Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring dynamic multi-level linkages in inter-organizational networks

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When an organization pursues the goals specific to its environment, networks are constructed to gain various resources from other collaborators. However, most individual studies on inter-organizational network have taken a simplified view of relationships among member organizations by focusing on a static and single level linkage. This paper proposes a multi-level approach to integrate resource, organization and network levels and explores the relationship between these levels. This enables us to identify a set of important micro, meso and macro linkages between resource, organization and network. Operational measures and results are illustrated via a case study from an incubator system of Xi'an High-tech Park of China. The case study demonstrates that one level triggers the changes of other levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, M. J., Galletta, D.F. and Carley, K.M. 2003. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D group: An empirical study. Management Science, 49: 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. 1994. Monitoring characteristics of the main bank system: an analytical and developmental view. In M. Aoki & H. Patrick (eds.), The Japanese Main Bank System: 109–141, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. 1996. Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decision. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1988. Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D.D. 1995. Size and relatedness of units sold: an agency theory and resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journa, 16: 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglof, E. and Perotti, E. 1994. The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu. Journal of Financial Economics, 36: 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

  • Borys, B. and Jemison, D. B. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14: 234–249.

  • Burt, R.S. 1980. Autonomy in a social typology. American Journal of Sociology, 85: 892–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. and Wernerfelt, B. 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26: 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35: 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms, Organization Science, 17: 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, M. K. and Rao, C.P. 1990. Choice of foreign market entry modes by service firms: Role of market knowledge. Management International Review, 30: 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.P. 1999. The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Networks, 1: 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.A. and Podolny, J. 1992. Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, M. and Benassi, M. 1998. The dark side of social capital. In Shaul Gabbay and Roger Leenders (eds) Capital and Liability. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. and Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria N. and Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R. and Westphal, J. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 473–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differces. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. 2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31: 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. 1991. Competitive for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan M. and Freeman J. 1989. Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. 1995. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 673–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. and Smith-Lovin, L. 1997. New directions in social network research on gender and organizational careers. In S. Jackson and C. Cooper (eds) Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Sussex, England: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. 1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. C. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32: 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. and Knoke, D. 2002. How Organizational Field Networks Shape Inter-organizational Tie-Formation Rates. Academy of Management Review, 27: 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. Hoskisson, R. E. and Wan, W. P. 2004. Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 613–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., Shan, W. and Walker, G. 1992. The make-or-cooperate decision in the context of an industry network. In N. Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action:348–365. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koka, B. and Prescott, J. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria and R.G. Eccles (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, form and action: 216–239. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C.J. and Spekman, R.E. 1997. Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1992. External economies and economic progress: The case of the Microcomputer industry. Business History Review, 66: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E. and Pattison, P.E. 1999. Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Networks, 21: 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach M. L. and Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61: 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., Koka, B.R. and Prescott, J.E. 1998. Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 439–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. T. and Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. and Dow, S. 2003. The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, K. and Rogers, M. 2004. Network density and R&D spillers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53: 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. and White, D. R. 2003. Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68: 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA: Bellknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. and Garcia-Pont, C. 1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, Y. and Sjoberg, C. 2000. The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden. Research Policy, 29: 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M.A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Nowak, P. 1976. Joint ventures and inter-organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 398–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. 1990. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K.G. and Sebastian, J.G. 1998. Network within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 240–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R.E. and Shook, D.E. 1990. Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 27: 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 1–37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Russo, M. 1985. Technical change and the industrial district: the role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy. Research Policy, 14: 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, M.D. 2000. Success breeds success: the linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11: 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, M.D. and Chakrabarti, A. K. 2002. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31: 1163–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations, Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, W., Walker G. and Kogut, B. 1994. Inter-firm cooperation and start-up innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. and Zelen, M. 1989. Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Networks, 11: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork, D. and Richards, W.D. 1992. Nonrespondents in communication network studies: Problems and possibilities. Group and Organization Management, 17: 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: the role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. 1982. Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 199–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. network analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. 1990. Different stroke from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96: 558–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S.D. 1998. structures: A network approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J., Gulati, R. and Shortell, S. 1997. An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangcheng Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, F., Xi, Y. Exploring dynamic multi-level linkages in inter-organizational networks. Asia Pacific J Manage 23, 187–208 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-7166-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-7166-9

Keywords

Navigation