Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do political ties facilitate or inhibit firm innovation in China? An examination of the institutional structure

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on political connection literature, we distinguish two types of political ties, horizontal (i.e., block ties with regions) and vertical (i.e., line ties with departments), and examine their effects on firm innovation. Based on a panel of Chinese public-listed private firms, we find that firms whose executives have block ties innovate much less than those without such ties, particularly when they are located in regions with less developed markets. In contrast, line ties increase firm innovation, particularly when the firms are located in regions with more developed markets. However, it also shows that the effect of line ties is attenuated when regional governments place a greater emphasis on innovation. Our research contributes to the literature on the relationship between political ties and firm innovation, the heterogeneity of political ties, and the interplay between political ties and the institutional environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abrami, R., Kirby, W., & McFarlan, F. W. (2014). Can China lead?: Reaching the limits of power and growth. Harvard Business School Press Books.

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Persistence of power, elites and institutions. American Economic Review, 98(1), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Yayavaram, S. (2011). Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organization Science, 22(6), 1631–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C. E., Lu, J., & Tao, Z. (2006). The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from China. American Economic Review, 96(2), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellettini, G., Ceroni, C. B., & Prarolo, G. (2013). Persistence of politicians and firms’ innovation. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 2056–2070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, U., Hsu, P. H., Tian, X., & Xu, Y. (2017). What affects innovation more: Policy or policy uncertainty? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(5), 1869–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J. P. (2011). Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J. P., Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, H., Fang, H., & Xu, L. C. (2011). Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of chinese firms. The Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Wu, B. (2014). Institutional barriers and industry dynamics. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1103–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change. Organization Science, 17(4), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for non-experimental causal studies’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 575–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & Mcconnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). NERI Index of Marketization of China’s provinces. Beijing: Economic Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, E., Jörg, R., & So, J. (2013). Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Review of Finance, 17(5), 1617–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G. (2009). China’s local political budget cycles. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., Jia, N., Shi, J., & Wang, Y. (2017). The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 67–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L., Tong, T. W., Zhang, Y., & He, W. (2018). Constructing a chinese patent database of listed firms in China. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 27(3), 579–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Bierman, Z. L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. G. L., Geng, X., & Wang, H. (2017). Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China. Organization Science, 28(2), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2002). Managing chinese bureaucrats: An institutional economics perspective. Political Studies, 50(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, N., Shi, J., & Wang, Y. (2018). The interdependence of Public and private stakeholder influence. Advances in Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000038007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Wulf, J. (2007). Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 634–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellyn, K. B., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2012). CEO power and risk taking: Evidence from the subprime lending industry. Corporate Governance, 20(3), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberthal, K., & Lieberthal, G. (2004). HBR spotlight: China tomorrow - the great transition - the hidden dragons – response. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegsalz, J., & Wagner, S. (2013). Patent examination at the state intellectual property office in China. Research Policy, 42(2), 552–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhou, L. A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in china. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E.J. 2018. On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216.

  • Ling, L., Zhou, X., Liang, Q., Song, P., & Zeng, H. (2016). Political connections, overinvestments and firm performance: Evidence from chinese listed real estate firms. Finance Research Letters, 18, 328–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2008). The changing chinese culture and business behavior: The perspective of intertwinement between Guanxi and corruption. International Business Review, 17(2), 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in china: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcwilliams, A., Fleet, D. D. V., & Cory, K. D. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 707–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, A. C. (2005). China’s “soft” centralization: Shifting Tiao/Kuai authority relations’. China Quarterly, 184, 791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, A. C. (2009). Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0. China Quarterly, 200, 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1995). Federalism, chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovtchinnikov, A. V., Reza, S. W., & Wu, Y. (2019). Political activism and firm innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(3), 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, M. (2006). New product development in Asia: An introduction to the special issue. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, M., & Markóczy, L. (2010). Complementary or alternative? The effects of corporate political strategy on innovation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 252–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B., & Thomas, N. (2000). Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, V. C. (2008). Factions and Finance in China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P., Hu, H. W., & Hillman, A. J. (2016). The Dark side of Board Political Capital: Enabling Blockholder Rent Appropriation’. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 1801–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, I. J., Bhatt, M., & Bartunek, J. M. (2009). Organizational knowledge creation in the chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 5(1), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Du, F., & Marquis, C. (2019). Defending Mao’s dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1111–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., & Luo, X. R. (2019). Retire in peace: Officials’ political incentives and corporate diversification in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 773–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Zhang, T., & Shou, Z. (2021). The double-edged sword effect of political ties on performance in emerging markets: The mediation of innovation capability and legitimacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(3), 1003–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. Y., & Wang, S. (2013). Chairman’s government background, excess employment and government subsidies: Evidence from chinese local state-owned enterprises. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, T. (2015). Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Science, 61(8), 1989–2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C. (2011). The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 1076–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Du, F. (2019). Deviant versus aspirational risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1226–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, G., & Yano, G. (2016). How does anti-corruption affect corporate innovation? Evidence from recent anti-corruption efforts in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(3), 498–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty, cost of capital, and corporate innovation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 111, 105698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, L. Q. (2015). Community constraints on the efficacy of elite mobilization. American Journal of Sociology, 120(6), 1690–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, L. Q., Wang, J., & Yang, B. (2019). Contesting commercialization: Political influence, responsive authoritarianism, and cultural resistance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64, 435–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Marquis, C., & Qiao, K. (2016). Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of charitable donations of chinese firms. Organization Science, 27(5), 1307–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. (2015). Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1615–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, W., Lin, Y., Gao, D., & Yang, H. (2019). Does politician turnover affect foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1184–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H., & Chung, C. N. (2014). Portfolios of political ties and business group strategy in emerging economies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 599–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Weiguo Zhong acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 72022002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Organization and Strategic Management, Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100871, China

    Hong Zhang & Weiguo Zhong

  2. Investment Center State Administration of Foreign Exchange(SAFE), 30 Jinrong Street, Xichen, Beijing, 100033, China

    Chudi Yang

Authors
  1. Hong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chudi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weiguo Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chudi Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Yang, C. & Zhong, W. Do political ties facilitate or inhibit firm innovation in China? An examination of the institutional structure. Asia Pac J Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09901-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09901-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation