Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 141–153 | Cite as

Visual Attention Patterns of Women with Androphilic and Gynephilic Sexual Attractions

  • Samantha J. Dawson
  • Katherine M. Fretz
  • Meredith L. ChiversEmail author
Special Section: The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation

Abstract

Women who report exclusive sexual attractions to men (i.e., androphilia) exhibit gender-nonspecific patterns of sexual response—similar magnitude of genital response to both male and female targets. Interestingly, women reporting any degree of attraction to women (i.e., gynephilia) show significantly greater sexual responses to stimuli depicting female targets compared to male targets. At present, the mechanism(s) underlying these patterns are unknown. According to the information processing model (IPM), attentional processing of sexual cues initiates sexual responding; thus, attention to sexual cues may be one mechanism to explain the observed within-gender differences in specificity findings among women. The purpose of the present study was to examine patterns of initial and controlled visual attention among women with varying sexual attractions. We used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of 164 women who differed in their degree of androphilia and gynephilia. We found that both exclusively and predominantly androphilic women showed gender-nonspecific patterns of initial attention. In contrast, ambiphilic (i.e., concurrent androphilia and gynephilia) and predominantly/exclusively gynephilic women oriented more quickly toward female targets. Controlled attention patterns mirrored patterns of self-reported sexual attractions for three of these four groups of women, such that gender-specific patterns of visual attention were found for androphilic and gynephilic women. Ambiphilic women looked significantly longer at female targets compared to male targets. These findings support predictions from the IPM and suggest that both initial and controlled attention to sexual cues may be mechanisms contributing to within-gender variation in sexual responding.

Keywords

Gender specificity Eye tracking Visual attention Information processing model Sexual orientation Sexual arousal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a grant from the American Institute of Bisexuality awarded to M. L. Chivers and an Ontario Trillium Scholarship awarded to S. J. Dawson. The authors would like to thank Katrina Bouchard, Jackie Huberman, and Kelly Suschinsky for their thoughtful suggestions on an earlier version of this article. This paper was presented at the annual meetings of the International Academy of Sex Research in Toronto, ON, Canada, August 2015, and Canadian Sex Research Forum, Kelowna, BC, Canada, September 2015, as well as the quinquennial meeting of the Puzzle of Sexual Orientation Workshop in Lethbridge, AB, Canada, July 2015.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Samantha J. Dawson, Katherine M. Fretz, and Meredith L. Chivers declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were approved under the General Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouchard, K. N., Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Gender-specificity of genital response and self-reported sexual arousal in women endorsing facets of bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., & Palomba, D. (2002). Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cash, T. F., & Szymanski, M. L. (1995). The development and validation of the Body-Image Ideals Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 466–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chivers, M. L. (2010). A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chivers, M. L., Bouchard, K. N., & Timmers, A. D. (2015). Straight but not narrow: Within-gender variation in the gender-specificity of women’s sexual response. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142575.Google Scholar
  11. Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chivers, M. L., & Timmers, A. D. (2012). Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 185–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014). Gender-specificity of solitary and dyadic sexual desire among gynephilic and androphilic women and men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 980–994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2016). Gender-specificity of initial and controlled visual attention to sexual stimuli in androphilic women and gynephilic men. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152785.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson, S. J., Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Sexual fantasies and viewing times across the menstrual cycle: A diary study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 173–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. DeWitte, M. (2016). Gender differences in implicit processing of sexual stimuli. European Journal of Personality, 30, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Diamond, L. M., & Wallen, K. (2011). Sexual minority women’s sexual motivation around the time of ovulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 237–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, W. A., White, L. A., Byrne, D., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forsythe, A., Mulhern, G., & Sawey, M. (2008). Confounds in pictorial sets: The role of complexity and familiarity in basic-level picture processing. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 116–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 57, 100–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Freund, K., & Watson, R. J. (1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 3, 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heaver, B., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory, 19, 398–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Herbenick, D., & Reece, M. (2010). Development and validation of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 1822–1830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huberman, J. S., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Examining gender specificity of sexual response with concurrent thermography and plethysmography. Psychophysiology, 52, 1382–1395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Huberman, J. S., Maracle, A. C., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Gender-specificity of women’s and men’s self-reported attention to sexual stimuli. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 983–995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Weiß, S., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2012). Vicarious viewing time: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task-or stimulus-specific processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1389–1401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 551–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
  35. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lippa, R. A. (2012). Effects of sex and sexual orientation on self-reported attraction and viewing times to images of men and women: Testing for category specificity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 149–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lippa, R. A. (2013). Men and women with bisexual identities show bisexual patterns of sexual attraction to male and female “swimsuit models.” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 187–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lippa, R. A., Patterson, T. M., & Marelich, W. D. (2010). Looking at and longing for male and female “swimsuit models” men are much more category specific than women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007a). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007b). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 74–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mogg, K., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2007). Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces. Biological Psychology, 76, 163–169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mogg, K., Millar, N., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 695–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Santtila, P., & Hyönä, J. (2012). Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1439–1451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Olatunji, B. O., Cisler, J. M., Deacon, B. J., Connolly, K., & Lohr, J. M. (2007). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 918–930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, Z. D., Janssen, E., & Laan, E. (2010). Women’s sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: The role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 880–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ponseti, J., & Bosinski, H. A. (2010). Subliminal sexual stimuli facilitate genital response in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1073–1079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015). Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.Google Scholar
  54. Rieger, G., Savin-Williams, R. C., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2016). Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 265–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosario, M., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Hunter, J., Exner, T. M., Gwadz, M., & Keller, A. M. (1996). The psychosexual development of urban lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosen, C., Brown, J., Heiman, S., Leiblum, C., Meston, R., Shabsigh, D., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 135–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rullo, J. E., Kinnish, K., & Strassberg, D. S. (2006). Sex differences in the specificity of sexual behavior, fantasy, and romantic attraction. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  59. Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Miner, M. H. (2015). Gender-specificity in sexual interest in bisexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1449–1457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2009). Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 417–426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Savin-Williams, R. C. (1990). Gay and lesbian youth: Expressions of identity. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  63. Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Snowden, R. J., & Gray, N. S. (2013). Implicit sexual associations in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 475–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the implicit association task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 558–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Spiering, M., & Everaerd, W. (2007). The sexual unconscious. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 166–184). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Janssen, E. (2003). Priming the sexual system: Implicit versus explicit activation. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 134–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., Karsdorp, P., Both, S., & Brauer, M. (2006). Nonconscious processing of sexual information: A generalization to women. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 268–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Steinman, D. L., Wincze, J. P., Barlow, D. H., & Mavissakalian, M. (1981). A comparison of male and female patterns of sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 529–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artifacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 559–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sylva, D., Safron, A., Rosenthal, A. M., Reber, P. J., Parrish, T. B., & Bailey, J. M. (2013). Neural correlates of sexual arousal in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Hormones and Behavior, 64, 673–684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson, E. M., & Morgan, E. M. (2008). “Mostly straight” young women: Variations in sexual behavior and identity development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 15–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Timmers, A. D., Bouchard, K. N., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Effects of gender and sexual activity cues on the sexual responses of women with multidimensionally defined bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tollison, C. D., Adams, H. E., & Tollison, J. W. (1979). Cognitive and physiological indices of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual males. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Toothaker, L. E. (1991). Multiple comparisons for researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: Evidence for new sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 85–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wenzlaff, F., Briken, P., & Dekker, A. (2015). Video-based eye tracking in sex research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1107524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wincze, J. P., & Qualls, C. B. (1984). A comparison of structural patterns of sexual arousal in male and female homosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 361–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha J. Dawson
    • 1
  • Katherine M. Fretz
    • 1
  • Meredith L. Chivers
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.354 Humphrey Hall, Department of PsychologyQueen’s University at KingstonKingstonCanada
  2. 2.218 Craine Hall, Department of PsychologyQueen’s University at KingstonKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations