Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 171–189 | Cite as

Towards a Thermal Optimization of a Methane/Steam Reforming Reactor

  • M. Mozdzierz
  • G. Brus
  • A. Sciazko
  • Y. Komatsu
  • S. Kimijima
  • J. S. Szmyd
Open Access


Plug-flow reactors are very common in methane/steam reforming applications. Their operation presents many challenges, such as a strong dependence on temperature and inlet composition distribution. The strong endothermic steam reforming reaction might result in a temperature drop at the inlet of the reactor. The strong non-uniform temperature distribution due to an endothermic chemical reaction can have tremendous consequences on the operation of the reactor, such as catalyst degradation, undesired side reactions and thermal stresses. One of the possibilities to avoid such unfavorable conditions and control thermal circumstances inside the reforming reactor is to use it as a fuel processor in the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) system. The heat generated by exothermic electrochemical SOFC reactions can support the endothermic reforming reaction. Furthermore, the thermal effects of electrochemical reactions help to shape the uniform temperature distribution. To examine thermal management issues, a detailed modeling and corresponding numerical analyses of the phenomena occurring inside the internal reforming system is required. This paper presents experimental and numerical studies on the methane/steam reforming process inside a plug-flow reactor. Measurements including different thermal boundary conditions, the fuel flow rate and the steam-to-methane ratios were performed. The reforming rate equation derived from experimental data was used in the numerical model to predict gas composition and temperature distribution along the steam reforming reactor. Finally, an attempt was made to control the temperature distribution by adopting locally controlled heating zones and non-uniform catalyst density distributions.


Methane/steam reforming Process control Plug-flow reactors Solid oxide fuel cells 


  1. 1.
    Yamamoto, O.: Solid oxide fuel cells: fundamental aspects and prospects. Electrochim. Acta. 45, 2423–2435 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aguiar, P., Chadwick, D., Kershenbaum, L.: Modelling of an indirect internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 1665–1677 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogden, J.M., Steinbugler, M.M., Kreutz, T.G.: A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development. J. Power Sources. 79, 143–168 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, L.: A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 26, 381–397 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, J., Froment, G.F.: Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE J. 35, 88–96 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, J., Froment, G.F.: Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation. AIChE J. 35, 97–103 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brus, G., Szmyd, J.: Numerical Modelling of Radiative Heat Transfer in an SOFC System. ECS Trans. 7, 2013–2020 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brus, G., Szmyd, J.S.: Numerical modelling of radiative heat transfer in a internal indirect reforming-type SOFC. J. Power Sources. 181, 8–16 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brus, G., Kolenda, Z., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: An analysis of heat transfer process in an internal indirect reforming type SOFC.. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Heat Transfer Conference, vol. 5, Washington, DC. ASME, 71–80 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brus, G., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: Experimental and numerical analysis of transport phenomena in an internal indirect fuel reforming type Solid Oxide Fuel Cells using Ni/SDC as a catalyst. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 395, 012159 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Settar, A., Nebbali, R., Madani, B., Abboudi, S.: Numerical investigation on the wall-coated steam methane reformer improvement: Effects of catalyst layer patterns and metal foam insertion. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 40, 8966–8979 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Komatsu, Y., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: Performance analysis for the part-load operation of a solid oxide fuel cellmicro gas turbine hybrid system. Energy. 35, 982–988 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Komatsu, Y., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: Numerical analysis on dynamic behavior of solid oxide fuel cell with power output control scheme. J. Power Sources. 223, 232–245 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuwahara, F., Yamane, T., Nakayama, A.: Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in porous media. Int. Commun. Heat Mass. 33, 411–418 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nield, D.A., Bejan, A.: Convection in porous media. Springer, New York (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carbonell, R.G., Whitaker, S.: Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media. In: Bear, J., Corapcioglu, M. Y. (eds.) Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media, pp. 121–198. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht (1984)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vafai, K., Tien, C.L.: Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 24, 195–203 (1981)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hassan, Y., Dominguez-Ontiveros, E.: Flow visualization in a pebble bed reactor experiment using PIV and refractive index matching techniques. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238, 3080–3085 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suzuki, K., Iwai, H., Nishino, T.: Electrochemical and Thermo-Fluid Modeling of a Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with Accompanying Indirect Internal Fuel Reforming. In: Sunden, B., Faghri, M. (eds.) Transport Phenomena in Fuel Cells, pp. 83–131. WIT Press, Southampton (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nishino, T., Szmyd, J.S.: Numerical Analysis of a Cell-Based Indirect Internal Reforming Tubular SOFC Operating With Biogas. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 7, 051004 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J.M., John Paul, O., Reid, R.C.: The properties of gases and liquids. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nagata, S., Momma, A., Kato, T., Kasuga, Y.: Numerical analysis of output characteristics of tubular SOFC with internal reformer. J. Power Sources. 101, 60–71 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Achenbach, E., Riensche, E.: Methane/steam reforming kinetics for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 52, 283–288 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patankar, S.: Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere, Washington (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferziger, J.H., Peric, M.: Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wei, J., Iglesia, E.: Isotopic and kinetic assessment of the mechanism of reactions of CH 4 with CO 2 or H 2O to form synthesis gas and carbon on nickel catalysts. J. Catal. 224, 370–383 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brus, G., Komatsu, Y., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: An Analysis of Biogas Reforming Process on Ni/YSZ and Ni/SDC Catalysts. Int. J. Thermodyn. 15, 43–51 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yakabe, H., Ogiwara, T., Hishinuma, M., Yasuda, I.: 3-D model calculation for planar SOFC. J. Power Sources. 102, 144–154 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahmed, K., Foger, K.: Kinetics of internal steam reforming of methane on Ni/YSZ-based anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Catal. Today. 63, 479–487 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hosseini, S., Ahmed, K., Tad, M.O.: CFD model of a methane fuelled single cell SOFC stack for analysing the combined effects of macro/micro structural parameters. J. Power Sources. 234, 180–196 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Achenbach, E.: Three-dimensional and time-dependent simulation of a planar solid oxide fuel cell stack. J. Power Sources. 49, 333–348 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brus, G.: Experimental and numerical studies on chemically reacting gas flow in the porous structure of a solid oxide fuel cells internal fuel reformer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 37, 17225–17234 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sciazko, A., Komatsu, Y., Brus, G., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J.S.: An Application of Generalized Least Squares Method to an Analysis of Methane/Steam Reforming Process on a Ni/YSZ Catalyst. ECS Trans. 57, 2987–2996 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sciazko, A., Komatsu, Y., Brus, G., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J. S.: A novel approach to the experimental study on methane/steam reforming kinetics using the Orthogonal Least Squares method. J. Power Sources. 262, 245–254 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sciazko, A., Komatsu, Y., Brus, G., Kimijima, S., Szmyd, J. S.: A novel approach to improve the mathematical modelling of the internal reforming process for solid oxide fuel cells using the orthogonal least squares method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 39, 16372–16389 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsolakis, A., Megaritis, A.: Catalytic exhaust gas fuel reforming for diesel engines-effects of water addition on hydrogen production and fuel conversion efficiency. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 29, 1409–1419 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Mozdzierz
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Brus
    • 1
  • A. Sciazko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. Komatsu
    • 2
  • S. Kimijima
    • 2
  • J. S. Szmyd
    • 1
  1. 1.AGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Shibaura Institute of TechnologySaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations