Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dimensional Reduction in Barriers and Facilitators to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Willingness for Full-Service Sex Workers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Full-Service Sex Workers (FSSWs) face heightened risk of acquiring HIV, yet exhibit relatively low adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)—an antiviral that substantially reduces HIV acquisition risk. Little work examines barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake willingness among FSSWs. This study aimed to identify the distinct components of barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake willingness for FSSWs. Here, we subjected 19 PrEP barriers and facilitators identified in the literature to a principal component analysis (PCA) among a sample of 83 FSSWs. Preliminary statistics supported factorability of data. PCA revealed three distinct components of barriers and facilitators that explained 62.80% of the total variance in survey responses. We labeled these components Behavioral and Social Concerns (α = 0.93), Access and Affordability (α = 0.67), and Biologically Based Health Concerns (α = 0.79). This study shows promise for future clinical and research utility of these factors and provides a basis for future psychometric studies of barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake willingness among FSSWs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Due to the sensitive nature of these data, data are not available for public use.

Code Availability

All analyses were conducted using point-and-click functions in IBM SPSS. No code is available.

References

Download references

Funding

This project was supported through 2018 Rosalee G. and Raymond A. Weiss Research and Program Innovation Grant from the American Psychological Foundation. At the time of publication, Stephen Ramos was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIH) by grant # T32 DA023356.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SR contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. HW contributed to writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. LK contributed to writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. SDB contributed to writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen D. Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors deny any conflicts of interest to report.

Informed Consent

Participants provided informed consent prior to completing the study screener and full survey.

Consent to Participate

All participants provided documented consent to participate in the study.

Consent for Publication

Individual data and images are not published. All data are presented in aggregate, as per initial consent to participate in the study.

Ethical Approval

Approved by the Illinois Institute of Technology IRB (IRB-2019-030).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramos, S.D., Woodward, H., Kannout, L. et al. Dimensional Reduction in Barriers and Facilitators to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Willingness for Full-Service Sex Workers. Arch Sex Behav 53, 799–810 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02742-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02742-z

Keywords

Navigation