Skip to main content
Log in

Owner type, pyramidal structure and R&D Investment in China’s family firms

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on socioemotional wealth perspective and agency theory, this paper holds that lone-founder firms tend to engage more actively in R&D projects than do family-controlled firms involving multiple family members as owners, while family ownership structure moderates that effect. Using a large sample of 5808 firm-year observations in China, the study found that lone-founder firms do more R&D than family-controlled firms, though the positive effect is less pronounced when founder’ ownership is higher and more pronounced when the divergence between founders’ ownership and control (resulted from pyramidal structures) is higher. These findings indicate that properties of family ownership structure, and particularly pyramidal ownership structure, are important contingencies of family firms’ R&D decisions. This yields implications for family business and researchers, as well as policymakers seeking to encourage innovativeness in the large family business sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achleitner, A., Kaserer, C., & Kauf, T. 2012. The dynamics of voting ownership in lone-founder, family-founder, and heir firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2): 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Link, A. N. (Eds.) 2019. A research agenda for entrepreneurship and innovation. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. 2014. Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6): 610–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. 2004. Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3): 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Chang, A. Y., & Cheung, J. S. T. 2019. Encouraging entrepreneurship and economic growth. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(4): 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12040178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. 2005. Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1): 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, H. V., & Wolfenzon, D. 2006. A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. The Journal of Finance, 61(6): 2637–2680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., Ding, Y., Villalonga, B., & Zhang, H. 2015. The role of institutional development in the prevalence and performance of entrepreneur and family-controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31: 284–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Duru, A., & Reeb, D. M. 2012. Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6): 1744–1758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, K., Craig, J. B., & Ramachandran, K. (Eds.) 2011. Family enterprise in the Asia Pacific: Exploring transgenerational entrepreneurship in family firms. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Chen, X., George, G., Luo, Y., & Tsui, A. S. 2015. West meets east: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2): 460–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bena, J., & Ortiz-Molina, H. 2013. Pyramidal ownership and the creation of new firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3): 798–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. 2006. The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2): 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. 2012. R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2): 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Wagner, M. 2014. Ownership versus management effects on corporate social responsibility concerns in large family and founder firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4): 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. 2015. Do private equity-owned firms have better management practices? American Economic Review, 105(5): 442–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2011. Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 551–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., & Solarino, A. M. 2016. Ownership of corporations: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(5): 1282–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. 2004. Understanding venture capital in East Asia: The impact of institutions on the industry today and tomorrow. Journal of World Business, 39(1): 72–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Chen, J. 2019. China has emerged as an aspirant economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9638-0.

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. 2008. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. 2015. State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Zahra, S. A., & Cai, L. 2018. Examining entrepreneurship through indigenous lenses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3): 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. 2002. Explaining the diversification discount. The Journal of Finance, 57(4): 1731–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, A. A., Jones, C. D., & Withers, M. C. 2015. Family- versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: Social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2): 436–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 249–265.

  • Cai, D., Luo, J., & Wan, D. 2012. Family CEOs: Do they benefit firm performance in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 923–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J., & Koleski, K. 2011. Backgrounder: China’s 12th five-year plan. US-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6): 1153–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. 2009. Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4): 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. R., & Miller, K. D. 2007. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. 2018. Governance mechanisms and family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. 2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 976–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. 2012. Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6): 1103–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1): 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daspit, J. J., Chrisman, J. J., Sharma, P., Pearson, A. W., & Mahto, R. V. 2018. Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. L. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 1995. Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. 2016. Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4): 1224–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, P., & Ortiz, M. 2019. When more is better: Multifamily firms and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, forthcoming.

  • The Economist. 2009. Dynastie and durability. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/14517406.

  • Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3): 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. 2011. NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces. Beijing:Economic Science Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. 2005. The emergence of corporate pyramids in China. Working paper:The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Kotlar, J., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. 2018. The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge-based resources. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1): 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H. C., Siau, K. L., Memili, E., & Dou, J. 2019. Cognitive antecedents of family business bias in investment decisions: A commentary on “Risky decisions and the family firm bias: An experimental study based on Prospect Theory.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2): 409–416.

  • French, J. L., & Rosenstein, J. 1984. Employee ownership, work attitudes, and power relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 27(4): 861–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Campbell, J. T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., & Sirmon, D. G. 2014. Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6): 1351–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 653–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J:Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. 2004. Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4): 883–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1): 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. 2010. The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.). Handbook of the economics of innovation, volume 1: 609–639. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebl, M. R. W. 2013. Risk aversion in family firms: What do we really know? The Journal of Risk Finance, 14(1): 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. 2002. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset. Oxford:Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. 1995. A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4): 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Nair, A., & Ahlstrom, D. 2015. Introduction to the special issue: Towards a theoretical understanding of innovation and entrepreneurship in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 835–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. 2008. Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3): 404–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, T., Li, C., & Chu, S. 2011. Cash holdings and corporate governance in family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 64(7): 757–764.

  • Kumar, P., & Langberg, N. 2009. Corporate fraud and investment distortions in efficient capital markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 40(1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. 2007. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1107–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2008. To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(1): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Liang, X. 2015. A Confucian social model of political appointments among Chinese private entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2): 592–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Chen, Y. J., & Wang, L. C. 2017. Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1): 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. 2017. Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3): 1164–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, L. C., Zhao, L., & Ahlstrom, D. 2013. Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1059–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llach, J., & Nordqvist, M. 2010. Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(3–4): 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. 2007. A cognitive perspective on entrepreneurship and the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1078–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Delgado, P., & Diéguez-Soto, J. 2015. Lone founders, types of private family businesses and firm performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Wan, D., & Cai, D. 2012. The private benefits of control in Chinese listed firms: Do cash flow rights always reduce controlling shareholders’ tunneling? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Wan, D., Cai, D., & Liu, H. 2013. Multiple large shareholder structure and governance: The role of shareholder number, contest for control, and formal institutions in Chinese family firms. Management Organization Review, 9(2): 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Xiang, Y., & Zhu, R. 2017. Military top executives and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3): 725–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R. W., Pham, P. K., & Zein, J. 2011. Family business groups around the world: Financing advantages, control motivations, and organizational choices. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(11): 3556–3600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memili, E., Fang, H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. 2015. The impact of small-and medium-sized family firms on economic growth. Small Business Economics, 45(4): 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2005. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family business. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2006. Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1): 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2011. Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5): 1051–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. 2010. Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly-traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2): 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. 2011. Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5): 829–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. 2008. Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munari, F., Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. 2010. The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8): 1093–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3): 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Bullón, F., & Sanchez-Bueno, M. J. 2011. The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24(1): 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A., Schwarz, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2017. Microfinance and entrepreneurship: An introduction. International Small Business Journal, 35(7): 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Chrisman, J. J. 2014. Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4): 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. S. 2017. History and the debate over intellectual property. Management and Organization Review, 13(1): 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perri, A., & Peruffo, E. 2017. Family business and technological innovation: Empirical insights from the Italian pharmaceutical industry. New York:Palgrave McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Bueno, M. J., & Usero, B. 2014. How may the nature of family firms explain the decisions concerning international diversification? Journal of Business Research, 67(7): 1311–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, T., Achleitner, A. K., Ampenberger, M., & Kaserer, C. 2014. Family firms and R&D behavior - New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy, 43(1): 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia, S., Nordqvist, M., Mazzola, P., & Massis, A. D. 2015. Family ownership and R&D intensity in small- and medium-sized firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3): 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder, D., Zaheer, A., Sapienza, H., & Ranucci, R. 2017. How family influence, socioemotional wealth, and competitive conditions shape new technology adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9): 1774–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. 1997. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52(1): 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3): 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2): 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G., & Ahlstrom, D. 2019. Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the great enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09648-2.

  • Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. 2008. Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China’s next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4–16.

  • Wasserman, N. 2006. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5): 960–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. 2017. Everyday entrepreneurship - A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3): 311–321.

  • White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. 2012. Social Darwinism in modern China. Journal of Modern Chinese History, 6(2): 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. 2005. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., & Dehlen, T. 2012. Value is in the eye of the owner: Affect infusion and socioemotional wealth among family firm owners. Family Business Review, 25(3): 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. We greatly thank for valuable comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers and the senior editor Prof. David Ahlstrom, as well as the help from Zeyue Huang. All remaining errors are our own

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-hui Luo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Jh., Li, X., Wang, L.C. et al. Owner type, pyramidal structure and R&D Investment in China’s family firms. Asia Pac J Manag 38, 1085–1111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09702-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09702-z

Keywords

Navigation