Abstract
This study examined the effects of contextual and cognitive variables for sexual protection on perceived social relationship factors. University students (108 women and 108 men) read script-based narratives on sexual encounters in which six variables were manipulated in two independent analyses. In the first analysis, four variables were evaluated: relational context (stable, casual), condom use (yes, no), script terminus (beginning, middle or end), and the rater’s sex. The dependent variables were interpersonal perception of one of the characters of the narrative, and expectations regarding characteristics and future of the relationship. In the second analysis, two other factors were manipulated only in the “yes” condom conditions: communication strategy (verbal, non-verbal) and condom proponent gender. Our findings corroborated other studies where condom use was viewed as unromantic with less positive characteristics for relationships. Condom proponents, especially male, were perceived as less romantic, particularly when proposing a condom non-verbally at the beginning of the encounter. However, the controlled variables enabled us to propose ways of associating condom use with positive expectations towards the proponent and the relationship itself. Romanticism, expectation of sexual intercourse, emotional proximity, and expectations of condom use in encounters where a condom was proposed increased when suggested by a woman, postponed to the end of the encounter, and verbally mentioned. We encourage women to take the lead in suggesting condom use, thus empowering them since they do not have to wait for the male to make the first move.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Communication Sciences, Philosophy, Geography, History, Management, International Relations, Psychology, Education, Mechanical Engineering, and Computer Sciences from three universities in the Lisbon region.
An example of the same experimental condition for casual relationship is presented in the Appendix.
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for drawing attention to this fact.
References
Alferes, V. R. (1997). Encenações e comportamentos sexuais: Para uma psicologia social da sexualidade [Scenarios and sexual behaviors: For a social psychology of sexuality]. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
Alvarez, M. J. (2005). Representações cognitivas e comportamentos sexuais de risco: O guião e as teorias implícitas da personalidade nos comportamentos de protecção sexual [Cognitive representations and sexual risk behaviors: The script and the implicit personality theories in sexual protective behaviors]. Lisboa: FCG/FCT.
Alvarez, M. J., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2008). Condom inclusion in cognitive representations of sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 358–370.
Applebaum, M., & McCall, R. (1983). Design and analysis in developmental psychology. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory, and methods (pp. 415–476). New York: Willey.
Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 634–654). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bryan, A. D., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The impact of males proposing condom use on perceptions of an initial sexual encounter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 275–286.
Civic, D. (1999). The association between characteristics of dating relationships and condom use among heterosexual young adults. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 343–352.
Cline, R. J., Johnson, S. J., & Freeman, K. E. (1992). Talk among sexual partners about AIDS: Interpersonal communication for risk reduction or risk enhancement? Health Communication, 4, 39–56.
Conley, T., & Rabinowitz, J. (2004). Scripts, close relationships and, symbolic meanings of contraceptives. Personal Relationships, 11, 539–558.
Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behavior. Health Communication, 5, 239–261.
Flowers, P., Smith, J. A., Sheeran, P., & Beail, N. (1997). Health and romance: Understanding unprotected sex in relationships between gay men. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 73–86.
Galambos, J. A., Abelson, R. P., & Black, J. B. (1986). Knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Galligan, R. F., & Terry, D. J. (1993). Romantic ideals, fear of negative implications, and the practice of safe sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1685–1711.
Hamilton, D. (1986). Person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), A survey of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 136–162). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Hammer, J. C., Fisher, J. D., Fitzgerald, P., & Fisher, W. A. (1996). When two heads aren’t better than one: AIDS risk behavior in college-age couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 375–397.
Hynie, M., & Lydon, J. E. (1995). Women’s perceptions of female contraceptive behavior: Experimental evidence of the sexual double standard. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 563–581.
Maticka-Tyndale, E. (1991). Sexual scripts and AIDS prevention: Variations in adherence to safer-sex guidelines by heterosexual adolescents. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 45–66.
McKinney, K., Sprecher, S., & Orbuch, T. (1987). A person perception experiment examining the effects of contraceptive behavior on first impressions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 235–248.
Miller, L. C., Bettencourt, B. A., DeBro, S. C., & Hoffman, V. (1993). Negotiating safer sex: Interpersonal dynamics. In J. Pryor & G. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 85–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1996). The perceived AIDS-preventive utility of knowing one’s partner well: A public health dictum and individuals’ risky sexual behavior. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 83–90.
Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72–107.
Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 235–297). New York: Academic Press.
Rosenthal, D., Gifford, S., & Moore, S. (1998). Safe sex or safe love: Competing discourses? AIDS Care, 10, 35–47.
Sacco, W., Rickman, R., Thompson, K., Levine, B., & Reed, D. (1993). Gender differences in AIDS-relevant condom attitudes and condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 5, 311–326.
Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294–309.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
Visser, R., & Smith, A. (2001). Relationship between sexual partners influences rates and correlates of condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13, 413–427.
Williams, S. S., Kimble, D. L., Covell, N. H., Weiss, L. H., Newton, K. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). College students use implicit personality theory instead of safer sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 921–933.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Example of one experimental condition for casual relationships (condom use, verbal communication strategy, by a man proponent, up to the end of the script):
Carlos and Ana do not know each other and, on this particular day, they meet in a disco. They notice each other and look each other in the eye. He starts to chat to her and they talk for a while about trivial things and pay each other compliments before approaching more personal subjects. In the disco, they have a few drinks, they chat and try to get to know each other better, and they are physically attracted. They dance and/ start to touch each other/. They kiss and continue to kiss and then they both decide to leave. Their caresses become more intimate and they decide to go to one of their homes. They listen to music, dim the lights, and begin to kiss and exchange caresses again. They get completely undressed. He says he prefers using a condom.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarez, MJ., Garcia-Marques, L. Cognitive and Contextual Variables in Sexual Partner and Relationship Perception. Arch Sex Behav 40, 407–417 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9725-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9725-5