Skip to main content
Log in

Neurofeedback in Learning Disabled Children: Visual versus Auditory Reinforcement

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children with learning disabilities (LD) frequently have an EEG characterized by an excess of theta and a deficit of alpha activities. NFB using an auditory stimulus as reinforcer has proven to be a useful tool to treat LD children by positively reinforcing decreases of the theta/alpha ratio. The aim of the present study was to optimize the NFB procedure by comparing the efficacy of visual (with eyes open) versus auditory (with eyes closed) reinforcers. Twenty LD children with an abnormally high theta/alpha ratio were randomly assigned to the Auditory or the Visual group, where a 500 Hz tone or a visual stimulus (a white square), respectively, was used as a positive reinforcer when the value of the theta/alpha ratio was reduced. Both groups had signs consistent with EEG maturation, but only the Auditory Group showed behavioral/cognitive improvements. In conclusion, the auditory reinforcer was more efficacious in reducing the theta/alpha ratio, and it improved the cognitive abilities more than the visual reinforcer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., pp. 56–64), Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR).

  • Becerra, J., Fernández, T., Harmony, T., Caballero, M. I., García, F., Fernández-Bouzas, A., et al. (2006). Follow-up study of learning-disabled children treated with neurofeedback or placebo. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 37, 198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J., Harmony, T., Rodríguez, M., Reyes, A., Yáñez, G., Fernández, T., et al. (2000). Auditory event-related potentials in poor readers. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36, 11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. R., Bebko, G., Burman, D. D., & Bitan, T. (2007). Children with reading disorder show modality independent brain abnormalities during semantic tasks. Neuropsychologia, 45, 775–783.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breteler, M. H., Arns, M., Peters, S., Giepmans, I., & Verhoeven, L. (2010). Improvements in spelling after QEEG-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: A randomized controlled treatment study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35, 5–11. doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, V. F., & Ribeiro do Valle, L. E. (2012). Effects of visual and auditory stimuli in a choice reaction time task. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5, 199–2015. doi:10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D. S., & Chabot, R. (2009). QEEG studies in the assessment and treatment of childhood disorders. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40, 113–121. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Gillispie, M., Leonard, L. B., Kail, R. V., & Miller, C. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 509–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, R. J., di Michele, F., & John, E. R. (2001). The clinical role of computerized EEG in the evaluation and treatment of learning and attention disorders in children and adolescents. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 13, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, R. J., di Michele, F., & Prichep, L. (2005). The role of quantitative electroencephalography in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabot, R. J., & Serfontein, G. (1996). Quantitative EEG profiles of children with attention deficit disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 951–963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz de León, A. E., Harmony, T., Marosi, E., Becker, J., & Alvarez, A. (1988). Effect of different factors on EEG spectral parameters. International Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 123–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, T., Harmony, T., Fernández-Bouzas, A., Díaz-Comas, L., Prado-Alcalá, R. A., Valdés-Sosa, P., et al. (2007). Changes in EEG current sources induced by neurofeedback in learning disabled children. An exploratory study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 32, 169–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, T., Harmony, T., Fernández-Bouzas, A., Silva, J., Herrera, W., Santiago-Rodríguez, E., & Sánchez, L. (2002). Sources of EEG activity in learning disabled children. Clinical Electroencephalography, 33, 160–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, T., Herrera, W., Harmony, T., Díaz-Comas, L., Santiago, E., Sánchez, L., et al. (2003). EEG and behavioral changes following neurofeedback treatment in learning disabled children. Clinical Electroencephalography, 43, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, L. C., Tedrus, G. M., Chiodi, M. G., Cerqueira, J. N., & Tonelotto, J. M. (2006). Quantitative EEG in children with learning disabilities: Analysis of band power. Archivos de Neuropsiquiatría, 64, 376–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galán, L., Biscay, R., Rodríguez, J. L., Pérez-Avalo, M. C., & Rodríguez, R. (1997). Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 102, 240–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, T., Rousson, V., & Scheiter Gasser, U. (2003). EEG power and coherence in children with educational problems. Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmony, T., Hinojosa, G., Marosi, E., Becquer, J., Rodríguez, M., Reyes, A., & Rocha, C. (1990). Correlation between EEG spectral parameters and an educational evaluation. International Journal of Neuroscience, 54, 147–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, J. L., Valdés, P., Biscay, R., Virués, T., Szava, S., Bosch, J., et al. (1994). A global scale factor in brain topography. International Journal of Neuroscience, 76, 267–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, P. J., Ackerman, P. T., & Dykman, R. A. (1986). Auditory event-related potentials in attention and reading disabled boys. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 3, 263–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, A., & Derman, B. (1985). Prueba de lecto-escritura. México, DF: Ed. Progreso.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, E. R., Ahn, H., Prichep, L., Trepetin, M., Brown, D., & Kaye, H. (1980). Developmental equations for the electroencephalogram. Science, 1980(210), 1255–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, E. R., Prichep, L., Ahn, H., Easton, P., Fridman, J., & Kaye, H. (1983). Neurometric evaluation of cognitive dysfunctions and neurological disorders in children. Progress in Neurobiology, 21, 239–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leark, R. A., Dupuy, T. R., Greenberg, L. M., Corman, C. L., & Kindschi, C. L. (1999). T.O.V.A. professional guide. Los Alamitos, CA: Universal Attention Disorders Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Vira, A., Friedman, E., Minas, J., Bolger, D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. (2010). Children with reading disability show brain differences in effective connectivity for visual, but not auditory word comprehension. PLoS One, 25, e13492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubar, J. F., Swartwood, M. O., Swartwood, J. N., & O’Donnell, P. H. (1995). Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 20, 83–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matousek, M., & Petersén, I. (1971). Frequency analysis of EEG registrations in normal children 1–16 years old. Nordisk Medicin, 85, 637–638.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, J. D., & Henry, M. J. (2010). Modality effects in rhythm processing: Auditory encoding of visual rhythms is neither obligatory nor automatic. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1377–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, M. A., Mosanezhad, E., Hashemi, T., & Jahan, A. (2012). The effectiveness of neurofeedback training on EEG coherence and neuropsychological functions in children with reading disability. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 43, 315–322. doi:10.1177/1550059412451880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H. J., Coffey, S. A., Holcomb, P. J., & Tallal, P. (1993). The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 235–253. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. W. Y., & Chan, A. H. S. (2012). Finger response times to visual, auditory and tactile modality stimuli [Abstract]. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2012, 1449–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riviello, J. J. Jr., Nordli, D. R. Jr., & Niedermeyer, E. (2011). Normal EEG and sleep: Infants to adolescents. In D. L. Schromer, & F. H. Lopes da Silva (Eds.), Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: Basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields (6th ed., pp. 163–180). New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  • Ogden, R. S., Wearden, J. H., & Jones, L. A. (2008). The remembrance of times past: Interference in temporal reference memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1524–1544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, M. T., & Hibbs, A. (2007). Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time. Journal of Sport Sciences, 25, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesarin, F., & Salmaso, L. (2010). Permutation tests for complex data: Theory, applications and software. UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo-Garcell, J. (2004). Aportes del electroencefalograma convencional y el análisis de frecuencias para el estudio del Trastorno por Déficit de Atención. Segunda parte. Salud Mental, 27, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, C., Büchel, C., & Rose, M. (2011). The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio–visual object processing. Neuroimage, 55, 304–311. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, J., & Kumar, G. P. (2010). Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Neuroscience & Medicine, 1, 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenvi, D., & Balasubramanian, P. (1994). A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times in males and females. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 38, 229–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Pereyra, J., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., Fernández, T., Díaz-Comas, L., Harmony, T., Fernández-Bouzas, A., et al. (2003). Are poor readers semantically challenged? An event-related brain potential assessment. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 49, 187–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Wright, J. C. (1966). Child psychology. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 577–605). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. D., Colebatch, J. G., Brown, P., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. A., & Marsden, C. D. (1992). Voluntary stimulus sensitive jerks and jumps mimicking myoclonus or pathological startle syndromes. Movement Disorders, 7(3), 257–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., Thompson, M., & Reid, A. (2010). Neurofeedback outcomes in clients with Asperger’s syndrome. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35, 63–81. doi:10.1007/s10484-009-9120-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, P., Biscay, R., Galán, L., Bosch, J., Zsava, S., & Virués, T. (1990). High resolution spectral EEG norms topography. Brain Topography, 3, 281–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, P., Bosch, J., Grave, R., Hernández, J., Riera, J., Pascual, R., & Biscay, R. (1992). Frequency domain models of the EEG. Brain Topography, 4, 309–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131–156. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weschler, D. (1981). Manual del WISC-R Español Escala de Inteligencia Revisada para el nivel escolar. México, DF: Manual Moderno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi, Y., Coburn, K. L., Estes, K. M., & Arruda, J. E. (1999). Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 80, 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the children’s and parents’ cooperation in this study. The authors also acknowledge Judith Becerra, Fabiola García, Nelson Pumariega, Héctor Belmont, Susana Angélica Castro-Chavira, Lourdes Lara, Leonor Casanova, Bertha Esquivel, Teresa Álvarez, María Elena Juárez, Eneida Porras-Kattz, and Efraín Santiago for technical assistance, Roberto A. Prado-Alcalá for his invaluable psychological comments, and Dorothy Pless for revising English style. This project was supported in part by Grants IN226001, IN204103 and IN204613 from PAPIIT; 2001 and E59 from CONCYTEQ; and 69145 and 218556 from CONACYT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thalía Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández, T., Bosch-Bayard, J., Harmony, T. et al. Neurofeedback in Learning Disabled Children: Visual versus Auditory Reinforcement. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 41, 27–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9309-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9309-6

Keywords

Navigation