Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Attentional Bias in Young Adult Heterosexual Men: Attention Allocation Following Self-Regulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Being sexually aroused can lead to a stronger propensity to engage in sexual risk-taking and sexually coercive behaviors possibly by narrowing attentional focus toward immediate gratification rather than long-term consequences. The goal of this paper was to investigate the attentional processes implicated in sexual self-regulation failure and its moderating factors, namely having a stronger sensitivity to sexual cues (dual control model) or being less able to implement behavioral intentions (action control theory) following a first effortful task. A total of 82 young adult heterosexual men completed a Dot Probe task to assess their attentional bias toward sexual stimuli. Effortful control was manipulated using a Stroop task. Regardless of conditions, higher sexual excitability was predictive of a stronger attentional bias toward sexual cues, while higher inhibition due to threat of performance failure was predictive of a lower bias for such cues. In the experimental condition, action-oriented individuals were able to negate this attentional bias by staying more focused on the task, while state-oriented participants showed higher orientation toward the sexual cues and thus a higher bias. These results suggest that both higher-order processes, like intention implementation, and lower-order processes, like sexual inhibition and excitation systems, are the key to regulation failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Reviewing the extensive literature on the replication crisis of ego depletion is beyond the scope of this paper. Different meta-analyses reached different conclusions regarding the putative effect size (Carter, Kofler, Forster, & McCullough, 2015; Carter & McCullough, 2014; Hagger, Wood, Stiff, & Chatzisarantis, 2010). Two preregistered multisite studies failed to replicate classical ego depletion effects (Hagger et al., 2016; Lurquin et al., 2016), yet have been criticized for the way they tried to manipulate the effect (Baumeister & Vohs, 2016; Dang, 2016). Other studies were successful (Dang et al., 2021; Garrison et al., 2019; Lin, Saunders, Friese, Evans, & Inzlicht, 2020), although with lower effect sizes than previous studies. This decline in effect sizes in recent years could merely be a function of increases in study precision and decreased research bias (Vadillo, 2019).

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded through a service contract granted by the Canadian Justice Department to the last author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Nolet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nolet, K., Emond, F.C., Pfaus, J.G. et al. Sexual Attentional Bias in Young Adult Heterosexual Men: Attention Allocation Following Self-Regulation. Arch Sex Behav 50, 2531–2542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01928-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01928-7

Keywords

Navigation