Skip to main content
Log in

Research on a new optimization algorithm simulating multi- states of matter inspired by finite element analysis approach

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new optimization algorithm is proposed, since a huge problem that many algorithms faced was not being able to effectively balance the global and local search ability. Matter exists in three states: solid, liquid, and gas, which presents different motion characteristics. Inspired by multi- states of matter, individuals of optimization algorithm have different motion characteristics of matter, which could present different search ability. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) approach can simulate multi- states of matter, which can be adopted to effectively balance the global search ability and local search ability in new optimization algorithm. The new algorithm is creative application of Finite Element Analysis at optimization algorithm field. Artificial Physics Optimization (APO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) belongs to the algorithm types defined by force and mass. According to FEA approach, node displacement caused by force and stiffness could be equivalent to motion caused by force and mass of APO and GSA. In the new algorithm framework, stiffness replaces mass of APO and GSA algorithm. This paper performs research on two different algorithms based on APO and GSA respectively. The individuals of new optimization algorithm are divided into solid state, liquid state, and gas state. The effects of main parameters on the performance were studied through experiments of 6 static test functions. The performance is compared with PSO, basic APO, or GSA for four complex models which made up of solid individual, liquid individual, and gas individual in iterative process. The reasonable complex model can be confirmed experimentally. Based on the reasonable complex model, the article conducted complete experiments against Enhancing artificial bee colony algorithm with multi-elite guidance (MGABC), Artificial bee colony algorithm with an adaptive greedy position update strategy (AABC), Multi-strategy ensemble artificial bee colony (MEABC), Self-adaptive heterogeneous PSO (fk-PSO), and APO with 28 CEC2013 test problem. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a good performance in comparison to its counterparts as a consequence of its better exploration– exploitation balance. The algorithm supplies a new method to improve physics optimization algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagheri Tolabi H, Lashkar Ara A, Hosseini R (2020) An enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve probabilistic load flow problem in a micro-grid. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01872-4

  2. Fan X, Wang P, Hao F (2019) Reliability-based design optimization of crane bridges using Kriging-based surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59:993–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasihmuddin MSBM, Mansor MAB, Abdulhabib Alzaeemi S, Sathasivam  (2020) Satisfiability Logic Analysis Via Radial Basis Function Neural Network with Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. Int J Of Inter Multi And Art Intell. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.06.002

  4. González-Crespo R, Choudhary SK, Kumar-Solanki V, Kumar S, Selamat A (2020) Comparative study on ant Colony optimization (ACO) and K-means clustering approaches for jobs scheduling and energy optimization model in internet of things (IoT). Int j of inter multi and art intell. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003

  5. Zhang D, Xiang W, Cao Q, Chen S (2020) Application of incremental support vector regression based on optimal training subset and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm in real-time sensor fault diagnosis. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01916-9

  6. Erik Cuevas·Alonso Echavarría·Marte A. Ramírez-Ortegón. An optimization algorithm inspired by the States of Matter that improves the balance between exploration and exploitation[J]. Appl Intell (2014) 40:256–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou X, Lu J, Huang J, Zhong M, Wang M (2021) Enhancing artificial bee colony algorithm with multi-elite guidance. Information Sci 543:242–258

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu WJ, Zhan ZH, Zhang J (2018) Artificial bee colony algorithm with an adaptive greedy position update strategy. Soft Comput 22(2):437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, Wu Z, Rahnamayan S, Sun H, Liu Y (2014) Multi-strategy ensemble artificial bee colony algorithm[J]. Inf Sci 279:587–603

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nepomuceno FV, Engelbrecht AP (2013) A self-adaptive heterogeneous pso for real-parameter optimization. Evolutionary Computation (pp.361-368). IEEE

  11. Bathe KJ (2014) Finite element procedures. Klaus-Jürgen Bathe, Watertown

  12. Zienkiewicz OC, Cheung YK (1967) The finite element method in structural and continuum mechanics. McGraw-hill, London

  13. Noor AK (1987) Parallel processing in finite element structural analysis.In Parallel computations and their impact on mechanics.  MA, Boston

  14. Fujita K, Yamaguchi T, Ichimura T, Hori M and Maddegedara L (2016) Acceleration of Element-by-Element Kernel in Unstructured Implicit Low-Order Finite-Element Earthquake Simulation Using OpenACC on Pascal GPUs[C]. in:2016 Third Workshop on Accelerator Programming Using Directives (WACCPD), Salt Lake City, pp. 1-12

  15. Chung ET, Efendiev Y, Lee CS (2015) Mixed generalized multiscale finite element methods and applications[J]. Multiscale Model Simulation 13(1):338–366

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Holland J (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT press Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) New optimizer using particle swarm theory[C]. In: MHS'95 proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 39–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Eberhart R, Shi Y (2001) Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 94–100

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shen X et al A dynamic adaptive particle swarm optimization for knapsack problem. Proceedings of Wcica 2006: Sixth world congress on intelligent control and automation. IEEE 2006:3183–3187

  20. Lakshmanaprabu SK, Shankar K, Rani SS et al (2019) An effect of big data technology with ant colony optimization based routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: towards s mart cities[J]. J Clean Prod 217:584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rashedi E (2009) Nezamabadi -pour H, Saryazdi S. GSA: a gravitational search algorithm[J]. Information Sci 179(13):2232–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Birbil S, Fang R (2003) S. an electromagnetism-like mechanism for global optimization[J]. J Glob Optim 25(3):263–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Formato R (2008) Central force optimization: a new nature inspired computational framework for multidimensional search and optimization[J]. Nat Inspired Cooperat Strategies Optimization 129:221–238

    Google Scholar 

  24. Formato R(2010) Improved CFO  Algorithm for antenna optimization[J]. Electromagnetics Res 19:405–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm[J]. J Glob Optim 39(3):459–471

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie LP, Zeng JC, Cui ZH (2010) On mass effects to artificial physics optimization algorithm for global optimization problems[J]. Int J Innov Comput Appl 2(2):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zengpan (2008) fundamentals of finite element analysis, Tsinghua University, Beijing

  28. Sun G, Zhang A, Wang Z, Yao Y, Ma J, Couples GD (2016) Locally informed gravitational search algorithm[J]. Knowl-Based Syst 104:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. He R, Ji WY, Qing W (2005) An improved particle swarm optimization based on self-adaptive escape velocity [J]. J Software 16(12):2036–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji J, Gao S, Wang S, Tang Y, Yu H, Todo Y (2017) Self-adaptive gravitational search algorithm with a modified chaotic local search[J]. IEEE Access 5:17881–17895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875381), National Natural Youth Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51905369), and administration committee of Yangquan development zone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youshan Gao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, Z., Gao, Y. & Wang, A. Research on a new optimization algorithm simulating multi- states of matter inspired by finite element analysis approach. Appl Intell 52, 378–397 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02190-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02190-z

Keywords

Navigation