep. Plutellidae) for the solution of plant protection problems in organic farming. DGaaE Nachrichten 1:19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason JM, Wright DJ (1997) Potential of the control of Plutella xylostella larvae with entomopathogenic nematodes. J Invertebr Pathol 70:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minks AK, Voerman S, Theunissen J (1994) Improved sex attractant for the leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella Zell. (Lep., Acrolepiidae). J Appl Entomol 117(3):243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyrop J, Shelton A, Theunissen J (1989) Value of a control decision rule for leek moth infestation in leek. Entomol Exp Appl 53:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaskota E, Dabrowski ZT (1986) Biological principles of leek moth (Acrolepia assectella Zeller, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) control. 1. Host plants damage caused by leek moth larvae and leek moth parasites. Ann Warsew Agric Univ SGGW-AR Hortic 13:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn R (1982) Sex-pheromone trapping of the leek moth, Acrolepiopsis assectella Z. (Lepid. Yponomeutidae - Acrolepiinae) using Z 11 H DAL. Results of the 1981 programme. Agronomie 2(10):957–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart GC (1995) Entomopathogenic nematodes for the biological control of insect. J Nematol 27(4S):529–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thibout E (1988) The specificity of Diadromus pulchellus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) towards its host Acrolepiopsis assectella, the leek moth. Entomophaga 33(4):439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GF (1927) A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from cultures. Science 66:302–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodring JL, Kaya HK (1988) Steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes: A handbook of techniques. South Co-operative Serv Bull 331:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann O (2004) Use of Tricogramma wasp in Germany: present status of research and commercial application of egg parasitoids against lepidopterous pest for crop and storage protection. Gesunde Pflanzen 56(6):157–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ricard Sorribes of the Plant Protection Service of the Agricultural Department of the Catalan Government for his technical support in the field experiments and we also thank Mark Burch for the English correction of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando García del Pino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García del Pino, F., Morton, A. Efficacy of Steinernema feltiae against the leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella in laboratory and field conditions. BioControl 53, 643–650 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9106-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9106-0

Keywords

Navigation