Skip to main content
Log in

“Sex-role preference” as an explanatory variable in homosexual behavior

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex-role preference is an important neglected variable in statistically controlled studies of homosexual behavior. This variable must accompany controls for degree of psychopathology of respondents and degree of heterosexual and homosexual behavior experienced by respondents. Cross-cultural differences exist. Mexican males have rigidly defined insertor-insertee roles, with earlier life events serving as predictors of these sex-role preferences. Greece is comparable to Mexico. In Turkey, stigmatization accompanies passive homosexuality. Role playing may be age graded, as in the Southwest Pacific. In lower socioeconomic classes of the United States, sex roles for homosexual males are more stereotypically and unequivocably defined. Chicanos generally have strong sex-role preferences when involved in homosexual encounters; their attitude is similar to that found in Mexico. Among middle-class Anglo-American males, few or no sex-role feelings are associated with types of sex acts by most homosexually behaving males. This may be related to a focus on oral-genital rather than anal sex acts. The sharply dichotomized gender roles and the cultural formulation linking effeminacy and homosexuality appear to provide the necessary conditions for the development of sex-role preferences in many societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bialor, P. (1975). Personal communication.

  • Bullough, V. (1973). Homosexuality as submissive behavior: Example from mythology.J. Sex Res. 9(4): 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. (1971). Participants in urban Mexican male homosexual encounters.Arch. Sex. Behav. 1(4): 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. (1972). Urban Mexican male homosexual encounters: An analysis of participants and coping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. (1976). Cultural factors affecting urban Mexican male homosexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 5(2): 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, W. (1965). Sexual patterns and their regulation in a society of the Southwest Pacific. InSex and Behavior Wiley, New York, pp. 164–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (1968). Sexual assault in the Philadelphia prisons and sheriff vans.Transaction 6: 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, G. (1937). Institutionalized homosexuality of the Mohave Indians. InThe Problem of Homosexuality in Modern Society Dutton, New York, pp. 183–226 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, J., Brown, M., and Vuorinen, S. (1973). Attitudes toward homosexuality.J. Soc. Psychol., pp. 174–175.

  • Dundes, A., Leach, J., and Özkok, B. (1972). The strategy of Turkish boys' verbal dueling. InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, R., and Morrione, T. (1974). Social interaction and stereotypic responses to homosexuals.Arch. Sex. Behav. 3(5): 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C., and Beach, F. (1951).Patterns of Sexual Behavior Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, P. (1974). Male homosexuality and Afro-Brazilian possession cults. Unpublished paper presented to Symposium on Homosexuality in Crosscultural Perspective, 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Mexico City, November.

  • Giallombardo, R. (1966).Society of Women: A Study of a Women's Prison Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, E. (1965). An empirical study of some relations between sexual patterns and gender identity in male homosexuals. InSex Research: New Developments Holt, New York, pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen, A. (1971).Sexuality and Homosexuality: A New View Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, J. (1959). Homo-eroticism in primitive society as a function of the self.J. Anal. Psychol. 4: 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1961). Cultural determinants of sexual behavior. InSex and Internal Secretions Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 1433–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, E. (1972).Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peñalosa, F. (1968). Mexican family roles.J. Marriage Family 30: 680–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanggaard, T. (1972).Phallos: A Symbol and Its History in the Male World International Universities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, G. (1960).A Minority: A Report on the Life of the Male Homosexual in Great Britain Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1973). Gay gringo in Brazil. InThe Gay Liberation Book Ramparts Press, San Francisco, pp. 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented to Symposium on Ethnosexuality, Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Anthropological Association, San Francisco, April 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrier, J.M. “Sex-role preference” as an explanatory variable in homosexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 6, 53–65 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01579248

Key words

Navigation