Abstract
Topological semantics have proved to be a very fruitful approach in formal epistemology, two noticeable representatives being the interior semantics and topological evidence models. In this paper, we introduce the concept of quasi-factive evidence as a way to account for untruthful evidence in the interior semantics. This allows us to import concepts from topological evidence models, thereby connecting the two frameworks in spite of their apparent disparities. This approach sheds light on the interpretation of belief in the interior semantics, and gives meaning to concepts that used to be essentially technical: the closure-interior semantics can be interpreted as the condition of existence of a quasi-factive justification, while the extremally disconnected spaces are now characterized as those where the available information is always consistent. But our most important result is the equivalence between the interior-closure-interior semantics and what we call the strengthening condition, along with a sound and complete axiomatization. Finally, we build on this strengthening condition to introduce a notion of relative plausibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable
Code Availability
Not applicable
Notes
That is, a subspace of an extremally disconnected space may not be extremally disconnected itself.
It technically makes sense to interpret formulas in other spaces, but then the Cl-Int semantics no longer has the intended properties (it does not even define a normal modal operator).
Actually the structures they consider are topological evidence models namely topological models equipped with a subbase whose elements are called basic pieces of evidence, but this is of little interest here.
For simplicity the recipient of the letter is none of the other primary characters.
We assume that their accusations are either correct or made up—no honest mistake—and that conspirators do not betray each other.
References
Baltag A, Bezhanishvili N, Özgün A, Smets S (2013) The topology of belief, belief revision and defeasible knowledge. In: International Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction, pp. 27–40. Springer
Baltag A, Bezhanishvili N, Özgün A, Smets S (2015) The topology of full and weak belief. In: International Tbilisi symposium on logic, language, and computation, pp. 205–228. Springer
Baltag A, Bezhanishvili N, Özgün A, Smets S (2019) A topological approach to full belief. J Philos Logic 48:205–244
Baltag A, Bezhanishvili N, Özgün A, Smets S (2022) Justified belief, knowledge, and the topology of evidence. Synthese 200(6):512
Bezhanishvili G, Bezhanishvili N, Lucero-Bryan J, van Mill J (2015) S4.3 and hereditarily extremally disconnected spaces. Georgian Math J 22(4):469–475
Bjorndahl A, Özgün A (2020) Logic and topology for knowledge, knowability, and belief. Rev Symbol Logic 13(4):748–775
Blackburn P, de Rijke M, Venema Y (2001) Modal logic. Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gettier E (1963) Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23(6):121–123
Ghosh S, de Jongh D (2013) Comparing strengths of beliefs explicitly. Logic J IGPL 21(3):488–514
Hintikka J (1962) Knowledge and belief: an introduction to the logic of the two notions
McKinsey J, Tarski A (1944) The algebra of topology. Ann Math pp 141–191
Özgün A (2013) Topological models for belief and belief revision. Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ryszard E (1989) General topology. Heldermann Verlag, Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics
Stalnaker R (2006) On logics of knowledge and belief. Philos stud 128(1):169–199
Steinsvold C (2007) Topological models of belief logics. City University of New York, NY
van Benthem J, Bezhanishvili G (2007) Modal logics of space. In: Handbook of spatial logics, pp. 217–298. Springer
van Benthem J, Pacuit E (2011) Dynamic logics of evidence-based beliefs. Studia Logica 99(1–3):61
van Benthem J, Fernandez-Duque D, Pacuit E (2014) Evidence and plausibility in neighborhood structures. Ann Pure Appl Logic 165(1):106–133
van Ditmarsch H, van der Hoek W, Kooi B (2007) Dynamic epistemic logic, vol 337. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Vickers S (1996) Topology via logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Alexandru Baltag for supervising this work, and to François Schwarzentruber for his valuable feedback and suggestions. I also would like to thank one anonymous referee for proposing a direct proof of Theorem 4.1, and an other one whose comments greatly contributed to improve the clarity of this paper.
Funding
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: General Topology
Appendix: General Topology
Definition A.1
Let \(X\) be a set. A topology on a \(X\) is a collection of sets \(\tau \subseteq \mathcal {P}({X})\) such that:
-
\(\tau\) contains \(\varnothing\) and \(X\),
-
\(\tau\) is closed under arbitrary unions, i.e. if \((U_i)_{i \in I} \in \tau ^I\), then \(\bigcup _{i \in I}U_i \in \tau\),
-
\(\tau\) is closed under finite intersections, i.e. for all \(U\in \tau\) and \(V\in \tau\), we have \(U\cap V\in \tau\).
The pair \((X,\tau )\) is then said to be a topological space, and elements of \(\tau\) are said to be open in \(X\).
Alternatively, a topology can be presented by a generating family, also called a subbase:
Definition A.2
Let \(B\subseteq \mathcal {P}({X})\) be a collection of subsets of \(X\). The topology generated by \(B\) is
This is the smallest topology containing the elements of \(B\).
A subset is called closed if its complement is open. A subset \(A \subseteq X\) is called a neighbourhood of a point \(x\in X\) if there exists an open set \(U\) such that \(x\in U\) and \(U\subseteq A\).
Definition A.3
Let \(Y\subseteq X\). The subspace topology on \(Y\) is defined by \(\tau _{Y} \,{{:}} {=}\,\{U\cap Y\mid U\in \tau \}\). The pair \((Y,\tau _{Y})\) is a topological space and is called a subspace of \((X,\tau )\).
Two crucial topological notions are the interior and closure operators.
Definition A.4
Let \(A \subseteq X\). The interior \(\text {Int} _{}(A)\) of A is the set of all points of which A is a neighbourhood:
Definition A.5
Let \(A \subseteq X\). The closure \(\text {Cl} _{}(A)\) of A is the set of all points whose every open neighbourhood intersects A:
We summarize in Table 7 a collection of standard properties of these operators, that we extensively use in this article.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gougeon, Q. Basing Belief on Quasi-Factive Evidence. glob. Philosophy 33, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-023-09698-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-023-09698-8