Correction to: Antonie van Leeuwenhoek https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0958-8

In the original publication of the article, it was noted that Fig. 1 present an image of Cupriavidus malaysiensis strain USMAHM13 and not of strain USMAA1020, as indicated in the figure legend. The image in the original version is thus noted to serve as a record of strain USMAHM13 and the corrected version of Fig. 1 is reprinted below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Transmission electron micrograph of Cupriavidus malaysiensis USMAA1020T grown in MSM containing γ-butyrolactone for 48 h through one-stage cultivation. Bar represents 500 nm