Skip to main content
Log in

Sex Differences in Attributions to Positive and Negative Sexual Scenarios in Men and Women With and Without Sexual Problems: Reconsidering Stereotypes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People with sexual problems are more likely to attribute negative sexual experiences to themselves, in contrast to sexually functional individuals who attribute negative sexual experiences to external factors such as the circumstance or partner. We investigated attribution patterns in 820 men and 753 women, some of whom reported an orgasmic problem, to assess differences between the sexes and those with and without an orgasmic difficulty. Specifically, using an Internet-based approach, we compared attribution responses to four sexual scenarios, one representing a positive sexual experience and three representing negative sexual experiences. Women were more likely to attribute positive outcomes to their partner than men. Women were also more likely to attribute negative outcomes to themselves than men, but they more readily blamed their partner and circumstances for negative outcomes than men as well. Those with orgasmic problems were less willing to take credit for positive outcomes and more willing to accept blame for negative outcomes. Interaction effects between sex and orgasmic problems further highlighted differences between men’s and women’s attribution patterns. These results are interpreted in the context of traditional notions that men’s attributions tend to be more self-serving and women’s attributions more self-derogatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These men showed symptoms of premature ejaculation (PE), “including ejaculating before desired” (wording borrowed from DSM-5, American Psychiatric Association, 2013), but were not formally diagnosed as such.

  2. These women showed signs of female orgasmic disorder (FOD) but did not necessarily meet the DSM-5 criteria and were not diagnosed as such.

  3. Analyses were run both with and without this variable, as its inclusion eliminated some participants who were not currently or recently in a relationship. The overall results (significant covariates) did not differ between analyses.

  4. “Interest in sex” correlated positively with “importance of sex” (r [1571] = .63), and “overall relationship quality” correlated positively with “sexual relationship quality” (r [1571] = .70).

  5. Interpretation of partial η2, 0.01 = small, 0.06 = medium, 0.14 = large (Draper, 2018). http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/best/effect.html.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Rowland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rowland, D.L., Dabbs, C.R. & Medina, M.C. Sex Differences in Attributions to Positive and Negative Sexual Scenarios in Men and Women With and Without Sexual Problems: Reconsidering Stereotypes. Arch Sex Behav 48, 855–866 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1270-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1270-z

Keywords

Navigation