Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supply chain socially sustainability practices and their impact on supply chain performance: a study from the Indian automobile industry

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While sustainability has been a well-researched area in academic literature, the performance impact of its social dimensions remains largely unexplored, especially in the context of emerging economies. The aim of this research paper is to test and validate the dimensions of supply chain social sustainability (SCSS) that firms should focus on and to examine the relationships between these practices and supply chain performance, both short term and long term. This paper adopts a questionnaire-based survey research approach in the context of Indian automobile industry. Empirical validation of the conceptual model developed was carried out using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Multiple regression was used to test the relationships between SCSS practices and supply chain performance. This study finds empirical support to the proposition that a firm’s initiatives on SCSS dimensions of safety, labour rights, ethical practices and welfare initiatives for people and their communities provide performance benefits to them and to their partners in the supply chains. Regression analysis revealed that safety (0.339) and labour rights (0.601) contribute to both short term and long term performance for the supply chain. While ethical practices have a positive impact on short term performance, welfare initiatives only provide long term qualitative benefits. SCSS is in evolving concept and adopting the right mix of factors can help firms to achieve sustainability in all three dimensions of the triple-bottom-line framework (People, Planet and Profit).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agami, N., Saleh, M., & Rasmy, M. (2012). A Hybrid Dynamic Framework for Supply Chain performance improvement. IEEE Systems Journal, 6(3), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahen, F., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2018). Institutional voids and the philanthropization of CSR practices: Insights from developing economies. Sustainability, 10(7), 2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, H. B., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 126, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi, K., Adegbite, E., Ogbechie, C., Idemudia, U., Kan, K. A. S., Issa, M., & Anakwue, O. I. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in SMEs: A shift from philanthropy to institutional works? Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzu Akyuz, G., & Erman Erkan, T. (2010). “ Supply chain performance measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17), 5137–5155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson-Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J., Bazin, D., & Mahieu, F. R. (2020). A policy framework for social sustainability: Social cohesion, equity and safety. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1388–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S. (2008). Contract labor: The “‘Achilles heel’ of corporate codes in commercial value chains.” Development and Change, 39(6), 977–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R. (2000). Ethical issues in international buyer–supplier relationships: A dyadic examination. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: Structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics., 25(1), 145–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Liane Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21, 534–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chardine-Baumann, E., & Botta-Genoulaz, V. (2014). “A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, T. A., & Tat, H. H. (2015). Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between supply? chain management practice and performance in the electronic manufacturing services industry? International Journal of Logistics Research & Applications, 18(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, F. (2011). CSR codes and the principal-agent problem in supply chains: Four case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: A SME perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1579–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closs, D. J., Speier, C., & Meacham, N. (2011). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: The role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0207-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S., Vidal, N., Spetic, W., Marshall, D., & McCarthy, L. (2018). Impact of social sustainability orientation and supply chain practices on operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2344–2366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golini, R., & Gualandris, J. (2018). An empirical examination of the relationship between globalisation, integration and sustainable innovation within manufacturing networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vo., 38(3), 874–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Matos, S., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Understanding why firms should invest in sustainable supply chains: A complexity approach. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1332–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huq, F. A., Stevenson, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready-made garments industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 610–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vo., 16(15), 1688–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazançoglu, Y., Ozturkoglu, Y., Mangla, S. K., Ozbiltekin-Pala, M., & Ishizaka, A. (2022). A proposed framework for multi-tier supplier performance in sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 61(14), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. A., Agyemang, M., Ishizaka, A., Zaman, S. I., Ali, S. M., & Laval, J. (2021). Barriers and overcoming strategies to multi-tier sustainable supply chain management: An explorative study in an emerging economy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(6), 1484–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: Introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2019). Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 699–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima-junior, F. R., Cesar, L., & Carpinetti, R. (2017). Computers & industrial engineering quantitative models for supply chain performance evaluation : A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113(July), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, L., Qin, S., & Chen, X. (2011). Ensuring supply chain quality performance through applying the SCOR model. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., Nadvi, K., Chan, A., Khara, N., & Xue, H. (2012). Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan. Development and Change, 43(6), 1211–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01798.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangla, S. K., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Luthra, S., Bai, C., Jakhar, S. K., & Khan, S. A. (2020). Operational excellence for improving sustainable supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 162, 105025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. (2016a). Social sustainability in the supply chain: construct development and measurement validation. Ecological Indicators, 71, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Social sustainability practices in the supply chain of Indian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Automation and Logistics, 1(3), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., Sharma, V., & Kavitha, T. N. (2016c). Socially sustainable business practices in Indian manufacturing industries: A study of two companies. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 24(1), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2016.075661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: an emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., & Benjamin, H. (2016b). Supply Chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 111, 42–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Mani, K. T. (2020). Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: Critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182664e0a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mena, S., Leede, M. D., Baumann, D., Black, N., Lindeman, S., & McShane, L. (2010). Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meseguer-Sánchez, V., Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J., López-Martínez, G., & Molina-Moreno, V. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability. A bibliometric analysis of their interrelations. Sustainability, 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P., & Munilla, L. S. (2004). The potential impact of social accountability certification on marketing: A short note. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Rajesh, R., & Paul, S. K. (2018). Modeling the interrelationships among barriers to sustainable supply chain management in leather industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 631–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais, D. O., & Silvestre, B. S. (2018). Advancing social sustainability in supply chain management: Lessons from multiple case studies in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamba, C. C., Chan, P. W., & Sharmina, M. (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naz, F., Bögenhold, D. (2020). Transformation of Labour Market and Gender Patterns of Work. In: Unheard Voices. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54363-1_2

  • Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). How plant managers’ experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relates to operational performance. Production & Operations Management, 18(3), 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M. E. (2010). Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popovic, T., Barbosa-Póvoa, A., Kraslawski, A., & Carvalho, A. (2018). Quantitative Indicators or social sustainability assessment of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 748–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L., & Brown, D. (2012). Business policies on human rights: An analysis of their content and prevalence among FTSE 100 firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organisations development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajak, S., & Vinodh, S. (2015). Application of fuzzy logic for social sustainability performance evaluation: A case study of an Indian automotive component manufacturing organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1184–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Kapitan, S. (2018). Balancing self/collective-interest: Equity theory for prosocial consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 528–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2016). Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1934–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., & Günter, H. (2010). Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Researchand Future Directions. In J. Fransoo, T. Waefler, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Behavioral Operations in Planning and Scheduling. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, B. S. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management: Current debate and future directions. Gestão & Produção, 23(2), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, B. S., Monteiro, M. S., Viana, F. L. E., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2018). Challenges for sustainable supply chain management: When stakeholder collaboration becomes conducive to corruption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 766–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smid, S. C., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). SEM with small samples: Two-step modeling and factor score regression versus Bayesian estimation with informative priors. In Small sample size solutions (pp. 239–254). Routledge

  • Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2018). Corporate social sustainability in supply chains: A thematic analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 882–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2013). Proactive CSR: an empirical analysis of the role of its economic, social and environmental dimensions on the association between capabilities and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsolakis, N., Niedenzu, D., Simonetto, M., Dora, M., & Kumar, M. (2021). Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry. Journal of Business Research, 131, 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varsei, M., Soosay, C., Fahimnia, B., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Framing sustainability performance of supply chains with multidimensional indicators. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2013). Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management: Current state and opportunities for future inquiry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(1), 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovleva, N., Sarkis, J., & Sloan, T. (2012). Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: The case of the food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1297–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yawar, S. A., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: A literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., Govindan, K., & Xie, X. (2020). How fairness perceptions, embeddedness, and knowledge sharing drive green innovation in sustainable supply chains: An equity theory and network perspective to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 120950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Pilani campus, Rajasthan, India

    Satyendra Kumar Sharma

  2. SP Jain Institute of Management & Research, Mumbai, India

    Sajeev Abraham George

  3. IIM Rohtak: Indian Institute of Management Rohtak, Rohtak, Haryana, India

    Praveen Ranjan Srivastava

  4. College of Business at Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Fauzia Jabeen

  5. International Logistics Management Department, Yasar University, Izmir, Turkey

    Cisem Lafci

Authors
  1. Satyendra Kumar Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sajeev Abraham George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Praveen Ranjan Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fauzia Jabeen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cisem Lafci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Ranjan Srivastava.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S.K., George, S.A., Srivastava, P.R. et al. Supply chain socially sustainability practices and their impact on supply chain performance: a study from the Indian automobile industry. Ann Oper Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05991-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05991-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation