Skip to main content
Log in

City and Soul in Plato and Alfarabi: An Explanation for the Differences Between Plato’s and Alfarabi’s Theory of City in Terms of Their Distinct Psychology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his political treatise, Mabadi ara ahl al-madina al-fadhila, Abu Nasr Alfarabi, the medieval Muslim philosopher, proposes a theory of virtuous city which, according to prominent scholars, is modeled on Plato’s utopia of the Republic. No doubt that Alfarabi was well-versed in the philosophy of Plato and the basic framework of his theory of city is platonic. However, his theory of city is not an exact reproduction of the Republic’s theory and, despite glaring similarities, the two theories do differ in many aspects. In both, Alfarabi’s Mabadi ara ahl al-madina al-fadhila and Plato’s Republic, the theory of virtuous city is accompanied by a theory of the soul. Since the theory of soul plays a foundational role in both theories of the virtuous city, the present article intends to provide an explanation for the differences between the two theories of the city in terms of the differences between the two theories of the soul.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are multiple writings of Alfarabi, such as the Political Regime and the Attainment of Happiness, that deal with the Platonic theme of the best city and contend for a comparison with the works of Plato. However, the present article mainly focuses on the Virtuous City. Other works of Alfarabi are occasionally referred to for explanatory purpose.

  2. On ninth century Arabic version of the Republic, cf. Walzer 1985, p. 426.

  3. Melamed argues that late Hellenists preferred Plato’s Republic to Aristotle’s Politics as a basic textbook on politics. This is evident from the fact that there is not even a single commentary on Aristotle’s Politics dating from that time. Since the medieval Muslim thinkers inherited the same manuscripts to which late Hellenists inclined, Plato’s Republic could reach them but Aristotle’s Politics couldn't. However, even if we keep the question of availability aside, the medieval Muslim philosophers would still have preferred Plato’s Republic as it suited their theological and philosophical world view better. For further details see Melamed 2003, pp. 1–2.

References

  • Alfarabi (1952) Fusul al madani. Translated by D. M. Dunlop as Alfarabi’s aphorisms of the statesman. Iraq 14:93–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/4199557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfarabi (1985) Mabadi ara ahl al-madina al-fadhila. Translated by R. Walzer as Alfarabi on the perfect state. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali I, Qin M (2019) On the relation of city and soul in Plato and Alfarabi. J Arts Humanit 8(2):27–34. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v8i2.1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2016) De anima. Translated by C. Shields as Aristotle de anima. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Black A (2011) The history of Islamic political thought: from the prophet to the present, 2nd edn. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobonich C (2002) Plato’s utopia recast: his later ethics and politics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhry M (1983) A history of Islamic philosophy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhry M (2002) Alfarabi, founder of Islamic Neoplatonism: his life, works and influence. Oneworld Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas D (1998) Greek thought, Arabic culture: The Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early Abbasid society (2nd–4th/8th–10th centuries). Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marmura M (2005) Probing in Islamic philosophy: studies in the philosophies of ibn sina, al-ghazali and other major Muslim thinkers. Global Academic Publishing, Binghamton

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed A (2003) The philosopher-king in medieval and renaissance Jewish political thought. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara D (2005) Platonopolis: platonic political philosophy in late antiquity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pines S (1963) Translator’s introduction. In: Moses Maimonides the guide of the perplexed, vol 1. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1991) The Republic. Translated by A. Bloom as The Republic of Plato. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal EIJ (1958) Political thought in medieval Islam: an introductory outline. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santas G (2013) Just city and just soul in Plato’s Republic. In: Anagnostopoulos G, Miller FD (eds) Reason and analysis in ancient Greek philosophy: essays in honor of David Keyt. Philosophical studies series, vol 120. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6004-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sim M (2008) The divided line and united psyche in Plato’s Republic. Southwest Philosophy Review 24(2):87–100. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview200824212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss L (1945) Farabi’s Plato. Louis Ginzberg: Jubilee volume on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. American Academy for Jewish Research, New York, pp 357–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer R (1985) Alfarabi on the perfect state. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer R (1991) Alfarabi. In: Lewis B, Pellat C, Schacht J (eds) Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol 2, New edn. Brill, Leiden, pp 778–781

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishraq Ali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, I., Qin, M. City and Soul in Plato and Alfarabi: An Explanation for the Differences Between Plato’s and Alfarabi’s Theory of City in Terms of Their Distinct Psychology. Axiomathes 30, 91–105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09439-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09439-w

Keywords

Navigation