Abstract
Some men sexually attracted to types of persons (e.g., women) or things (e.g., animals) also have internalized sexual attractions: sexual arousal by the idea of being the type of person or thing to whom they are attracted. Consequently, some of these men develop erotic target identity inversions, in which they imitate, yearn to be, or identify as an instance of their erotic target. Erotic Target Identity Inversion Theory predicts that for every external erotic target to which men are attracted, a subset of men will develop an internalized sexual attraction, which may cause an erotic target identity inversion. We examined these predictions in Internet surveys of three samples of men with paraphilic sexual interests: 322 men attracted to amputees, 1501 men attracted to animals, and 402 men attracted to severely obese persons. All samples included substantial minorities of men reporting internalized sexual attractions and erotic target identity inversions specific to their external sexual attractions (e.g., men attracted to amputees who are also aroused by the fantasy of being amputees and wish to become amputees). The correlation between degree of each internalized sexual attraction and degree of its corresponding erotic target identity inversion was approximately 1.0 after correction for attenuation. In each sample, participants’ specific internalized sexual attraction was positively correlated with autogynephilia, likely the most common internalized sexual attraction in men. Erotic Target Identity Inversion Theory can potentially explain a variety of otherwise puzzling phenomena, including transgender identity among female-attracted natal males and men seeking amputations of healthy limbs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
These data are available upon reasonable request. A copy of the survey instrument is available to those who contact the corresponding author.
Notes
One complication is that if an internalized sexual attraction is especially strong, this may prevent sexual attraction to any external erotic target. (Lack of sexual interest in others is analloeroticism.) This has been observed among autogynephilic males, some of whom identify as asexual (Blanchard, 1989a). Both Blanchard and we believe that analloerotic autogynephilic males are like males attracted to women, and that the former would express attraction to women if the internalization of their autogynephilia was less complete. Strictly speaking, this means that our first latent variable, “External Sexual Attraction” might be more accurately renamed “Propensity to Have a Specific External Sexual Attraction.” However, in the current research, we recruited participants who had specific external sexual attractions, and so none were analloerotic.
References
Abel, G. G., & Osborn, C. (1992). The paraphilias: The extent and nature of sexually deviant and criminal behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 675–687.
Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Joseph Henry Press.
Bailey, J. M., Blanchard, R., Hsu, K. J., & Revelle, W. (2021). A map of desire: Multidimensional scaling of men’s sexual interest in male and female children and adults. Psychological Medicine, 51, 2714–2720.
Bailey, J. M., & Hsu, K. J. (2017). Orienting basic research on chronophilias [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 23–26.
Bailey, J. M., & Hsu, K. J. (2022). How autogynephilic are natal females? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 3311–3318.
Bailey, J. M., Hsu, K. J., & Bernhard, P. A. (2016). An Internet study of men sexually attracted to children: Sexual attraction patterns. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 976–988.
Bártová, K., Androvičová, R., Krejčová, L., Weiss, P., & Klapilová, K. (2021). The prevalence of paraphilic interests in the Czech population: Preference, arousal, the use of pornography, fantasy, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 58, 86–96.
Baur, E., Forsman, M., Santtila, P., Johansson, A., Sandnabba, K., & Långström, N. (2016). Paraphilic sexual interests and sexually coercive behavior: A population-based twin study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1163–1172.
Bhugra, D., Popelyuk, D., & McMullen, I. (2010). Paraphilias across cultures: Contexts and controversies. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 242–256.
Blanchard, R. (1989a). The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 315–334.
Blanchard, R. (1989b). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616–623.
Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 235–251.
Blanchard, R. (1992). Nonmonotonic relation of autogynephilia and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 271–276.
Blanchard, R. (1993a). Partial versus complete autogynephilia and gender dysphoria. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 301–307.
Blanchard, R. (1993b). The she-male phenomenon and the concept of partial autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 69–76.
Blanchard, R. (1993c). Varieties of autogynephilia and their relationship to gender dysphoria. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 241–251.
Blanchard, R., & Hucker, S. J. (1991). Age, transvestism, bondage, and concurrent paraphilic activities in 117 fatal cases of autoerotic asphyxia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 371–377.
Blanchard, R., Racansky, I. G., & Steiner, B. W. (1986). Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross-dressers. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 452–462.
Borneman, M. J. (2010). Correction for attenuation. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 261–264). Sage.
Brown, A., Barker, E. D., & Rahman, Q. (2020). Erotic target identity inversions among men and women in an Internet sample. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17, 99–110.
Dawson, S. J., Bannerman, B. A., & Lalumière, M. L. (2016). Paraphilic interests: An examination of sex differences in a nonclinical sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 20–45.
First, M. B. (2005). Desire for amputation of a limb: Paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 35, 919–928.
Foley, K. E. (2017, May 24). New research shows there’s a good reason why some people want to cut off their healthy arms and legs. Quartz. https://qz.com/988823/new-research-shows-theres-a-good-reason-why-some-people-want-to-cut-off-their-healthy-arms-and-legs
Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1993). Erotic target location errors in male gender dysphorics, paedophiles, and fetishists. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 558–563.
Hall, W. J., Dawes, H. C., & Plocek, N. (2021). Sexual orientation identity development milestones among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 753954. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753954
Hsu, K. J., & Bailey, J. M. (2017). Autopedophilia: Erotic-target identity inversions in men sexually attracted to children. Psychological Science, 28, 115–123.
Hsu, K. J., & Bailey, J. M. (2019). The “furry” phenomenon: Characterizing sexual orientation, sexual motivation, and erotic target identity inversions in male furries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1349–1369.
Hsu, K. J., & Bailey, J. M. (2022). Erotic target identity inversions. In D. P. VanderLaan & W. I. Wong (Eds.), Gender and sexuality development: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 589–612). Springer.
Hsu, K. J., Rosenthal, A. M., & Bailey, J. M. (2015). The psychometric structure of items assessing autogynephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1301–1312.
Hsu, K. J., Rosenthal, A. M., Miller, D. I., & Bailey, J. M. (2017). Sexual arousal patterns of autogynephilic male cross-dressers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 247–253.
Imhoff, R., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2017). Toward a theoretical understanding of sexual orientation and sexual motivation [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 29–33.
Joyal, C. C., & Carpentier, J. (2017). The prevalence of paraphilic interests and behaviors in the general population: A provincial survey. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 161–171.
Kimbrough, A. M., Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 896–900.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. W. B. Saunders.
Långström, N., & Seto, M. C. (2006). Exhibitionistic and voyeuristic behavior in a Swedish national population survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 427–435.
Långström, N., & Zucker, K. J. (2005). Transvestic fetishism in the general population: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 87–95.
Lawrence, A. A. (2004). Autogynephilia: A paraphilic model of gender identity disorder. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 8, 69–87.
Lawrence, A. A. (2006). Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 263–278.
Lawrence, A. A. (2007). Becoming what we love: Autogynephilic transsexualism conceptualized as an expression of romantic love. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 506–520.
Lawrence, A. A. (2009a). Anatomic autoandrophilia in an adult male. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 1050–1056.
Lawrence, A. A. (2009b). Erotic target location errors: An underappreciated paraphilic dimension. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 194–215.
Lawrence, A. A. (2010). Societal individualism predicts prevalence of nonhomosexual orientation in male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 573–583.
Lawrence, A. A. (2013). Men trapped in men’s bodies: Narratives of autogynephilic transsexualism. Springer.
Lawrence, A. A. (2017). Autogynephilia and the typology of male-to-female transsexualism: Concepts and controversies. European Psychologist, 22, 39–54.
Moser, C., & Kleinplatz, P. J. (2020). Conceptualization, history, and future of the paraphilias. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 379–399.
Parzer, V., Sjöholm, K., Brix, J. M., Svensson, P. A., Ludvik, B., & Taube, M. (2021). Development of a BMI-assigned Stunkard scale for the evaluation of body image perception based on data of the SOS reference study. Obesity Facts, 14, 397–404.
Ramachandran, V. S., & McGeoch, P. (2007). Can vestibular caloric stimulation be used to treat apotemnophilia? Medical Hypotheses, 69, 250–252.
Roberts, S. E., Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., & Gerbasi, K. C. (2016). Not all fantasies are created equal: Fantasy sport fans’ perceptions of furry, brony, and anime fans. Phoenix Papers, 2, 40–60.
Serano, J. (2020). Autogynephilia: A scientific review, feminist analysis, and alternative ‘embodiment fantasies’ model. Sociological Review, 68, 763–778.
Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.
Seto, M. C. (2017). The puzzle of male chronophilias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 3–22.
Stoller, R. J. (1985). A child fetishist. In Presentations of gender (pp. 93–136). Yale University Press.
Stunkard, A. J., Sorenson, T., & Schulsinger, F. (1983). Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In S. Kety, L. P. Rowland, R. L. Sidman, & S. W. Matthysse (Eds.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders (pp. 115–120). Raven.
Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., et al. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309–325.
Trafimow, D. (2016). The attenuation of correlation coefficients: A statistical literacy issue. Teaching Statistics, 38, 25–28.
Weir, C. B., & Jan, A. (2019). BMI classification percentile and cut off points. Treasure: StatPearls.
Zucker, K. J., & Blanchard, R. (1997). Transvestic fetishism: Psychopathology and theory. In D. R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 253–279). Guilford.
Acknowledgements
We thank moderators of acrotomophilic, zoophilic, and lipophilic Internet sites who allowed us to survey their communities. We are especially grateful to Komet, ZTHorse, and other members of “Zooville” for their support and specific feedback on the survey.
Funding
This study received no financial support or funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
Ethical Approval
The authors certify that the research complies with ethical standards and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northwestern University.
Informed Consent
Electronic consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. On the first page of the online survey, participants were informed of the research purpose and potential risks and benefits of participating, that their participation was voluntary, and were presented with contact information for the researcher and for Northwestern University’s IRB. The research survey questions were displayed only if the participant clicked “agree” which indicated that the participant read and understood the information, were at least 18 years of age, and agreed to volunteer as a research participant for the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, J.M., Hsu, K.J. & Jang, H.H. Elaborating and Testing Erotic Target Identity Inversion Theory in Three Paraphilic Samples. Arch Sex Behav (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02647-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02647-x