Abstract
In this work we present a phase space analysis of a quintessence field and a perfect fluid trapped in a Randall-Sundrum’s Braneworld of type 2. We consider a homogeneous but anisotropic Bianchi I brane geometry. Moreover, we consider the effect of the projection of the five-dimensional Weyl tensor onto the three-brane in the form of a negative Dark Radiation term. For the treatment of the potential we use the “Method of f-devisers” that allows investigating arbitrary potentials in a phase space. We present general conditions on the potential in order to obtain the stability of standard 4D and non-standard 5D de Sitter solutions, and we provide the stability conditions for both scalar field-matter scaling solutions, scalar field-dark radiation solutions and scalar field-dominated solutions. We find that the shear-dominated solutions are unstable (particularly, contracting shear-dominated solutions are of saddle type). As a main difference with our previous work, the traditionally ever-expanding models could potentially re-collapse due to the negativity of the dark radiation. Additionally, our system admits a large class of static solutions that are of saddle type. These kinds of solutions are important at intermediate stages in the evolution of the universe, since they allow the transition from contracting to expanding models and viceversa. New features of our scenario are the existence of a bounce and a turnaround, which lead to cyclic behavior, that are not allowed in Bianchi I branes with positive dark radiation term. Finally, as specific examples we consider the potentials V∝sinh−α(βϕ) and V∝[cosh(ξϕ)−1] which have simple f-devisers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Dark energy models includes: cosmological constant model, quintessence scalar field, k-essence, tachyon, Chaplygin gas, etc. (see Copeland et al. 2006 for a review and references therein).
However, if we include the variable \(y=\frac{V}{3 H^{2}}\) in the analysis, the solutions associated to the line of fixed points \(Q_{10}^{+}\) are unstable to perturbations along the y-direction.
References
Ade, P.A.R., et al.: Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters (2013a). 1303.5076
Ade, P.A.R., et al.: Planck 2013 results. XXVI. Background geometry and topology of the Universe (2013b). 1303.5086
Allen, L.E., Wands, D.: Phys. Rev. D 70, 063515 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.063515. astro-ph/0404441
Amanullah, R., Lidman, C., Rubin, D., Aldering, G., Astier, P., et al.: Astrophys. J. 716, 712 (2010). doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/712. 1004.1711
Apostolopoulos, P.S., Tetradis, N.: Phys. Lett. B 633, 409 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.12.015. hep-th/0509182
Apostolopoulos, P.S., Brouzakis, N., Saridakis, E.N., Tetradis, N.: Phys. Rev. D 72, 044013 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.044013. hep-th/0502115
Archidiacono, M., Calabrese, E., Melchiorri, A.: Phys. Rev. D 84, 123008 (2011). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123008. 1109.2767
Astashenok, A.V., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Lett. B 718, 1194 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.12.058. 1211.1888
Astashenok, A.V., Elizalde, E., Odintsov, S.D., Yurov, A.V.: Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2260 (2012a). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2260-2. 1206.2192
Astashenok, A.V., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D., Scherrer, R.J.: Phys. Lett. B 713, 145 (2012b). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.017. 1203.1976
Astashenok, A.V., Elizalde, E., de Haro, J., Odintsov, S.D., Yurov, A.V.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 347, 1 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10509-013-1484-4. 1301.6344
Bamba, K., Capozziello, S., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 342, 155 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8. 1205.3421
Barragan, C., Olmo, G.J.: Phys. Rev. D 82, 084015 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.084015. 1005.4136
Barreiro, T., Copeland, E.J., Nunes, N.J.: Phys. Rev. D 61, 127301 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.127301. astro-ph/9910214
Barrow, J.D.: Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 79 (2004). gr-qc/0403084
Barrow, J.D., Maartens, R.: Phys. Lett. B 532, 153 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01552-6. gr-qc/0108073
Barrow, J.D., Tsagas, C.G.: Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 195003 (2009). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/19/195003. 0904.1340
Barrow, J.D., Ellis, G.F.R., Maartens, R., Tsagas, C.G.: Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 155 (2003). gr-qc/0302094
Bennett, C.L., Larson, D., Weiland, J.L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., et al.: Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: final maps and results (2012). 1212.5225
Binetruy, P., Deffayet, C., Langlois, D.: Nucl. Phys. B 565, 269 (2000a). doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00696-3. hep-th/9905012
Binetruy, P., Deffayet, C., Ellwanger, U., Langlois, D.: Phys. Lett. B 477, 285 (2000b). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00204-5. hep-th/9910219
Biswas, T., Mazumdar, A., Siegel, W.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0603, 009 (2006). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/009. hep-th/0508194
Blake, C., Kazin, E., Beutler, F., Davis, T., Parkinson, D., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, 1707 (2011). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19592.x. 1108.2635
Bowcock, P., Charmousis, C., Gregory, R.: Class. Quantum Gravity 17, 4745 (2000). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313. hep-th/0007177
Brandenberger, R., Firouzjahi, H., Saremi, O.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0711, 028 (2007). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/028. 0707.4181
Bratt, J.D., Gault, A.C., Scherrer, R.J., Walker, T.P.: Phys. Lett. B 546, 19 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02637-0. astro-ph/0208133
Brax, P., van de Bruck, C.: Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 201 (2003). hep-th/0303095
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E.N.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0910, 020 (2009). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/020. 0906.1789
Cai, Y.-F., Chen, S.-H., Dent, J.B., Dutta, S., Saridakis, E.N.: Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 215011 (2011). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/215011. 1104.4349
Campos, A., Sopuerta, C.F.: Phys. Rev. D 64, 104011 (2001a). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.104011. hep-th/0105100
Campos, A., Sopuerta, C.F.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 104012 (2001b). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.104012. hep-th/0101060
Cardenas, R., Gonzalez, T., Leiva, Y., Martin, O., Quiros, I.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 083501 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.083501. astro-ph/0206315
Carloni, S., Dunsby, P.K.S., Solomons, D.M.: Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 1913 (2006). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/6/006. gr-qc/0510130
Christopherson, A.J.: Phys. Rev. D 82, 083515 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083515. 1008.0811
Clifton, T., Ferreira, P.G., Padilla, A., Skordis, C.: Phys. Rep. 513, 1 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001. 1106.2476
Coley, A.A.: Dynamical Systems and Cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
Copeland, E.J., Liddle, A.R., Wands, D.: Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4686. gr-qc/9711068
Copeland, E.J., Sami, M., Tsujikawa, S.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006). doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X. hep-th/0603057
Copeland, E.J., Mizuno, S., Shaeri, M.: Phys. Rev. D 79, 103515 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.103515. 0904.0877
Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., Mena, O.: Dark radiation candidates after Planck (2013a). 1304.5981
Di Valentino, E., Galli, S., Lattanzi, M., Melchiorri, A., Natoli, P., et al.: Phys. Rev. D 88, 023501 (2013b). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.023501. 1301.7343
Diamanti, R., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., Archidiacono, M., Melchiorri, A.: Dark radiation and interacting scenarios (2012). 1212.6007
Dominguez, A., Prada, F.: Measurement of the expansion rate of the Universe from γ-ray attenuation (2013). 1305.2163
Dominguez, A., Finke, J.D., Prada, F., Primack, J.R., Kitaura, F.S., et al.: Astrophys. J. 770, 77 (2013). doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/77. 1305.2162
Dunsby, P., Goheer, N., Bruni, M., Coley, A.: Phys. Rev. D 69, 101303 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.101303. hep-th/0312174
Dutta, S., Saridakis, E.N., Scherrer, R.J.: Phys. Rev. D 79, 103005 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.103005. 0903.3412
Eddington, A.S.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 90, 668 (1930)
Einstein, A.: Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1917, 142 (1917)
Escobar, D., Fadragas, C.R., Leon, G., Leyva, Y.: Class. Quantum Gravity 29, 175005 (2012a). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175005. 1110.1736
Escobar, D., Fadragas, C.R., Leon, G., Leyva, Y.: Class. Quantum Gravity 29, 175006 (2012b). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/17/175006. 1201.5672
Fang, W., Li, Y., Zhang, K., Lu, H.-Q.: Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 155005 (2009). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/15/155005. 0810.4193
Farajollahi, H., Salehi, A., Tayebi, F., Ravanpak, A.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1105, 017 (2011). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/05/017. 1105.4045
Foster, S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 3485 (1998). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/11/014. gr-qc/9806098
Freedman, W.L., Madore, B.F.: Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 673 (2010). doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101829. 1004.1856
Garcia-Aspeitia, M.A.: Brane tension constrictions using astrophysical objects (2013). 1306.1283
Gibbons, G.W.: Nucl. Phys. B 292, 784 (1987). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90670-5
Goheer, N., Dunsby, P.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 043527 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043527. gr-qc/0204059
Goheer, N., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 103513 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.103513. gr-qc/0211020
Goheer, N., Dunsby, P.K.S., Coley, A., Bruni, M.: Phys. Rev. D 70, 123517 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123517. hep-th/0408092
Goheer, N., Leach, J.A., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 5689 (2007). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/22/026. 0710.0814
Goheer, N., Leach, J.A., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 035013 (2008). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/3/035013. 0710.0819
Goheer, N., Goswami, R., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 105003 (2009). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/10/105003. 0809.5247
Gonzalez, T., Leon, G., Quiros, I.: Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 3165 (2006). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/025. astro-ph/0702227
Gonzalez, T., Cardenas, R., Quiros, I., Leyva, Y.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 310, 13 (2007). doi:10.1007/s10509-007-9389-8. 0707.2097
Gonzalez-Garcia, M.C., Niro, V., Salvado, J.: J. High Energy Phys. 1304, 052 (2013). doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2013)052. 1212.1472
Goswami, R., Goheer, N., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Phys. Rev. D 78, 044011 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044011. 0804.3528
Guth, A.H.: Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347
Haghani, Z., Sepangi, H.R., Shahidi, S.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1202, 031 (2012). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/031. 1201.6448
Harrison, E.R.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 862 (1967). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.39.862
Hawkins, R.M., Lidsey, J.E.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 041301 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.041301. gr-qc/0011060
Hebecker, A., March-Russell, J.: Nucl. Phys. B 608, 375 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00286-3. hep-ph/0103214
Hinshaw, G., et al.: Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170, 288 (2007). doi:10.1086/513698. astro-ph/0603451
Hinshaw, G., et al.: Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results (2012). 1212.5226
Holanda, R.F.L., Silva, J.W.C., Dahia, F.: Complementary cosmological tests of RSII brane models (2013). 1304.4746
Hou, Z., Reichardt, C.L., Story, K.T., Follin, B., Keisler, R., et al.: Constraints on cosmology from the cosmic microwave background power spectrum of the 2500-square degree SPT-SZ survey (2012). 1212.6267
Huey, G., Lidsey, J.E.: Phys. Lett. B 514, 217 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00808-5. astro-ph/0104006
Huey, G., Lidsey, J.E.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 043514 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043514. astro-ph/0205236
Ichiki, K., Yahiro, M., Kajino, T., Orito, M., Mathews, G.J.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 043521 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043521. astro-ph/0203272
Ida, D.: J. High Energy Phys. 0009, 014 (2000). gr-qc/9912002
Khoury, J., Ovrut, B.A., Steinhardt, P.J., Turok, N.: Phys. Rev. D 64, 123522 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.123522. hep-th/0103239
Komatsu, E., et al.: Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011). doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18. 1001.4538
Kraus, P.: J. High Energy Phys. 9912, 011 (1999). hep-th/9910149
Langlois, D., Maartens, R., Sasaki, M., Wands, D.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 084009 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.084009. hep-th/0012044
Lazkoz, R., Leon, G.: Phys. Lett. B 638, 303 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.075. astro-ph/0602590
Lazkoz, R., Leon, G., Quiros, I.: Phys. Lett. B 649, 103 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.03.060. astro-ph/0701353
Leach, J.A., Carloni, S., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 4915 (2006). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/15/011. gr-qc/0603012
Leon, G.: Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 035008 (2009). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/3/035008. 0812.1013
Leon, G., Fadragas, C.R.: Cosmological Dynamical Systems: And Their Applications. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken (2012). http://books.google.cl/books?id=dZm7pwAACAAJ
Leon, G., Saridakis, E.N.: Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 065008 (2011). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/6/065008. 1007.3956
Leon, G., Silveira, P., Fadragas, C.R.: Phase-space of flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models with both a scalar field coupled to matter and radiation (2010). 1009.0689
Leon, G., Leyva, Y., Socorro, J.: Quintom phase-space: beyond the exponential potential (2012). 1208.0061
Leyva, Y., Gonzalez, D., Gonzalez, T., Matos, T., Quiros, I.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 044026 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.044026. 0909.0281
Lidsey, J.E., Matos, T., Urena-Lopez, L.A.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 023514 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.023514. astro-ph/0111292
Linde, A.D.: Phys. Lett. B 108, 389 (1982). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9
Maartens, R.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 084023 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084023. hep-th/0004166
Maartens, R., Koyama, K.: Living Rev. Relativ. 13, 5 (2010). 1004.3962
Maartens, R., Sahni, V., Saini, T.D.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 063509 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.063509. gr-qc/0011105
Malaney, R.A., Mathews, G.J.: Phys. Rep. 229, 145 (1993). doi:10.1016/0370-1573(93)90134-Y
Matos, T., Urena-Lopez, L.A.: Class. Quantum Gravity 17, 75 (2000). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/13/101. astro-ph/0004332
Matos, T., Luevano, J.-R., Quiros, I., Urena-Lopez, L.A., Vazquez, J.A.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 123521 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123521. 0906.0396
Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation (1974)
Mukherji, S., Peloso, M.: Phys. Lett. B 547, 297 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02780-6. hep-th/0205180
Mukohyama, S., Shiromizu, T., Maeda, K.-i.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 024028 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024028. hep-th/9912287. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.029901
Niz, G., Padilla, A., Kunduri, H.K.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0804, 012 (2008). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/012. 0801.3462
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Lett. B 595, 1 (2004a). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.060. hep-th/0405078
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 70, 103522 (2004b). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103522. hep-th/0408170
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Lett. B 631, 1 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.10.010. hep-th/0508049
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D., Tsujikawa, S.: Phys. Rev. D 71, 063004 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063004. hep-th/0501025
Novello, M., Bergliaffa, S.E.P.: Phys. Rep. 463, 127 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006. 0802.1634
Olive, K.A., Steigman, G., Walker, T.P.: Phys. Rep. 333, 389 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00031-4. astro-ph/9905320
Pavluchenko, S.A.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 103518 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.103518. astro-ph/0304354
Perlmutter, S., et al.: Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999). doi:10.1086/307221. astro-ph/9812133
Randall, L., Sundrum, R.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999a). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370. hep-ph/9905221
Randall, L., Sundrum, R.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999b). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690. hep-th/9906064
Ratra, B., Peebles, P.J.E.: Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406
Riess, A.G., et al.: Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998). doi:10.1086/300499. astro-ph/9805201
Sahni, V., Starobinsky, A.A.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 373 (2000). astro-ph/9904398
Sahni, V., Wang, L.-M.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 103517 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.103517. astro-ph/9910097
Sahni, V., Shtanov, Y., Viznyuk, A.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0512, 005 (2005). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/12/005. astro-ph/0505004
Santos, M.G., Vernizzi, F., Ferreira, P.G.: Phys. Rev. D 64, 063506 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.063506. hep-ph/0103112
Saridakis, E.N.: Nucl. Phys. B 808, 224 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.09.022. 0710.5269
Sasaki, M., Shiromizu, T., Maeda, K.-i.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 024008 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024008. hep-th/9912233
Savchenko, N.Y., Toporensky, A.V.: Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 2553 (2003). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/13/307. gr-qc/0212104
Shiromizu, T., Maeda, K.-i., Sasaki, M.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024012. gr-qc/9910076
Shtanov, Y., Sahni, V.: Phys. Lett. B 557, 1 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00179-5. gr-qc/0208047
Sievers, J.L., Hlozek, R.A., Nolta, M.R., Acquaviva, V., Addison, G.E., et al.: The Atacama cosmology telescope: cosmological parameters from three seasons of data (2013). 1301.0824
Solomons, D.M., Dunsby, P., Ellis, G.: Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 6585 (2006). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/23/001. gr-qc/0103087
Stern, D., Jimenez, R., Verde, L., Kamionkowski, M., Stanford, S.A.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1002, 008 (2010). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/02/008. 0907.3149
Suyu, S.H., Treu, T., Blandford, R.D., Freedman, W.L., Hilbert, S., et al.: The Hubble constant and new discoveries in cosmology (2012). 1202.4459
Szydlowski, M., Dabrowski, M.P., Krawiec, A.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 064003 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.064003. hep-th/0201066
Tavakol, R.: Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Dynamical Systems in Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Toporensky, A.V., Tretyakov, P.V.: Gravit. Cosmol. 11, 226 (2005). gr-qc/0510025
Toporensky, A.V., Tretyakov, P.V., Ustiansky, V.O.: Astron. Lett. 29, 1 (2003). doi:10.1134/1.1537370. gr-qc/0207091
Urena-Lopez, L.A.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1203, 035 (2012). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/035. 1108.4712
Urena-Lopez, L.A., Matos, T.: Phys. Rev. D 62, 081302 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.081302. astro-ph/0003364
van den Hoogen, R.J., Ibanez, J.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 083510 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.083510. gr-qc/0212095
van den Hoogen, R.J., Coley, A.A., He, Y.: Phys. Rev. D 68, 023502 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023502 gr-qc/0212094.
Vollick, D.N.: Class. Quantum Gravity 18, 1 (2001). doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/1/301 hep-th/9911181.
Wald, R.M.: Phys. Rev. D 28, 2118 (1983). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2118
Weinberg, D.H., Mortonson, M.J., Eisenstein, D.J., Hirata, C., Riess, A.G., et al.: Phys. Rep. 530, 87 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001 1201.2434.
Wetterich, C.: Nucl. Phys. B 302, 668 (1988). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9
Xiao, K., Zhu, J.-Y.: Phys. Rev. D 83, 083501 (2011). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.083501 1102.2695.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by PROMEP, DAIP, and by CONACyT, México, under grant 167335 (YL); by MECESUP FSM0806, from Ministerio de Educación, Chile (GL) and by PUCV through Proyecto DI Postdoctorado 2013 (GL, YL). GL and YL are grateful to the Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile, for their kind hospitality and their joint support for a research visit. YL is also grateful to the Departamento de Física and the CA de Gravitación y Física Matemática for their kind hospitality and their joint support for a postdoctoral fellowship. The authors would like to thank E.N. Saridakis for reading the original manuscript and for giving helpful comments concerning bouncing solutions. I. Quiros is acknowledged for helpful suggestions. The authors whish to thank to two anonymous referees for their useful comments and criticisms.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Stability of static solutions
As we commented before, the system (29)–(33) admits eighteen classes of (curves of) fixed points corresponding to static solutions, i.e., having Q=0, that is with H=0. Their coordinates in the phase space and their existence conditions are displayed in Table 2. In the Table 5 are presented the corresponding eigenvalues, where λ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 3(ϵ,Σ c ), λ 4(ϵ,Σ c ) are the roots of the equation
and μ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 3(ϵ,Σ c ), μ 4(ϵ,Σ c ) are the roots of the equation
Now let us comment on the stability of the first order perturbations of (28)–(33) near the critical points showed in Table 2.
The line of fixed points E 1 is non-hyperbolic. However, the points located at the curve behave as saddle points since its matrix of perturbations admits at least two real eigenvalues of different signs.
The one-parametric line of fixed points E 2 has two real eigenvalues of different signs provided cos(4u)≠1. In this case, although non-hyperbolic, it behaves as a set of saddle points. For \(u\in\{\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{3\pi}{2} \}\) all the eigenvalues are zero. In this case we need to resort to a numerical elaboration.
g 1(γ,Ω λ ,Σ) is always real-valued for the allowed values of the phase space variables and the allowed range for the free parameters. Then, although non-hyperbolic, the 2D set of fixed points E 3 is of saddle type.
The eigenvalues associated to the one-parametric curve of fixed points E 4 are always reals for the allowed values of the phase space variables and the allowed range for the free parameters. Thus, although non-hyperbolic, it behaves as a saddle point. For the allowed values of the phase space variables and the allowed range for the free parameters the expression g 3(γ,x c ,Ω λc ,Σ c )≥0. If it is strictly positive, then the fixed points located in the 2D invariant set E 5 behaves as saddle points.
The eigenvalues of the perturbation matrix associated to \(E_{6}^{\epsilon}\) are {0,0,λ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 3(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 4(ϵ,Σ c )} where λ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),λ 3(ϵ,Σ c ) and λ 4(ϵ,Σ c ) are the roots of the polynomial equation with real coefficients:
-
For f′(0)≠0,f(0)<0, Eq. (57) has only two changes of signs in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there is zero or two positive roots of (57). Substituting λ by −λ in (57) and applying the same rule we have zero or two negative roots of (57) for f′(0)≠0,f(0)<0. If all of them are complex conjugated, we need to resort to numerical investigation. If none of them are complex conjugated, then the curve of fixed points \(E_{6}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For ϵf′(0)>0,f(0)>0, Eq. (57) has only one change of sign in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there is one positive root of (57). Substituting λ by −λ in (57) and applying the same rule we have three negative roots of (57) for ϵf′(0)>0,f(0)>0. In summary, for ϵf′(0)>0,f(0)>0, at least two eigenvalues of the linear perturbation matrix of \(E_{6}^{+}\) are real of different signs. In this case the curve of fixed points \(E_{6}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For ϵf′(0)<0,f(0)>0, Eq. (57) has three changes of sign in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there are three positive roots of (57). Substituting λ by −λ in (57) and applying the same rule we have only one negative root of (57) for ϵf′(0)<0,f(0)>0. In this case the curve of fixed points \(E_{6}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For f′(0)=f(0)=0 the non null eigenvalues are −2,2; for f′(0)=0,f(0)≠0, the non null eigenvalues are:
$$\begin{aligned} &{\pm\frac{\sqrt{-\sqrt{24 f(0) \varSigma_c^2+(f(0)-4)^2}-f(0)+4}}{\sqrt{2}},}\\ &{\pm\frac{\sqrt{\sqrt{24 f(0) \varSigma_c^2+(f(0)-4)^2}-f(0)+4}}{\sqrt{2}};} \end{aligned}$$and for f′(0)≠0,f(0)=0, the non null eigenvalues are \(-2, 2, -\epsilon\sqrt{4 - 6 \varSigma_{c}^{2}}f'(0)\). Thus, in both cases \(E_{6}^{\pm}\) consists of saddle points.
The eigenvalues of the perturbation matrix associated to \(E_{7}^{\epsilon}\) are {0,0,μ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 3(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 4(ϵ,Σ c )} where μ 1(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 2(ϵ,Σ c ),μ 3(ϵ,Σ c ) and μ 4(ϵ,Σ c ) are the roots of the polynomial equation with real coefficients:
-
For \(\epsilon f'(0)<0, f(0)<0, -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<\varSigma_{c} <0\) or \(\epsilon f'(0)>0, f(0)<0, 0<\varSigma_{c} <\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\), or \(\epsilon f'(0)<0, f(0)<0, 0<\varSigma_{c} <\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\), or \(\epsilon f'(0)>0, f(0)<0, -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<\varSigma_{c} <0\), the Eq. (58) has only two changes of signs in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there is zero or two positive roots of (58). Substituting μ by −μ in (58) and applying the same rule we have zero or two negative roots of (58) for the same values of the free parameters. If all of them are complex conjugated, we need to resort to numerical investigation. If none of them are complex conjugated, then the curve of fixed points \(E_{7}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For \(f(0)>0, \epsilon f'(0)>0, 0<\varSigma_{c} <\frac{1}{\sqrt {2}}\) or \(f(0)>0, \epsilon f'(0)<0, \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<\varSigma_{c} <0\), Eq. (58) has only one change of sign in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there is one positive root of (58). Substituting μ by −μ in (58) and applying the same rule we have three negative roots of (58) for the same values of the parameters. In this case the curve of fixed points \(E_{7}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For \(f(0)>0, 0<\varSigma_{c} <\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}, \epsilon f'(0)<0\) or \(f(0)>0, -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<\varSigma_{c} <0, \epsilon f'(0)>0\) Eq. (58) has three changes of sign in the sequence of its coefficients. Hence, using the Descartes’s rule, we conclude that for this range of the parameters, there are three positive roots of (58). Substituting μ by −μ in (58) and applying the same rule we have only one negative root of (58) for the same values of the parameters. In this case the curve of fixed points \(E_{7}^{\epsilon}\) consists of saddle points.
-
For f′(0)=f(0)=0 the non null eigenvalues are \(2 \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1-\varSigma_{c}^{2}},-2 \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1-\varSigma_{c}^{2}}\); for f′(0)=0,f(0)≠0, the non null eigenvalues are \(\pm\sqrt{4-(f(0)+4) \varSigma_{c}^{2}-\sqrt{\Delta}}\), and \(\pm\sqrt{4-(f(0)+4) \varSigma_{c}^{2}+\sqrt{\Delta}}\), where \(\Delta=(f(0) (f(0) +4)+16) \varSigma_{c}^{4}-32 \varSigma_{c}^{2}+16\); and for f′(0)≠0,f(0)=0, the non null eigenvalues are \(-\sqrt{2} \varSigma_{c} \epsilon f'(0),\pm2 \sqrt{2-2 \varSigma _{c}^{2}}\). Thus, in both cases \(E_{7}^{\pm}\) consists of saddle points.
Observe that g 4(γ,x,Ω λ ) is always real-valued for the allowed values of the phase space variables and the allowed range for the free parameters. Then, although non-hyperbolic, E 8 behaves as a set of saddle points.
When Ω λc ≠1, \(\frac{\sqrt{6 \gamma (\varOmega_{\lambda}+1)^{2}-8 (\varOmega_{\lambda }^{2}+1 )}}{\varOmega_{\lambda}+1}\) is real valued, in this case the fixed points in the line E 9 behaves as saddle points.
For Σ c ≠0, \(\sqrt{2} \sqrt{\gamma (9 \varSigma^{2}-6 )-4 \varSigma^{2}+4}\) is real-valued, in this case the fixed points in the line E 10 behaves as saddle points.
For Σ c ≠0, the linear perturbation matrix evaluated at E 11 has at least two real eigenvalues of different signs, thus, the fixed points in the line E 11 behaves as saddle points.
Observe that the line E 9 and the line E 11 contains the special point with coordinates F: (Q=0,x=0,Ω m =0,Ω λ =1,Σ=0) in the first case when Ω λc →1 whereas in the second case for Σ c →0. Taking in both cases the proper limits we have that the eigenvalues of the linearization for F are \(\{0,0,-\sqrt{6 \gamma-4},\sqrt{6 \gamma-4},0,0 \}\). Hence, for \(\gamma> \frac{2}{3}\), F is of saddle type, whereas for \(\gamma< \frac{2}{3}\), there are two purely imaginary eigenvalues and the rest of the eigenvalues are zero. In this case we cannot say anything about its stability from the linearization and we need to resort to numerical inspection.
Observe that \(\sqrt{\gamma (6-9 \varSigma^{2} )+18 \varSigma^{2}-8}\) is real-valued for the allowed values of the phase space variables and the allowed range for the free parameters. Thus, all the points located at the line E 12 behaves as saddle points.
For \(0<\gamma<\frac{4}{3}\), \(E_{13}^{\pm}\) behaves as a saddle point.
Appendix B: Stability of expanding (contracting) solutions
Now let us comment on the stability of the first order perturbations of (28)–(33) near the critical points showed in Table 3.
The line of singular points \(Q_{1}^{\pm}\), although it is non-hyperbolic (actually, normally hyperbolic), behaves like a saddle point in the phase space of the RS model, since they have both nonempty stable and unstable manifolds (see the Table 6). The class \(Q_{1}^{+}\) is the analogous to the line denoted by P 1 in Escobar et al. (2012b).
The singular points \(Q_{2}^{\pm}(s^{*})\) and \(Q_{3}^{\pm}(s^{*})\) are non-hyperbolic (these points are related to \(P_{3}^{\pm}\) investigated in Escobar et al. 2012b), however they behave as saddle points since they have both nonempty stable and unstable manifolds (see the Table 6).
The singular point \(Q_{4}^{+}(s^{*})\) is the analogous to P 4 in Escobar et al. (2012b). It is a stable node in the cases \(0<\gamma\leq\frac{2}{9},s^{*}<-\sqrt{3\gamma},f' (s^{*} )<0\) or \(\frac{2}{9}<\gamma<\frac{4}{3},-\frac{2 \sqrt{6} \gamma}{\sqrt{9 \gamma -2}}\leq s^{*}<-\sqrt{3\gamma}, f' (s^{*} )<0\), or \(0<\gamma\leq\frac{2}{9},s^{*}>\sqrt{3\gamma }, f' (s^{*} )>0\), or \(\frac{2}{9}<\gamma<\frac{4}{3},\sqrt{3\gamma }<s^{*}\leq\frac{2 \sqrt{6} \gamma}{\sqrt{9 \gamma-2}}, f' (s^{*} )>0\). It is a spiral stable point for \(\frac{2}{9}<\gamma <\frac{4}{3},s^{*}<-\frac{2 \sqrt{6} \gamma}{\sqrt{9 \gamma -2}},f' (s^{*} )<0\) or \(\frac{2}{9}<\gamma<\frac{4}{3},s^{*}>\frac{2 \sqrt{6} \gamma}{\sqrt{9 \gamma-2}},f' (s^{*} )>0\). In summary, it is stable for \(0<\gamma <\frac{4}{3},s^{*}<-\sqrt{3\gamma},f' (s^{*} )<0\) or \(0<\gamma <\frac{4}{3},s^{*}>\sqrt{3\gamma},f' (s^{*} )>0\). Otherwise, it is a saddle point.
The singular point \(Q_{4}^{-}(s^{*})\) is a local source under the same conditions for which \(Q_{4}^{+}(s^{*})\) is stable.
The singular point \(Q_{5}^{+}(s^{*})\) is the analogous to P 5 in Escobar et al. (2012b). It is not hyperbolic for \(s^{*}\in\{0,\pm\sqrt{6},\pm\sqrt{3\gamma},2 \}\) or f′(s ∗)=0. In the hyperbolic case, \(Q_{5}^{+}(s^{*})\) is a stable node for \(0<\gamma \leq\frac{4}{3},-\sqrt{3 \gamma}<s^{*}<0,f' (s^{*} )<0\) or \(\frac{4}{3}<\gamma\leq2,-2<s^{*}<0,f' (s^{*} )<0\) or \(0<\gamma\leq \frac{4}{3},0<s^{*}<\sqrt{3 \gamma},f' (s^{*} )>0\) or \(\frac{4}{3}<\gamma\leq2,0<s^{*}<2,f' (s^{*} )>0\); otherwise, it is a saddle point.
The singular point \(Q_{5}^{-}(s^{*})\) is a local source under the same conditions for which \(Q_{5}^{+}(s^{*})\) is stable.
For evaluating the Jacobian matrix, and obtaining their eigenvalues at the singular points \(Q_{6}^{\pm}\), \(Q_{7}^{\pm}\) and \(Q_{11}^{\pm}\) we need to take the appropriate limits. The details on the stability analysis for \(Q_{6}^{+}\) and \(Q_{11}^{+}\) are offered in the Appendix C. The analysis of \(Q_{7}^{+}\) is essentially the same as for \(Q_{6}^{+}\).
The circles of critical points \(Q_{8} ^{\pm}\) are non-hyperbolic. Both solutions represents transient states in the evolution of the universe.
The singular point \(Q_{9}^{\pm}\) and the line of critical points \(Q_{10}^{\pm}\) are non-hyperbolic (\(Q_{9}^{+}\) is the analogous of P 10 for Ω λ =0 while \(Q_{10}^{+}\) is the analogous of P 10 for Ω λ ≠0 in Escobar et al. 2012b). In the Appendix B.1 we analyze the stability of \(Q_{9}^{+}\) by introducing a local set of coordinates adapted to the singular points. The non-hyperbolic fixed point \(Q_{9}^{-}\), behaves as a past attractor.
The singular point \(Q_{11}^{+}\) is the analogous of P 11 in Escobar et al. (2012b), this point represents a 1D set of singular points such that (Ω λ =1), parametrized by the values of s c . It is normally hyperbolic.
The singular points \(Q_{12}^{\pm}(s^{*})\) are non-hyperbolic for s ∗=0,±2, γ=4/3 or f′(s ∗)=0. \(Q_{12}^{+}(s^{*})\) is a stable node for \(\frac{4}{3}<\gamma\leq2,2<s^{*}\leq\frac{8}{\sqrt{15}}, f' (s^{*} )>0\), a stable spiral for \(\frac{4}{3}<\gamma\leq2, s^{*}>\frac{8}{\sqrt{15}}, f' (s^{*} )>0\). In summary, \(Q_{12}^{+}(s^{*})\) is stable for \(\frac{4}{3}<\gamma\leq2, s^{*}>2, f' (s^{*} )>0\). Otherwise it is a saddle point. \(Q_{12}^{-}(s^{*})\) is unstable for the same conditions for which \(Q_{12}^{+}(s^{*})\) is stable.
The eigenvalues of the linear perturbation matrix evaluated at each of these critical points are displayed in the Table 6.
2.1 B.1 De Sitter solutions
To investigate the de Sitter solution \(Q_{9}^{+}\), we introduce the local coordinates:
where ϵ is a small constant ϵ≪1. Then, we obtain the approximated system
The system (60) admits the exact solution passing by (\(\hat {Q}_{0},\hat{x}_{0},\hat{\varOmega}_{\lambda0},\hat{\varOmega}_{m0},\hat {\varOmega }_{\sigma0},\hat{s}_{0}\)) at τ=0 given by
where \(\beta=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-12 f(0)}\).
For the choice \(\beta^{2}<\frac{9}{4}\), i.e., f(0)>0, all the perturbations \(\hat{Q},\hat{x} ,\hat{\varOmega}_{m },\hat{\varOmega}_{\sigma},\hat {s}\) shrink to zero as τ→+∞, and \(\hat{\varOmega}_{\lambda}\) converges to a constant value. For \(\beta=\pm\frac{3}{2}\), i.e., for f(0)=0, \(\hat{x}\rightarrow \frac{\hat{s}_{0}}{\sqrt{6}}\) and \(\hat{s}\rightarrow\hat{s}_{0}\), and the other perturbations shrink to zero as τ→+∞. Combining the above arguments we obtain that for f(0)≥0, \(Q_{9}^{+}\) is stable, but not asymptotically stable. For \(\beta^{2}>\frac{9}{4}\), i.e., f(0)<0, all the perturbation values, but \(\hat{x}\) and \(\hat{s}\), which diverges, shrink to zero as τ→+∞. Thus, \(Q_{9}^{+}\) is a saddle.
For analyzing the curve of singular points \(Q_{10}^{+}\) we consider an arbitrary value Ω λ =u c , 0<u c <1, and introduce the local coordinates
where ϵ is a small constant ϵ≪1.
Then, we obtain the approximated system
The system (63) admits the exact solution passing by (\(\hat{Q}_{0},\hat{x}_{0},\hat{\varOmega}_{\lambda0},\hat{\varOmega }_{m0},\hat{\varOmega }_{\sigma0},\hat{s}_{0}\)) at τ=0 given by
where \(\vartheta=\sqrt{12 f(0) (u_{c}-1)+9}\). It is easy to see that for f(0)≥0 the solution is stable, but not asymptotically stable. For f(0)<0 is of saddle type.
It is worthy to mention that the above results could be proved by noticing that \(Q_{10}^{+}\)—as 1D set—is normaly hyperbolic since the eigen-direction associated with the null eigenvalue, (0,0,1,0,0,0)T, that is, the Ω λ -axis, is tangent to the set. Thus, the stability issue can be resolved by analyzing the signs of the non-null eigenvalues. However, let us comment that if we include the variable \(y=\frac{V}{3 H^{2}}\), in the analysis, the solution is unstable to perturbations along the y-direction.
Appendix C: Asymptotic analysis on the singular surface Ω λ +Σ 2=1
In this section we analyze the asymptotic structures of the system (28)–(33) near the critical points at the singular surface Ω λ +Σ 2=1.
3.1 C.1 Shear-dominated solution
Observe that the one of the singular points at the surface Ω λ +Σ 2=1 that represents a shear-dominated solution is \(Q_{6}^{+}\). To investigate its stability we introduce the local coordinates:
where ϵ is a constant satisfying ϵ≪1 and s c is an arbitrary real value for s. Taylor expanding the resulting system and truncating the second order terms we obtain the approximated system
Let us define the rates:
Let us assume γ>0. With the above assumptions we can define the new time variable N=γlna which preserves the time arrow. Then we deduce the differential equations
where the comma denotes derivatives with respect to N.
The system admits the general solution:
or
where c 1≠0 and c 2 are arbitrary constants. In the general case we have that r m →0 and r σ tends to a constant as N→−∞.
Thus, as τ→−∞ the system (66) has the asymptotic structure:
The system (71) admits the exact solution passing by (\({Q}_{0},\hat{x}_{0},\hat{\varOmega}_{\lambda0},\hat{\varOmega}_{m0},\hat {\varOmega}_{ \sigma0},\hat{s}_{0}\)) at τ=0 given by
Thus, the energy density perturbations goes to zero, and s diverge as τ→−∞. For that reason, \(Q_{6}^{+}\) cannot be the future attractor of the system, thus \(Q_{6}^{+}\) has a large probability to be a past attractor. Using the same approach for \(Q_{6}^{-}\) we obtain that as τ→+∞, the energy density perturbations goes to zero, but s diverge. Thus, although \(Q_{6}^{-}\) have a large probability to be a late time attractor, actually it is of saddle type. For \(Q_{7}^{\pm}\) we have similar results as for \(Q_{6}^{\pm}\). Since the procedure is essentially the same as for \(Q_{6}^{\pm}\), we omit the details.
3.2 C.2 Solution with 5D-corrections
Another singular points at the surface Ω λ +Σ 2=1 are the isotropic solutions with Ω λ =1 (critical points \(Q_{11}^{\pm}\)). For the stability analysis of \(Q_{11}^{+}\) , we introduce the local coordinates:
where ϵ is a constant satisfying ϵ≪1 and Q c ,s c are arbitrary real values of Q,s respectively. Then, we obtain the approximated system
where we have defined the rate \(r=\frac{\hat{\varOmega}_{m}}{\hat {\varOmega}_{\lambda}}\). The evolution equation for r is given by
The Eq. (75) has two singular points r=0 with eigenvalue \(\frac{dr'}{dr}|_{r=0}=-3\gamma\) and r=−1 with eigenvalue \(\frac {dr'}{dr}|_{r=-1}=3\gamma\). Then, assuming γ>0 we have that r→−1 as τ→−∞. This argument allow us to prove that as τ→−∞, the system (74) has the asymptotic structure
The system (76) admits the exact solution passing by (\({Q}_{0},\hat{x}_{0},\hat{\varOmega}_{\lambda0},\hat{\varOmega}_{m0},\hat {\varOmega}_{\sigma0},\hat{s}_{0}\)) at τ=0 given by
Hence, for γ>1, the perturbations \(\hat{Q},\hat{x}, \hat {\varOmega}_{\lambda},\hat{\varOmega}_{m},\hat{\varOmega}_{\sigma}\) shrink to zero as τ→−∞. In that limit s tends to a finite value. In this case, the solution under investigation has a 4D unstable manifold. The numerical simulations suggest that the singular point at the surface Ω λ +Σ 2=1 with Ω λ =1 is a local source. On the other hand, for γ<1, the solution behave as a saddle point, since the perturbation values \(\hat{x}\) and \(\hat{\varOmega }_{\sigma}\) do not tend to zero as τ→−∞. Using the same approach for \(Q_{11}^{-}\) we obtain that for γ>1, \(Q_{11}^{-}\) is stable as τ→+∞, whereas for γ<1 it is of saddle type.
These results for \(Q_{11}^{+}\) and for \(Q_{11}^{-}\) are in agreement with the analogous results for m + and for m − in the reference Campos and Sopuerta (2001a).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Escobar, D., Fadragas, C.R., Leon, G. et al. Asymptotic behavior of a scalar field with an arbitrary potential trapped on a Randall-Sundrum’s braneworld: the effect of a negative dark radiation term on a Bianchi I brane. Astrophys Space Sci 349, 575–602 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1650-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1650-8