Abstract
Preferences for anal sex roles (top/bottom) are an important aspect of gay male identity, but scholars have only recently begun to explore the factors that covary with these preferences. Here, we argue that the gendered nature of both racial stereotypes (i.e., Black men are masculine, Asian men are feminine) and sexual role stereotypes (i.e., tops are masculine, bottoms are feminine) link the categories Asian/bottom and the categories Black/top. We provide empirical evidence for these claims at three levels of analysis: At the cultural level based upon gay men’s stereotypic beliefs about others (Study 1), at the interpersonal level based upon gay men’s perceptions of others’ sexual role preferences (Study 2), and at the intrapersonal level based upon racially diverse men’s self-reported sexual roles on a public hookup website (Study 3). These studies offer the first systematic evidence of linkages between race categories and sexual roles in gay male communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We excluded participants who failed to report their sexual orientation or indicated that they were straight (n = 2).
We recruited fewer men for the gender condition than for the race and sexual role conditions because the gender ratings were fully within-subject (i.e., participants evaluated all traits on a continuous gender scale). Thus, fewer observations were required to achieve high power in the gender condition compared to the checklists in the other two conditions. Because gay men are somewhat difficult to survey in large numbers, this strategy helped to ensure appropriate power while being sensitive to the constraints of Mechanical Turk’s online sample.
We calculated prior probabilities using combinatorics, which revealed that the chances of obtaining exactly two matches in a 10 word list given an original sample of 93 words is [C(10,3)*C(83,7)]/C(93,10) ≈ 22.0 % and the chances of exactly three matches is [C(10,4)*C(83,6)]/C(93.10) ≈ 6.2 %.
We excluded participants who failed to report their sexual orientation or indicated that they were straight (n = 2).
Most studies of gay men’s sexual role preferences, including the initial studies reported here, have focused on the categories “bottom” and “top.” To remain consistent with that work, we excluded profiles that listed “versatile” as their sexual role preference. Although it is an interesting phenomenon, a better understanding of sexual role versatility awaits future investigation.
We also examined these effects with bottom, bottom/versatile, top/versatile, and top as separate categories. The pattern of results was conceptually identical to those presented above. Overall, sexual role preferences varied significantly across race categories, χ 2(6) = 70.50, p < .001. Among Asian men, 44 % identified as bottoms, 38 % identified as bottom/versatile, 10 % identified as top/versatile, and 7 % identified as tops. Among Black men, 2 % identified as bottoms, 10 % identified as bottom/versatile, 40 % identified as top/versatile, and 48 % identified as tops. Among White men, 16 % identified as bottoms, 28 % identified as bottom/versatile, 30 % identified as top/versatile, and 26 % identified as tops. Thus, we obtained similar results when analyzing the categories bottom and bottom/versatile and the categories top and top/versatile together and separately, buttressing our conclusions about the intrapersonal links between race categories and sexual role preferences.
References
Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.
Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH meeting (pp. 187–194). Los Angeles, CA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dolezal, C., Neives, L., Díaz, F., Decena, C., & Balan, I. (2004). Looking for a tall, dark, macho man…sexual-role behaviour variations in Latino gay and bisexual men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6, 159–171.
Carpinella, C. M., & Johnson, K. L. (2013). Appearance-based politics: Sex-typed facial cues communicate political party affiliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 156–160.
Carrier, J. M. (1977). “Sex-role preference” as an explanatory variable in homosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 53–65.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541–560.
Choi, K. H., Han, C. S., Hudes, E. S., & Kegeles, S. (2002). Unprotected sex and associated risk factors among young Asian and Pacific Islander men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 472–481.
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.
Freeman, J. B., Johnson, K. L., Ambady, N., & Rule, N. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1318–1331.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120.
Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V., & Cuddy, A. J. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506.
Gil, S. (2007). A narrative exploration of gay men’s sexual practices as a dialectical dialogue. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 63–75.
Gilbert, G. M. (1951). Stereotype persistence and change among college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 245–254.
Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392–403.
Han, C. (2006). Geisha of a different kind: Gay Asian men and the gendering of sexual identity. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 3–28.
Hoppe, T. (2011). Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men’s bottom narratives. Sexualities, 14, 193–217.
Jeffries, W. L. (2009). Sociodemographic, sexual, and HIV and other sexually transmitted disease risk profiles for nonhomosexual-identified men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1042–1045.
Johns, M. M., Pingel, E., Eisenberg, A., Santana, M. L., & Bauermeister, J. (2012). Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 505–518.
Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116–131.
Johnson, K. L., & Ghavami, N. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS ONE, 6, e18025.
Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.
Kelly, S., & Floyd, F. J. (2001). The effects of negative racial stereotypes and Afrocentricity on Black couple relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 110–123.
Kippax, S., & Smith, G. (2001). Anal intercourse and power in sex between men. Sexualities, 4, 413–434.
Logan, T. D. (2010). Personal characteristics, sexual behaviors, and male sex work: A quantitative approach. American Sociological Review, 75, 679–704.
Lye Chng, C., & Géliga-Vargas, J. (2000). Ethnic identity, gay identity, sexual sensation seeking and HIV risk taking among multiethnic men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 326–339.
Moskowitz, D. A., & Hart, T. A. (2011). The influence of physical body traits and masculinity on anal sex roles in gay and bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 834–841.
Moskowitz, D. A., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2008). Tops, bottoms, and versatiles. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23, 191–202.
Parker, R. G., & Gagnon, J. H. (1995). Conceiving sexuality: Approaches to sex research in a postmodern world. New York: Routledge.
Phua, V. C. (2007). Contesting and maintaining hegemonic masculinities: Gay Asian American men in mate selection. Sex Roles, 57, 909–918.
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50-ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.
Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277–291.
Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013a). Accurate identification of a preference for insertive versus receptive intercourse from static facial cues of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1217–1222.
Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013b). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 72–86.
Wegesin, D. J., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (2000). Top/bottom self-label, anal sex practices, HIV risk and gender role identity in gay men in New York City. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12, 43–62.
Wei, C., & Raymond, H. F. (2011). Preference for and maintenance of anal sex roles among men who have sex with men: Sociodemographic and behavioral correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 829–834.
Weinrich, J. D., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Robinson, S. R., McCutchan, J. A., & The HNRC Group. (1992). Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 559–585.
Wilson, P. A., Valera, P., Ventuneac, A., Balan, I., Rowe, M., & Carballo-Diéguez, A. (2009). Race-based sexual stereotyping and sexual partnering among men who use the Internet to identify other men for bareback sex. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 399–413.
Wilson, P. A., & Yoshikawa, H. (2004). Experiences of and responses to social discrimination among Asian and Pacific Islander gay men: Their relationship to HIV risk. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16, 68–83.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. (2006). The ecological approach to person perception: Evolutionary roots and contemporary offshoots. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 81–113). New York: Psychology Press.
Zeger, S. L., & Liang, K. Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42, 121–130.
Zheng, L., Hart, T. A., & Zheng, Y. (2013). Attraction to male facial masculinity in China: Relationship to intercourse preference positions and sociosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1223–1232.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (Lick) and National Science Foundation Grant BCS-1052896 (Johnson). We thank Michael O. Alfera for his assistance in calculating prior probabilities for Study 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lick, D.J., Johnson, K.L. Intersecting Race and Gender Cues are Associated with Perceptions of Gay Men’s Preferred Sexual Roles. Arch Sex Behav 44, 1471–1481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0472-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0472-2