Skip to main content
Log in

An analytical method for the evaluation of the in-plan irregularity of non-regularly asymmetric buildings

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a new method for the evaluation of the static eccentricity \(e_{s}\) and the ratio \(\Omega _{\uptheta } \) of uncoupled torsional to lateral frequencies in real multi-storey buildings. The above-mentioned parameters greatly affect the lateral-to-torsional coupling of the response of asymmetric systems and thus are of paramount importance in the assessment of the in-plan irregularity of buildings. The proposed method, which is a generalization of that suggested by Calderoni et al. (Earthq Spectra 18(2):219–231, 2002), allows the calculation of the static eccentricity \(e_{s}\) and the ratio \(\Omega _{\uptheta } \) from the structural response to arbitrary distributions of forces and torsional couples. The effectiveness of the method is validated on some regularly and non-regularly asymmetric buildings characterised by different in-plan irregularity. The analyses demonstrate that the results of the method are rigorous in the case of regularly asymmetric systems and only slightly depend upon the heightwise distribution of the forces in the case of non-regularly asymmetric systems. Finally, the values of the static eccentricity \(e_{s}\) and the ratio \(\Omega _{\uptheta } \) resulting from the proposed method are compared to those obtained by means of the procedure suggested by Makarios and Anastassiadis in (Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7(1):33–55, 1998a; Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7(1):57–71, 1998b) .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastassiadis K, Athanatopoulou A, Makarios T (1998) Equivalent static eccentricities in the simplified methods of seismic analysis of buildings. Earthq Spectra 14(1): 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanatopoulou AM, Makarios T, Anastassiadis K (2006) Earthquake analysis of isotropic asymmetric multistorey buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 15(4):417–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2012) Corrective eccentricities for assessment by nonlinear static method of 3D structures subjected to bidirectional ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:1751–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderoni B, D’Aveni A, Ghersi A, Rinaldi Z (2002) Static vs. modal analysis of asymmetric buildings: effectiveness of dynamic eccentricity formulations. Earthq Spectra 18(2):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN. EN 1998-1 (2005) EuroCode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles

  • Chandler AM, Duan XN (1993) A modified static procedure for the design of torsionally unbalanced multi-storey frame buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22(5):447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung VWT, Tso WK (1986) Eccentricity in irregular multi story buildings. Can J Civ Eng 13:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSI (2009) Analysis reference manual for SAP2000, ETABS, and SAFE, ISO # GEN062708M1 Rev.1, Berkeley, California

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M (2009) Use of pushover analysis for predicting seismic response of irregular buildings: a case study. J Earthq Eng 13(8):1089–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2011) Sensitivity of seismic performance of existing framed RC structures to irregular mechanical properties. In: Proceedings of the 6th European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures, Haifa, Israel

  • De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2008) A review of research on seismic behaviour of irregular building structures since 2002. Bull Earthquake Eng 6:285–308

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano M, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2006) Effect of overstrength on the seismic behaviour of multi-storey regularly asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 4(1):23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2012) Effect of the variability in plan of concrete mechanical properties on the seismic response of existing RC framed structures. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9412-5

  • Doudomis IN, Athanatopoulou AM (2008) Invariant torsion properties of multistorey asymmetric buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 17(1):79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan XN, Chandler AM (1993) Inelastic seismic response of code-designed multistorey frame buildings with regular asymmetry. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22(5):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta SC, Roy R (2012) Seismic demand of low-rise multistory systems with general asymmetry. J Eng Mech. 138(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghersi A, Rossi PP (2000) Formulation of design eccentricity to reduce ductility demand in asymmetric buildings. Eng Struct 22(7):857–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghersi A, Rossi PP (2006) Influence of design procedures on the seismic response of bi-eccentric plan-asymmetric systems. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 14(4):467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghersi A, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2007) Static versus modal analysis: influence on inelastic response of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 5(4):511–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibullah A (1998) Center of rigidity—a redefinition. Comput Struct Inc 3(1)

  • Hejal R, Chopra AK (1987) Earthquake response of torsionally-coupled buildings. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report no. UBC/EERC-87/20, College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley

  • Makarios T (2008) Practical calculation of the torsional stiffness radius of multi-storey tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 17(1):39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarios T, Anastassiadis A (1998a) Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: theory. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7(1):33–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarios T, Anastassiadis A (1998b) Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: applications. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7(1):57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino EM (2002) Analisi critica della definizione di edifici regolarmente asimmetrici. Ingegneria Sismica 3:35–42 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino EM, Rossi PP (2004) Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 13(4):277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam AS, Tso WK (2000) Extension of Eurocode 8 torsional provisions to multi-storey buildings. J Earthq Eng 4(1):25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulos KG, Anagnostopoulos SA (2005) Inelastic torsion of multistorey buildings under earthquake excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(12):1449–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombetti T, Silvestri S, Gasparini G, Pintucchi B, De Stefano M (2008) Numerical verification of the effectiveness of the “alpha” method for the estimation of the maximum rotational elastic response of eccentric systems. J Earthq Eng 12(2):249–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tso WK, Dempsey KM (1980) Seismic torsional provisions for dynamic eccentricity. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8(3):275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zárate G, Ayala AG (2004) Validation of single storey models for the evaluation of the seismic performance of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, paper no. 2213, Vancouver, Canada

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding provided by the (Italian) Department of Civil Protection (ReLUIS 2005–2008 Grant—Task 2: Evaluation and mitigation of vulnerability of r.c. existing buildings). The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo M. Marino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosco, M., Marino, E.M. & Rossi, P.P. An analytical method for the evaluation of the in-plan irregularity of non-regularly asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 11, 1423–1445 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9438-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9438-3

Keywords

Navigation