Skip to main content
Log in

Turbulent Duct Flow Controlled with Spanwise Wall Oscillations

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spanwise oscillation of channel walls is known to substantially reduce the skin-friction drag in turbulent channel flows. In order to understand the limitations of this flow control approach when applied in ducts, direct numerical simulations of controlled turbulent duct flows with an aspect ratio of A R = 3 are performed. In contrast to channel flows, the spanwise extension of the duct is limited. Therefore, the spanwise wall oscillation either directly interacts with the duct side walls or its spatial extent is limited to a certain region of the duct. The present results show that this spanwise limitation of the oscillating region strongly diminishes the drag reduction potential of the control technique. We propose a simple model that allows estimating the achievable drag reduction rates in duct flows as a function of the width of the duct and the spanwise extent of the controlled region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karniadakis, G.E., Choi, K.-S.: Mechanisms on transverse motion in turbulent wall flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 45–62 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Quadrio, M.: Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer by in-plane wall motion. Philos. T. R. Soc. A 369(1940), 1428–1442 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Quadrio, M., Ricco, P.: Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251–271 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Quadrio, M., Ricco, P., Viotti, C.: Streamwise-traveling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 161–178 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricco, P., Hahn, S.: Turbulent drag reduction through rotating discs. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 267–290, 5 (2013). ISSN 1469-7645

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wise, D.J., Ricco, P.: Turbulent drag reduction through oscillating discs. J. Fluid Mech. 746, 536–564, 5 (2014). ISSN 1469-7645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duque-Daza, C.A., Baig, M.F., Lockerby, D.A., Chernyshenko, S.I., Davies, C.: Modelling turbulent skin-friction control using linearised Navier-Stokes equations. J. Fluid Mech. 702, 403–414 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatti, D., Quadrio, M.: Reynolds-number dependence of turbulent skin-friction drag reduction induced by spanwise forcing. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 553–582, 009 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurst, E., Yang, Q., Chung, Y.M.: The effect of reynolds number on turbulent drag reduction by streamwise travelling waves. J. Fluid Mech. 759, 28–55, 11 (2014). ISSN 1469-7645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moarref, R., Jovanovic, M.R.: Model-based design of transverse wall oscillations for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 707, 205–240 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Agostini, L., Touber, E., Leschziner, M.A.: The turbulence vorticity as a window to the physics of friction-drag reduction by oscillatory wall motion. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 51, 3–15 (2015). ISSN 0142-727X. Theme special issue celebrating the 75th birthdays of Brian Launder and Kemo Hanjalic

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agostini, L., Touber, E., Leschziner, M.A.: Spanwise oscillatory wall motion in channel flow: drag-reduction mechanisms inferred from DNS-predicted phase-wise property variations at R e τ = 1000. J. Fluid Mech. 743, 606–635, 003 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Touber, E., Leschziner, M.A.: Near-wall streak modification by spanwise oscillatory wall motion and drag-reduction mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 150–200 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yakeno, A., Hasegawa, Y., Kasagi, N.: Modification of quasi-streamwise vortical structure in a drag-reduced turbulent channel flow with spanwise wall oscillation. Phys. Fluids 26, 085109 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatti, D., Güttler, A., Frohnapfel, B., Tropea, C.: Experimental assessment of spanwise-oscillating dielectric electroactive surfaces for turbulent drag reduction in an air channel flow. Exp. Fluids 56(5), 110 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gouder, K., Potter, M., Morrison, J.F.: Turbulent friction drag reduction using electroactive polymer and electromagnetically driven surfaces. Exp. Fluids 54 (1441), 1441 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, K.S.: Near-wall structure of turbulent boundary layer with spanwise-wall oscillation. Phys. Fluids 14(7), 2530–2542 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, K.-S., DeBisschop, J.-R., Clayton, B.R.: Turbulent boundary-layer control by means of spanwise-wall oscillation. AIAA J. 36(7), 1157–1163 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricco, P., Wu, S.: On the effects of lateral wall oscillations on a turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Therm. Fluid Science 29, 41–52 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Trujillo, S.M., Bogard, D.G., Ball, K.S.: Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using an oscillating wall. AIAA Paper 97–1870 (1997)

  21. Auteri, F., Baron, A., Belan, M., Campanardi, G., Quadrio, M.: Experimental assessment of drag reduction by traveling waves in a turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 22(11), 115103 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi, K.-S., Graham, M.: Drag reduction of turbulent pipe flows by circular-wall oscillation. Phys. Fluids 10(1), 7–9 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Skote, M.: Temporal and spatial transients in turbulent boundary layer flow over an oscillating wall. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 38, 1–12 (2012). ISSN 0142-727X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lardeau, S., Leschziner, M.A.: The streamwise drag-reduction response of a boundary layer subjected to a sudden imposition of transverse oscillatory wall motion. Phys. Fluids 25, 075109 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Skote, M.: Comparison between spatial: temporal wall oscillations in turbulent boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 273–294 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer, P.F., Lottes, J.W., Kerkemeier, S.G.: Nek5000: Open source spectral element CFD solver. Available at http://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov (2008)

  27. Patera, A.: A spectral element method for fluid dynamics: Laminar flow in a channel expansion. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 468–588 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Marin, O., Vinuesa, R., Obabko, A.V., Schlatter, P.: Characterization of the secondary flow in hexagonal ducts. Phys. Fluids 28(12), 125101 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R.: Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Luchini, P., Quadrio, M.: A low-cost parallel implementation of direct numerical simulation of wall turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 211, 551–571 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Vinuesa, R., Noorani, A., Lozano-Durán, A., El Khoury, G.K., Schlatter, P., Fischer, P.F., Nagib, H.M.: Aspect ratio effects in turbulent duct flows studied through direct numerical simulation. J. Turbul. 15(10), 677–706 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Straub, S., Vinuesa, R., Schlatter, P., Frohnapfel, B., Gatti, D.: Direct Numerical Simulation of Controlled Turbulent Duct Flows. Master’s thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2015)

  33. Ricco, P., Quadrio, M.: Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 29, 601–612 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vinuesa, R., Prus, C., Schlatter, P., Nagib, H.M.: Convergence of numerical simulations of turbulent wall-bounded flows and mean cross-flow structure of rectangular ducts. Meccanica 51(12), 3025–3042 (2016). ISSN 1572-9648

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Lozano-Durán, A., Jiménez, J.: Effect of the computational domain on direct simulations of turbulent channels up to re τ = 4200. Phys. Fluids 26(1), 011702 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vinuesa, R., Schlatter, P., Nagib, H.M.: Characterization of the secondary flow in turbulent rectangular ducts with varying aspect ratio. In: International Symposium Turbulence & Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP-9), 30 June–3 July, Melbourne, Australia (2015)

  37. Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K., Kasagi, N.: Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14(11), L73–76 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Oliver, T.A., Malaya, N., Ulerich, R., Moser, R.D.: Estimating uncertainties in statistics computed from direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids 26(3), 035101 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moser, R.D., Kim, J., Mansour, N.N.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to R e τ = 590. Phys. Fluids 11(4), 943–945 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Örlü, R., Schlatter, P.: Comparison of experiments and simulations for zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers. Exp. Fluids 54(6), 1547 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted using the resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at High Performance Computing Center North (HPC2N) and at National Supercomputer Center (NSC) at Linköping University. Steffen Straub is grateful for the financial support of the Prof. Dr.-Ing. Erich Müller-Stiftung and the Dr.-Ing. Willy-Höfler-Stiftung.

Ricardo Vinuesa and Phlipp Schlatter acknowledge the support by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council (VR).

Bettina Frohnapfel acknowledges the support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation in form of a Feodor-Lynen-Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Straub.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Validation

In order to validate the implementation of the oscillating wall, the DNS results of one uncontrolled and one controlled turbulent channel flow simulated in Nek5000 are compared against literature data from Moser, Kim and Mansour (MKM) [39] and results obtained with a a classic pseudo-spectral DNS code (abbreviated in the following with PSC) [30]. The profile of the mean streamwise velocity \(\overline {u}^{+}\) is shown in Fig. 13a. Very good agreement between the present results (c:0), data from MKM and results generated with the second code (PSC:0), is found for the uncontrolled case (lower curves). Also the controlled cases show very good agreement. Note that the results are scaled with the actual friction velocity of each flow [2].

Fig. 13
figure 13

Inner-scaled a mean streamwise velocity \(\overline {u}^{+}\), b RMS of streamwise velocity fluctuations, c RMS of wall-normal velocity fluctuations and d RMS of spanwise velocity fluctuations in the channel compared to literature references [39] (MKM) and results generated with a pseudo-spectral code [30] (PSC). Blue lines correspond to uncontrolled flows and purple lines to controlled flows with A + = 12

The RMS values of the streamwise velocity fluctuations are presented in Fig. 13b. Here, the applied control technique causes a reduction of the inner-scaled streamwise velocity fluctuations close to the wall up to y + ≈ 30. A slight undershoot of the peak value for c:0 is visible for both controlled and uncontrolled cases which might be caused by a slightly insufficient spatial resolution [40].

Figure 13c shows the RMS of wall-normal velocity fluctuations. The agreement between uncontrolled channel cases c:0, MKM and CPL:0 is very good, as is the agreement between the two controlled cases c:12 and CPL:12. Excellent agreement is also found for the spanwise velocity fluctuations shown in Fig. 13d. The large fluctuations at the wall for the controlled cases are a result of the applied decomposition into mean and fluctuating values (see Section 2) since the value at the wall is determined by the prescribed oscillation amplitude. Finally, we compare the Reynolds stresses \(-\overline {u^{\prime } v^{\prime }}^{+}\) in Fig. 14 which shows reasonable agreement for all considered cases.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Inner-scaled Reynolds shear stress in the channel. See Fig. 13 for different line styles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Straub, S., Vinuesa, R., Schlatter, P. et al. Turbulent Duct Flow Controlled with Spanwise Wall Oscillations. Flow Turbulence Combust 99, 787–806 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-017-9846-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-017-9846-6

Keywords

Navigation