Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 1395–1405

Premarital Sexual Standards and Sociosexuality: Gender, Ethnicity, and Cohort Differences

  • Susan Sprecher
  • Stanislav Treger
  • John K. Sakaluk
Original Paper

Abstract

In this article, we present results from a “cohort-longitudinal” analysis of sexual attitudes and behaviors based on a large sample of young adults (N = 7,777) obtained from a university setting over a 23-year period. We investigated gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences in sexual permissiveness, endorsement of the double standard, and sociosexuality. Compared to women, men had more permissive attitudes, particularly about sex in casual relationships, endorsed the double standard to a greater degree, and had a more unrestricted sociosexuality. Black men were generally more permissive than White, Hispanic, and Asian men, whereas ethnic differences were not found among women. Participants from the 1995–1999 cohort were slightly less permissive than those from the 1990–1994 and 2005–2012 cohorts. Although prior meta-analytic studies (e.g., Petersen & Hyde, 2010) found reduced gender differences in sexuality over time, our cohort analyses suggest that gender differences in sexual permissiveness have not changed over the past two decades among college students.

Keywords

Sexual attitudes Sexual standards Sociosexuality Gender differences Ethnic differences 

References

  1. Ahrold, T. K., & Meston, C. M. (2010). Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of U.S. college students: Gender acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 190–202.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bermudez, M. P., Castro, A., Gude, F., & Buela-Casal, G. (2010). Relationship power in the couple and sexual double standard as predictors of the risk of sexually transmitted infections and HIV: Multicultural and gender differences. Current HIV Research, 8, 172–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, P. D., & Lipsitz, A. (1991). Sexual behavior among college students in the AIDS era: A comparative study. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 3, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotto, L. A., Chik, H. M., Ryder, A. G., Gorzalka, B. B., & Seal, B. N. (2005). Acculturation and sexual function in Asian women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 613–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. P. (2006). Are the correlates of sociosexuality different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1321–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Das, A., & Nairn, S. (2013). Race differentials in partnering patterns among older U.S. men: Influence of androgens or religious participation? Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0096-y.
  13. Davidson, J. K., Moore, N. B., Earle, J. R., & Davis, R. (2008). Sexual attitudes and behavior at four universities: Do region, race, and/or religion matter? Adolescence, 43, 189–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLamater, J. (1989). The social control of human sexuality. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 30–62). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. M. (2006). The evolution of plasticity in female–female desire. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18, 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond, L. M. (2007). A dynamical systems approach to female same-sex sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 142–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Earle, J. R., Perricone, P. J., Davidson, J. K., Moore, N. B., Harris, C. T., & Cotten, S. R. (2007). Premarital sexual attitudes and behaviors at a religiously-affiliated university: Two decades of change. Sexuality and Culture, 11, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenman, R., & Dantzker, M. L. (2006). Gender and ethnic differences in sexual attitudes at a Hispanic-serving university. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 153–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Espinosa-Hernandez, G., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2009). Sexual behaviors and attitudes and ethnic identity during college. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 471–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, S. S., Turner, R. A., & Araujo, K. (1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: Gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrell, M. Z., Tolone, W. L., & Walsh, R. H. (1977). Maturational and societal changes in the sexual double-standard: A panel analysis (1967–1971; 1970–1974). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis, A. M. (2013). The wages of sin: How the discovery of penicillin reshaped modern sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 5–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fugère, M. A., Escoto, C., Cousins, A. J., Riggs, M. L., & Haerich, P. (2008a). Sexual attitudes and double standards: A literature review focusing on participant gender and ethnic background. Sexuality and Culture, 12, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fugère, M. A., Escoto, C., Cousins, A. J., Riggs, M. L., & Haerich, P. (2008b, February). Sexual attitudes and double standards in two ethnically and religiously diverse samples. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuqurque, NM.Google Scholar
  25. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Greeley, A. M. (1991). Faithful attraction: Discovering intimacy, love, and fidelity in American marriage. New York: Doherty.Google Scholar
  28. Harding, D. T., & Jencks, C. (2003). Changing attitudes toward premarital sex: Cohort, period, and aging effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonason, P. K., Teicher, E. A., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). The TIPI’s validity confirmed: Associations with sociosexuality and self-esteem. Individual Differences Research, 9, 52–60.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, J., & Bazzini, D. G. (2001). Gender, sexual experience, and the sexual double standard: Evaluations of female contraceptive behavior. Sex Roles, 45, 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenrick, D. T. (2001). Evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and dynamical systems: Building an integrative paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., Butner, J., Li, N. P., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2002). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Mapping the domains of the new interactionist paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, K., Balswick, J. O., & Robinson, I. E. (1977). The continuing premarital sexual revolution among college females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahoney, E. R. (1978). Gender and social class differences in changes in attitudes toward premarital coitus. Sociology and Social Research, 62, 279–288.Google Scholar
  39. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of ‘non-relationship’ sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mark, M. M., & Miller, M. L. (1986). The effects of sexual permissiveness, target gender, subject gender, and attitude toward women on social perception: In search of the double standard. Sex Roles, 15, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meston, C. M., & Ahrold, T. (2010). Ethnic, gender, and acculturation influences on sexual behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 179–189.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1998). Ethnic, gender, and length of residency influences on sexual knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Padilla, E. R., & O’Grady, K. E. (1987). Sexuality among Mexican Americans: A case of sexual stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 5–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Paul, E. L., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2008). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development? In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 375–390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.Google Scholar
  48. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Reiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  51. Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26, 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  53. Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson, I., & Jedlicka, D. (1982). Change in sexual attitudes and behavior of college students from 1965–1980: A research note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robinson, I., Ziss, K., Ganza, B., & Katz, S. (1991). Twenty years of the sexual revolution, 1965–1985: An update. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenfeld, M. J., & Kim, B. (2005). The independence of young adults and the rise of interracial and same-sex unions. American Sociological Review, 70, 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sakaluk, J. K., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit sexual double standards. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 464–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sherwin, R., & Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual norms and dating relationships: A trend analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Singh, B. K. (1980). Trends in attitudes toward premarital sexual relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among U.S. college students: Comparisons with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 261–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., Walsh, R., & Anderson, C. (1988). A revision of the Reiss Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walsh, R. (1989). Premarital sex among teenagers and young adults. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 162–186). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  66. Wells, B. E., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Changes in young people’s sexual behavior and attitudes, 1943–1999: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 9, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Sprecher
    • 1
  • Stanislav Treger
    • 2
  • John K. Sakaluk
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology & AnthropologyIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations