Skip to main content
Log in

Sex/Gender: Did John Money Borrow the Distinction from Leland Earl Hinsie?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Hinsie ignored the terms heterosociality and homosociality, introduced into medical psychology by Flügel (1927) “in an analogous sense to the well-known existing pair of ‘homosexual’ and ‘heterosexual’” (p. 147), or rather, Hinsie oddly redefined them in terms of “social relationship” rather than social orientedness (Hinsie & Shatzky, 1953, pp. 255, 258). Many developmentalists were using heterosexuality in the sense of heterosociality, incidentally: “the focus of [social] interest upon members of the opposite sex” (Garrison, 1934, p. 94).

  2. I thank Dr. Ken Zucker for confirming that Money’s 1952 dissertation does not cite Hinsie.

  3. Adler (1910) already discussed the developmental implications of psychische Zweigeschlechtlichkeit (rather than Bisexualität).

  4. According to the reviewer, Volume 2 of Helene Deutsch’s The Psychology of Women (1945) “misses—as the psychoanalyst usually misses—the useful distinction between sex (a matter of anatomy, physiology and fervid behavior) and gender (the social estimation of the man-like or the masculine and of the woman-like or feminine). The blurring of this distinction, with its consequent exaggeration of mating and its episodes, is common among those depictions of the hominid which spring from an interest in the fortunes of the individual organism as a person, a patient, a case, an offender against society, or a psyche” (Damm, 1946, p. 311, emphasis in original).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diederik F. Janssen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen, D.F. Sex/Gender: Did John Money Borrow the Distinction from Leland Earl Hinsie?. Arch Sex Behav 49, 2223–2226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01767-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01767-y

Navigation