Abstract
Study 1: Students (N = 256 women, 129 men, and 13 nonbinary individuals, 61.8% heterosexual) from the same college campus studied 20 years ago (Murnen, 2000) reported on terms they used to refer to male genitals, female genitals, and “having sex” either within the context of an intimate partnership, talking with friends of their gender, or talking with friends in a mixed-gender group. Terms for genitals were coded as degrading or not, and terms for sex as aggressive or not, based on the previous study. Whereas in the past almost three-quarters of men used a degrading term for female genitals, that amount decreased to about one-quarter in the present sample. On the other hand, among women there was a significant increase in the use of a degrading term for women’s genitals in the intimate partner context, particularly among sexual minority women. Degrading and aggressive language use was predicted by pornography use and endorsement of gender stereotyped sexual attitudes. Study 2: Interpretations of sexual terms were studied among 29 sexual minority women, 81 heterosexual women, 16 sexual minority men, and 54 heterosexual men. We found that few terms were perceived as degrading or aggressive today (unlike 20 years ago) and that students believe that societal changes such as sexual education and the #MeToo movement were perceived as responsible for changes in sexual language use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, L. A., & Whitson, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
Aubrey, J. S., & Smith, S. E. (2013). Development and validation of the Endorsement of the Hookup Culture Index. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.637246
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Bruns, A. E., & Maguin, E. (2018). Agents, virgins, sluts, and losers: The sexual typecasting of young heterosexual women. Sex Roles, 79, 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0907-7
Dawson, K., Gabhainn, S. N., & MacNeela, P. (2020). Toward a model of porn literacy: Core concepts, rationales, and approaches. Journal of Sex Research, 57, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1556238
DeLamater, J. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1998). Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551913
Diamond, L. M. (2012). The desire disorder in research on sexual orientation in women: Contributions of dynamical systems theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9909-7
Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. Times Books.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the Sex is Power scale. Gender Issues, 30, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-013-9114-6
Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorising women’s engagement in the sexualisation of culture. Feminism and Psychology, 20, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509351854
Gibson, C., Davenport, S., Fowler, T., Harris, C. B., Prudhomme, M., Whiting, S., & Simmons, H. S. (2019). Understanding the 2017 “Me Too” Movement’s timing. Humanity and Society, 43(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597619832047
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507084950
Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the “sexualization of culture” debates. Sex Roles, 66, 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low-and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x
Graff, K., Murnen, S. K., & Krause, A. (2013). Low-cut shirts and high- heeled shoes: Increased sexualization across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles, 69, 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0321-0
Graff, K., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2012). Too sexualized to be taken seriously? Perceptions of a girl in childlike vs. sexualizing clothing. Sex Roles, 66, 764–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0145-3
Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Lee, C. H. J., Matika, C. M., Wang, W., & Lindsay, C. J. (2017). The diversity and prevalence of sexual orientation self-labels in a New Zealand national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0857-5
Gurung, R. A. R., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z
Hald, G. M. (2006). Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 624–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0
Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 624–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1
Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. Routledge.
Klaassen, M. J. E., & Peter, J. (2015). Gender (in)equality in internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic internet videos. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.976781
Lamont, E., Roach, T., & Kahn, S. (2018). Navigating campus hookup culture: LGBTQ students and college hookups. Sociological Forum, 33, 1000–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12458
Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386119
Maas, M. K., McCauley, H. L., Bonomi, A. E., & Leija, S. G. (2018). “I was grabbed by my pussy and its #NotOkay”: A Twitter backlash against Donald Trump’s degrading commentary. Violence Against Women, 24, 1739–1750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217743340
Mager, J., & Helgeson, J. G. (2011). Fifty years of advertising images: Some changing perspectives on role portrayals along with enduring consistencies. Sex Roles, 64, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9782-6
Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
Muehlenhard, C. L., Peterson, Z. D., Humphreys, T. P., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
Murnen, S. K. (2000). Gender and the use of sexually degrading language. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00214.x
Murnen, S. K. (2015). A social constructivist approach to understanding the relationship between masculinity and sexual aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16, 370–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039693
Murnen, S. K., & Kohlman, M. H. (2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9225-1
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If ’boys will be boys’, then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020488928736
Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). An abbreviated tool for assessing conformity to masculine norms: Psychometric properties of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021904
Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). ‘“Hookups”’: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/3813373
Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. Times Books.
Pearson, C. (2017). Thousands are knitting ‘pussy hats’ for the women’s march on Washington. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/thousands-are-knitting-pussy-hats-for-the-womens-march-on-washington_n_586bb22ee4b0d9a5945c636a?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000603.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.551851
PettyJohn, M. E., Muzzey, F. K., Maas, M. K., & McCauley, H. L. (2019). #HowIWillChange: Engaging men and boys in the #MeToo Movement. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 20(4), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000186
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sabina, C., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2008). The nature and dynamics of internet pornography exposure for youth. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 691–693. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0179
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Sage.
Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2016). Our scripted sexuality: The development and validation of the heterosexual script and its relation to television consumption. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815623686
Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K., & Myers, T. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college women and men think about and do to be “sexy”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314524168
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. (2015). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html.
van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
Weis, J. R. (2015). Title IX and the state of campus sexual violence in the United States: Power, policy, and local bodies. Human Organization, 74(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.3.276
Wright, P. J., & Bae, S. (2015). A national prospective study of pornography consumption and Gendered attitudes towards women. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9264-z
Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., Kraus, A., & Klann, E. (2017). Pornography consumption and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 43, 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures were performed in accordance with ethical guidelines for research, reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at Kenyon College.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the two studies.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murnen, S.K., Bullock, P.E., Tetreault, E.J. et al. Sexual Language Use in U.S. College Students Across Twenty Years. Arch Sex Behav 50, 2189–2201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02022-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02022-8