Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Coverage Restrictions on Antipsychotic Utilization Among Low-Income Medicare Part D Enrollees

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research demonstrates substantial access problems associated with utilization management and formulary exclusions for antipsychotics in Medicaid, but the use and impact of coverage restrictions for these medications in Medicare Part D remains unknown. We assess the effect of coverage restrictions on antipsychotic utilization in Part D by exploiting a unique natural experiment in which low-income beneficiaries are randomly assigned to prescription drug plans with varying levels of formulary generosity. Despite considerable variation in use of coverage restrictions across Part D plans, we find no evidence that these restrictions significantly deter utilization or reduce access to antipsychotics for low-income beneficiaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMCP Electronic Prior Authorization Work Group (2015). Proceedings of the AMCP Partnership Forum: NCPDP electronic prior authorization standards—building a managed care implementation plan. American Journal of Managed Care, 21, 545–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association. (2011). Standardization of prior authorization for medical services white paper. Retrieved March 20, 2016 from http://massneuro.org/Resources/Transfer%20from%20old%20sit/AMA%20White%20Paper%20on%20Standardizing%20Prior%20Authorization.pdf.

  • Balkrishnan, R., Joish, V. N., Bhosle, M. J., Rasu, R. S., & Nahata, M. C. (2007). Prior authorization of newer insomnia medication in managed care: Is it cost saving? Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 3, 393–398.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., Barrett, A., Caffery, E., Hourihan, K., & Ireys, H. T. (2013). Medication continuity among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Psychiatric Services, 13, 878–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2015). Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes, Attachment L. Retrieved April 10, 2016 from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prescription-Drug-Coverage/PrescriptionDrugCovGenIn/Downloads/2015StarRatingsTechnicalNotes.pdf.

  • Farley, J. F., Cline, R. R., Schommer, J. C., Hadsall, R. S., & Nyman, J. A. (2008). Retrospective assessment of Medicaid step-therapy prior authorization policy for atypical antipsychotic medications. Clinical Therapeutics, 30, 1524–1539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave E., Hoadley J., Summer L., Merrell K. (2010) Medicare Part D formularies, 2006–2010: A chartbook. Retrieved April 10, 2016 from http://67.59.137.244/documents/Oct10_PartDFormulariesChartBook_CONTRACTOR_RS.pdf.

  • Huskamp, H. A., Stevenson, D. G., Donohue, J. M., Newhouse, J. P., & Keating, N. L. (2007). Coverage and prior authorization of psychotropic drugs under Medicare Part D. Psychiatric Services, 58, 308–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavetti, K., & Simon, K. (2014). Strategic formulary design in stand-alone and integrated Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans. Working Paper. Retrieved April 10, 2016 from http://www.kurtlavetti.com/MA_PDP_vc.pdf.

  • Law, M. R., Ross-Dengan, D., & Soumerai, S. B. (2008). Effect of prior authorization of second-generation antipsychotic agents on pharmacy utilization and reimbursements. Psychiatric Services, 59, 540–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. Y., Soumerai, S. B., Ross-Dengan, D., Zhang, F., & Adams, A. S. (2010). Unintended impacts of a Medicaid prior authorization policy on access to medications for bipolar illness. Medical Care, 48, 4–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morra, D., Nicholson, S., Levinson, S., Gans, D. N., Hammons, T., & Casalino, L. P. (2011). US physician practices versus Canadians: spending nearly four times as much money interacting with payers. Health Affairs, 30, 1443–1450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchetti, E., Grunze, H., Leucht, S., & Vita, A. (2015). Long-acting injection antipsychotic medications in the management of schizophrenia. Evidence-Based Psychiatric Care, 1, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabury, S. A., Goldman, D. P., Kalsekar, I., Sheehan, J. J., Laubmeier, K., & Lackdawalla, D. N. (2014). Formulary restrictions on atypical antipsychotics: impact on costs for patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Medicaid. American Journal of Managed Care, 20, e52–e60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, K., Tennyson, S., & Hudson, J. (2009). Do state cost control policies reduce Medicaid prescription drug spending? Risk Management and Insurance Review, 12, 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soumerai S.B., Zhang F., Ross-Dengan D., et al. (2008) Use of atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia in Maine Medicaid following a policy change. Health Affairs, 27, w185–w195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, W. B., Joyce, G., Xia, J., Dirant, R., Wan, G., & Goldman, D. P. (2011). Medicaid cost-containment measures aimed at second-generation antipsychotics led to less use of all antipsychotics. Health Affairs, 30, 2346–2354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Adams, A. S., Ross-Dengan, D., Zhang, F., & Soumerai, S. B. (2009). Effects of prior authorization on medication discontinuation among Medicaid beneficiaries with bipolar disorder. Psychiatric Services, 60, 520–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This is an unfunded study that was conducted as part of the corresponding author’s doctoral dissertation research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela N. Roberto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author (Roberto) is employed on a part-time basis by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which had no role in the funding or conduct of this analysis. Authors Brandt, Onukwugha, Perfetto, Powers, and Stuart report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Disclosures

No portion of this work has been previously published or presented elsewhere. The manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), or the U.S. government or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Descriptive statistics for Benchmark Prescription Drug plans in 2012, by plan name

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberto, P.N., Brandt, N., Onukwugha, E. et al. The Impact of Coverage Restrictions on Antipsychotic Utilization Among Low-Income Medicare Part D Enrollees. Adm Policy Ment Health 44, 943–954 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-017-0813-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-017-0813-2

Keywords

Navigation