Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic response of low-rise buildings with eco-rubber geotechnical seismic isolation (ERGSI) foundation system: numerical investigation

  • S.i. : Geotechnical Seismic Isolation
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence caused extensive damage to over 6000 residential buildings in Christchurch and highlighted an urgent need to improve the resilience of the housing sector. As a result, the authors have developed the eco-rubber geotechnical seismic isolation (ERGSI) foundation system for new low-rise buildings. It is a cost-effective and sustainable technology that integrates a horizontal geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) layer—i.e. a deformable seismic energy dissipative filter made of gravel–rubber mixtures (GRMs)—and a flexible rubberised concrete (RuC) raft footing. The present study aims at evaluating the performance of an ideal ERGSI system in dissipating seismic energy and assessing the seismic response of two-storey RC framed structures placed on the ERGSI system. Firstly, results of laboratory investigations are presented and ideal GRM and RuC for use in ERGSI systems are identified. Hence, OpenSees finite-element numerical investigations and spectral acceleration analyses are undertaken for a 900 mm-thick GRM layer with 40% rubber content by volume. Further, time-history dynamic analyses—carried out by SeismoStruct software—are presented and discussed for two ERGSI-isolated RC framed structures having natural period of 0.3 s and 0.5 s. The results obtained for the ERGSI-isolated structures are finally compared with those obtained for two non-isolated framed structures placed on a traditional foundation (i.e. RC footing placed on a compacted gravel layer). This study demonstrates that the seismic demand (i.e. peak acceleration measured at the structure top-floor, lateral deformation at each floor and base shear) on low-rise buildings can be significantly reduced by using ERSGI foundation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Banasiak LJ, Chiaro G, Palermo A, Granello G (2021) Environmental implications of the recycling of end-of-life tires in seismic-isolation foundation systems. Lect Notes Civ Eng 144:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banasiak LJ, Chiaro G, Palermo A, Granello G (2019) Recycling of end-of-life tyres in civil engineering applications: environmental implications. In: proceedings of the WasteMINZ 2019 conference, Hamilton, New Zealand, pp. 15

  • Banović I, Radnić J, Grgić N (2019) Geotechnical seismic isolation system based on sliding mechanism using stone pebble layer: shake-table experiments. Shock Vib 2019:9346232

    Google Scholar 

  • Bompa DV, Elghazouli AY, Xu B, Stafford PJ, Ruiz-Teran AM (2017) Experimental assessment and constitutive modelling of rubberised concrete materials. Constr Build Mater 137:246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet S, de la Llera JC, Kausel E (2016) Non-linear modeling of seismic isolation systems made of recycled tire-rubber. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission (CERC) (2012) CERC Volume 3: Low-Damage Building Technologies

  • Canterbury residential technical guidance (2012) - Part a: Technical Guidance, pp.120

  • Chew K, Chiaro G, Vinod JS, Tasalloti A, Allulakshmi K (2022) Direct shear behavior of gravel-rubber mixtures: discrete element modeling and microscopic investigations. Soils Found 66(2):101156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaro G, Tasalloti A, Banasiak L, Palermo A, Granello G, Rees S (2020) Sustainable recycling of end-of-life tyres in civil (geotechnical) engineering applications: turning issues into opportunities in the New Zealand context. NZ Geomech News 99:38–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaro G, Palermo A, Granello G, Tasalloti A, Banasiak LJ (2021) Reuse of waste tires to develop eco-rubber seismic-isolation foundation systems. Lect Notes Civ Eng 144:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaro G, Tasalloti A, Chew K, Vinod JS, Allulakshmi K (2022a) Macro- and micro-scale engineering response of rigid-soft gravel-rubber inclusions: insights from detailed laboratory and DEM numerical investigations. Lect Notes Civ Eng 196:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaro G, Palermo A, Granello G, Tasalloti A, Stratford C, Banasiak LJ (2019) Eco-rubber seismic-isolation foundation systems: a cost-effective way to build resilience. In: proceedings of the 2019 Pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 8

  • Chiaro G, Palermo A, Banasiak LJ, Granello G (2019) Direct shear behaviour of gravel-granulated tyre rubber mixtures. In: proceedings of the 13th ANZ geomechanics conference, Perth, Australia, pp. 221–226

  • Chiaro G, Tasalloti A, Palermo A Banasiak L (2022b) Small-strain shear stiffness and strain-dependent dynamic properties of gravel-rubber mixtures. In: proceedings of the 17th symposium of earthquake engineering, Roorkee, India, pp. 10

  • Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, London, p 784

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanya JS, Boominathan A, Banerjee S (2020) Response of low-rise building with geotechnical seismic isolation systems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 136:106187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldin NN, Senouci AB (1992) Engineering properties of rubberized concrete. Can J Civ Eng 19(5):912–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippou FC, Popov EP and Bertero VV (1983) Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete joints. Report EERC 83-19, earthquake engineering research center, University of California, Berkeley, United States

  • Forcellini D (2020) Assessment of geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) as a mitigation technique for seismic hazard events. Geosciences 10(6):222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcellini D (2021) Fragility assessment of geotechnical seismic isolated (GSI) configurations. Energies 14(16):5088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcellini D, Chiaro G, Palermo A, Banasiak L (2022) Numerical evaluation of the seismic performance of GSI foundation systems for buildings using gravel-rubber mixtures. In: proceedings of the 17th symposium of earthquake engineering, Roorkee, India, pp. 8.

  • Hazarika H, Abdullah A (2016) Improvement effects of two and three dimensional geosynthetics used in liquefaction countermeasures. JGS Special Publ 2(68):2336–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez E, Palermo A, Granello G, Chiaro G, Banasiak L (2020) Eco-rubber seismic-isolation foundation system, a sustainable solution for the New Zealand context. Struct Eng Int 30(2):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez E, Liu R, Palermo A, Chiaro G, Scott A (2021) Rubberised concrete: material characterisation and mechanical behaviour. In: proceedings of the 2021 NZ concrete conference, Rotorua, NZ, pp. 11.

  • Indraratna B, Qi Y, Ngo TN, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Neville T, Ferreira BS, Shahkolahi A (2019) Use of geogrids and recycled rubber in railroad infrastructure for enhanced performance. Geosciences 9:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail MK, Hassan AAA (2016) Ductility and cracking behavior of reinforced self-consolidating rubberized concrete beams. J Mater Civ Eng 29(1):04016174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam WY, Pampanin S, Elwood K (2011) Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttelton) earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 44(4):239–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JM (2002) Seismic isolation systems for developing countries. Earthq Spectra 18(3):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HK, Santamarina JC (2008) Sand–rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Can Geotech J 45:1457–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikitas G, Bhattacharya S, Hyodo M, Konja A and Mitoulis S (2014) Use of rubber for improving the performance of domestic buildings against seismic liquefaction. In: proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural dynamics, EURODYN 2014, Porto, Portugal, pp. 259–265

  • Lin SL, Uma SR, Nayerloo M, Buxton R, King A (2014) Engineering characterisation of building performance with detailed engineering evaluation (DEE) data from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. In: ASEC 2014 conference: structural engineering in Australasia, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Lin SL, Uma SR, King AB, Buxton R, Horspool NA (2016) A compiled and extensible database for building damage from the 2010–2011 earthquake sequence in Canterbury, New Zealand. GNS Science Report, Lower Hutt, Wellington

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114:1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2007) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees): OpenSees command language manual. PEER Center, University of California, Berkeley, United States, p 451

    Google Scholar 

  • Menegotto M and Pinto P (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and nonelastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. IABSE symposium: resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, Final Report, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Paolella L, Scapagna RL, Chiaro G, Modoni G (2021) A simplified vulnerability model for the extensive liquefaction risk assessment of buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 19:3933–3961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasha SMK, Hazarika K, Yoshimoto N (2019) Physical and mechanical properties of gravel-tire chips mixture (GTCM). Geosynth Int 26(1):92–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K, Karapetrou S, Tsagdi K (2015) Numerical investigation of the seismic response of RC buildings on soil replaced with rubber-sand mixtures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 79:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis D, Anastasiadis A, Vratsikidis A, Kapouniaris A, Massimino MR, Abate G, Corsico S (2021) Large-scale field testing of geotechnical seismic isolation of structures using gravel-rubber mixtures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 50(10):2712–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redstall S (2016). NZ in 2023: Where will be booming? Newshub, 23 May 2016. http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2016/11/nz-in-2023-where-will-be-booming.html (accessed on 21 May 2022).

  • Seismosoft. SeismoStruct 2021 A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Available online: http://www.seismosoft.com (accessed on 9 March 2021)

  • Senetakis K, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2012) Dynamic properties of dry sand/rubber (RSM) and gravel/rubber (GRM) mixtures in a wide range of shearing strain amplitudes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 33:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasalloti A, Chiaro G, Palermo A, Banasiak LJ (2020) Effect of rubber crumbs volumetric content on the shear strength of gravelly soil in direct shear apparatus. ASCE Geotech Special Publ 319:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasalloti A, Chiaro G, Banasiak L, Palermo A (2021a) Experimental investigation of the mechanical behaviour of gravel-granulated tyre rubber mixtures. Constr Build Mater 273:121749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasalloti A, Chiaro G, Murali A, Banasiak L (2021b) Physical and mechanical properties of granulated rubber mixed with granular soils – a literature review. Sustainability 13(8):4309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasalloti A, Chiaro G, Murali A, Banasiak L, Palermo A, Granello G (2021c) Recycling of end-of-life tires (ELTs) for sustainable geotechnical applications: a New Zealand perspective. Appl Sci 11(17):7824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasalloti A, Chiaro G, Young J, Ross O, Palermo A and Granello G (2021d). Experimental seismic characterisation of gravel-granulated tyre mixtures and design implications. In: proceedings of the 2021d NZSEE annual conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, p. 10

  • Tsang HH (2008) Seismic isolation by rubber–soil mixtures for developing countries. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 37(2):283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH (2009) Geotechnical seismic isolation. Earthquake engineering: new research. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, U.S., pp 55–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH, Pitilakis K (2019) Mechanism of geotechnical seismic isolation system: analytical modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 122:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH, Lo SH, Xu X, Neaz Sheikh M (2012) Seismic isolation for low-to-medium-rise buildings using granulated rubber-soil mixtures: numerical study. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 41(14):2009–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH, Tran DP, Hung WY, Pitilakis K, Gad EF (2021) Performance of geotechnical seismic isolation system using rubber-soil mixtures in centrifuge testing. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 50(5):1271–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiavos A, Alexander NA, Diambra A, Ibrahim E, Vardanega PJ, Gonzales-Buelga A, Sextos A (2019) A sand-rubber deformable granular layer as low-cost seismic isolation strategy in developing countries: experimental investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 125:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrewise (2020) Regulated product stewardship for end of life tyres, Tyrewise 2.0. Updated 783 Report, pp. 261

  • Ministry for the Environment (2015). Waste tyres economic research. Report 3, May 2015, p. 87

  • Yang Z, Elgamal A, Parra E (2003) A computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(12):1119–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment of New Zealand (MBIE Smart Ideas Endeavour Research Grant No. 56289) and QuakeCoRE, a New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission-funded Centre. This is QuakeCoRE paper No. 0763. The support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Mr Kevin Chew for his assistance with the DEM numerical simulations, Dr Davide Forcellini for his assistance with the OpenSees numerical simulations and Dr Royce Liu for his assistance with laboratory testing. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of MBIE and QuakeCoRE.

Funding

The authors have received research support from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment of New Zealand (MBIE Smart Ideas Endeavour Research Grant No. 56289) and QuakeCoRE, a New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission-funded Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand

    Gabriele Chiaro, Alessandro Palermo, Ali Tasalloti, Gabriele Granello & Ernesto Hernandez

  2. Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand

    Laura Banasiak

Authors
  1. Gabriele Chiaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro Palermo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Banasiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Tasalloti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriele Granello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ernesto Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: GC and AP; Formal analysis: GC, AT, GG and EH; Funding acquisition: GC, AP and LB; Investigation: GC, AT and EH; Methodology: GC, AP, GG and LB; Project administration: GC and AP; Supervision: GC and AP; Writing-original draft: GC and EH; Writing-review and editing: AP, GG and LB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Chiaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiaro, G., Palermo, A., Banasiak, L. et al. Seismic response of low-rise buildings with eco-rubber geotechnical seismic isolation (ERGSI) foundation system: numerical investigation. Bull Earthquake Eng 21, 3797–3821 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01584-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01584-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation