Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Accountability, human rights and social justice in public sector recordkeeping

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accountability, human rights and social justice are inextricably linked. Rights cannot be defended and upheld, and inequalities cannot be highlighted and challenged in the absence of accountability. In recent decades, recordkeepers have increasingly emphasised the role of archives and records in facilitating accountability, upholding rights and exposing instances of social injustice. This paper assesses the twenty-first-century recordkeeping literature as it relates to the ethical issues of accountability, human rights and social justice in public sector recordkeeping. While there is some consensus on the role of recordkeeping with regard to accountability and human rights, there is less agreement regarding social justice, which remains a contested and poorly defined concept in the literature. The debates around accountability, human rights and social justice impact on perceptions of the role of the archivist and have led to a strong trend towards more activist interpretations, with increasing calls for greater inclusion and the development of participatory recordkeeping models. Despite this trend, implementation remains a challenge, and the gap between theory and practice needs to be continually addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Article 19 reads: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”.

  2. See for example Flinn (2011).

References

  • Arendt H (2005) Eichmann and the Holocaust. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Society of Archivists (2020) Online Learning. https://www.archivists.org.au/learning-publications/online-courses. Accessed 15 Jul 2022

  • Banton M (2009) “Expatriate” or “migrated” archives: the role of the UK archivist. Archives 34(121):14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman D (1995) Archival strategies. Am Arch 58(4):380–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghtol C (2002) A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. J Doc 58(5):507–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betancur Roldán MC (2022) Archival traditions in Latin America. Arch Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09393-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boles F (2010) But a thin veil of paper. Am Arch 73(1):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles F (2019) To everything there is a season. Am Arch 82(2):598–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain P, Doig A, Flanary R, Barata K (2001) Filing for corruption: transparency, openness and record-keeping. Crime Law Soc Ch 36(4):409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone K, Gilliland AJ, Montenegro M, Lowry J, Sutherland T (2021) Rights in and to records and recordkeeping: Fighting bureaucratic violence through a human rights-centered approach to the creation, management and dissemination of documentation. Educ Inf 37(1):3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M (2010) Hannah Arendt’s world: bureaucracy, documentation, and banal evil. Archivaria 70:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M (2013) On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives. Arch Sci 13(4):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M (2014) Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Arch Sci 14:307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M (2021) Dusting for fingerprints: introducing feminist standpoint appraisal. J Crit Libr Stud 3(2)

  • Caswell M, Cifor M (2016) From human rights to feminist ethics: radical empathy in the archives. Archivaria 81:23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen K, Anderson J (2019) Toward slow archives. Arch Sci 19(2):87–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifor M (2016) Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Arch Sci 16(1):7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifor M, Caswell M, Migoni AA, Geraci N (2018) “What we do crosses over to activism”: the politics and practice of community archives. Publ Hist 40(2):69–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clann Project. http://clannproject.org/. Accessed 15 Jul 2022

  • Commisso C (2017) The post-truth archive: considerations for archiving context in fake news repositories. Preserv Digit Technol Cult 46(3):99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook M (2006) Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context. J Soc Arch 27(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (2001a) Fashionable nonsense or professional rebirth: postmodernism and the practice of archives. Archivaria 51:14–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (2001b) Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Arch Sci 1(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (2013) Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Arch Sci 13:95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook T, Schwartz JM (2002) Archives, records, and power: from (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Arch Sci 2:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RJ (1997) More than diplomatic: functional requirements for evidence in recordkeeping. Rec Manag J 7(1):31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox RJ (2008) Archival ethics: the truth of the matter. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec 59(7):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RJ (2013) Rethinking archival ethics. J Inf Ethics 22(2):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čtvrtník M (2022) Classified records and the archives. Arch Sci 22(2):129–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson ES (2013) Archives and the ethics of replevin. J Inf Ethics 22(2):110–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy S (2013) When good archivists go bad: the role of ethics and values in everyday archival decision-making. Archifacts 2013:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (1995) Archive fever. Translated by Eric Prenowitz. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

  • Dingwall G (2004) Trusting archivists: the role of archival ethics codes in establishing public faith. Am Arch 67(1):11–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks JM (2004) Accountability, history, and archives: Conflicting priorities or synthesized strands? Archivaria 57:29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J, Alisauskas A, Mordell D (2019) “Treat them with the reverence of archivists”: records work, grief work, and relationship work in the archives. Archivaria 88:84–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff W (2001) Issues of authenticity, social accountability, and trust with electronic records. Inf Soc 17(4):229–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff W, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, Wallace DA (2013) Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Arch Sci 13(4):317–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff W, Harris V (2002) Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Arch Sci 2(3):263–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar AW (2006) Introducing Critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Arch Sci 6(1):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranti L, MacNeil H (1996) The protection of the integrity of electronic records: an overview of the UBC-MAS research project. Archivaria 42:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, McCarthy G (2015) Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Arch Sci 15(4):337–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, McKemmish S, Rolan G (2019) Participatory information governance. Rec Manag J 29(1/2):178–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Wilson JZ, McKemmish S, Lewis A, McGinniss D, Rolan G, Altham S (2021) Transformative justice: transdisciplinary collaborations for archival autonomy. Arch Rec 42(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng H (2017) Identity and archives: return and expansion of the social value of archives. Arch Sci 17(2):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Find and Connect. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/. Accessed 15 Jul 2022

  • Fleckner JA (2013) F. Gerald Ham: Jeremiah to the profession. Am Arch 77(2):377–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn A (2011) Archival activism: independent and community-led archives, radical public history and the heritage professions. Interactions: UCLA J Educ Inf Stud 7.2

  • Frogner RO (2022) The train from Dunvegan: implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) in public archives in Canada. Arch Sci 22(2):209–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale C (2006) Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. J Soc Arch 27(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld C (2018) The end of archival ideas?’. In: Browne C (ed) Archival futures. Facet, London, pp 137–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Genovese TR (2016) Decolonizing archival methodology. AlterNative an Int J Indig Peoples 12(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2011) Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Arch Sci 11(3–4):193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2015) Permeable binaries, societal grand challenges, and the roles of the twenty-first century archival and recordkeeping profession. Archifacts 2015:12–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A (2018) To what lengths the “physical and moral defence of the record” in times of conflict and exigency? Arch Rec 39(2):117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland A, McKemmish S (2014) The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights. Atlanti Rev Mod Arch Theory Pract 24:78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooda M (2012) The practical power of human rights: How international human rights standards can inform archival and record keeping practices. Arch Sci 12(2):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick B (2015) Recognizing “access to information” as a basic human right: a necessary step in enforcing human rights provisions within free trade agreements. Loy U Chi Int’l L Rev 12(2):215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (2009) The power of archives: archivists’ values and value in the postmodern age (with an Introduction by Dennis Meissner). Am Arch 72(1):13–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (2013) A critique of social justice as an archival imperative: What is it we’re doing that’s all that important? Am Arch 76(2):302–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M, Boles F, Bruemmer BH, Daniels-Howell TJ (2004) The archivist’s new clothes; or the naked truth about evidence, transactions and recordness. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/42/ManifestoFinal.pdf;jsessionid=54C31182290DA8473CD2E1E97C8A31BD?sequence=4. Accessed 21 Apr 2022

  • Hamer A (2018) Ethics of archival practice: New considerations in the digital age. Archivaria 85:156–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman R (2009) En mal d’archive: Postmodernist theory and recordkeeping. J Soc Arch 30(1):27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris V (2005) Archival ethics. IASA J 25:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris V (2011) Jacques Derrida meets nelson Mandela: archival ethics at the endgame. Arch Sci 11(1–2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris V (2014) Antonyms of our remembering. Arch Sci 14(3–4):215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston RD (2013) Archival ethics and the professionalization of archival enterprise. J Inf Ethics 22(2):46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley C (2006) Archivists and accountability. Arch Manuscr 34(2):82–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Huvila I (2015) The unbearable lightness of participating? Revisiting the discourses of “participation” in archival literature. J Doc 71(2):358–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovino L (2006) Recordkeeping participants: legal and ethical responsibilities. Recordkeeping, ethics and law. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2006a) Embracing the power of archives. Am Arch 69(1):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2006b) Ethical concerns for archivists. Public Hist 28(1):87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2007) Archives for all: professional responsibility and social justice. Am Arch 70(2):252–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2010) The archive is politics: neutrality is not an option. Archifacts 2010:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2013a) Archivists and social responsibility: a response to Mark Greene. Am Arch 76(2):335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson R (2013b) Values and ethics. J Inf Ethics 22(2):21–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson H (1922) A manual of archive administration. Clarendon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E (2002) Many paths to partial truths: archives, anthropology, and the power of representation. Arch Sci 2(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemoni HN, Ngulube P, Stilwell C (2007) Public records and archives as tools for good governance: reflections within the recordkeeping scholarly and practitioner communities. ESARBICA J 26:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (2001) Tacit narratives: the meanings of archives. Arch Sci 1(2):131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (2002) Archival temples, archival prisons: modes of power and protection. Arch Sci 2(3):221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (2006) Access: the democratic imperative. Arch Manuscr 34(2):62–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar E (2012) Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Arch Sci 12(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Library and Archives Canada (2019) Indigenous heritage action plan. https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/aboriginal-heritage/initiatives/Pages/actionplan.aspx. Accessed 1 Aug 2022

  • Lowry J (2019a) “Displaced archives”: proposing a research agenda. Arch Sci 19(4):349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry J (2019b) Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial Records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. Arch Sci 19(2):185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonagh M (2013) The right to information in international human rights law. Hum Rights Law Rev 13(1):25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKemmish S (1998) The smoking gun: recordkeeping and accountability. Monash University. Conference contribution. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/58056fee94b64. Accessed 20 Sep 2022

  • MacNeil H (2011) Trust and professional identity. Arch Sci 11(2):175–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil H, Mak B (2007) Constructions of authenticity. Libr Trends 56(1):26–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuku M, Makwanise N (2012) Archives, accountability, human rights and good governance: Where is the nexus? Mousaion 30(2):187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen K (2015a) Informational justice: a conceptual framework for social justice in library and information services. Libr Trends 64(2):198–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen K (2015b) Toward a political philosophy of information. Libr Trends 63(3):427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattlage A (2015) Responsibilities of information professionals vis-à-vis information rights. J Inf Ethics 24(1):65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A (2000) Anticipating accountability processes. Arch Manuscr 28(1):52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer A (2001) Electronic records management and public accountability: beyond an instrumental approach. Inf Soc 17(4):259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar L (2003) The right to information: the right to records: The relationship between record keeping, access to information, and government accountability. https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/programs/ai/rti/articles/record_keeping_ai.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2022

  • Moss M (2011) Is it a question of trust or why are we afraid to go to Nineveh? Arch Sci 11(3–4):409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz W (2022) Critical archival theory and the Caribbean’s neoliberal archival turn. Arch Sci 22(2):239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Archives and Records Administration, Guiding principles for reparative description. https://www.archives.gov/research/reparative-description/principles. Accessed 1 Aug 2022

  • National Center for Truth and Reconciliation, https://nctr.ca/. Accessed 15 Jul 2022

  • Neazor M (2007) Recordkeeping professional ethics and their application. Archivaria 64:47–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Okello-Obura C (2012) Effective records and information management as a catalyst for fighting corruption. Mousaion 30(2):201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole J (2004) Archives and historical accountability: Toward a moral theology of archives. Archivaria 58:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha OB, Ngoepe M (2011) The Protection of Information Bill and access to information in South Africa: an informetric study of the media coverage. EASRBICA J 30:211–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Orentlicher D (2005) Updated set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. United Nations Commission on Human Rights. file:///C:/Users/Admin/Downloads/E_CN.4_2005_102_Add.1-EN.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2022

  • Palmer M (2000) Records management and accountability versus corruption, fraud and maladministration. Rec Manag J 10(2):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton JM (2003) Values: a strategic initiative for records managers. Rec Manag Bull 114:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope J (2006) No records, no rights, no accountability. Archifacts 2006:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter M (2017) Protecting rights, asserting professional identity. Arch Rec 38(2):296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punzalan R, Caswell M (2016) Critical directions for archival approaches to social justice. Libr Q 86(1) https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xq5k4kg. Accessed 21 Apr 2022

  • Ramirez MH (2015) Being assumed not to be: a critique of whiteness as an archival imperative. Am Arch 78(2):339–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolan G (2017) Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Arch Sci 17(3):195–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, revised. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sassoon J, Burrows T (2009) Minority reports: Indigenous and community voices in archives. In: Papers from the 4th international conference on the history of records and archives (ICHORA4), Perth, Western Australia, August 2008. Arch Sci 9(1–2):1–5

  • Schwartz JM, Cook T (2002) Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory. Arch Sci 2(1–2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1979) Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf Accessed 21 Apr 2022

  • Shepherd E, Hoyle V, Lomas E, Flinn A, Sexton A (2020) Towards a human-centred participatory approach to child social care recordkeeping. Arch Sci 20(4):307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speck JG (2010) Protecting public trust: an archival wake-up call. J Arch Organ 1:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinnett G (2009) Archival landscape: archives and human rights. Prog Libr 32:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler AL (2002) Colonial archives and the arts of governance. Arch Sci 2(1–2):87–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svärd P (2017) Accountability, transparency, and the role of information management. Enterprise content management, records management and information culture amidst e-government development. Chandos Publishing, Sawston, pp 83–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Svärd P (2018) Access to government information: A global phenomenon but what are the challenges? ESARBICA J 37:158–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Tough AG (2008) Accountability and recordkeeping: some thoughts’. ESARBICA J 27:4–19

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1948) Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Accessed 21 April 2022

  • United Nations (2007) Declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf. Accessed 21 April 2022

  • United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. https://sdgs.un.org/. Accessed 14 May 2022

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (2011) Universal declaration on archives. https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/20190510_ica_declarationuniverselle_en_0.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2022

  • Upward F (1996) Structuring the records continuum part one: post-custodial principles and properties. Arch Manuscr 24(2):268–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Upward F (1997) Structuring the records continuum part two: structuration theory and recordkeeping. Arch Manuscr 25(1):10–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DA (2004) Recordkeeping for accountability. ESARBICA J 23:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DA (2010) Locating agency: interdisciplinary perspectives on professional ethics and archival morality. J Inf Ethic 19(1):172–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DA, Duff WM, Saucier R, Flinn A (2020) Archives, recordkeeping and social justice. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, Gilliland A, Punzalan R (2014) Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Arch Sci 14(3–4):397–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlyn D (2012) Anthropology in and of the archives: possible futures and contingent pasts. Archives as anthropological surrogates. Annu Rev Anthropol 41:461–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Mark Farrell, Bert Gordijn & Alan J. Kearns

Authors
  1. Mark Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bert Gordijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan J. Kearns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Farrell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrell, M., Gordijn, B. & Kearns, A.J. Accountability, human rights and social justice in public sector recordkeeping. Arch Sci 23, 161–185 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09403-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09403-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation