Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Differences in Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal: Measurement Artifacts or True Phenomena?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex differences in patterns of sexual arousal have been reported recently. Men’s genital arousal is typically more category-specific than women’s, such that men experience their greatest genital arousal to stimuli depicting their preferred sex partners whereas women experience significant genital arousal to stimuli depicting both their preferred and non-preferred sex partners. In addition, men’s genital and subjective sexual arousal patterns are more concordant than women’s: The correlation between genital and subjective sexual arousal is much larger in men than in women. These sex differences could be due to low response-specificity in the measurement of genital arousal in women. The most commonly used measure of female sexual arousal, vaginal photoplethysmography, has not been fully validated and may not measure sexual arousal specifically. A total of 20 men and 20 women were presented with various sexual and non-sexual emotionally laden short film clips while their genital and subjective sexual arousal were measured. Results suggest that vaginal photoplethysmography is a measure of sexual arousal exclusively. Women’s genital responses were highest during sexual stimuli and absent during all non-sexual stimuli. Sex differences in degree of category-specificity and concordance were replicated: Men’s genital responses were more category-specific than women’s and men’s genital and subjective sexual arousal were more strongly correlated than women’s. The results from the current study support the continued use of vaginal photoplethysmography in investigating sex differences in patterns of sexual arousal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Three participants did not fully meet one of the inclusion criteria but their data were used for analyses. One man reported having a history of mental illness but was not on medication at the time of testing. One man reported being in a monogamous relationship for three months. One woman reported using medication to treat a minor mental illness, but she had been on the same low dose of medication for a very long period of time.

  2. Removal of movement artifacts from all physiological data was conducted by the first author, blind to stimulus categories. On average, the number of trials requiring editing for women (M = 13.6, SD = 5.03) was significantly higher than the number of trials requiring editing for men (M = .5, SD = 1.60), t(38) = 11.09, p < .001, d = 3.51.

  3. Only one woman reported that she had never experienced an orgasm during any form of sexual activity, with or without a partner. She did report slightly increased levels of subjective sexual arousal for both continuous and post-stimulus subjective sexual arousal for some sexual stimuli.

  4. The Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used when necessary (i.e., when the assumption of sphericity was not met) for all ANOVAs and always yielded the same results. Uncorrected values are reported.

  5. The assumption of equality of variances was examined for all t-tests reported in this study. The assumption was not met for one test but the results did not change when using the corrected value. Uncorrected values are reported.

References

  • Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4, 623–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2007). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal among men and women: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003). Was it a phase? Young women’s relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 352–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, B. (1976). Swinging: In retrospect. Journal of Sex Research, 12, 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., Langevin, R., Cibiri, S., & Zajac, Y. (1973). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males. British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The sexual response system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 315–341). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H., Morokoff, P., & Greenwood, P. (1974). Sexual arousal in women: The development of a measurement device for vaginal blood volume. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 559–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. M. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Bennett, W. H., Globetti, G., & Alsikafi, M. (1974). Premarital sexual standards of rural youth. Journal of Sex Research, 10, 266–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. P. (1979). Vaginal photoplethysmography: Methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 357–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (1980). Female sexual response patterns: Interactions of physiological, affective, and contextual cues. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1311–1316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon, P. W., Wincze, J. P., & Hoon, E. F. (1976). Physiological assessment of sexual arousal in women. Psychophysiology, 13, 196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen, T. M., Paterson, L., Binik, Y. M., Amsel, R., Bouvier, F., & Khalifé, S. (2006). Convergent and discriminant validity of clitoral color Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of female sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 281–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laan, E., Everaerd, W., & Evers, A. (1995). Assessment of female sexual arousal: Response specificity and construct validity. Psychophysiology, 32, 476–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laan, E., Sonderman, M., & Janssen, E. (1995, September). Straight and lesbian women’s sexual responses to straight and lesbian erotica: No sexual orientation effects. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Provincetown, MA.

  • Levin, R. J. (1998). Assessing human female sexual arousal by vaginal photoplethysmography: A critical examination. Sexologies: European Journal of Medical Sexology, 6, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Frolich, P. F. (2003). Love at first fright: Partner salience moderates roller-coaster-induced excitation transfer. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 537–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1996). The effects of immediate, delayed, and residual sympathetic activation on sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 143–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & Roberts, T. (1992). Toward a his and hers theory of emotion: Gender differences in visceral perception. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rellini, A. H., McCall, K. M., Randall, P. K., & Meston, C. M. (2005). The relationship between women’s subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Psychophysiology, 42, 116–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. C., & Beck, J. G. (1988). Patterns of sexual arousal: Psychophysiological processes and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullo, J., Kinnish, K., & Strassberg, D. (2006). Sex differences in the specificity of sexual behavior, fantasy, and romantic attraction. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincze, J. P., Venditti, E., Barlow, D., & Mavissakalian, M. (1980). The effects of a subjective monitoring task in the physiological measure of genital response to erotic stimulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 533–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., & Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 93–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is based on research conducted by the first author to fulfill requirements for a master’s degree. Financial support was provided through a Canada Graduate Scholarship (Master’s) awarded to the first author and a Standard Research Grant awarded to the second author by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We thank Grant Harris, Michael Seto, Vern Quinsey, Doug VanderLaan, Paul Vasey, and Rob Williams for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Also, we would like to thank the participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada, T1K 3M4

    Kelly D. Suschinsky & Martin L. Lalumière

  2. Law and Mental Health Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Meredith L. Chivers

Authors
  1. Kelly D. Suschinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin L. Lalumière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meredith L. Chivers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly D. Suschinsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suschinsky, K.D., Lalumière, M.L. & Chivers, M.L. Sex Differences in Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal: Measurement Artifacts or True Phenomena?. Arch Sex Behav 38, 559–573 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9339-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9339-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation