Skip to main content
Log in

Accretion-ejection in rotating black holes: a model for ‘outliers’ track of radio-X-ray correlation in X-ray binaries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Astrophysics and Space Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the global accretion-ejection solutions around a rotating black hole considering three widely accepted pseudo-Kerr potentials that satisfactorily mimic the space-time geometry of rotating black holes. We find that all the pseudo potentials provide standing shock solutions for large range of flow parameters. We identify the effective region of the shock parameter space spanned by energy (\(\mathcal{E}_{\text{in}}\)) and angular momentum (\(\lambda _{\text{in}}\)) measured at the inner critical point (\(x_{\text{in}}\)) and find that the possibility of shock formation becomes feeble when the viscosity parameter (\(\alpha \)) is increased. In addition, we find that shock parameter space also depends on the adiabatic index (\(\gamma \)) of the flow and the shock formation continues to take place for a wide range of \(\gamma \) as \(1.5 \le \gamma \le 4/3\). For all the pseudo potentials, we calculate the critical viscosity parameter (\(\alpha _{\text{shock}}^{\text{cri}}\)) beyond which standing shock ceases to exist and compare them as function of black hole spin (\(a_{k}\)). We observe that all the pseudo potentials under consideration are qualitatively similar as far as the standing shocks are concerned, however, they differ both qualitatively and quantitatively from each other for rapidly rotating black holes. Further, we compute the mass loss from the disc using all three pseudo potentials and find that the maximum mass outflow rate (\(R^{ \mathrm{max}}_{{\dot{m}}}\)) weakly depends on the black hole spin. To validate our model, we calculate the maximum jet kinetic power using the accretion-ejection formalism and compare it with the radio jet power of low-hard state of the black hole X-ray binaries (hereafter XRBs). The outcome of our results indicate that XRBs along the ‘outliers’ track might be rapidly rotating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewer for useful comments and suggestions that help to improve the manuscript. Authors express sincere gratitude to S. Corbel for sharing the observational data with them. AN thanks GD, SAG; DD, PDMSA and Director, URSC for encouragement and continuous support to carry out this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santabrata Das.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

  • The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

  • This work does not involve Human Participants and/or Animal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Calculation of sound speed (\(a_{c}\)) at the critical point (\(x_{c}\))

Appendix: Calculation of sound speed (\(a_{c}\)) at the critical point (\(x_{c}\))

Putting \(N = 0\) in Eq. (17b) and using Eq. (20), we get an algebraic equation of \(a_{c}\) which is given by,

$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{A\alpha (g+ \gamma \frac{v_{c}^{2}}{a_{c}^{2}} ) ^{2}a_{c}^{4}}{\gamma x_{c}} + \frac{3 a_{c}^{2} v_{c}^{2}}{(\gamma -1)x _{c}} -\frac{ a_{c}^{2} v_{c}^{2}}{(\gamma -1)} \biggl( \frac{d\ln F _{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr)_{c} \\& \quad{}+ \frac{3 A \alpha g (g {+} \gamma \frac{v_{c} ^{2}}{a_{c}^{2}})a_{c}^{4}}{\gamma x_{c}}- \frac{A \alpha g(g {+} \gamma \frac{v_{c}^{2}}{a_{c}^{2}})a_{c}^{4}}{ \gamma } \biggl(\frac{d\ln F_{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr)_{c} \\& \quad{}- \frac{2 A\lambda (g + \gamma \frac{v_{c}^{2}}{a_{c}^{2}})a_{c}^{2}v_{c}}{x_{c}^{2}} - \biggl[2A\alpha g \biggl(g + \gamma \frac{v_{c}^{2}}{a_{c}^{2}} \biggr) a_{c}^{2} \\& \quad{}+ \frac{(\gamma +1)v_{c}^{2}}{(\gamma -1)} \biggr] \biggl( \frac{d \varPhi _{i}^{\text{eff}}}{dx} \biggr)_{c} = 0. \end{aligned}$$
(29)

Using \(M_{c} = v_{c}/a_{c}\), we get

$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{A\alpha (g+ \gamma M_{c}^{2} )^{2}a_{c}^{4}}{\gamma x_{c}} + \frac{3 M_{c}^{2} a_{c}^{4} }{(\gamma -1)x_{c}} -\frac{M_{c} ^{2} a_{c}^{4}}{(\gamma -1)} \biggl( \frac{d\ln F_{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr) _{c} \\& \quad+ \frac{3 A \alpha g (g + \gamma M_{c}^{2})a_{c}^{4}}{\gamma x _{c}} \\& \quad{} - \frac{A \alpha g(g + \gamma M_{c}^{2})a_{c}^{4}}{\gamma } \biggl(\frac{d \ln F_{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr)_{c} \\& \quad{}- \frac{2 A\lambda (g + \gamma M_{c} ^{2})M_{c} a_{c}^{3}}{x_{c}^{2}} - \biggl[2A\alpha g \bigl(g + \gamma M_{c}^{2} \bigr) a_{c}^{2} \\& \quad{}+ \frac{(\gamma +1)M_{c}^{2} a_{c} ^{2}}{(\gamma -1)} \biggr] \biggl( \frac{d\varPhi _{i}^{\text{eff}}}{dx} \biggr) _{c}= 0. \end{aligned}$$
(30)

After some simple algebra, we have

$$ a_{1} a_{c}^{2} + a_{2} a_{c} + a_{3} = 0, $$
(31)

where

$$\begin{aligned} a_{1} = {}& -\frac{A\alpha (g + \gamma M_{c}^{2})^{2}}{\gamma x_{c}} - \frac{3 M_{c}^{2}}{(\gamma -1)x_{c}}\\ & + \frac{M_{c}^{2}}{(\gamma -1)} \biggl(\frac{d\ln F_{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr)_{c} - \frac{3A \alpha g (g + \gamma M_{c}^{2})}{\gamma x_{c}} \\ &+ \frac{A \alpha g(g + \gamma M_{c} ^{2})}{\gamma } \biggl(\frac{d\ln F_{i}(x)}{dx} \biggr)_{c}, \\ a_{2} = {}& \frac{2A\lambda M_{c} (g + \gamma M_{c}^{2})}{x_{c}^{2}}, \\ a_{3} = {}& \biggl[2A\alpha g \bigl(g + \gamma M_{c}^{2} \bigr) + \frac{(\gamma + 1)M _{c}^{2}}{(\gamma - 1)} \biggr] \biggl(\frac{d\varPhi _{i}^{\text{eff}}}{dx} \biggr) _{c}. \end{aligned}$$

In may be noted that the trivial solutions are avoided in Eq. (31). Finally, we solve this equation to obtain \(a_{c}\) and consider only positive root as \(a_{c}>0\) always.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aktar, R., Nandi, A. & Das, S. Accretion-ejection in rotating black holes: a model for ‘outliers’ track of radio-X-ray correlation in X-ray binaries. Astrophys Space Sci 364, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3509-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3509-0

Keywords

Navigation