Skip to main content
Log in

Refinements to the Silvestri’s theory for the evaluation of the seismic actions in flat-bottom silos containing grain-like material

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seismic behavior of flat-bottom silos containing grain-like material still presents strong uncertainties and current design codes tend to provide too conservative formulations for the estimation of the seismic actions. Over the years, some researchers focused on the dynamic behavior of such silos mainly through numerical investigations. Analytical formulations for the evaluation of the pressures exerted by the ensiled grain on the silo wall under seismic excitation were developed by Younan and Veletsos (J Struct Eng ASCE 124(1):62–70 1998) and, more recently, by Silvestri et al. (Bull Earthq Eng 10(5):1535–1560 2012). Experimental shaking-table tests were performed on silo specimens (Silvestri et al. EESD 2015, submitted), which showed good agreement with the Silvestri’s analytical formulations, even if some theoretical limits of validity were not satisfied. This has encouraged a complete revision and refinements of the theoretical framework, which is the object of this paper. In detail, the static and the dynamic actions exchanged between different grain portions and between the grain and the silo wall are idealised in a more physically consistent way. The analytical developments are carried out by means of simple free-body dynamic equilibrium equations. The refinements yield to a significant extension of the theoretical limits of validity and to a new set of analytical formulas for the wall pressures and for the wall shear and bending moment. A comparison of the analytical formulas with (i) the consolidated Janssen (Zeitschrift des vereines deutcher Ingenieure 39:1045–1049 1895) and Koenen (Centralblatt der Bauverwaltung 16:446–449 1896) theory for static design of silos and (ii) with the Eurocode 8 provisions for seismic design of silos and with the experimental results is also performed in order to (i) check the updated theoretical model in static conditions and (ii) verify the reliability of the different formulations in accelerated conditions, respectively. The refined theory confirms that the portion of ensiled material that interacts with the silo wall is significantly smaller than the effective mass suggested by Eurocode 8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Concrete Institute (ACI) (1997) Standard practice for design and construction of concrete silos and stacking tubes for storing granular materials and commentary. ACI 313-97/313-R97, Farmington Hills, MI

  • Amundson LR (1945) Determination of band stresses and lateral wheat pressures for a cylindrical grain bin. Agric Eng 26:321–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold PC, McLean AG, Roberts AW (1980) Bulk solids: storage, flow and handling. TUNRA. Bulk solids handling research association. University of Newcastle, Australia

  • Ayuga F (2008, June) Some unresolved problems in the design of steel cylindrical silos. In: International conference on structures and granular solids-from scientific principles to engineering applications. The Royal society of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp 123–133

  • Buisman ASK (1940) Grondmechanika, Waltman. EN 1998-4 (2006) Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 4 -Silos, tanks and pipelines. CEN, Brussels

  • Foti D, Ivorra S, Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Di Chiacchio L (2013) ASESGRAM Assessment of the seismic behavior of flat‐bottom silos containing grain‐like materials SERIES seismic engineering research infrastructures for European synergies (http://www.series.upatras.gr/ASESGRAM)

  • Hirshfeld D, Rapaport DC (2001) Granular flow from a silo: discrete-particle simulations in three dimensions. Eur Phys J E 4(2):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler S, Meskouris K (2006) Granular material silos under dynamic excitation: numerical simulation and experimental validation. J Struct Eng 132(10):1573–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson JA (1903) Grain pressures in deep bins. CSCE Trans 17:554–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen H (1895) Versuche uber Getreidedruck in Silozellen. Zeitschrift des vereines deutcher Ingenieure. In: s.l.:s.n. 39:1045–1049

  • Koenen M (1896) Berechnung des Seiten und Bodendrucks in Silozellen, Centralblatt der Bauverwaltung. In: s.l.:s.n. 16:446–449

  • Landry JW, Grest GS, Silbert LE, Plimpton SJ (2003) Confined granular packings: structure, stress, and forces. Phys Rev E 67(4):041303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra P (2000) Practical nonlinear seismic analysis of tanks. Earthq Spectra 16(2):473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi SC, Ogilvie JR, Norris ER (1977) Silage pressures in tower silos. Part 3. Experimental model studies and comparison with. Can Agric Eng 19(2):107–110

  • NEHRP (2009). Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P750, Washington D.C

  • Ovarlez G, Fond C, Clément E (2003) Overshoot effect in the Janssen granular column: a crucial test for granular mechanics. Phys Rev E 67(6):060302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankine WM (1857) On the stability of loose earth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 147:9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter JM, Hull TS (1989) Wall loads in squat steel silos during earthquakes. Eng Struct 11(3):139–147

  • Rotter JM, Holst JM, Ooi JY, Sanad AM (1998) Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 356:2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab CV, Ross IJ, White GM, Colliver DG (1994) Wheat loads and vertical pressure distribution in a full-scale bin part I—filling. Trans ASAE 37(5):1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Trombetti T, Foti D (2012) On the evaluation of the horizontal forces produced by grain-like material inside silos during earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 10(5):1535–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri S, Ivorra S, Di Chiacchio L, Trombetti T, Foti D, Gasparini G, Pieraccini L, Dietz M, Taylor C (2015) Shaking-table tests of flat-bottom silos containing grain-like material. EESD (submitted on date 08/04/2014)

  • Tatko R, Kobielak S (2008) Horizontal bulk material pressure in silo subjected to impulsive load. Shock Vib 15:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trahair NS, Abel A, Ansourian P, Irvine HM, Rotter JM (1983) Structural design of steel bins for bulk solids. Australian Institute of Steel Construction, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanel L, Claudin P, Bouchaud JP, Cates ME, Clément E, Wittmer JP (2000) Stresses in silos: comparison between theoretical models and new experiments. Phys Rev Lett 84(7):1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Younan AH (1998) Dynamics of solid-containing tanks. II: flexible tanks. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(1):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R, Noh SY, Butenweg C, Meskouris K (2002) Seismic excited granular material silos. In: Proceedings of Eurodyn, pp. 253–258

  • Woodcock CR, Mason JS (eds) (1988) Bulk solids handling: an introduction to the practice and technology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokota H, Sugita M, Mita I (1983) Vibration tests and analyses of coal-silo model. In: Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on the Design of Silos for Strength and Flow, S (pp 107–116)

  • Younan AH, Veletsos AS (1998) Dynamics of solid-containing tanks I: rigid tanks. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(1):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support received from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program [FP7/2007-2013] under Grant Agreement N° 227887 for the SERIES Project (ASESGRAM project: “Assessment of the seismic behaviour of flat-bottom silos containing grain-like materials”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Pieraccini.

Appendix: Notation

Appendix: Notation

The following symbols are used in the paper:

p 0(z)

Horizontal grain-wall pressure for the Janssen and Koenen theory

p v (z)

Vertical grain–grain pressure for the Janssen and Koenen theory

τ 0(z)

Vertical frictional grain-wall stress for the Janssen and Koenen theory

μ GW

Grain-wall friction coefficient

μ GG

Grain-grain friction coefficient

μ GB

Grain-bottom friction coefficient

γ (N/m3)

Specific weigh of the ensiled material

λ

Pressure ratio between horizontal and mean of the vertical pressures

R (m)

Internal radius of the silo

H (m)

Height of the ensiled material inside the silo

z (m)

Distance of a generic grain layer from the top free-surface of the content

Δp n,GW (ϑ) (N/m2)

Radial additional pressure for the Trahair formulation

Δp ϑ,GW (ϑ) (N/m2)

Circumferential additional pressure for the Trahair formulation

α g

Ratio of the constant horizontal acceleration to the gravity acceleration g

g

[m/s2] Gravity acceleration

f

Slenderness function

α(z)

Ratio of the response acceleration of the silo at a vertical distance z form the equivalent surface of the stored content, to the acceleration of gravity

ϑ

Latitude of the radial direction respect to x axis (clock-wise)

A (m2)

Surface of the horizontal cross-section of the silo

H/R

Slenderness ratio of the silo

a eh (z)

Along-the-height profile of the horizontal acceleration

a ev (z)

Along-the-height profile of the vertical acceleration

a eh(zϑ)

Portion of horizontal acceleration on the radial direction

a eh(zϑ)

Portion of the horizontal acceleration parallel to the external vertical surface of element E

a eh0

Constant horizontal acceleration

a ev0

Constant vertical acceleration

ν(z)

Vertical acceleration factor

ν 0

Constant vertical acceleration factor

s st (z) (m)

Thickness of the material which leans of the wall in static conditions

s(zϑ) (m)

Thickness of the material which leans of the wall in dynamic conditions

p v,GG (z) (N/m2)

Vertical grain–grain pressure acting on disk D in accelerated conditions

p h,GG (z) (N/m2)

Horizontal grain–grain pressure acting on disk D in accelerated conditions

p h,GW (z) (N/m2)

Horizontal grain-wall pressure in accelerated conditions

τ v,GW (zϑ) (N/m2)

Vertical frictional grain-wall stress in accelerated conditions

τ h,GG (z) (N/m2)

Horizontal frictional grain–grain stress acting on disk D in accelerated conditions

τ h,GB (z) (N/m2)

Horizontal frictional grain-bottom stress in accelerated conditions

τ h,GW (zϑ) (N/m2)

Horizontal frictional grain-wall stress in accelerated conditions

Δp h,GW (zϑ) (N/m2)

Horizontal grain-wall overpressure in accelerated conditions

p h,GW,st (z) (N/m2)

Horizontal grain-wall pressure in static conditions

C D (z)

Boundary of the disk D on the horizontal section

T (N)

Shear action at the base of the silo wall for the Silvestri’s theory

M (N m)

Moment at the silo wall for the Silvestri’s theory

M Completed (N m)

Moment at the base of the silo wall accounting for vertical frictional grain-wall stress contribution for the Silvestri’s theory

β(zϑ)

Dynamic factor

β 0(ϑ)

Constant dynamic factor

ω(z) (m)

Static function

a

Double static function-radius ratio

A D (z) (m2)

Surface of the horizontal cross-section of disk D

f Iv,D (z) (N)

Vertical inertial force of the disk D

f Ih,D (z) (N)

Horizontal inertial force of the disk D

f Iv,E (zϑ) (N)

Vertical inertial force of the disk E

f Ih,E (zϑ) (N)

Horizontal inertial force of the disk E

V D (z) (m3)

Volume of a grain layer of disk D of infinitesimal thickness dz

r(zϑ) (m)

Radius of the disk D in accelerated conditions

C 1

First constant of integration

C 2

First constant of integration

O

Center of the horizontal cross-section of the silo

O

Local center for each point holding to C D (z) in accelerated conditions

R h,GG (z) (N)

Resultant of the projection of p h,GG (z) on C D (z) along the x axis

Ω(zϑ)

Auxiliary latitude

r *(zϑ) (m)

Auxiliary radius of the contour C D (z)

dA D,v (zϑ) (m2)

Lateral vertical surface of an infinitesimal portion of the disk C D (z)

E(zϑ)

Elementary portion of element E

A E,Ext (zϑ) (m2)

Vertical lateral surface of E(zϑ)

A E,din (z) (m2)

Surface of a horizontal cross-section of element E in contact with the wall

A E,Int (zϑ) (m2)

Vertical lateral surface of element E(zϑ) in contact with disk D

V E,din (z) (m3)

Volume of element E along the height

V D,din (z) (m3)

Volume of disk D along the height

T xx (z) (N)

Shear action at the base of the silo wall for the refined theory

M yy,1(z) (N m)

Moment at the silo wall due to overpressure for the refined theory

M yy,2(z) (N m)

Moment at the silo wall due to frictional vertical stresses for the refined theory

M yy (z) (N m)

Wall bending moment for the refined theory

\( p_{h,GW} (z)_{I^\circ } \) (N/m2)

First order approximation with Taylor’s series of the horizontal grain-wall pressure provided by Janssen and Koenen

\( p_{h,GW} (z)_{II^\circ } \) (N/m2)

Second order approximation with Taylor’s series of the horizontal grain-wall pressure provided by Janssen and Koenen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pieraccini, L., Silvestri, S. & Trombetti, T. Refinements to the Silvestri’s theory for the evaluation of the seismic actions in flat-bottom silos containing grain-like material. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 3493–3525 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9786-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9786-2

Keywords

Navigation