Notes
The much less specific sexual orientation of heterosexual women needs a different theory as discussed by Bailey (2009).
Japanese for “abnormity, perversion.” Outside of Japanese culture, this usually refers to pornographic depictions in comics (manga) and animated movies (anime).
References
Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–64). New York: Springer.
Bailey, M. J., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. M., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101.
Fredriks, A. M., van Buuren, S., Fekkes, M., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., & Wit, J. M. (2005). Are age references for waist circumference, hip circumference and waist-hip ratio in Dutch children useful in clinical practice? European Journal of Pediatrics, 164, 216–222.
Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (1996). The science in phallometric measurement of male sexual interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 156–160.
Hoffmann, H., Janssen, E., & Turner, S. (2004). Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: Effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 43–53.
Imhoff, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2014). Sexual disinhibition under sexual arousal: Evidence for domain specificity in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1123–1136.
Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Bernhardt, J., Dierksmeier, A., & Banse, R. (2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 676–690.
Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1275–1288.
Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Weiß, S., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2012). Vicarious viewing time: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task- or stimulus-specific processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1389–1401.
Joseph, P. N., Sharma, R. K., Agarwal, A., & Sirot, L. K. (2015). Men ejaculate larger volumes of semen, more motile sperm, and more quickly when exposed to images of novel women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 195–200.
Mazières, A., Trachman, M., Cointet, J.-P., Coulmont, B., & Prieur, C. (2014). Deep tags: Toward a quantitative analysis of online pornography. Porn Studies, 1, 80–95.
Norris, A. L., Marcus, D. K., & Green, B. A. (2015). Homosexuality as a discrete class. Psychological Science, 26, 1843–1853.
Oberlader, V. A., Ettinger, U., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016). Development of a cued pro- and antisaccade paradigm: An indirect measure to explore automatic components of sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0839-7.
Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2012). A billion wicked thoughts: What the Internet tells us about sexual relationships. New York: Plume.
Oliver, D. L. (1989). The native cultures of the Pacific Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Plaud, J. J., & Martini, R. (1999). The respondent conditioning of male sexual arousal. Behavior Modification, 23, 254–268.
Rachman, S. (1966). Sexual fetishism: An experimental analogue. Psychological Record, 16, 293–296.
Schmidt, A. F., Babchishin, K. M., & Lehmann, R. J. B. (2016). A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3.
Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., & Imhoff, R. (2015). Indirect measures in forensic contexts. In T. M. Ortner & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Behavior-based assessment in psychology: Going beyond self-report in the personality, affective, motivation, and social domains (pp. 173–194). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schmidt, A. F., Mokros, A., & Banse, R. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153.
Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.
Seto, M. C. (2016). The puzzle of male chronophilias. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0799-y.
Shimokata, H., Tobin, J. D., Muller, D. C., Elahi, D., Coon, P. J., & Andres, R. (1989). Studies in the distribution of body fat: I. Effects of age, sex, and obesity. Journal of Gerontology, 44, M66–M73.
Smid, W. J., & Wever, E. C. (2014). Incentive theory of sexual motivation: A framework for the description of sexual offending behaviour and the role of sexual deviance. In D. P. Boer (Ed.), The Wiley–Blackwell handbook on the assessment, treatment and theories of sexual offending (pp. 141–164). Chichester: Wiley.
Tanner, J. (1978). Fetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168–193.
Wright, L. W., & Adams, H. E. (1994). Assessment of sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 221–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Roland Imhoff declares that he has no conflict of interest. Rainer Banse declares that he has no conflict of interest. Alexander F. Schmidt declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imhoff, R., Banse, R. & Schmidt, A.F. Toward a Theoretical Understanding of Sexual Orientation and Sexual Motivation. Arch Sex Behav 46, 29–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0881-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0881-5