Notes
To be consistent with Connor et al.’s terminology, I am using the term “sexual pain” to refer to pain during sexual activity experienced by women who have undergone FGC. However, as argued by Binik (2010) and Binik et al. (2002) and reflected in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), the pain is not inherently sexual but rather it is located in the genital and pelvic region and commonly triggered by penetrative sexual activities. The pain can be provoked in both sexual and non-sexual contexts. Thus, the terms genito-pelvic pain and pain during intercourse/sexual activity are typically preferable.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Bergeron, S., Rosen, N. O., & Morin, M. (2011). Genital pain in women: Beyond interference with intercourse. Pain, 152, 1223–1225.
Binik, Y. M. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 292–303.
Binik, Y. M., Reissing, E. D., Pukall, C. F., Flory, N., Payne, K. A., & Khalifé, S. (2002). The female sexual pain disorders: Genital pain or sexual dysfunction? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 425–429.
Boerner, K., & Rosen, N. O. (2015). Acceptance of vulvovaginal pain in women with provoked vestibulodynia and their partners: Associations with pain, psychological, and sexual adjustment. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1450–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12889.
Brauer, M., Lakeman, M., van Lunsen, R., & Laan, E. (2014). Predictors of task-persistent and fear-avoiding behaviors in women with sexual pain disorders. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 3051–3063. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12697.
Cano, A., & Williams, A. C. (2010). Social interaction in pain: Reinforcing pain behaviors or building intimacy? Pain, 149, 9–11.
Connor, J. J., Brady, S. S., Chaisson, N., Mohamed, F. S., & Robinson, B. E. (2019). Understanding women’s responses to sexual pain after female genital cutting: An integrative psychological pain response model. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1422-9.
Davis, S. N. P., Bergeron, S., Bois, K., Sadikaj, G., Binik, Y. M., & Steben, M. (2015). A prospective 2-year examination of cognitive and behavioral correlates of provoked vestibulodynia outcomes. Clinical Journal of Pain, 31, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000128.
Edmond, S. N., & Keefe, F. J. (2015). Validating pain communication: Current state of the science. Pain, 156, 215–219.
Elmerstig, E., Wijma, B., & Bertero, R. N. T. (2008). Why do young women continue to have sexual intercourse despite pain? Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 357–363.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Perters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 581–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Craig, K. D., Duck, S., Cano, A., Goubert, L., Jackson, P. L., … Fitzgerald, T. D. (2011). A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 910–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023876.
Krahé, C., Springer, A., Weinman, J. A., & Fotopoulou, A. (2013). The social modulation of pain: Others as predictive signals of salience—a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00386.
Lemieux, A., Bergeron, S., Steben, M., & Lambert, B. (2013). Do romantic partners’ responses to entry dyspareunia affect women’s experiences of pain? The roles of catastrophizing and self-efficacy. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 2274–2284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12252.
Muise, A., Bergeron, S., Impett, E. A., Delisle, I., & Rosen, N. O. (2018). Communal motivation in couples coping with vulvodynia: Sexual distress mediates associations with pain, depression, and anxiety. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 106, 34–40.
Muise, A., Bergeron, S., Impett, E. A., & Rosen, N. O. (2017). Costs and benefits of sexual communal motivation for couples coping with vulvodynia. Health Psychology, 36, 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000470.
Nguyen, R. H. N., Reese, R. L., & Harlow, B. L. (2015). Differences in pain subtypes between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women with chronic vulvar pain. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 144–150.
Nguyen, R. H. N., Turner, R. M., Rydell, S. A., Maclehose, R. F., & Harlow, B. L. (2013). Perceived stereotyping and seeking care for chronic vulvar pain. Pain Medicine, 14, 1461–1467.
Pazmany, E., Bergeron, S., Verhaeghe, J., Van Oudenhove, L., & Enzlin, P. (2014). Sexual communication, dyadic adjustment, and psychosexual well-being in premenopausal women with self-reported dyspareunia and their partners: A controlled study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1786–1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12518.
Pukall, C. F., Goldstein, A., Bergeron, S., Foster, D., Stein, A., Kellogg-Spadt, S., & Bachmann, G. A. (2016). Vulvodynia: Definition, prevalence, impact, and pathophysiological factors. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 291–304.
Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M. (2012). A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and pain perception (part 2): Do biopsychosocial factors alter pain sensitivity differently in women and men? Pain, 153, 619–635.
Rosen, N. O., & Bergeron, S. (2019). Genito-pelvic pain through a dyadic lens: Moving toward an interpersonal emotion regulation model of women’s sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 56, 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1513987.
Rosen, N. O., Bergeron, S., Sadikaj, G., & Delisle, I. (2015). Daily associations among male partner responses, pain during intercourse, and anxiety in women with vulvodynia and their partners. Journal of Pain, 16, 1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.09.003.
Rosen, N. O., Bergeron, S., Sadikaj, G., Glowacka, M., Delisle, I., & Baxter, M. (2013). Impact of partner responses on sexual function in women with vulvodynia and their partners: A dyadic daily experience study. Health Psychology, 33, 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034550.
Rosen, N. O., Muise, A., Impett, E. A., Delisle, I., Baxter, M., & Bergeron, S. (2018). Sexual cues mediate the daily relations between interpersonal goals, pain, and wellbeing in couples coping with vulvodynia. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 216–227.
Rosen, N. O., Rancourt, K., Corsini-Munt, S., & Bergeron, S. (2014). Beyond a “woman’s problem”: The role of relationship processes in genital pain. Current Sexual Health Reports, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-013-0006-2.
Rosen, N. O., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Byers, E. S. (2017). Understanding the sexual satisfaction of women with provoked vestibulodynia and their partners: Comparison with matched controls. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 43, 747–759.
Sadownik, L., Smith, K. B., Hui, A., & Brotto, L. A. (2017). The impact of a woman’s dyspareunia and its treatment on her intimate partner: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 43, 529–542.
Smith, K. B., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Sexual function, relationship adjustment, and the relational impact of pain in male partners of women with provoked vulvar pain. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12484.
Acknowledgements
Natalie O. Rosen is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. She is grateful to Samantha Dawson and Serena Corsini-Munt for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this commentary.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Rosen has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosen, N.O. The Importance of Interpersonal Context When Conceptualizing Sexual Pain After Female Genital Cutting. Arch Sex Behav 50, 1887–1890 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01523-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01523-x