Abstract
This contribution discusses the application of Chebyshev Type I filter for processing real earthquake records. Consideration is given to the effects of filtering parameters (passband amplitude ripple and order of the filter) on the time series, strong-motion parameters, Fourier Amplitude Spectrum of acceleration, and elastic displacement response spectra. Time histories of five earthquakes with different moment magnitudes have been examined (from stations located close to the epicenters). Data processing is based on application of bandpass Chebyshev filtering over frequency range with substantial signal to noise ratio (level of 3 or approximately 3 dB). Applying different filters, we have monitored several important strong-motion parameters: peak values of acceleration, velocity, and displacement; Arias intensity, acceleration/velocity spectrum intensity, significant duration, etc. Some new results and conclusions concerning the influence of Chebyshev filter in data processing of records have been summarized. The graphical and numerical outcomes obtained, as well as the comparison with a Butterworth causal filter, are included in the work. The results could be potentially useful to engineering seismologists who need to evaluate and better understand the merits of this type of filtering for strong-motion data processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PEER:
-
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, USA
- USGS:
-
US Geological Survey, USA
- CSMIP:
-
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, USA
- COSMOS:
-
Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems
- ISESD:
-
Internet Site for European Strong-motion Data
- NGA:
-
Next Generation Attenuation of ground motion
- PGA, PGV, PGD:
-
Peak Ground Acceleration/Velocity/Displacement
- SNR:
-
Signal to Noise Ratio
- UDB:
-
Usable Data Bandwidth
- FAS:
-
Fourier Amplitude Spectrum
- NS, V, EW:
-
North–South, Vertical, East–West components
- BLD, EDR, DIN , DNZ, ERZ:
-
Buldan-Kayma, Edremit, Dinar Meteo, Denizli Meteo, Erzincan Meteo Stations
- ASI, VSI:
-
Acceleration/Velocity Spectrum Intensity
- EDA:
-
Effective Design Acceleration
- Ia:
-
Arias intensity
- TD:
-
Significant duration
- Tp:
-
Predominant period
- SD:
-
Displacement response spectra
References
Ambraseys NN, Smit P, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjornsson R, Olafsson S, Suhadolo P and Costa G (2004). Internet site for European strong-motion data. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 45: 113–129
Bazzurro P, Sjoberg B, Luco N, Silva W, Darragh R (2004) Effect of strong motion processing procedures on time histories, elastic and inelastic spectra. COSMOS invited workshop on strong- motion record processing. Richmond, California, USA, 26–27 May 2004. http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.html
Boore DM (2001). Effects of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 1199–1211
Boore DM (2005). On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2): 745–750
Boore DM and Akkar S (2003). Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32(11): 1729–1748
Boore DM and Bommer JJ (2005). Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 25(2): 93–115
Chapman MC (1998) Disaggregated seismic hazard and the elastic input energy spectrum: an approach to design earthquake selection. Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/public/etd-6198-10207/materials/dissertation-mcc.pdf
Darragh B, Silva W, Gregor N (2004) Strong motion record processing for the PEER center. COSMOS invited workshop on record processing guidelines. http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.html
Erdik M (2004) Strong-motion data acquisition, processing and utilization in Turkey. COSMOS invited workshop on record processing guidelines. http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.html
Katsumata A (2001). Relationship between displacement and velocity amplitudes of seismic waves from local earthquakes. Earth Planets Space 53: 347–355
Raoof M, Hermann RB and Malagnini L (1999). Attenuation and excitation of three-component ground motion in Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(4): 888–902
Rinaldis D (2004) Acquisition and processing of analogue and digital accelerometric records: ENEA methodology and experience from Italian earthquakes. COSMOS invited workshop on record processing guidelines. http://www.cosmos-eq.org/recordProcessingPapers.html
SeismoSignal (2004) A computer program for signal processing of strong-motion data, ver.3.1. http://www.seismosoft.com
Stewart JP, Liu AH, Choi Y, Baturay MB (2001) Amplification factors for spectral acceleration in active regions. PEER report 2001/10. http://cee.ea.ucla.edu/faculty/Papers/draft_report.PDF
Von Thun JL, Rochim LH, Scott GA, Wilson JA (1988) Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II–Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation. Geotechnical Special Publication 20, ASCE, New York, pp 463–481
Zaré M and Bard P-Y (2002). Strong motion dataset of Turkey: data processing and site classification. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 22(8): 703–718
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mollova, G., Scherbaum, F. Influence of parameters selection in Chebyshev filters on the strong motion data processing. Bull Earthquake Eng 5, 609–627 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9043-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9043-4