Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Geotechnical Seismic Isolation (GSI) is defined as a category of seismic isolation techniques that are in direct contact with geomaterials and of which the isolation mechanism primarily involves geotechnics (Tsang 2009). The term GSI was coined based on an analogy between conventional “Structural” seismic isolation and new “Geotechnical” seismic isolation. Over the past decade, GSI has diversified and gained momentum through extensive research and development. This special issue aims to give readers a taste of the variety and promise of GSI systems, which are briefly discussed below with respect to their isolation mechanisms, choice of materials and research methodologies.
GSI will lead to a paradigm shift in earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures. GSI does not require modifications to the structural systems or architectural features. Instead, minor changes to the foundation systems may be required in some cases. The key to GSI is compliance, intervention and/or separation at the interface between the foundation and surrounding geomaterials, whether natural or modified. This approach enables seismic energy to be dissipated, by various means, before it can reach the structure. This can effectively fulfil the low-damage performance requirement as part of resilience-based seismic design. GSI systems can be classified into three main branches based on their isolation mechanisms:
-
1.
Dynamic soil-foundation-structure interaction and its favourable effects can be facilitated in a controlled manner by modifying the foundation soils to lengthen the natural period of the system and dissipate seismic wave energy without causing undesirable permanent ground deformations. Half of the articles in this special issue focus on GSI systems that are based on this mechanism (Aloisio et al. 2022; Bernal‑Sanchez et al. 2023; Chiaro et al. 2022; Dhanya et al. 2023; Edinçliler and Yildiz 2023; Tsang 2022; Vratsikidis and Pitilakis 2022).
-
2.
Controlled sliding between the structural foundation and surrounding geomaterials can be designed by introducing a low-friction interface to limit the amount of seismic energy transmitted onto the structure. The sliding displacement can be designed to occur within an acceptable range. This GSI mechanism is featured in two articles in this special issue (Banović et al. 2022; Tsiavos et al. 2022).
-
3.
Vibration scattering or filtering, as well as various forms of damping, can be utilised to dissipate seismic energy outside the structure. This special issue presents five different GSI systems of varying configurations that belong to this branch (Forcellini and Alzabeebee 2022; Gatto et al. 2022; Hazarika et al. 2023; Nikitas and Bhattacharya 2023; Somma and Flora 2023).
In addition to reducing structural demands such as inter-storey drift and structural or ground acceleration, GSI can also mitigate liquefaction potential, as demonstrated in the studies conducted by Bernal‑Sanchez et al. (2023) and Nikitas and Bhattacharya (2023) based on the use of mixtures of soil and waste tyre rubber granules. This illustrates the potential for GSI to provide a more comprehensive seismic design solution that considers not only structural demands but also soil liquefaction.
A wide range of materials have been explored for creating GSI systems. Amongst these, rubber-soil mixtures have been the most researched materials (Bernal-Sanchez et al. 2023; Chiaro et al. 2022; Dhanya et al. 2023; Forcellini and Alzabeebee 2022; Nikitas and Bhattacharya 2023; Vratsikidis and Pitilakis 2022), whilst there is a case study with the use of whole waste tyres (Hazarika et al. 2023). Meanwhile, other materials have also been investigated, including EPS beads (Edinçliler and Yildiz 2023), geosynthetics (Banović et al. 2022; Dhanya et al. 2023), stone pebbles (Banović et al. 2022), sand, timber and PVC (Tsiavos et al. 2022), polyurethane (Gatto et al. 2022), super absorbent polymers (SAP) (Somma and Flora 2023), as well as various high-damping (Aloisio et al. 2022) and low-modulus materials (Tsang 2022).
On the other hand, investigation of GSI involves utilising a wide range of research tools and skills. This includes analytical and numerical modelling of soil-foundation-structure systems (Aloisio et al. 2022; Chiaro et al. 2022; Forcellini and Alzabeebee 2022; Gatto et al. 2022; Hazarika et al. 2023; Somma and Flora 2023; Tsang 2022). Laboratory testing of material samples has also been carried out (Dhanya et al. 2023; Gatto et al. 2022; Hazarika et al. 2023; Nikitas and Bhattacharya 2023; Somma and Flora 2023), along with characterising geomaterials at the particle scale (Bernal-Sanchez et al. 2023). Shaking table testing (Banović et al. 2022; Dhanya et al. 2023; Edinçliler and Yildiz 2023; Nikitas and Bhattacharya 2023; Tsiavos et al. 2022) and field measurements (Hazarika et al. 2023; Vratsikidis and Pitilakis 2022) have been conducted as well. In addition, practical design models and parameters have been proposed for designing GSI systems (Aloisio et al. 2022; Somma and Flora 2023; Tsang 2022).
Overall, this special issue highlights the promise of GSI to reduce seismic vulnerability of various types of structures, such as buildings, bridges, and embankments. The use of locally available and low-cost materials can also enhance the sustainability and affordability of GSI. This new research area offers unlimited opportunities for geotechnical, structural and material engineers to harness their creativity, uncover their complementary expertise and ignite a new passion.
The submissions to this special issue were by invitation only, with each author limited to contributing one article. We gratefully acknowledge the valuable contributions of all the invited authors from different parts of the world. We also extend our appreciation to the international board of peer reviewers, who provided useful and constructive comments and suggestions. Finally, we would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Professor Dr Atilla Ansal, for launching this special issue and making the final decision on each manuscript, and the Executive Editor, Petra van Steenbergen, for her guidance and support throughout the whole process.
In closing, GSI is an emerging category of earthquake protection methods and technologies that aim to enhance infrastructure resilience, promote environmental sustainability, and ensure universal seismic safety for all beings in the world. It contributes to the achievement of several UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as the development of resilient infrastructure and cities, the promotion of circular economy, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and the alleviation of poverty and inequality. More information about GSI can be found at the following website: https://www.gsi-global.org/ or https://sites.google.com/view/gsi-global
References
Aloisio A, Contento A, Xue J, Fu R, Fragiacomo M, Briseghella B (2022) Probabilistic formulation for the q-factor of piles with damping pre-hole. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01497-7
Banović I, Radnić J, Grgić N, Semren K (2022) Effectiveness of several low-cost geotechnical seismic isolation methods: a shake-table study. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01481-1
Bernal-Sanchez J, Leak J, Barreto D (2023) Rubber–soil mixtures: use of grading entropy theory to evaluate stiffness and liquefaction susceptibility. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01673-3
Chiaro G, Palermo A, Banasiak L, Tasalloti A, Granello G, Hernandez E (2022) Seismic response of low-rise buildings with eco-rubber geotechnical seismic isolation (ERGSI) foundation system: numerical investigation. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01584-9
Dhanya JS, Fouzul MA, Banerjee S, Boominathan A, Zhussupbekov A (2023) Shaking table experiments on framed structure resting on geogrid reinforced geotechnical seismic isolation system. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01687-x
Edinçliler A, Yildiz Ö (2023) Shaking table tests on geotechnical seismic isolation for medium-rise buildings using EPS beads-sand mixtures. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01587-6
Forcellini D, Alzabeebee S (2022) Seismic fragility assessment of geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) for bridge configuration. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01356-5
Gatto MPA, Lentini V, Montrasio L (2022) Dynamic properties of polyurethane from resonant column tests for numerical GSI study. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01412-0
Hazarika H, Kuribayashi K, Kuroda S, Hu Y (2023) Performance evaluation of waste tires in protecting embankment against earthquake loading. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01690-2
Nikitas G, Bhattacharya S (2023) Experimental study on sand–tire chip mixture foundations acting as a soil liquefaction countermeasure. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01667-1
Somma F, Flora A (2023) SAP–sand mixtures as a geotechnical seismic isolation technology: from the dynamic characterization to a simple analytical design approach. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01660-8
Tsang HH (2009) Geotechnical seismic isolation. Earthquake Engineering: New Research. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, USA, pp 55–87
Tsang HH (2022) Analytical design models for geotechnical seismic isolation systems. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01469-x
Tsiavos A, Kolyfetis D, Panzarasa G, Burgert I, Stojadinovic B (2022) Shaking table investigation of a low–cost and sustainable timber–based energy dissipation system with recentering ability. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01464-2
Vratsikidis A, Pitilakis D (2022) Field testing of gravel–rubber mixtures as geotechnical seismic isolation. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01541-6
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tsang, HH., Pitilakis, K. Preface for the special issue on geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI). Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 3745–3748 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01694-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01694-y