Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aerial application methods control spider mites on corn in Kansas, USA

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Banks grass mite, Oligonychus pratensis (Banks), and two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, are important chelicerae herbivores on irrigated corn in Kansas, USA. They cause loss of foliage, stalk breakage, kernel shrinkage and yield loss. Aerial application methods were evaluated to control spider mites in a commercial corn field in August, 2017, near Hoxie, Kansas. Dimethoate (0.56 kg active ingredient/ha) and Lorsban Advanced (1.05 kg active ingredient/ha) mixed with a nonionic surfactant, Traverse (0.25% v/v), were aerially applied using conventional flat-fan hydraulic nozzles at 28.1 L/ha and aerial electrostatic nozzles at 9.3 L/ha. To assess spray droplet spectra of the aerial application methods, water sensitive paper samplers were deployed at the whorl of husk leaves at the tip of the ear before aerial spray treatments were applied. Spray droplet spectra were quantified using commercial image analysis software. Treatment efficacy was assessed both objectively and subjectively. Objective efficacy evaluation incorporated the use of an active multispectral optical sensor via spectral analysis of the midrib regions of corn leaves on the abaxial surface where spider mites reside. Subjective damage ratings based upon in-field spider mite movement observations were scored by professional crop scouting consultants. Results of objective spectral analysis and subjective damage ratings indicated that both the conventional and electrostatic nozzles with 283 and 210-µm spray droplet ‘volume median diameter’ (VMD) at 28.1 and 9.3 L/ha, respectively, controlled spider mites compared to an untreated check.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alm SR, Reichard DL, Hall FR (1987) Effects of sray drop size and distribution of drops containing Bifenthrin on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol 80:517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders H, Ozkan HE, Reichard DL, Carpenter TG, Brazee RD (1992) Spray deposit patterns of an electrostatic atomizer. Trans ASAE 35:1361–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders H, Ozkan HE, Reichard DL, Carpenter TG, Brazee RD (1993) Deposition efficiency of air-assisted, charged sprays in a wind tunnel. Trans ASAE 36:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer T, Bynum E (1993) Yield loss to corn from feeding by the Banks grass mite and two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp Appl Acarol 17:895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2004) Terminology relating to liquid particles and atomization. Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon O, Swift J, Baskett R, Lyons T (1961) Experimental acaricides tested for control of spider mites on field corn on two San Joaquin Delta islands. Calif Agric 15:10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon OG, Lyons T, Baskett R (1962) Effects of spider mite infestations on dent corn in California. J Econ Entomol 55:823–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensoussan N, Santamaria ME, Zhurov V, Diaz I, Grbić M, Grbić V (2016) Plant-herbivore interaction: dissection of the cellular pattern of Tetranychus urticae feeding on the host plant. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg R, Kennedy G (1982) Intercrop relationships and spider mite dispersal in a corn-peanut agroecosystem. Entomol Exp Appl 32:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg R, Kennedy G (1987) Ecological and agricultural considerations in the management of twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch). Agric Zool Rev 2:185–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschman LL, Chowdhury MA (1990) Management of Banks grass mites in field corn: aerial applications of propargite. Southwest Entomol 15:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum E, Archer T (1986) Chemical carrier coverage-southwestern corn borer control in corn and crop oil spreading on various crops. Southwest Entomol 11:45–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bynum E Jr, Archer T, Lyle W, Bordovsky J, Onken AB (1991) Chemical coverage on corn and sorghum plants sprayed with lithium sulfate using an airplane, chemigation, or a multifunction irrigation-pesticide application system. J Econ Entomol 84:1869–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bynum ED Jr, Michels J Jr, MacDonald JC, Bible JB (2015) Impact of banks grass mite damage to yield and quality of maize silage. Southwest Entomol 40:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bynum ED, Nino E, Vandiver M, Porter P (2017) Is early season whorl-stage application of acaricide a viable practice for managing spider mites in maize? Southwest Entomol 42:651–664. https://doi.org/10.3958/059.042.0304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton J, Bouse L, Kirk I (1995) Electrostatic charging of aerial spray over cotton. Trans ASAE 38:1641–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler L, Archer T, Ward C, Lyle W (1979) Influences of irrigation practices on spider mite densities on field corn. Environ Entomol 8:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doenier CE (1955) Penetration of the foliage of maize and potatoes by aerial spray. J Econ Entomol 48:629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehler LE (1974) A review of the spider-mite problem on grain sorghum and corn in West Texas. The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald GJ, Maas SJ, Detar WR (2004) Spider mite detection and canopy component mapping in cotton using hyperspectral imagery and spectral mixture analysis. Precis Agric 5:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles DK, Blewett TC (1991) Effects of conventional and reduced-volume, charged-spray application techniques on dislodgeable foliar residue of captan on strawberries. Agric Food Chem 39:1646–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FR, Reichard DL (1978) Effects of spray droplet size, dosage, and solution per ha rates on mortality of twospotted spider mite. J Econ Entomol 71:279–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog GA, Lambert WR III, Law SE, Seigler WE, Giles DK (1983) Evaluation of an electrostatic spray application system for control of insect pests in cotton. J Econ Entomol 76:637–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden EL (2002) Spatial ecology and remote sensing in the precision management of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Teranychidae) in peanut. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzer T, Norman J, Perring T, Berry J, Heintz J (1988) Effects of microenvironment on the dynamics of spider-mite populations. Exp Appl Acarol 4:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahannama M, Watkins A, Yule A (1999) Examination of electrostatically charged sprays for agricultural spraying applications. In: Institute for liquid atomization and spray systems-Europe, Toulouse, France, 1999. Proceedings of ILASS Europe, vol 7, pp 13–18

  • Kirk IW, House VS (1995) Effects of application parameters on efficacy of propargite on spider mites. In: Beltwide cotton conference, San Antonio, TX, vol 2. National Cotton Council, pp 1048–1050

  • Kirk I, Hoffmann W, Carlton J (2001) Aerial electrostatic spray system performance. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 44:1089–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan Y, Zhang H, Hoffmann W, Juan D, Lopez J (2013) Spectral response of spider mite infested cotton: mite density and miticide rate study. Int J Agric Biol Eng 6:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Latheef MA, Carlton JB, Kirk IW, Hoffmann WC (2009) Aerial electrostatic-charged sprays for deposition and efficacy against sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cotton. Pest Manag Sci 65:744–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Law SE (2001) Agricultural electrostatic spray application: a review of significant research and development during the 20th century. J Electrost 51–52:25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3886(01)00040-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law SE, Mills HA (1980) Electrostatic application of low-volume microbial insecticide spray on broccoli plants. J Am Soc Hort Sci 105:774–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Luedeling E, Hale A, Zhang M, Bentley WJ, Dharmasri LC (2009) Remote sensing of spider mite damage in California peach orchards. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 11:244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolies DC, Kennedy GG (1985) Movement of the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, among hosts in a corn-peanut agroecosystem. Entomol Exp Appl 37:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin D, Carlton J (2013) Airspeed and orifice size affect spray droplet spectrum from an aerial electrostatic nozzle for fixed-wing applications. Appl Eng Agric 29:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin DE, Latheef MA (2017a) Aerial electrostatic spray deposition and canopy penetration in cotton. J Electrost 90:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2017.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin DE, Latheef MA (2017b) Remote sensing evaluation of two-spotted spider mite damage on greenhouse cotton. JoVE J Vis Exp 122:e54314–e54314

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin DE, Latheef MA, López JD (2015) Evaluation of selected acaricides against twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on greenhouse cotton using multispectral data. Exp Appl Acarol 66:227–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maski D, Durairaj D (2010) Effects of charging voltage, application speed, target height, and orientation upon charged spray deposition on leaf abaxial and adaxial surfaces. Crop Protect 29:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messenger M, Buschman L, Nechols J (2000) A comparison of sampling techniques for spider mites and spider mite predators in corn. Southwest Entomol 25:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Munthali DC (1984) Biological efficiency of small dicofol droplets against Tetranychus urticae (Koch) eggs, larvae and protonymphs. Crop Protect 3:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(84)90038-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nansen C, Sidumo AJ, Gharalari AH, Vaughn K (2010) A new method for sampling spider mites on field crops. Southwest Entomol 35:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3958/059.035.0101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens JC, Ward CR, Teetes GL (1976) Current status of spider mites in corn and sorghum. In: Loden HD, Wilkinson D (eds) Annual corn and sorghum research conference, Chicago, 1976. American Seed Trade Association, pp 38–64

  • Pickett C, Gilstrap F (1985) Dynamics of spider mite species (Acarina: Tetranychidae) composition infesting corn. J Kans Entomol Soc 58:503–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett C, Gilstrap F (1986) Dispersion patterns and sampling of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) infesting corn in the Texas high plains. Environ Entomol 15:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2018) JMP® (ppJMP® Version 14), 14th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloderbeck P, Morrison W, Patrick C, Buschman L (1988) Seasonal shift in species composition of spider mites on corn in the western Great Plains. Southwest Entomol 13:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Western NM, Hislop EC, Dalton WJ (1994) Experimental air-assisted electrohydrodynamic spraying. Crop Protect 13:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(94)90076-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson L, Gonzalez D, Leigh T, Maggi V, Foristiere C, Goodell P (1983) Within-plant distribution of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cotton: a developing implementable monitoring program. Environ Entomol 12:128–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the assistance of Tate Mauck of Hoxie Flying Service for making the aerial applications and Steve Launchbaugh for permission to use his corn field for conducting this study.

Disclaimer

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 3103 F and B Road, College Station, TX, 77845, USA

    Daniel E. Martin & Mohamed A. Latheef

Authors
  1. Daniel E. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed A. Latheef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Martin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, D.E., Latheef, M.A. Aerial application methods control spider mites on corn in Kansas, USA. Exp Appl Acarol 77, 571–582 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00367-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00367-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation