Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Credibility analysis of water environment complaint report based on deep cross domain network

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Netizens’ complaint reports are the key to the early detection and treatment of environmental water pollution events, but there are often reports that are malicious, contain exaggerations, and deliberately exaggerate the facts. The manual analysis of complaint reports is complicated, and the lack of sufficient labeled data does not allow for an effective credibility classification model. This paper proposes a deep cross domain network, which learns knowledge from the source domain (microblog texts) and applies it to the target domain (complaint report texts) to improve the complaint report reliability classification model’s performance. First, the long short term memory extracts the domain-shared features of the source and target domains, the source-private features, and the target-private features. Then, the self-attention mechanism fuses the domain-shared features and the domain-private features. Finally, the multilayer perceptron outputs the classification result, while the multi-kernel maximum mean difference is used to calculate the distance between the source and target domains as part of the loss function. Experiments on complaint report texts and microblog texts show that our proposed method consistently outperforms other nonknowledge transfer models and completes the credibility analysis of water environment complaint reports well. This paper provides an innovative method for the credibility analysis of water environment complaint reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horne B, Adali S (2017) This just in: fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, vol 1

  2. Du XD, Zhu RQ, Zhao FQ, Zhao FZ, Han P, Zhu ZY (2020) A deceptive detection model based on topic, sentiment, and sentence structure information. Appl Intell 50(11):3868–3881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01779-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaliyar RK, Goswami A, Narang P, Sinha S (2020) FNDNet—a deep convolutional neural network for fake news detection. Cogn Syst Res 61:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tu K, Chen C, Hou C, Yuan J, Li J, Yuan X (2021) Rumor2vec: a rumor detection framework with joint text and propagation structure representation learning. Inf Sci 560:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu F, Sheng VS, Wang M (2020) Near real-time topic-driven rumor detection in source microblogs. Knowl-Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Przybyla P (2020) Capturing the style of fake news. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 01, pp 490–497

  7. Wang WY (2017) "Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": a new benchmark dataset for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2067

  8. Zhang H, Fang Q, Qian S, Xu C (2019) Multi-modal knowledge-aware event memory network for social media rumor detection. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia, Nice, France

  9. Wang Z, Guo Y (2020) Rumor events detection enhanced by encoding sentimental information into time series division and word representations. Neurocomputing 397:224–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoang T, Liu J, Pratt N, Zheng VW, Chang KC, Roughead E, Li J (2018) Authenticity and credibility aware detection of adverse drug events from social media. Int J Med Inform 120:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotfi S, Mirzarezaee M, Hosseinzadeh M, Seydi V (2021) Detection of rumor conversations in Twitter using graph convolutional networks. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02036-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Qian S, Hu J, Fang Q, Xu C (2020) Fake news detection via knowledge-driven multimodal graph convolutional networks. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2020 international conference on multimedia retrieval, Dublin, Ireland

  13. Lu Y-J, Li C-T, Assoc Computat L (2020) GCAN: graph-aware co-attention networks for explainable fake news detection on social media. In: 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics

  14. Li Z, Yang Z, Luo L, Xiang Y, Lin H (2020) Exploiting adversarial transfer learning for adverse drug reaction detection from texts. J Biomed Inform 106:103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems, Long Beach, California, USA

  16. Tzeng E, Hoffman J, Darrell T, Saenko K (2015) Simultaneous deep transfer across domains and tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 4068–4076

  17. Long M, Cao Y, Wang J, Jordan M (2015) Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 32nd international conference on machine learning, proceedings of machine learning research

  18. Gretton A, Sriperumbudur B, Sejdinovic D, Strathmann H, Balakrishnan S, Pontil M, Fukumizu K (2012) Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 25th international conference on neural information processing systems—volume 1, Lake Tahoe, Nevada

  19. Kim Y (2014) Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, Oct 2014. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 1746–1751

  20. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies—volume 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota

  21. Ma J, Gao W, Mitra P, Kwon S, Jansen BJ, Wong K-F, Cha M (2016) Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, New York, New York, USA

  22. Lai S, Xu L, Liu K, Zhao J (2015) Recurrent convolutional neural networks for text classification. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Austin, Texas

  23. Zhou P, Shi W, Tian J, Qi Z, Li B, Hao H, Xu B (2016) Attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory networks for relation classification. In: Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 2: short papers), Berlin, Germany, Aug 2016. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 207–212

  24. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Leening MJG, Vedder MM, Witteman JCM, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW (2014) Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies. Ann Intern Med 160(2):122. https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China under Grant 61873007 and 61890935, by Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China (2018ZX07111005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

    Qingwu Fan & Huazheng Han

  2. Illinois State University, Normal, IL, 61790, USA

    Shaoen Wu

Authors
  1. Qingwu Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huazheng Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaoen Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingwu Fan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (ZIP 6.63 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Q., Han, H. & Wu, S. Credibility analysis of water environment complaint report based on deep cross domain network. Appl Intell 52, 8134–8146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02842-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02842-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation